576:. So because the list includes some -WP notable awards, amongst the many WP-notable awards, you would deleted the whole article? AfD is not clean up, and such issues should be discussed on the Talk Page. That is flawed logic and certainly not consistent with any
206:
646:(i.e. "Y"). If there are non WP-notable awards then it can be discussed on the Talk Page but it is not an AfD concern (e.g. AfD is not clean up); however I can point to thousands of WP List articles where not all the items in the list have WP articles.
132:
127:
136:
284:. But many of the awards listed her are WP-notable awards with their on WP articles? I don't see how deleting a list article about a WP-notable film studio (it has its own WP-article), which has many WP-notable awards, meets any form of
119:
200:
123:
704:
Either the WP-community should come out clearly and state that it does not want PORN-related articles, OR, the WP-community needs to clarify that despite the !votes, WP PORN-related articles that meet
349:
115:
67:
166:
472:
But this is a film-studio and not just an NCORP. We have lots of WP seperate list articles for film awards. Many of these awards have their own WP articles? I don't see the clear
159:
389:
221:
416:
has its own WP page. We have (tens of) thousands of WP articles on people, films, studios etc. with seperate WP articles listing their film awards. Most of the awards
188:
721:
655:
589:
564:
545:
518:
485:
467:
441:
401:
381:
361:
341:
321:
297:
272:
250:
61:
369:
329:
309:
91:
182:
106:
178:
228:
306:
194:
86:
79:
17:
601:. I cannot see this as being a full delete as there are a lot of WP-notable awards being listed here (which are also part of
100:
96:
638:, this list is a "complex and cross-categorization lists (such as "Lists of X of Y")", which are acceptable under LISTN as
527:
738:
40:
717:
651:
585:
481:
437:
293:
503:, which is barely more than a stub. Possibly trim the least notable awards out of the list in the process.
455:
734:
560:
463:
397:
246:
36:
541:
268:
57:
602:
713:
647:
581:
477:
433:
289:
214:
621:(although somebody then needs to do it, and this list is very long, so it would distort the main
635:
631:
451:
260:
238:
664:
639:
622:
500:
476:
that is been broken here; in fact, per my comments below, deleting this would violate WP:PAG?
417:
413:
377:
357:
337:
317:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
733:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
696:
617:
Awards. A full delete therefore makes no sense. I could see the rationale for a Merge per
556:
513:
459:
393:
242:
709:
705:
577:
473:
285:
537:
264:
53:
555:: these PR-driven awards will be undue in the main article, so I would oppose a merge. --
667:
have been nominated/won in their LIST only one is possibly, a non-notable award class:
625:
article), but certainly not a
Redirect, as it would hide lots of WP-notable material?
373:
353:
333:
313:
153:
618:
504:
288:? In that case, there are thousands of WP film awards lists that can be AfD'ed.
690:
684:
429:
425:
678:
672:
643:
606:
421:
708:
must not be deleted. Otherwise, we (and I), are wasting our time quoting
263:, and all of the titles doesn’t even exist as a Knowledge (XXG) article.
614:
610:
729:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
530:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
116:
List of awards and nominations received by
Girlfriends Films
68:
List of awards and nominations received by
Girlfriends Films
350:
list of
Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
241:
and excessive intricate detail cited to primary sources.
642:(i.e. "X") is WP-notable, and so are many of the awards
149:
145:
141:
663:. Just to clarify, of the five classes of awards that
213:
420:
have won also have their own individual WP articles;
536:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
227:
412:. I don't understand the issue here. The studio
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
741:). No further edits should be made to this page.
388:Note: This discussion has been included in the
368:Note: This discussion has been included in the
348:Note: This discussion has been included in the
328:Note: This discussion has been included in the
634:(and no "delete" above has explained it). Per
390:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
454:articles, and is generally tied to either
387:
370:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
367:
347:
327:
330:list of Film-related deletion discussions
305:Note: This debate has been added to the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
712:at AfD on porn-related articles?
630:I still don't see how this fails
450:This is not a typical feature in
92:Introduction to deletion process
675:have a section in a WP article
1:
458:and / or promotionalism. --
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
758:
722:12:12, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
656:11:07, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
590:11:17, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
565:22:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
546:18:00, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
519:12:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
486:11:12, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
468:02:21, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
442:13:22, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
402:12:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
382:12:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
362:12:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
342:12:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
322:12:11, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
298:11:10, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
273:12:06, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
251:01:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
62:18:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
699:have their own WP article
693:have their own WP article
687:have their own WP article
681:have their own WP article
731:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
307:WikiProject Pornography
80:Articles for deletion
580:that I am aware of.
497:Merge and redirect
665:Girlfriends Films
640:Girlfriends Films
623:Girlfriends Films
548:
501:Girlfriends Films
418:Girlfriends Films
414:Girlfriends Films
404:
384:
364:
344:
310:list of deletions
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
749:
697:NightMoves Award
535:
533:
531:
511:
324:
232:
231:
217:
169:
157:
139:
77:
34:
757:
756:
752:
751:
750:
748:
747:
746:
745:
739:deletion review
549:
526:
524:
505:
304:
174:
165:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
755:
753:
744:
743:
725:
724:
714:Britishfinance
702:
701:
700:
694:
688:
682:
676:
669:
668:
648:Britishfinance
627:
626:
595:
594:
593:
592:
582:Britishfinance
568:
567:
534:
523:
522:
521:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
478:Britishfinance
445:
444:
434:Britishfinance
406:
405:
385:
365:
345:
325:
302:
301:
300:
290:Britishfinance
276:
275:
259:Clearly fails
237:Does not meet
235:
234:
171:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
754:
742:
740:
736:
732:
727:
726:
723:
719:
715:
711:
707:
703:
698:
695:
692:
689:
686:
683:
680:
677:
674:
671:
670:
666:
662:
659:
658:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
597:
596:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
572:
571:
570:
569:
566:
562:
558:
554:
553:Nom's comment
551:
550:
547:
543:
539:
532:
529:
520:
517:
516:
512:
510:
509:
502:
498:
495:
494:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
470:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
448:
447:
446:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
408:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
386:
383:
379:
375:
371:
366:
363:
359:
355:
351:
346:
343:
339:
335:
331:
326:
323:
319:
315:
311:
308:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
280:
279:
278:
277:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
255:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
168:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
730:
728:
660:
598:
573:
552:
525:
514:
507:
506:
496:
456:WP:LISTCRUFT
409:
281:
256:
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
162:
73:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
557:K.e.coffman
460:K.e.coffman
394:K.e.coffman
243:K.e.coffman
201:free images
691:XRCO Award
685:XBIZ Award
673:AEBN Award
603:WP:PORNBIO
538:Randykitty
430:XRCO Award
265:Sheldybett
54:Randykitty
735:talk page
679:AVN Award
644:AVN Award
607:AVN Award
374:• Gene93k
354:• Gene93k
334:• Gene93k
314:• Gene93k
37:talk page
737:or in a
636:WP:LISTN
632:WP:LISTN
528:Relisted
452:WP:NCORP
261:WP:NLIST
239:WP:LISTN
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
661:Comment
574:Comment
410:Comment
282:Comment
207:WP refs
195:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
710:WP:PAG
706:WP:PAG
619:bd2412
578:WP:PAG
508:bd2412
474:WP:PAG
286:WP:PAG
257:Delete
179:Google
137:delete
222:JSTOR
183:books
167:Stats
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
718:talk
652:talk
615:XRCO
613:and
611:XBIZ
599:Keep
586:talk
561:talk
542:talk
482:talk
464:talk
438:talk
428:and
426:XBIZ
398:talk
378:talk
358:talk
338:talk
318:talk
294:talk
269:talk
247:talk
215:FENS
189:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
605:):
499:to
422:AVN
229:TWL
158:– (
720:)
654:)
609:,
588:)
563:)
544:)
484:)
466:)
440:)
432:?
424:,
400:)
392:.
380:)
372:.
360:)
352:.
340:)
332:.
320:)
312:.
296:)
271:)
249:)
209:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
716:(
650:(
584:(
559:(
540:(
515:T
480:(
462:(
436:(
396:(
376:(
356:(
336:(
316:(
292:(
267:(
245:(
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
163:·
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.