282::"The boundaries of the Triangle vary with the author". These "generations" have been recognized by scholars and by writers for major magazines as a way of characterizing how, say, children born to WW2 veterans (Baby Boomers) were different in their values or career paths from those born years later, such as the "Generation X."
296:
I wasn't arguing that the terms aren't worthy of discussion. I was arguing that the author's attempt to write an article that holds them out as a systematically and objectively defined, lockstep series is invalid. But as I noted above, it doesn't matter now, because it turns out an article covering
136:
These terms are inherently loosely and inconsistently defined by authors who use them, and there is no source that establishes them as a concrete and cohesive series as purported by this article. The sources given do not meet WP:RS as reliable sources, and in any event references can't be used to
258:
These articles have long been a problem, because there are a number of overlapping terms, with various incompatible definitions. But all of them are used, and need discussion. The attempts of some writers to make a formal scheme of them is only one way of thinking of them.
157:
96:
91:
100:
83:
129:
234:
297:
this topic already existed, so this one is now a redirection to that one. No merger was called for because the new article had no new information.
137:
back up these definitions because, as I said, different references use different definitions, or else they concede that the boundaries are vague.
87:
355:
331:
306:
291:
270:
250:
202:
174:
146:
79:
71:
65:
182:
These generations do not have clear boundaries, no, but generally speaking, they last around 15 years and average in those spans.
17:
237:. I wrote to him to tell him about article duplication and about deleting existing material. Then I restored the previous
198:
53:
370:
36:
369:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
166:
61:
302:
246:
186:
142:
343:
238:
214:
351:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
287:
279:
194:
57:
342:
As this is now a redirect it is doing little harm. This is definitely NOT a reflection on
298:
242:
138:
278:
They do not have to have absolutely determinative and clear boundaries. Neither does the
347:
266:
49:
325:
117:
283:
190:
48:. This is now a redirect so any discussion on its deletion should take place on
318:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
261:
363:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
124:
113:
109:
105:
217:
and redirected his article there, which is fine. (He
213:
The author found there was already an article called
158:
list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions
323:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
373:). No further edits should be made to this page.
235:List of cultural generations, 1900 to present
8:
152:
156:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
241:and his redirected title to it.)
80:List of generations, 1900-present
72:List of generations, 1900-present
346:(which would be a strong keep).
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
233:article he created, called
390:
356:16:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
332:00:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
66:00:59, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
307:22:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
292:22:12, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
271:21:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
251:01:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
203:22:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
175:22:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
147:20:44, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
366:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
229:and redirected it to
344:List of generations
239:List of generations
215:List of generations
44:The result was
334:
206:
189:comment added by
177:
161:
54:non-admin closure
381:
368:
328:
322:
320:
280:Bermuda Triangle
225:the contents of
205:
183:
169:
162:
127:
121:
103:
34:
389:
388:
384:
383:
382:
380:
379:
378:
377:
371:deletion review
364:
326:
316:
184:
167:
123:
94:
78:
75:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
387:
385:
376:
375:
359:
358:
336:
335:
321:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
273:
253:
181:
179:
178:
134:
133:
74:
69:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
386:
374:
372:
367:
361:
360:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
338:
337:
333:
330:
329:
319:
315:
314:
308:
304:
300:
295:
294:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
274:
272:
268:
264:
263:
257:
254:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
209:
208:
207:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
176:
173:
172:
170:
159:
155:
151:
150:
149:
148:
144:
140:
131:
126:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
365:
362:
339:
324:
317:
299:—Largo Plazo
275:
260:
255:
243:—Largo Plazo
230:
227:that article
226:
222:
218:
210:
180:
165:
164:
153:
139:—Largo Plazo
135:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
340:Weak delete
185:—Preceding
58:Ron Ritzman
348:Mark Hurd
199:contribs
187:unsigned
130:View log
327:MBisanz
256:Comment
231:another
223:deleted
211:Update:
97:protect
92:history
284:Edison
191:Pwnera
125:delete
101:delete
50:WP:RFD
221:then
128:) – (
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
352:talk
303:talk
288:talk
276:Keep
267:talk
247:talk
219:also
195:talk
154:Note
143:talk
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
62:talk
262:DGG
163:--
354:)
305:)
290:)
269:)
249:)
201:)
197:•
160:.
145:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
56:)
350:(
301:(
286:(
265:(
245:(
193:(
171:'
168:I
141:(
132:)
122:(
120:)
82:(
60:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.