86:
81:
90:
73:
141:
an indiscriminate collection of information. Also currently unverified (although it should be possible to verify it, as the criteria for inclusion are quite specific and aren't subjective or random).
169:
as an indiscriminate list. If the original songs are notable the covers can be mentioned in the song article, and the covers can also be mentioned in the articles for those covering them.
113:
239:
197:
173:
161:
145:
124:
55:
77:
69:
61:
190:
17:
254:
211:
list. This is but one important band, of many. Just multiply that by a few hundred times, and for good measure add the
36:
253:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
142:
181:
I would expect that a song that gets covered by multiple notable artists is automatically notable itself per
224:
52:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
134:
236:
208:
186:
138:
120:
Unencyclopedic list; Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information —
216:
194:
158:
121:
182:
228:
170:
220:
107:
154:
232:
157:, whose songs are frequently covered. As long as artists are notable. --
212:
235:
and you will see the unmaintanable scale of the potential problem.
193:
could be used to cover this. Seems like a bit of footwork.... --
247:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
153:
Probably a reasonable split of valuable information from
103:
99:
95:
70:
List of artists who have covered songs by The Smiths
62:
List of artists who have covered songs by The Smiths
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
257:). No further edits should be made to this page.
185:. I suppose this info could be split out, and a
191:Category:Smith's Songs covered by other artists
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
240:09:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
198:20:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
174:20:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
162:20:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
146:09:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
125:08:59, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
137:, and probably comes under
274:
56:14:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
250:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
133:- unnecessary list per
225:Jean-Jacques Goldman
143:Walton monarchist89
265:
252:
111:
93:
48:
34:
273:
272:
268:
267:
266:
264:
263:
262:
261:
255:deletion review
248:
84:
68:
65:
46:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
271:
269:
260:
259:
243:
242:
209:indiscriminate
202:
201:
200:
164:
148:
118:
117:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
270:
258:
256:
251:
245:
244:
241:
238:
234:
230:
229:Michel Berger
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
203:
199:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
176:
175:
172:
168:
165:
163:
160:
156:
152:
149:
147:
144:
140:
136:
132:
129:
128:
127:
126:
123:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
53:Mailer Diablo
50:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
249:
246:
221:Quincy Jones
204:
178:
166:
150:
130:
119:
45:
43:
31:
28:
237:Ohconfucius
131:Weak Delete
155:The Smiths
195:Kendrick7
159:Kendrick7
151:Week Keep
122:Doug Bell
171:Otto4711
114:View log
213:Beatles
179:Comment
135:WP:LIST
87:protect
82:history
217:Stones
207:as an
205:Delete
189:(i.e.
187:WP:CAT
167:Delete
139:WP:NOT
91:delete
108:views
100:watch
96:links
49:elete
16:<
183:WP:N
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
51:. -
112:– (
233:黃霑
231:,
227:,
223:,
219:,
215:,
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
116:)
110:)
72:(
47:d
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.