Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/List of entertainment events at the SM Mall of Asia complex - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

52:‎. While the arguments for a procedural Keep based on the number of pages nominated was not anchored in policy, the Delete side failed to attain consensus. Views expressed here suggest discussion would be more effective with individual article nominations or smaller groups, perhaps based on country of venue, which would allow using the appropriate country Portal to solicit views. Any editor is welcome to renominate individual pages or small region-based groups without delay. 1909:
has been nominated individually so a nominator doesn't have to wait months for a follow-up. Secondly, I've seen individual articles removed from bundled nominations so it is worth the time to argue to Keep individual articles if you think that notability can be established. I realize that a bundled nomination can seem overwhelming to editors that are inclusionists but the Delete closure is not a done deal. Make your case, for one or two articles or for them all.
1621:. First of all, any complaints about the bundled nomination are nonsense. These are all extremely similar, and dumping 30 listings at once isn't going to be any better in terms of coverage or participation. If (and that's a big if) anyone thinks that any of these lists are sufficiently unique enough of a case to warrant an individual nomination, they can always explain why, and nomination can be updated to have any like that separate.And second, 1827:
merged with a corresponding article about the particular venue then the same problem applies. That is what I have an objection to/problem with. I accept there a are are instances where bundling is appropriate, but I don't think this is one of them. Sorry to ruffle your feathers Mike - it wasn't my intention. Please accept my apology, but my overall objection still stands.
241:. Other problems exist: Verifiability varies, but many of these are poorly referenced. Almost all events cataloged are not independently notable. The lists don't have clear inclusion criteria -- "entertainment events" doesn't specifically exclude or include sporting events, for example. While the lists are mostly music performances, other performances are ignored. 1625:. Some of these are wildly unsourced, and for those that do have sources, they tend to be primary to the venue, or just some local news coverage that yes, an aging Def Leppard played here, but no one cared enough to show up. That doesn't pass the smell test for NLIST, as especially evidenced by the vague inclusion criteria. 1908:
I'm relisting discussion for another week as it is not realistic to ask participants to evaluate 28 articles over 7 days and because discussion is still ongoing in this discussion. To answer a couple of questions, I've seen bundled nominations closed as Procedural Keeps and the next day, each article
1437:, which closed as no consensus, neither of which had a second nomination, so I'm not sure where you're getting that from. In any case, dumping these all down at once as separate nominations will not produce any more meaningful results than bundling them together, so this just isn't a good argument. 1841:
Thank you for your apology. Is Wikipeidia process really so inflexible that individual exceptions can't be filtered from a bulk nomination without closing the bulk nomination and re-nominating the articles discretely? Seems sad, if so, that such a process stands in the way of doing the right thing.
1657:
As I explained immediately above, having 30 individual nominations dumped at once isn't going to make a bit of difference in terms of ease of evaluation, and will probably only serve to fragment discussion of this general type of article. And like I also explained, if you think there are any that
1826:
The difficulty with bundling these articles together is there is no opportunity to address an individual article over the bundle of articles. If for instance I can establish notability for one article, then it will be deleted because the other articles are not notable or if one article is better
1398:
These need to be individually nominated (and some were already kept once or twice before individually); some events are naturally excluded because they're not meant for public attendance (for instance, shareholder meetings or private religious rallies) or don't meet our criteria plain and simple
1642:
these need to be considered individually, Bundling them, while simpler for the person nominating, makes it very difficult for those assessing each articles individual value. While I can evaluate the worth of some venues, I can not evaluate all venues. I would also challenge any of you who a
1777:
When an AfD is closed keep, there's the implication that it shouldn't be re-nominated again until some time has passed. Is that also true for a "procedural keep" closure? I think that's so, and that's why I identify a difference between "procedural close" and "procedural keep". --
1643:
suggesting a sweeping delete of all to prove, on the basis of each particular venue named, that that particular venues list should be deleted. Some may be more appropriately merged into the venues article rather than deleted. The bundled nomination makes no sense in this instance.
1430: 1658:
deserve to get pulled out because they're sufficiently different, you can always just say so, and I doubt anyone would throw up much of a fuss about it. And it's not anyone's job to "prove" that an article should get deleted, an impossible task anyway. People
202: 1744:
Thanks! I've heard of a procedural closure before, but never a "procedural keep". To me, they seem quite different: "keep" implies that a decision to keep was made, dismissing the AfD with prejudice ... when really that isn't the intent. (Or is it?) --
1289: 1284: 1842:
Not to be obstinate, but I don't know what individual nominations would change. If I re-nominated each article, I'd explain the same thing again and again: there's no demonstration of notability of the group of performances, and that doesn't satisfy
1293: 1335: 1330: 1276: 1868:
Nothing in the process suggests one (or more than one) cannot be found notable. I'd certainly support a relisting individually if a couple could be found to satisfy NLIST...but no one seems to be able to identify RS for a single one. Regards,
1339: 1197: 1192: 1570:(and vote Keep all). However, the nominator is in my opinion totally right regarding the fact that certain of these lists would need a better definition of their respective scope, and more sources. But that can be discussed on talk pages.- 1201: 277: 272: 132: 127: 1322: 281: 136: 1184: 967: 962: 264: 119: 1059: 1054: 971: 1063: 954: 461: 456: 1046: 645: 640: 465: 1013: 1008: 649: 1685:
and would make a stronger case for invididual nominations. But to date, not a single RS has been shown that satisfies NLIST for a single venue. These appear nothing more than directory listings and as such are against
1105: 1100: 1017: 875: 870: 783: 778: 448: 1434: 1109: 1280: 1243: 1238: 921: 916: 879: 787: 632: 196: 1247: 1000: 925: 829: 824: 507: 502: 1092: 1151: 1146: 862: 833: 770: 599: 594: 511: 1676:
A proceedural keep vote might be acceptable if one could show a flaw in the rationale being applied to all the nominations. That is, if one cited reliable sources showing a couple (just two or three) satisfied
1451:
That's a bit confusing as "List of entertainers" was nominated under a different name. And I see the "Perth Arena" does have a previous nomination, but my first-time nomination links all work, leading here. --
1326: 1230: 1155: 908: 603: 1188: 816: 494: 415: 410: 1272: 1138: 691: 686: 586: 419: 323: 318: 268: 123: 695: 553: 548: 369: 364: 327: 557: 402: 373: 1318: 958: 737: 732: 678: 310: 1180: 1050: 741: 540: 356: 260: 115: 67: 1812:
which applies to all of these articles: are the performances notable, as a group? I think they're not, and I think that applies uniformly. I don't appreciate the implication of laziness. --
724: 452: 636: 1004: 950: 1096: 1042: 866: 774: 1498: 1662:
explained why they think these should be deleted, and just asking for more bureaucratic process without actually demonstrating how it might help just comes across as stonewalling.
1234: 912: 820: 498: 444: 159: 1142: 628: 590: 1704:
What is a "procedural keep vote"? I don't think I've ever heard of it before, and there are two such votes here now. Where can I read about the vote meanings used in AfD? --
996: 1088: 858: 766: 406: 217: 1226: 904: 682: 314: 184: 2055: 2034: 2020: 1995: 1981: 1960: 1946: 1923: 1878: 1859: 1836: 1821: 1787: 1772: 1754: 1739: 1713: 1699: 1671: 1652: 1634: 1609: 1595: 1581: 1566:. The variety of venues makes it impossible to vote here imv. And if i was to vote, I would argue most of these lists are about notable topics as a set and might meet 1558: 1532: 1485: 1461: 1446: 1424: 1390: 1373: 812: 544: 490: 360: 250: 61: 1502: 1134: 582: 1506: 1399:(made for TV events or an obvious industry plant where those in the crowd are paid to be there and fill seats or all get free tickets). As always with these : --> 728: 398: 91: 1759:
All procedural closes will by definition be keeps in that specific instance (but not necessarily in general); in contrast "procedural deletes" are covered by
674: 306: 178: 536: 352: 106: 174: 720: 1494: 224: 1663: 1626: 1438: 190: 86: 79: 17: 1527: 1934: 100: 96: 1897: 2072: 1723: 40: 1933:. This bundling has been so convoluted that not every project appears to have been properly notified, including us at 163: 1681:, then it would be quite reasonable to argue that the mass nominaton raised questions about appropriate levels of 1832: 1648: 1542: 1804:
Nothing obliges you to evaluate the worth (do you mean "notability"?) of any venues. Instead, we're evaluating
1667: 1630: 1442: 1567: 1522: 36: 1977: 1942: 1874: 1865: 1828: 1768: 1735: 1695: 1644: 1605: 1571: 1554: 2025:
Just wondering: which reasons? The only "Keep" vote says they need to be nominated individually. --
2049: 1415: 1386: 210: 1682: 2030: 1991: 1956: 1855: 1817: 1783: 1750: 1709: 1591: 1481: 1457: 1431:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of entertainers who have performed at the Mall of Asia
1369: 246: 1847: 1843: 1809: 1805: 1678: 1546: 1473: 1469: 238: 234: 1429:
I looked at the talk page for all of these, and the only ones that had prior AFD results were
75: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
2067:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
2016: 1511: 1760: 1727: 1687: 1622: 2068: 1973: 1938: 1870: 1764: 1731: 1691: 1601: 1576: 1550: 56: 1400:
5 article nominations I just don't see a bulk nom as a good way to filter through GNG/N.
2046: 1403: 1383: 2026: 1987: 1952: 1851: 1813: 1779: 1746: 1719: 1705: 1587: 1477: 1453: 1365: 242: 1623:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a database of concert (or "entertainment" even) performances
1356: 1310: 1264: 1218: 1172: 1126: 1080: 1034: 988: 942: 896: 850: 804: 758: 712: 666: 620: 574: 528: 482: 436: 390: 344: 298: 153: 2012: 237:
overall, as the content of the lists aren't notable as a group. Seems to fail
53: 1722:
a procedual keep is when the nomination for deletion contains errors, see
1914: 1435:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Entertainment events at Perth Arena
1986:
Not sure how that's an example of convolution. What am I missing? --
255:
I am also nominating the following related pages on the same basis:
1476:
and having weak inclusion criteria apply to all of the topics. --
1273:
List of entertainment events at Central Harbourfront Event Space
2063:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1900:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
1468:
I nominated them together because the concerns about failing
1319:
List of entertainment events at Movistar Arena (Buenos Aires)
1181:
List of entertainment events at Civic Arena (Pittsburgh, PA)
261:
List of entertainment events at the SM Mall of Asia complex
116:
List of entertainment events at the SM Mall of Asia complex
68:
List of entertainment events at the SM Mall of Asia complex
1549:. None of the lists have notability as a class. Regards-- 1850:. How would that be meaningfully different for each? -- 951:
List of entertainment events at the Little Caesars Arena
1966: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1043:
List of entertainment events at the Olimpiyskiy Stadium
1030: 1026: 1022: 984: 980: 976: 938: 934: 930: 892: 888: 884: 846: 842: 838: 800: 796: 792: 754: 750: 746: 708: 704: 700: 662: 658: 654: 616: 612: 608: 570: 566: 562: 524: 520: 516: 478: 474: 470: 432: 428: 424: 386: 382: 378: 340: 336: 332: 294: 290: 286: 149: 145: 141: 209: 445:
List of entertainment events at Madison Square Garden
629:
List of entertainment events at the Sydney SuperDome
1912:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 997:
List of entertainment events at the Golden 1 Center
223: 859:List of entertainment events at Canada Life Centre 767:List of entertainment events at the Araneta Center 1227:List of entertainment events at the Toyota Center 905:List of entertainment events at the United Center 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 2075:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1493:Note: This discussion has been included in the 813:List of entertainment events at Scotiabank Arena 491:List of entertainment events at Crypto.com Arena 1968:as an example. I think you can count that as a 1135:List of entertainment events at Liverpool Arena 583:List of entertainment events at Rod Laver Arena 1089:List of entertainment events at AsiaWorld–Expo 399:List of entertainment events at The OVO Hydro 8: 675:List of entertainment events at the O2 Arena 307:List of entertainment events at Rogers Arena 107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 1382:nonencyclopedic. WIkipedia not catalog. -- 537:List of entertainment events at Perth Arena 353:List of entertainment events at Spark Arena 1492: 721:List of entertainment events at Kia Forum 1726:. Worth noting, it's a different from a 1433:, which closed as keep (dubiously), and 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 1935:Knowledge (XXG):Tambayan Philippines 1951:Convoluted? What do you mean? -- ` 24: 1846:; plus, there are concerns about 1497:lists for the following topics: 92:Introduction to deletion process 1541:against policy and guidelines: 1: 2056:03:50, 5 September 2024 (UTC) 2035:19:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC) 2021:01:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 1996:17:10, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 1982:16:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 1961:14:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC) 62:12:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC) 1947:14:35, 31 August 2024 (UTC) 1924:00:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC) 1879:20:59, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 1860:15:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 1837:09:51, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 1822:03:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 1788:13:52, 30 August 2024 (UTC) 1773:21:09, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 1755:20:46, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 1740:20:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 1714:15:20, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 1700:21:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 1672:19:54, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 1653:12:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 1635:21:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 1610:15:31, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 1596:03:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 1582:19:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 1559:06:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC) 1533:00:15, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 1486:02:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC) 1462:02:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC) 1447:14:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 1425:19:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 1391:17:41, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 1374:17:21, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 251:17:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 82:(AfD)? Read these primers! 2094: 2065:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 164:edits since nomination 2044:per NealeWellington. 80:Articles for deletion 2011:Per above reasons. 1906:Relisting comment: 1724:WP:PROCEDURALCLOSE 1586:What is "imv"? -- 1926: 1535: 1422: 97:Guide to deletion 87:How to contribute 2083: 2054: 2052: 1922: 1911: 1903: 1901: 1579: 1574: 1530: 1525: 1518: 1514: 1495:deletion sorting 1423: 1418: 1412: 1411: 1406: 1360: 1342: 1314: 1296: 1268: 1250: 1222: 1204: 1176: 1158: 1130: 1112: 1084: 1066: 1038: 1020: 992: 974: 946: 928: 900: 882: 854: 836: 808: 790: 762: 744: 716: 698: 670: 652: 624: 606: 578: 560: 532: 514: 486: 468: 440: 422: 394: 376: 348: 330: 302: 284: 228: 227: 213: 157: 139: 77: 34: 2093: 2092: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2073:deletion review 2050: 2045: 1913: 1896: 1894: 1866:NealeWellington 1829:NealeWellington 1645:NealeWellington 1640:Procedural keep 1577: 1572: 1564:Procedural keep 1543:WP:NOTDIRECTORY 1528: 1523: 1516: 1512: 1416: 1409: 1404: 1401: 1333: 1317: 1287: 1271: 1241: 1225: 1195: 1179: 1149: 1133: 1103: 1087: 1057: 1041: 1011: 995: 965: 949: 919: 903: 873: 857: 827: 811: 781: 765: 735: 719: 689: 673: 643: 627: 597: 581: 551: 535: 505: 489: 459: 443: 413: 397: 367: 351: 321: 305: 275: 259: 170: 130: 114: 111: 74: 71: 59: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2091: 2090: 2087: 2078: 2077: 2059: 2058: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1928: 1910: 1904: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1664:35.139.154.158 1637: 1627:35.139.154.158 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1561: 1536: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1439:35.139.154.158 1393: 1362: 1361: 1315: 1269: 1223: 1177: 1131: 1085: 1039: 993: 947: 901: 855: 809: 763: 717: 671: 625: 579: 533: 487: 441: 395: 349: 303: 231: 230: 167: 110: 109: 104: 94: 89: 72: 70: 65: 57: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2089: 2088: 2076: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2061: 2060: 2057: 2053: 2048: 2043: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2007: 2006: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1929: 1927: 1925: 1921: 1919: 1918: 1907: 1902: 1899: 1892: 1891: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1867: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1684: 1680: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1641: 1638: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1617: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1600:"In my view" 1599: 1598: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1580: 1575: 1569: 1565: 1562: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1537: 1534: 1531: 1526: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1499:Entertainment 1496: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1421: 1419: 1408: 1407: 1397: 1394: 1392: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1341: 1337: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1295: 1291: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1249: 1245: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1203: 1199: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1157: 1153: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1111: 1107: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1065: 1061: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1019: 1015: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 986: 982: 978: 973: 969: 964: 960: 956: 952: 948: 944: 940: 936: 932: 927: 923: 918: 914: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 890: 886: 881: 877: 872: 868: 864: 860: 856: 852: 848: 844: 840: 835: 831: 826: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 794: 789: 785: 780: 776: 772: 768: 764: 760: 756: 752: 748: 743: 739: 734: 730: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 706: 702: 697: 693: 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 668: 664: 660: 656: 651: 647: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 618: 614: 610: 605: 601: 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 559: 555: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 513: 509: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 472: 467: 463: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 421: 417: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 375: 371: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 329: 325: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 283: 279: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 257: 256: 253: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 226: 222: 219: 216: 212: 208: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 180: 176: 173: 172:Find sources: 168: 165: 161: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 108: 105: 102: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 83: 81: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 60: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 2064: 2062: 2041: 2008: 1969: 1930: 1916: 1915: 1905: 1895: 1893: 1659: 1639: 1618: 1578:(Mushy Yank) 1568:WP:SPLITLIST 1563: 1538: 1515: 1510: 1413: 1402: 1395: 1379: 1363: 254: 232: 220: 214: 206: 199: 193: 187: 181: 171: 73: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 1763:. Regards, 1730:. Regards, 1728:speedy keep 1690:. Regards, 1573:My, oh my! 197:free images 1974:Borgenland 1939:Borgenland 1871:Goldsztajn 1765:Goldsztajn 1732:Goldsztajn 1692:Goldsztajn 1602:Geschichte 1551:Goldsztajn 2069:talk page 1683:WP:BEFORE 1517:Quidditch 1384:Altenmann 37:talk page 2071:or in a 2027:mikeblas 1988:mikeblas 1972:though. 1953:mikeblas 1898:Relisted 1852:mikeblas 1848:WP:NOTDB 1844:WP:NLIST 1814:mikeblas 1810:WP:NOTDB 1806:WP:NLIST 1780:mikeblas 1747:mikeblas 1720:Mikeblas 1706:mikeblas 1679:WP:NLIST 1588:mikeblas 1547:WP:NLIST 1478:mikeblas 1474:WP:NLIST 1470:WP:NOTDB 1454:mikeblas 1366:mikeblas 243:mikeblas 239:WP:NOTDB 235:WP:NLIST 160:View log 101:glossary 39:or in a 1505:, and 1417:chatter 1336:protect 1331:history 1290:protect 1285:history 1244:protect 1239:history 1198:protect 1193:history 1152:protect 1147:history 1106:protect 1101:history 1060:protect 1055:history 1014:protect 1009:history 968:protect 963:history 922:protect 917:history 876:protect 871:history 830:protect 825:history 784:protect 779:history 738:protect 733:history 692:protect 687:history 646:protect 641:history 600:protect 595:history 554:protect 549:history 508:protect 503:history 462:protect 457:history 416:protect 411:history 370:protect 365:history 324:protect 319:history 278:protect 273:history 203:WP refs 191:scholar 133:protect 128:history 78:New to 2013:Dash9Z 1970:Delete 1761:WP:CSD 1688:policy 1619:Delete 1539:Delete 1503:Events 1380:delete 1340:delete 1294:delete 1248:delete 1202:delete 1156:delete 1110:delete 1064:delete 1018:delete 972:delete 926:delete 880:delete 834:delete 788:delete 742:delete 696:delete 650:delete 604:delete 558:delete 512:delete 466:delete 420:delete 374:delete 328:delete 282:delete 233:Fails 175:Google 137:delete 1507:Lists 1387:: --> 1357:views 1349:watch 1345:links 1311:views 1303:watch 1299:links 1265:views 1257:watch 1253:links 1219:views 1211:watch 1207:links 1173:views 1165:watch 1161:links 1127:views 1119:watch 1115:links 1081:views 1073:watch 1069:links 1035:views 1027:watch 1023:links 989:views 981:watch 977:links 943:views 935:watch 931:links 897:views 889:watch 885:links 851:views 843:watch 839:links 805:views 797:watch 793:links 759:views 751:watch 747:links 713:views 705:watch 701:links 667:views 659:watch 655:links 621:views 613:watch 609:links 575:views 567:watch 563:links 529:views 521:watch 517:links 483:views 475:watch 471:links 437:views 429:watch 425:links 391:views 383:watch 379:links 345:views 337:watch 333:links 299:views 291:watch 287:links 218:JSTOR 179:books 154:views 146:watch 142:links 54:Owen× 16:< 2042:Keep 2031:talk 2017:talk 2009:Keep 1992:talk 1978:talk 1965:See 1957:talk 1943:talk 1931:Wait 1875:talk 1856:talk 1833:talk 1818:talk 1808:and 1784:talk 1769:talk 1751:talk 1736:talk 1710:talk 1696:talk 1668:talk 1660:have 1649:talk 1631:talk 1606:talk 1592:talk 1555:talk 1545:and 1482:talk 1472:and 1458:talk 1443:talk 1405:Nate 1396:Keep 1388:talk 1370:talk 1353:logs 1327:talk 1323:edit 1307:logs 1281:talk 1277:edit 1261:logs 1235:talk 1231:edit 1215:logs 1189:talk 1185:edit 1169:logs 1143:talk 1139:edit 1123:logs 1097:talk 1093:edit 1077:logs 1051:talk 1047:edit 1031:logs 1005:talk 1001:edit 985:logs 959:talk 955:edit 939:logs 913:talk 909:edit 893:logs 867:talk 863:edit 847:logs 821:talk 817:edit 801:logs 775:talk 771:edit 755:logs 729:talk 725:edit 709:logs 683:talk 679:edit 663:logs 637:talk 633:edit 617:logs 591:talk 587:edit 571:logs 545:talk 541:edit 525:logs 499:talk 495:edit 479:logs 453:talk 449:edit 433:logs 407:talk 403:edit 387:logs 361:talk 357:edit 341:logs 315:talk 311:edit 295:logs 269:talk 265:edit 247:talk 211:FENS 185:news 150:logs 124:talk 120:edit 2051:679 1364:-- 225:TWL 158:– ( 2033:) 2019:) 1994:) 1980:) 1959:) 1945:) 1937:. 1920:iz 1877:) 1858:) 1835:) 1820:) 1786:) 1771:) 1753:) 1738:) 1712:) 1698:) 1670:) 1651:) 1633:) 1608:) 1594:) 1557:) 1513:WC 1509:. 1501:, 1484:) 1460:) 1445:) 1372:) 1355:| 1351:| 1347:| 1343:| 1338:| 1334:| 1329:| 1325:| 1309:| 1305:| 1301:| 1297:| 1292:| 1288:| 1283:| 1279:| 1263:| 1259:| 1255:| 1251:| 1246:| 1242:| 1237:| 1233:| 1217:| 1213:| 1209:| 1205:| 1200:| 1196:| 1191:| 1187:| 1171:| 1167:| 1163:| 1159:| 1154:| 1150:| 1145:| 1141:| 1125:| 1121:| 1117:| 1113:| 1108:| 1104:| 1099:| 1095:| 1079:| 1075:| 1071:| 1067:| 1062:| 1058:| 1053:| 1049:| 1033:| 1029:| 1025:| 1021:| 1016:| 1012:| 1007:| 1003:| 987:| 983:| 979:| 975:| 970:| 966:| 961:| 957:| 941:| 937:| 933:| 929:| 924:| 920:| 915:| 911:| 895:| 891:| 887:| 883:| 878:| 874:| 869:| 865:| 849:| 845:| 841:| 837:| 832:| 828:| 823:| 819:| 803:| 799:| 795:| 791:| 786:| 782:| 777:| 773:| 757:| 753:| 749:| 745:| 740:| 736:| 731:| 727:| 711:| 707:| 703:| 699:| 694:| 690:| 685:| 681:| 665:| 661:| 657:| 653:| 648:| 644:| 639:| 635:| 619:| 615:| 611:| 607:| 602:| 598:| 593:| 589:| 573:| 569:| 565:| 561:| 556:| 552:| 547:| 543:| 527:| 523:| 519:| 515:| 510:| 506:| 501:| 497:| 481:| 477:| 473:| 469:| 464:| 460:| 455:| 451:| 435:| 431:| 427:| 423:| 418:| 414:| 409:| 405:| 389:| 385:| 381:| 377:| 372:| 368:| 363:| 359:| 343:| 339:| 335:| 331:| 326:| 322:| 317:| 313:| 297:| 293:| 289:| 285:| 280:| 276:| 271:| 267:| 249:) 205:) 162:| 152:| 148:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 2047:C 2029:( 2015:( 1990:( 1976:( 1955:( 1941:( 1917:L 1873:( 1864:@ 1854:( 1831:( 1816:( 1782:( 1767:( 1749:( 1734:( 1718:@ 1708:( 1694:( 1666:( 1647:( 1629:( 1604:( 1590:( 1553:( 1529:✎ 1524:☎ 1480:( 1456:( 1441:( 1420:) 1414:( 1410:• 1368:( 1359:) 1321:( 1313:) 1275:( 1267:) 1229:( 1221:) 1183:( 1175:) 1137:( 1129:) 1091:( 1083:) 1045:( 1037:) 999:( 991:) 953:( 945:) 907:( 899:) 861:( 853:) 815:( 807:) 769:( 761:) 723:( 715:) 677:( 669:) 631:( 623:) 585:( 577:) 539:( 531:) 493:( 485:) 447:( 439:) 401:( 393:) 355:( 347:) 309:( 301:) 263:( 245:( 229:) 221:· 215:· 207:· 200:· 194:· 188:· 182:· 177:( 169:( 166:) 156:) 118:( 103:) 99:( 58:☎

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Owen×
☎
12:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
List of entertainment events at the SM Mall of Asia complex

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
List of entertainment events at the SM Mall of Asia complex
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
edits since nomination
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑