480:, and you know very well this is not the first time. We all have better things to do in Knowledge (XXG), I'm sure, than wasting time with this sort of childish tantrums! This AfD proposal has been made in entirely good faith: A list with only one item in it is by definition not a list; it's a travesty of the very concept. But if every time someone who proposes to delete an article that's for some reason dear to your heart you begin to behave boorishly ("you're having a brain freeze", and other such stupidities), then dialogue and collaboration collapse. You are advised to
56:) This AfD proposal was submitted on the basis of the contested list having only one item in it. Since the time the proposal was submitted, editors have added more items on the list. Whether or not the items legitimately appear on the list is a subject that would be discussed, if at all, on the article's talk page and, of course, not here. In any case, the basis for the AfD proposal exists no more. Therefore, the proposal is withdrawn.
458:
went back to a previous version and restored 5 items that had been stripped out, so now it is a list of six again. I don't have access to the corresponding five deleted articles, to add references conveniently. I guess I could/should request restoration of the five separate articles to get material to merge back here. --
367:
Wrong on both counts. Firstly, I had no part in previous listings. In the most recent AfD, which was the first time I got involved with this subject, I witnessed the items in the list getting deleted one by one. Before the list dwindled down to two items, the AfD was closed. The closing was premature
457:
What has gone on seems obnoxious to me. It seems that five separate articles have been deleted outright, without moving any details over to this list-article, so there were then just redlinks which have then been stripped out. List items do not have to have to link to articles to exist. Anyhow, I
330:
Normally it would be appalling behavior to renominate so soon, but in this case it seems completely justified as this manifestly is not a list anymore. If the community decided we shouldn’t have all but one of the items that were previously on the list, it follows that the list shouldn’t exist
312:
thing. And Canada doesn't really have any significant number of housing cooperatives that are actually notable or sourceable enough to warrant encyclopedia articles, so there's no prospect of it getting reexpanded back to a useful or list-justifying number of entries either.
97:
92:
87:
348:
It is not OK to keep listing articles on AfD until you get the result you want, as is being done here. This article should be kept to discourage that sort of behaviour. Also, I think there is the potential for other notable co-ops to be found (given time).
239:
82:
383:, we are not posting up articles on the basis of speculations about the future. If it so happens that many more housing co-ops sprout up in Candada, I'd welcome the recreation of this list. As it now is, it's a carcass. -
409:(which is pretty long). I grant that a list-article of notable examples doesn't need to be split out from a main article, unless the list has gotten largish. So fine, redirect this back to the current main article (
443:. The previous AfD started with some six items in the list; now, it's a list of only one item. Try and see what is really going on here: This is a non-list. This list is dead. It's an ex-list. -
233:
165:
160:
169:
199:
152:
192:
493:
467:
452:
426:
392:
358:
340:
322:
283:
65:
124:
139:
292:. As I repeatedly pointed out in the prior discussion, five of the six articles that were once here were simultaneously up for deletion, due to not being
254:
221:
472:
The list might eventually stay on, or be deleted; nobody knows. And I do not much care either way. What matters the most is the obnoxious
215:
119:
112:
17:
211:
156:
261:
148:
133:
129:
71:
53:
520:
40:
414:
402:
227:
380:
296:
as having any notability at all — so any disagreement about whether six, five, four or three articles were
401:
about wanting to discourage the behavior. Maybe "List of" should be dropped from the title, by a move to
516:
36:
373:
271:
336:
489:
448:
410:
406:
388:
354:
279:
247:
61:
368:
in my humble opinion but that was what was decided. I submitted this AfD for the only reason that
481:
463:
422:
318:
108:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
515:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
332:
293:
485:
444:
436:
398:
384:
350:
275:
57:
274:, having only one item in it. Not much to say about this state of affairs, really.
477:
459:
432:
418:
314:
186:
439:. There is nothing to "discourage" or "encourage" so please drop the silliness.
98:
Articles for deletion/List of housing cooperatives in Canada (4th nomination)
93:
Articles for deletion/List of housing cooperatives in Canada (3rd nomination)
88:
Articles for deletion/List of housing cooperatives in Canada (2nd nomination)
304:
thing was imminent. And now it's happened exactly as I pointed out: this
431:
Kindly retire this nonsense about "discouraging the behavior," both you
372:
and therefore cannot, by any reasonable measure, be considered a list.
300:
to justify a list was irrelevant, because its reduction to a list of
511:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
441:
The article, as it now stands, is not the same article any more
405:(currently a redlink) and some material could be moved from
83:
Articles for deletion/List of housing cooperatives in Canada
182:
178:
174:
246:
260:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
523:). No further edits should be made to this page.
374:It serves no encyclopaedic purpose whatsoever
8:
140:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
80:
149:List of housing cooperatives in Canada
72:List of housing cooperatives in Canada
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
78:
413:) or, better, split out / develop
24:
370:the list contains one single item
125:Introduction to deletion process
415:Housing cooperatives in Canada
403:Housing cooperatives in Canada
1:
115:(AfD)? Read these primers!
540:
411:Housing cooperative#Canada
407:Housing cooperative#Canada
494:05:29, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
468:23:40, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
453:22:48, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
427:19:47, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
393:15:28, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
359:13:11, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
341:17:31, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
323:16:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
284:13:12, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
66:06:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
52:. Nomination withdrawn. (
513:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
77:AfDs for this article:
476:you seem to exhibit,
113:Articles for deletion
270:A list that fails
130:Guide to deletion
120:How to contribute
54:non-admin closure
531:
294:properly sourced
265:
264:
250:
202:
190:
172:
110:
34:
539:
538:
534:
533:
532:
530:
529:
528:
527:
521:deletion review
207:
198:
163:
147:
144:
107:
104:
102:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
537:
535:
526:
525:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
399:User:Mparrault
381:WP:CRYSTALBALL
379:Secondly, per
377:
362:
361:
343:
325:
268:
267:
204:
143:
142:
137:
127:
122:
105:
103:
101:
100:
95:
90:
85:
79:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
536:
524:
522:
518:
514:
509:
508:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
470:
469:
465:
461:
456:
455:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
429:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
397:I agree with
396:
395:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
375:
371:
366:
365:
364:
363:
360:
356:
352:
347:
344:
342:
338:
334:
329:
326:
324:
320:
316:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
288:
287:
286:
285:
281:
277:
273:
263:
259:
256:
253:
249:
245:
241:
238:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
213:
210:
209:Find sources:
205:
201:
197:
194:
188:
184:
180:
176:
171:
167:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
145:
141:
138:
135:
131:
128:
126:
123:
121:
118:
117:
116:
114:
109:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
84:
81:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
512:
510:
473:
440:
369:
345:
327:
309:
305:
301:
297:
289:
269:
257:
251:
243:
236:
230:
224:
218:
208:
195:
106:
49:
47:
31:
28:
272:WP:LISTPURP
234:free images
333:Beeblebrox
308:a list of
517:talk page
486:The Gnome
445:The Gnome
437:Mparrault
385:The Gnome
351:Mparrault
276:The Gnome
58:The Gnome
37:talk page
519:or in a
474:behavior
331:either.
193:View log
134:glossary
39:or in a
478:Doncram
460:Doncram
433:Doncram
419:Doncram
315:Bearcat
240:WP refs
228:scholar
166:protect
161:history
111:New to
482:behave
328:Delete
298:enough
290:Delete
212:Google
170:delete
255:JSTOR
216:books
200:Stats
187:views
179:watch
175:links
16:<
490:talk
464:talk
449:talk
435:and
423:talk
417:. --
389:talk
355:talk
346:Keep
337:talk
319:talk
280:talk
248:FENS
222:news
183:logs
157:talk
153:edit
62:talk
50:keep
484:. -
310:one
302:one
262:TWL
191:– (
492:)
466:)
451:)
425:)
391:)
357:)
339:)
321:)
306:is
282:)
242:)
185:|
181:|
177:|
173:|
168:|
164:|
159:|
155:|
64:)
488:(
462:(
447:(
421:(
387:(
376:.
353:(
349:-
335:(
317:(
278:(
266:)
258:·
252:·
244:·
237:·
231:·
225:·
219:·
214:(
206:(
203:)
196:·
189:)
151:(
136:)
132:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.