335:. This list is clearly part of a series of lists which have been broken up into smaller portions keep them manageable. The lists correspond to the "batches" in which the declarations were announced. Buildings and structures which have been declared to be historic by an authority should be presumed to be notable, and we should have lists of them in our encyclopedia. (There is room for nuance here—not all listed buildings are equally notable, but the nominator has made no such argument.)
491:, to link between the five related list-articles of historic buildings in Hangzhou, and I put it into the top of each of them. These list-articles appear to be part of a newly organized project to cover historic sites in China, which in my opinion should be part of a new WikiProject for that, which could be technically under both the China wikiproject and
376:
at the list and check the sourcing out while you're at it. (Deadlink?! No third-party coverage?!!) It simply doesn't pass the smell-test at all... To reiterate, I'm quite sure this OR masquerading as encyclopedic material... & all the dude (terribly fishy account if you just take a quick look)
569:
link to an article, if that was anyone's concern. Additionally, as other editors have pointed out, the content itself is not unlike what is done for other cities, so
Hangzhou should be no exception. Some formatting and editing could be done to improve the article, but it should certainly be kept.
459:
The topic is certainly notable. The problem with the article is that it is entirely sourced to a single website, which is currently down. It therefore needs tagging for better references, but unless the nominator believes it’s a hoax or completely made up, I don’t see a basis for deletion.
220:
255:--no indication based on third-party coverage, or lack thereof, that this "fifth batch", nay the fourth, third, etc. should deserve their own pages. Little encyclopedic value, more like a vanity project for user:laohangzhou (no surprises given the name!)
578:
371:
Your !vote reads like a knee-jerk inclusionist reaction that just takes for granted whatever is presented. So can anyone just come along and create a random "list of historic buildings in x" and it can never be deleted?! I'm simply inviting you to
146:
141:
150:
133:
214:
137:
537:
529:
541:
533:
525:
129:
81:
180:
485:
312:
235:
553:
512:
469:
451:
430:
412:
386:
364:
344:
324:
304:
284:
264:
202:
75:
173:
352:
196:
292:
272:
192:
120:
477:. I'm glad to see this list-article; there has been no organized coverage of historic sites in China so far, that I am aware of, or at least not under
105:
242:
417:
At least some of the listed buildings appear to have official, multilingual plaques installed with some didactic text and a catalog number, e.g.
208:
421:. If this is a hoax it's very sophisticated. With some legwork and language skills I expect everything on this list is verifiable.
544:
is around 1,500 words, total of 10,200 words, so they could probably all be merged into 2 articles of around 5,000 words each?
100:
93:
17:
69:
114:
110:
442:. There's probably a better way of grouping them, but lists of government-declared historic monuments are valid. --
595:
40:
573:
549:
382:
360:
260:
591:
500:
36:
447:
562:
403:
you should have said so in the nomination, and should provide evidence to support that bold claim.
396:
392:
320:
300:
280:
228:
545:
378:
356:
256:
521:
508:
465:
89:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
590:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
499:
in the United States. wp:HSITES has lots of relevant resources, including a discussion page
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
492:
478:
426:
408:
340:
64:
443:
377:
had to do wuz slap the words "historic building" & y'all just look the other way...
496:
418:
400:
316:
296:
276:
54:
504:
461:
252:
167:
422:
404:
336:
59:
353:
A Building at 19, Jin Chai Dai Alley and
Buildings at 10, 12, 13, Zhupo Alley
520:, this, and the other "batch Hanzhou building" articles don't appear
586:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
130:
List of fifth batch of declared historic buildings in
Hangzhou
82:
List of fifth batch of declared historic buildings in
Hangzhou
163:
159:
155:
227:
419:
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_726be0290100w0ls.html
395:? Why should we assume it's any less notable than
495:(the Historic sites wikiproject). Like there is
313:list of Architecture-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
598:). No further edits should be made to this page.
311:Note: This discussion has been included in the
291:Note: This discussion has been included in the
271:Note: This discussion has been included in the
241:
8:
565:as an article, so now the list at least has
121:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
486:Hangzhou declared historic buildings topnav
310:
293:list of China-related deletion discussions
290:
273:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
270:
481:. I just created a navigation template,
399:? If you're claiming this article is a
391:Why wouldn't we want an article about
7:
24:
106:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
355:get its own article someday!
540:is around 1,800 words, and
96:(AfD)? Read these primers!
615:
579:22:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
554:14:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
513:01:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
470:18:43, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
452:16:19, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
431:19:16, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
413:18:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
387:18:34, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
365:18:34, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
345:16:15, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
325:13:47, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
305:13:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
285:13:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
265:13:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
76:05:17, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
588:Please do not modify it.
351::Gee, can't wait to see
32:Please do not modify it.
536:is around 2,300 words,
532:is around 1,600 words,
528:is around 3,000 words,
94:Articles for deletion
563:19 Jinchaidai Alley
397:58 Joralemon Street
393:19 Jinchaidai Alley
55:(non-admin closure)
574:Khu'hamgaba Kitap
367:
327:
307:
287:
253:original research
111:Guide to deletion
101:How to contribute
57:
606:
490:
484:
350:
246:
245:
231:
183:
171:
153:
91:
74:
53:
34:
614:
613:
609:
608:
607:
605:
604:
603:
602:
596:deletion review
561:I have created
488:
482:
188:
179:
144:
128:
125:
88:
85:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
612:
610:
601:
600:
582:
581:
556:
515:
472:
454:
436:
435:
434:
433:
415:
348:
347:
329:
328:
308:
288:
249:
248:
185:
124:
123:
118:
108:
103:
86:
84:
79:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
611:
599:
597:
593:
589:
584:
583:
580:
577:
576:
575:
568:
564:
560:
557:
555:
551:
547:
546:Coolabahapple
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
516:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
487:
480:
476:
473:
471:
467:
463:
458:
455:
453:
449:
445:
441:
438:
437:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
389:
388:
384:
380:
379:Kingoflettuce
375:
370:
369:
368:
366:
362:
358:
357:Kingoflettuce
354:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
309:
306:
302:
298:
294:
289:
286:
282:
278:
274:
269:
268:
267:
266:
262:
258:
257:Kingoflettuce
254:
244:
240:
237:
234:
230:
226:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
194:
191:
190:Find sources:
186:
182:
178:
175:
169:
165:
161:
157:
152:
148:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
126:
122:
119:
116:
112:
109:
107:
104:
102:
99:
98:
97:
95:
90:
83:
80:
78:
77:
73:
72:
68:
67:
63:
62:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
587:
585:
572:
571:
566:
558:
517:
474:
456:
439:
373:
349:
332:
250:
238:
232:
224:
217:
211:
205:
199:
189:
176:
87:
70:
65:
60:
49:
47:
31:
28:
215:free images
522:WP:TOOLONG
444:Necrothesp
251:Smells of
592:talk page
542:5th batch
538:4th batch
534:3rd batch
530:2nd batch
526:1st batch
501:wt:HSITES
493:wp:HSITES
479:wp:HSITES
317:Shellwood
297:Shellwood
277:Shellwood
37:talk page
594:or in a
174:View log
115:glossary
39:or in a
518:Comment
505:Doncram
497:wp:NRHP
462:Mccapra
401:WP:HOAX
221:WP refs
209:scholar
147:protect
142:history
92:New to
423:Pburka
405:Pburka
337:Pburka
193:Google
151:delete
236:JSTOR
197:books
181:Stats
168:views
160:watch
156:links
16:<
567:one
559:Keep
550:talk
509:talk
503:. --
475:Keep
466:talk
457:Keep
448:talk
440:Keep
427:talk
409:talk
383:talk
374:look
361:talk
341:talk
333:Keep
321:talk
301:talk
281:talk
261:talk
229:FENS
203:news
164:logs
138:talk
134:edit
66:uidh
50:keep
243:TWL
172:– (
552:)
524:,
511:)
489:}}
483:{{
468:)
450:)
429:)
411:)
385:)
363:)
343:)
323:)
315:.
303:)
295:.
283:)
275:.
263:)
223:)
166:|
162:|
158:|
154:|
149:|
145:|
140:|
136:|
52:.
548:(
507:(
464:(
446:(
425:(
407:(
381:(
359:(
339:(
319:(
299:(
279:(
259:(
247:)
239:·
233:·
225:·
218:·
212:·
206:·
200:·
195:(
187:(
184:)
177:·
170:)
132:(
117:)
113:(
71:e
61:b
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.