404:
It does not bother me that there is a list of streets in a city here. It does not bother me that there are no sources in the article to verify information either - that can be fixed over time. The issue is that there is nothing in the article to show that the fact that these streets are eponymous in
306:
and reference better. Most street in NYC are numbered so they obviously aren't eponymous. Notability has to do with article space, not for lists. Saying: "This is actually one of the most common methods of street naming anywhere in the world." has no basis in fact. The most common street names are
409:
when there is no given reason why something is important about this reason for naming. Just because NYC is the nation's largest city does not mean you can make lists of streets in the city given their name for whatever reason you can dream of. Does anyone not get the point?
193:. This list examines a relationship between a method of naming streets in a specific city without showing why streets named this way in this specific city (NYC) are notable. This is actually one of the most common methods of street naming anywhere in the world.
159:
383:. This is a list of notable streets, in the largest American city, made in this form for ease of reading and research by our core readers. Whole books have been written on the specific topic, and thus can be
88:
83:
153:
92:
75:
265:
115:
352:
Our standard of notability is coverage in reliable and verifiable sources, and this article already includes one of several books that cover the subject, which is also covered in
239:
79:
213:
427:
That it is notable is shown by the books about the specific topic, as
Bearian commented above. Nothing further is necessary to meet a notability guideline.
48:. The consensus, supported by at least some sourcing, is that the practice of naming streets out of people in New York is notable, thus justifying this list.
174:
71:
63:
141:
312:
438:
419:
396:
367:
344:
316:
298:
280:
254:
228:
202:
57:
135:
308:
131:
17:
181:
120:
337:
147:
453:
289:
Every street is named after something or other. WP is not a directory of street names, as interesting as some may be.
36:
405:
this city is something of notable importance. Given no such information, it is no different from making a list called
276:
250:
224:
452:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
294:
53:
272:
246:
220:
190:
332:
167:
363:
354:
358:
among many other sources about New York City street names. The notability standard is met here.
415:
392:
290:
198:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
376:
49:
380:
384:
327:
434:
359:
411:
388:
194:
109:
429:
446:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
407:"List of streets in Dallas, Texas named after tree species"
105:
101:
97:
166:
324:- Interesting, but too trivial for an encyclopedia.
266:
180:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
456:). No further edits should be made to this page.
240:list of New York-related deletion discussions
8:
260:
234:
214:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
208:
72:List of eponymous streets in New York City
64:List of eponymous streets in New York City
264:: This debate has been included in the
238:: This debate has been included in the
212:: This debate has been included in the
375:per Richard Arthur Norton, Alansohn,
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
191:Knowledge (XXG) is not a case study
307:"park" and "second" and "main". --
24:
309:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
1:
317:05:02, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
299:04:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
281:00:09, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
255:00:09, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
229:00:08, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
203:21:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
439:00:02, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
420:05:37, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
397:21:07, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
368:13:59, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
345:04:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
58:03:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
473:
449:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
355:The New York Times
44:The result was
283:
269:
257:
243:
231:
217:
464:
451:
343:
340:
335:
330:
270:
244:
218:
185:
184:
170:
123:
113:
95:
34:
472:
471:
467:
466:
465:
463:
462:
461:
460:
454:deletion review
447:
338:
333:
328:
325:
273:Jclemens-public
247:Jclemens-public
221:Jclemens-public
127:
119:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
470:
468:
459:
458:
442:
441:
422:
399:
370:
347:
319:
301:
284:
258:
232:
188:
187:
124:
121:Afd statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
469:
457:
455:
450:
444:
443:
440:
436:
432:
431:
426:
423:
421:
417:
413:
408:
403:
400:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
371:
369:
365:
361:
357:
356:
351:
348:
346:
342:
341:
336:
331:
323:
320:
318:
314:
310:
305:
302:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
282:
278:
274:
267:
263:
259:
256:
252:
248:
241:
237:
233:
230:
226:
222:
215:
211:
207:
206:
205:
204:
200:
196:
192:
183:
179:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
133:
130:
129:Find sources:
125:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
448:
445:
428:
424:
406:
401:
385:well-sourced
372:
353:
349:
326:
321:
303:
291:Jaque Hammer
286:
261:
235:
209:
189:
177:
171:
163:
156:
150:
144:
138:
128:
45:
43:
31:
28:
154:free images
50:Mkativerata
360:Alansohn
116:View log
412:Sebwite
402:Comment
389:Bearian
377:WP:LIST
195:Sebwite
160:WP refs
148:scholar
89:protect
84:history
381:WP:50k
379:, and
322:Delete
287:Delete
132:Google
93:delete
435:talk
329:Dough
175:JSTOR
136:books
118:) •
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
425:Keep
416:talk
393:talk
373:Keep
364:talk
350:Keep
313:talk
304:Keep
295:talk
277:talk
262:Note
251:talk
236:Note
225:talk
210:Note
199:talk
168:FENS
142:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:keep
430:DGG
271:--
245:--
219:--
182:TWL
114:– (
437:)
418:)
395:)
387:.
366:)
339:72
334:48
315:)
297:)
279:)
268:.
253:)
242:.
227:)
216:.
201:)
162:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
433:(
414:(
391:(
362:(
311:(
293:(
275:(
249:(
223:(
197:(
186:)
178:·
172:·
164:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
134:(
126:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.