852:
Yeah, Knowledge's lists should totally be dictated by listicles. But again, this underrated character is still described in the episode article! We're not scrubbing mention of this listicle author's #24 entirely! And if Brooks' multiple appearances don't count him as guest star, take that up with the
783:
The sheer amount of people who agree that it's non-notable kind of proves your "drive-by nomination" argument wrong. If it was really an ill-considered nomination then there would be some controversy outside yourself. I'm sure people did invest time and energy into this list, but considering
Simpsons
833:
Brooks was not a guest star; he was a regular part of the production team and voiced multiple characters. The work specifically covers such characters, "in the course of this book, we remember the iconic characters". The coverage of Brodka is likewise specifically about such characters, "The 25
745:
The passage of many years demonstrates that the topic is sound. The page has been read by hundreds of thousands of people in that time and the talk page indicates that they have no complaints. All we have in this case is a disruptive, drive-by nomination and a tiny claque of supporters. Such
113:
108:
103:
98:
93:
87:
52:. While this article has been kept several times in previous AfDs, there is clearly a broad consensus that this list is non-notable. It's entirely appropriate for consensus to evolve over time and it's been almost a decade since it was last assessed.
764:
Racism has survived for many years, but I wouldn't call it sound. Just because the article has been read and there are no complaints on the Talk page doesn't mean that the list is appropriate. As for the rest of your counterargument, please read
254:
871:- This really is indiscriminate fancruft. Previous AfDs have no bearing here since the last one was almost a decade ago, when there was actually still a chance of Knowledge turning into Wikia. Fortunately we did not go down that road.
80:
746:
ambushes and attrition are a significant cause of the decline in
Knowledge particpation as people won't invest effort when their work can be so casually destroyed without regard to the principles of natural justice such as
370:- Pointless collection of minutia. If there are any that are relevant search terms, it's easy enough just to redirect to the episode in question. Otherwise cataloging them can be left to a fan wiki.
560:- Ah. Sad to see another long-labor-of-love-list bite the dust here, thanks to pesky "policies" and "guidelines". :) I even did a quick search just in case and did find more than I thought I would (
248:
180:
175:
184:
306:
167:
813:
207:
214:
853:
guest star list and the producers who called him one. Not that I expect you to ever change your mind, just making sure others can see through this failed logic.
326:
154:
139:
637:. As much of a Simpsons fan I am, this is listcruft. Many of the characters aren't actually one-time, some are recurring, so there is also a degree of
269:
236:
391:
a list of one-time characters, but characters who were "central" one time. Yikes. Otherwise, I was going to see how closely this might parallel
932:
907:
884:
857:
847:
828:
797:
778:
759:
740:
722:
669:
650:
629:
613:
589:
552:
528:
514:
499:
478:
444:
428:
404:
379:
362:
338:
318:
298:
63:
573:
230:
437:
491:
226:
171:
812:, not for being one-time characters? That the source isn't about Jacques but about Albert Brooks? That they are already listed in
685:" The nomination makes no new points and is blatantly false as it's easy to find coverage of Simpsons one-off characters such as
487:
424:
349:"One-time" says it all, this is a list of non-notable characters. The information is better off in the Simpsons Wiki or similar.
276:
134:
127:
17:
163:
69:
690:
561:
916:
It's pretty clear that this will be axed, before this, please copy the contents to
Simpsons wikia, as the main article for
400:
460:
392:
242:
148:
144:
565:
471:
could be addressed by adding some content controls or something, but then we'd end up duplicating the guest-stars.
577:
949:
843:
755:
718:
569:
40:
638:
468:
455:
396:
597:. We don't need a list of every character who has ever appeared on The Simpsons, there are simply too many.
413:. In other words, no need for a transwiki before we delete it: this can go directly into the recycle bin.—
706:
524:
495:
294:
945:
897:
821:
698:
511:
475:
36:
903:
839:
751:
714:
420:
540:
The only reasonable list out of this woudl be guest stars, and there are separate lists for that. --
766:
582:
334:
314:
262:
59:
784:
Wiki probably has even more and better referenced info anyway, that doesn't really count for much.
817:
702:
686:
926:
791:
774:
736:
683:
It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome.
665:
520:
356:
290:
123:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
944:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
893:
808:
So you can't even be bothered to understand that both of these examples are known for being
728:
678:
646:
508:
472:
917:
892:
This is a great example of an unnecessary (almost trivial) list about more-or-less cameos.
410:
835:
747:
694:
548:
414:
286:
878:
710:
330:
310:
54:
854:
825:
610:
441:
375:
922:
787:
770:
732:
661:
623:
464:
352:
201:
114:
Articles for deletion/List of one-time characters in The
Simpsons (7th nomination)
109:
Articles for deletion/List of one-time characters in The
Simpsons (6th nomination)
104:
Articles for deletion/List of one-time characters in The
Simpsons (5th nomination)
99:
Articles for deletion/List of one-time characters in The
Simpsons (4th nomination)
94:
Articles for deletion/List of one-time characters in The
Simpsons (3rd nomination)
88:
Articles for deletion/List of one-time characters in The
Simpsons (2nd nomination)
642:
541:
731:
really apply when the last AFD was in 2010? Consensus can change, after all.
872:
838:
and that's why it has been kept repeatedly in the past. My !vote stands.
598:
371:
519:
If at first you don't delete, try, try, try, try, try, try, try again.
834:
Most
Underrated "Simpsons" Characters". The topic clearly passes
395:. Answer? It doesn't matter; this isn't salvageable in any form.
81:
Articles for deletion/List of one-time characters in The Simpsons
816:
and described (or PRESERVED as you would say) in more detail at
940:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
387:. And, on top of that, original research. Note that it's not
307:
list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
197:
193:
189:
261:
697:and the rest is just the usual personal opinions –
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
952:). No further edits should be made to this page.
436:Non-notable characters by definition. There are
409:The Simpsons Wiki has this information already,
325:Note: This discussion has been included in the
305:Note: This discussion has been included in the
814:List of The Simpsons guest stars (seasons 1–20)
275:
8:
155:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
488:List of one-time characters in The Simpsons
901:
507:Except the last one was nine years ago...
486:This has been kept 7 times under the name
440:that should go to their episodes instead.
327:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
324:
304:
677:The nomination is obviously improper per
580:... but still, it's hard to justify). —
164:List of one-time The Simpsons characters
70:List of one-time The Simpsons characters
77:
923:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
7:
824:? This is sad, just embarrassing.
709:, &c. – which are contrary to
24:
285:All in-universe fancruft. Fails
140:Introduction to deletion process
75:Previous AfDs for this article:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
933:09:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
798:05:34, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
64:21:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
908:02:12, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
885:12:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
858:19:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
848:13:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
829:06:28, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
779:20:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
760:13:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
741:03:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
723:00:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
670:21:56, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
651:17:43, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
630:09:12, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
614:07:51, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
590:03:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
553:03:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
529:20:25, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
515:01:08, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
500:00:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
479:00:17, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
461:List of Simpsons guest stars
445:22:02, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
429:22:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
405:21:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
393:List of Simpsons guest stars
380:21:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
363:21:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
339:21:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
319:21:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
299:21:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
693:. The topic easily passes
660:- Not encyclopedia worthy.
130:(AfD)? Read these primers!
969:
691:Lawrence Tierney's Brodka
942:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
687:Albert Brooks' Jacques
467:FWIW. BTW I could say
822:Life on the Fast Lane
438:a number of redirects
128:Articles for deletion
914:Delete and transwiki
621:Worst. List. EVER.
456:Squeamish Ossifrage
397:Squeamish Ossifrage
818:Marge Be Not Proud
910:
795:
639:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
469:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
427:
360:
341:
321:
145:Guide to deletion
135:How to contribute
960:
929:
786:
626:
607:
604:
601:
587:
585:
545:
459:
419:
351:
280:
279:
265:
217:
205:
187:
125:
34:
968:
967:
963:
962:
961:
959:
958:
957:
956:
950:deletion review
931:
927:
883:
796:
748:double jeopardy
707:WP:WEDONTNEEDIT
624:
605:
602:
599:
583:
581:
543:
453:
361:
222:
213:
178:
162:
159:
122:
119:
118:
90:
83:
73:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
966:
964:
955:
954:
936:
935:
921:
911:
906:comment added
887:
877:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
785:
699:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
672:
654:
653:
632:
616:
592:
584:Rhododendrites
555:
534:
533:
532:
531:
504:
503:
481:
447:
431:
407:
382:
365:
350:
343:
342:
322:
283:
282:
219:
158:
157:
152:
142:
137:
120:
117:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
84:
79:
76:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
965:
953:
951:
947:
943:
938:
937:
934:
930:
924:
919:
918:this category
915:
912:
909:
905:
899:
895:
891:
888:
886:
882:
881:
876:
875:
870:
867:
859:
856:
851:
850:
849:
845:
841:
837:
832:
831:
830:
827:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
799:
793:
789:
782:
781:
780:
776:
772:
768:
763:
762:
761:
757:
753:
749:
744:
743:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
725:
724:
720:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
684:
680:
676:
673:
671:
667:
663:
659:
656:
655:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
633:
631:
628:
627:
620:
617:
615:
612:
608:
596:
593:
591:
586:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
556:
554:
550:
546:
539:
536:
535:
530:
526:
522:
518:
517:
516:
513:
510:
506:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
482:
480:
477:
474:
470:
466:
462:
457:
451:
448:
446:
443:
439:
435:
432:
430:
426:
422:
418:
417:
412:
408:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
383:
381:
377:
373:
369:
366:
364:
358:
354:
348:
345:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
323:
320:
316:
312:
308:
303:
302:
301:
300:
296:
292:
288:
278:
274:
271:
268:
264:
260:
256:
253:
250:
247:
244:
241:
238:
235:
232:
228:
225:
224:Find sources:
220:
216:
212:
209:
203:
199:
195:
191:
186:
182:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
160:
156:
153:
150:
146:
143:
141:
138:
136:
133:
132:
131:
129:
124:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
89:
85:
82:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
941:
939:
913:
889:
879:
873:
868:
809:
767:WP:ASPERSION
682:
674:
657:
634:
622:
618:
594:
557:
537:
521:Clarityfiend
492:165.91.13.55
483:
452:per others.
449:
433:
415:
388:
384:
367:
346:
291:Clarityfiend
284:
272:
266:
258:
251:
245:
239:
233:
223:
210:
121:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
902:—Preceding
894:Dellwood546
810:guest stars
711:core policy
703:WP:ITSCRUFT
570:Screen Rant
566:Digital Spy
558:Weak Delete
249:free images
928:reply here
416:S Marshall
946:talk page
840:Andrew D.
752:Andrew D.
729:WP:DELAFD
727:How does
715:Andrew D.
679:WP:DELAFD
641:as well.
331:Shellwood
311:Shellwood
55:Lord Roem
37:talk page
948:or in a
855:Reywas92
836:WP:LISTN
826:Reywas92
695:WP:LISTN
578:Buzzfeed
442:Reywas92
389:actually
287:WP:LISTN
208:View log
149:glossary
39:or in a
904:undated
788:ZXCVBNM
771:DonIago
733:DonIago
662:Wm335td
625:Lugnuts
562:AV Club
484:Comment
353:ZXCVBNM
255:WP refs
243:scholar
181:protect
176:history
126:New to
890:Delete
869:Delete
658:Delete
643:Ajf773
635:Delete
619:Delete
595:Delete
538:Delete
450:Delete
434:Delete
385:Delete
368:Delete
347:Delete
227:Google
185:delete
50:delete
465:WP:FA
463:is a
270:JSTOR
231:books
215:Stats
202:views
194:watch
190:links
16:<
920:. --
898:talk
874:Reyk
844:talk
820:and
792:TALK
775:talk
756:talk
737:talk
719:talk
675:Keep
666:talk
647:talk
611:Talk
544:asem
525:talk
496:talk
411:here
401:talk
376:talk
357:TALK
335:talk
315:talk
295:talk
263:FENS
237:news
198:logs
172:talk
168:edit
60:talk
900:)
880:YO!
689:or
681:, "
588:\\
574:NME
372:TTN
277:TWL
206:– (
58:~ (
846:)
777:)
769:.
758:)
750:.
739:)
721:)
713:.
705:,
701:,
668:)
649:)
609:|
576:,
572:,
568:,
564:,
551:)
527:)
509:ミラ
498:)
490:.
473:ミラ
403:)
378:)
337:)
329:.
317:)
309:.
297:)
289:.
257:)
200:|
196:|
192:|
188:|
183:|
179:|
174:|
170:|
62:)
925:|
896:(
842:(
794:)
790:(
773:(
754:(
735:(
717:(
664:(
645:(
606:P
603:I
600:J
549:t
547:(
542:M
523:(
512:P
502:;
494:(
476:P
458::
454:@
425:C
423:/
421:T
399:(
374:(
359:)
355:(
333:(
313:(
293:(
281:)
273:·
267:·
259:·
252:·
246:·
240:·
234:·
229:(
221:(
218:)
211:·
204:)
166:(
151:)
147:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.