Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/List of cricketers by number of international five-wicket hauls - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

562:, the guidline says "a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources." The above comments don't reflect the current WP policy on such lists. Closing admin, please close this AfD in the light of WP:LISTN. 202: 136: 131: 140: 123: 667: 610: 440: 371: 196: 127: 119: 71: 653: 468: 271: 404:
Murali list is about an individual who was the highest wicket-taker in test cricket so it is easy to find articles/books that discuss his fifers as a group, but not in this case.
163: 217: 577: 550: 533: 513: 496: 419: 392: 358: 326: 303: 283: 263: 184: 65: 291: 658:
Could you please either withdraw that accusation or show me exactly what I am misquoting. I have lifted those quotes straight from NLIST (with some emphasis added).
52:. There is no support for deletion besides the nom. One user supports a merger. Consensus is against deletion. This should not preclude a separate merge proposal. 178: 95: 174: 110: 224: 431:
this is a well-defined list, with plenty of supporting prose. It is neither trivial nor indiscriminate, so no idea why LISTCRUFT is being quoted.
190: 617:
Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability.
595:
Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability
90: 83: 17: 339:
which is the criterea for judging lists. Lists can only be made (except nav lists) if they have recieved coverage in multiple
384: 59: 104: 100: 375: 705: 40: 591:
why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources
619:
Editors are still urged to demonstrate list notability via the grouping itself before creating stand-alone lists.
546: 238: 701: 36: 673: 315: 663: 606: 436: 681::The list may be a valuable information source. This is particularly the case for a structured list. 622:
Grouping is necessary for stand-alone list except when we create a list for navigational purposes.
299: 279: 210: 627: 542: 490: 388: 646: 570: 559: 461: 450: 412: 351: 336: 256: 234: 79: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
700:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
522: 509: 314:
This is a well-designed list, with a clear set of inclusion criteria. It's more than just a
245: 659: 602: 432: 340: 527: 295: 275: 453:. Please provide sources where this was discussed as a group as I failed to find any. 639: 631: 563: 481: 454: 405: 401: 379: 344: 249: 53: 635: 320: 157: 623: 505: 318:, with plenty of prose, and coverage of both men's and women's cricket. 372:
List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Muttiah Muralitharan
696:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
120:
List of cricketers by number of international five-wicket hauls
72:
List of cricketers by number of international five-wicket hauls
525:. Topic can be easily accommodated within the main article. 615:
Spike 'em is again misquotating and want to cherrypick.
374:
are featured lists. This strikes me as an occasion when
153: 149: 145: 244:
Helpful content can be smerged with the main article,
209: 558:- I am still not convinced that how this list meets 272:
list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions
223: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 708:). No further edits should be made to this page. 290:Note: This discussion has been included in the 270:Note: This discussion has been included in the 676:, it does not have to be a navigational list: 601:to be discussed as a group for it to be kept. 370:, considering so many similar articles (e.g. 8: 292:list of Cricket-related deletion discussions 111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 289: 269: 248:, which is comparatively small in size. 677: 616: 594: 587: 241:. No coverage about them as a group. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 504:As per above. A well detailed list. 597:. It does not state that the topic 343:as a group which this list fails. 24: 449:Please elaborate how this meets 96:Introduction to deletion process 1: 638:if they want to re-consider. 668:13:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC) 654:11:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC) 611:21:53, 10 January 2021 (UTC) 578:21:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC) 66:16:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC) 551:15:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 534:10:51, 7 January 2021 (UTC) 514:21:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 497:21:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 469:13:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 441:20:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 420:13:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 393:19:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 359:13:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 327:18:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 304:18:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 284:18:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 264:17:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC) 86:(AfD)? Read these primers! 725: 480:per Lugnuts and StAnselm. 698:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 84:Articles for deletion 586:NLIST actually says 589:One accepted reason 376:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS 486: 306: 286: 101:Guide to deletion 91:How to contribute 64: 716: 651: 644: 575: 568: 541:as per Lugnuts. 530: 523:five-wicket haul 493: 487: 484: 466: 459: 417: 410: 356: 349: 323: 261: 254: 246:five-wicket haul 228: 227: 213: 161: 143: 81: 56: 34: 724: 723: 719: 718: 717: 715: 714: 713: 712: 706:deletion review 647: 640: 571: 564: 532: 528: 521:selectively to 491: 482: 462: 455: 413: 406: 352: 345: 321: 257: 250: 170: 134: 118: 115: 78: 75: 62: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 722: 720: 711: 710: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 581: 580: 553: 536: 526: 516: 499: 474: 473: 472: 471: 444: 443: 425: 424: 423: 422: 396: 395: 364: 363: 362: 361: 330: 329: 308: 307: 287: 231: 230: 167: 114: 113: 108: 98: 93: 76: 74: 69: 58: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 721: 709: 707: 703: 699: 694: 693: 682: 680: 675: 671: 670: 669: 665: 661: 657: 656: 655: 652: 650: 645: 643: 637: 633: 629: 628:CreativeNorth 625: 621: 620: 614: 613: 612: 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 590: 585: 584: 583: 582: 579: 576: 574: 569: 567: 561: 557: 554: 552: 548: 544: 543:CreativeNorth 540: 537: 535: 531: 524: 520: 517: 515: 511: 507: 503: 500: 498: 494: 488: 479: 476: 475: 470: 467: 465: 460: 458: 452: 448: 447: 446: 445: 442: 438: 434: 430: 427: 426: 421: 418: 416: 411: 409: 403: 400: 399: 398: 397: 394: 390: 386: 383: 382: 378:makes sense. 377: 373: 369: 366: 365: 360: 357: 355: 350: 348: 342: 338: 334: 333: 332: 331: 328: 325: 324: 317: 313: 310: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 288: 285: 281: 277: 273: 268: 267: 266: 265: 262: 260: 255: 253: 247: 242: 240: 236: 226: 222: 219: 216: 212: 208: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 180: 176: 173: 172:Find sources: 168: 165: 159: 155: 151: 147: 142: 138: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 116: 112: 109: 106: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 88: 87: 85: 80: 73: 70: 68: 67: 63: 61: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 697: 695: 678: 648: 641: 618: 598: 588: 572: 565: 555: 538: 518: 501: 477: 463: 456: 428: 414: 407: 380: 367: 353: 346: 319: 311: 258: 251: 243: 239:WP:LISTCRUFT 232: 220: 214: 206: 199: 193: 187: 181: 171: 77: 57: 49: 47: 31: 28: 679:Information 674:WP:LISTPURP 233:Delete per 197:free images 316:stats dump 702:talk page 660:Spike 'em 603:Spike 'em 529:wjemather 433:Spike 'em 335:It fails 296:Shellwood 276:Shellwood 37:talk page 704:or in a 672:And per 632:Extra999 560:WP:LISTN 451:WP:NLIST 402:StAnselm 337:WP:NLIST 235:WP:LISTN 164:View log 105:glossary 54:Eddie891 39:or in a 636:Lugnuts 556:Comment 322:Lugnuts 203:WP refs 191:scholar 137:protect 132:history 82:New to 649:(talk) 624:Pilean 573:(talk) 506:Pilean 464:(talk) 415:(talk) 385:Anselm 354:(talk) 259:(talk) 175:Google 141:delete 642:Störm 566:Störm 519:Merge 483:extra 457:Störm 408:Störm 347:Störm 341:WP:RS 252:Störm 218:JSTOR 179:books 158:views 150:watch 146:links 16:< 664:talk 607:talk 593:and 547:talk 539:Keep 510:talk 502:Keep 492:talk 478:Keep 437:talk 429:Keep 389:talk 368:Keep 312:Keep 300:talk 280:talk 211:FENS 185:news 154:logs 128:talk 124:edit 60:Work 50:keep 599:has 485:999 225:TWL 162:– ( 666:) 634:, 630:, 626:, 609:) 549:) 512:) 495:) 439:) 391:) 381:St 302:) 294:. 282:) 274:. 237:, 205:) 156:| 152:| 148:| 144:| 139:| 135:| 130:| 126:| 662:( 605:( 545:( 508:( 489:( 435:( 387:( 298:( 278:( 229:) 221:· 215:· 207:· 200:· 194:· 188:· 182:· 177:( 169:( 166:) 160:) 122:( 107:) 103:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Eddie891
Work
16:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
List of cricketers by number of international five-wicket hauls

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
List of cricketers by number of international five-wicket hauls
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑