475:, "The MediaWiki software does not allow page history to be publicly archived at a page title that does not host a live page or redirect. Therefore, if two pages with parallel histories are merged but it is undesirable to keep a redirect from the deprecated page title to the destination page title, the old page history needs to move. This is sometimes done by moving the page history to a subpage of the talk page of the destination page. An example can be found at
291:; and yet we have stuff from 2010 and 2013..).; because many of the entries are not even Chinese people (showing how this is an arbitrary listing by a trivial characteristic of otherwise entirely unrelated people); and because, of course, it does not cite a single source, which for what one would think are stamps from a fair bit ago, makes even the usual claims from
384:, just like most of these other lists, it's unsourced, horribly incomplete, has arbitrary inclusion criteria, and even if the names can be verified in a catalog, there's zero proof that the underlying topic is one worth making a list out of. All of these stamp AFDs, even the ones closed as "keep", have failed to prove
255:(as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists as a reason to keep having them even when they fail inclusion criteria), as Knowledge is not a philatelical catalogue and there is no indication how this kind of page is of any broader encyclopedic significance. An encyclopedia is
364:
in
Knowledge. Also considering "pre-division" Taiwan was under Japanese rule for most of the first half of the 20th-century, even calling the splitting off of Taiwan "division" seems to be the wrong wording. Plus the list does not comply with its own parameters, and there are no sources. It has
535:
and adding a "History" section, I find the content of this article to be valuable even if it is unsourced. The list can be used to find sources about the dynasties period aspect of the topic which can aid a selective merge to the article that currently discusses only the current
546:
and sourcing entries on the list, which had previously been completely unsourced. I would not have been able to expand the Hong Kong article that well without the help of the unsourced entries in the list, which substantially aided me in searching for more sources about the
411:
Ignoring the NLIST concern here, it makes no sense to partition it to the dynasties period and the current period. I would of said to merge them first but the list is unsourced. Perhaps that article would also fail NLIST but that is the subject for another AfD.
763:), would you support preserving the history as I suggested above and converting this article into a redirect to the other article? It is useful to retain the history to assist in finding sources and merging material from this article into the other article.
208:
481:
Although this is not a parallel versions case, the guide says that "moving the page history to a subpage of the talk page of the destination page" is an option. I would support either this or moving to draft followed by a redirect to
746:
722:
532:
515:
483:
406:
52:. While this topic is potentially of interest and notable, the article as it is does not establish notability. There is no prejudice against recreating this list with proper sources in the future if there is interest.
138:
133:
142:
202:
125:
472:
321:
129:
587:
543:
165:
599:
569:
742:
519:
511:
121:
73:
325:
223:
112:
190:
97:
786:
777:
As a completely unreferenced list, I am not seeing a benefit in preserving article history. I think you are overstating the usefulness of this list.
772:
734:
709:
688:
671:
654:
636:
615:
581:
558:
495:
466:
452:
421:
399:
374:
355:
337:
308:
280:
251:(as generally "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a
67:
317:
184:
476:
304:
276:
346:
It is an unsouced list. We have no evidence it actually meets the criteria for a list. Plus no one seems to really know what scope it has.
180:
230:
92:
85:
17:
440:
196:
760:
667:
169:
106:
102:
749:
discusses people on postage stamps from 1949–present. I agree that there is no need to have two separate articles.
807:
577:
524:
370:
351:
40:
300:
272:
256:
697:
287:
On top of that, this list really takes the cake because it is inconsistent with its own inclusion criteria (
663:
248:
247:, as already stated: not in this AfD, and not in the article. Otherwise, this and all similar pages fail
803:
260:
60:
36:
649:
603:
573:
366:
347:
333:
296:
289:
This page lists only those people who appeared on
Chinese stamps before the division of the country
268:
216:
764:
607:
550:
487:
462:
444:
434:
417:
292:
264:
782:
754:
730:
705:
252:
81:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
802:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
365:
existed since 2006. Unsourced articles should not last over 15 days, let alone over 15 years.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
768:
684:
611:
554:
491:
448:
360:
It says it is only for pre-division, but that would be inconsistent with every other use of
54:
645:
595:
244:
718:
632:
443:), would you support my proposal below to retain the article history under a redirect?
329:
458:
430:
413:
389:
594:
now has a 652-word history as well as every entry on the list sourced), it would be
568:
I still do not see how any of this justifies a complete list or a content fork from
778:
750:
726:
721:. While a list of this type could be sourced, it is an unnecessary content fork of
701:
159:
680:
628:
473:
Knowledge:Administrators' guide/Fixing cut-and-paste moves#Parallel versions
486:
so that the useful history is preserved to assist in searches for sources.
747:
List of people on the postage stamps of the People's
Republic of China
723:
List of people on the postage stamps of the People's
Republic of China
533:
List of people on the postage stamps of the People's
Republic of China
516:
List of people on the postage stamps of the People's
Republic of China
484:
List of people on the postage stamps of the People's
Republic of China
407:
List of people on the postage stamps of the People's
Republic of China
295:
that the contents list can be "easily verified" entirely implausible.
265:
interesting to a limited number of dedicated philatelical enthusiasts
361:
471:
Thank you for supporting the retention of the page history. From
798:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
627:
there should be a general discussion about these stamp lists --
602:. A complete list is justified because the subject passes
745:
discusses people on postage stamps from 1878–1949, while
591:
539:
528:
155:
151:
147:
477:
Talk:Compilation of Final
Fantasy VII#Old page history
215:
525:Knowledge:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion
588:list of people on the postage stamps of Hong Kong
544:List of people on the postage stamps of Hong Kong
457:I am fine with a drafticiation or userification.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
810:). No further edits should be made to this page.
388:the lists are "useful" or "notable" or whatever
316:Note: This discussion has been included in the
257:not an indiscriminate collection of information
600:postage stamps and postal history of Hong Kong
570:postage stamps and postal history of Hong Kong
243:No evidence whatsoever exists that this meets
743:List of people on the postage stamps of China
520:List of people on the postage stamps of China
512:List of people on the postage stamps of China
229:
122:List of people on the postage stamps of China
74:List of people on the postage stamps of China
8:
644:Lacks independent sources establishing that
113:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
542:on adding a 511-word "History" section to
315:
604:Knowledge:Notability#Stand-alone lists
288:
7:
514:to another title and redirect it to
24:
392:wants to be thrown around today.
679:due to lack of proper sourcing.
320:lists for the following topics:
263:, and despite it possibly being
98:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
405:Delete this article then move
1:
518:after the latter is moved to
510:Move the article history of
88:(AfD)? Read these primers!
827:
787:12:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
773:10:48, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
735:05:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
710:00:03, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
689:14:28, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
672:22:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
655:06:49, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
68:21:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
800:Please do not modify it.
637:22:08, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
616:10:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
582:04:07, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
559:12:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
496:00:38, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
467:22:34, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
453:12:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
422:06:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
400:18:17, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
375:16:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
356:16:44, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
338:15:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
309:15:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
281:15:49, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
700:, no reliable sources.
598:to include the list in
170:edits since nomination
86:Articles for deletion
527:. As an editor who
664:Bookworm857158367
574:John Pack Lambert
465:
420:
367:John Pack Lambert
348:John Pack Lambert
340:
103:Guide to deletion
93:How to contribute
818:
698:WP:Verifiability
461:
416:
397:
395:Ten Pound Hammer
318:deletion sorting
234:
233:
219:
163:
145:
83:
63:
57:
34:
826:
825:
821:
820:
819:
817:
816:
815:
814:
808:deletion review
651:MrsSnoozyTurtle
393:
322:Lists of people
249:WP:NOTDIRECTORY
176:
136:
120:
117:
80:
77:
61:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
824:
822:
813:
812:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
712:
691:
674:
657:
639:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
563:
562:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
425:
424:
402:
379:
378:
377:
341:
312:
311:
297:RandomCanadian
293:PhilatelyCRUFT
284:
283:
269:RandomCanadian
237:
236:
173:
116:
115:
110:
100:
95:
78:
76:
71:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
823:
811:
809:
805:
801:
796:
795:
788:
784:
780:
776:
775:
774:
770:
766:
762:
759:
756:
752:
748:
744:
741:
738:
737:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
716:
713:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
692:
690:
686:
682:
678:
675:
673:
669:
665:
661:
658:
656:
653:
652:
647:
643:
640:
638:
634:
630:
626:
623:
617:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
590:(which after
589:
585:
584:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
566:
565:
564:
561:
560:
556:
552:
548:
545:
541:
534:
530:
526:
522:
521:
517:
513:
508:
507:
498:
497:
493:
489:
485:
478:
474:
470:
469:
468:
464:
460:
456:
455:
454:
450:
446:
442:
439:
436:
432:
429:
428:
427:
426:
423:
419:
415:
410:
409:to this title
408:
403:
401:
396:
391:
387:
383:
380:
376:
372:
368:
363:
359:
358:
357:
353:
349:
345:
342:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
314:
313:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
285:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
239:
238:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
171:
167:
161:
157:
153:
149:
144:
140:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
118:
114:
111:
108:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
90:
89:
87:
82:
75:
72:
70:
69:
66:
64:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
799:
797:
757:
739:
714:
693:
676:
662:. Per Lupe.
659:
650:
641:
624:
596:undue weight
549:
537:
531:on sourcing
509:
480:
437:
404:
394:
385:
381:
343:
240:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
79:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
592:these edits
203:free images
56:Malinaccier
586:Regarding
529:began work
261:it is true
259:, even if
253:WP:BADIDEA
804:talk page
538:Today, I
330:Shellwood
37:talk page
806:or in a
761:contribs
740:Comment:
648:is met.
646:WP:NLIST
540:did work
459:Jumpytoo
441:contribs
431:Jumpytoo
414:Jumpytoo
305:contribs
277:contribs
245:WP:NLIST
166:View log
107:glossary
39:or in a
779:4meter4
751:4meter4
727:4meter4
719:WP:FORK
702:Avilich
536:period.
209:WP refs
197:scholar
139:protect
134:history
84:New to
765:Cunard
717:. Per
715:Delete
696:Fails
694:Delete
681:Stifle
677:Delete
642:Delete
608:Cunard
551:Cunard
547:topic.
488:Cunard
445:Cunard
390:WP:ATA
382:Delete
344:Delete
241:Delete
181:Google
143:delete
50:delete
362:China
326:China
224:JSTOR
185:books
160:views
152:watch
148:links
16:<
783:talk
769:talk
755:talk
731:talk
706:talk
685:talk
668:talk
660:Keep
633:talk
629:Lupe
625:Keep
612:talk
578:talk
555:talk
523:per
492:talk
463:Talk
449:talk
435:talk
418:Talk
371:talk
352:talk
334:talk
324:and
301:talk
273:talk
217:FENS
191:news
156:logs
130:talk
126:edit
62:talk
398:•
386:why
307:)
279:)
231:TWL
164:– (
785:)
771:)
733:)
708:)
687:)
670:)
635:)
614:)
606:.
580:)
557:)
494:)
479:."
451:)
373:)
354:)
336:)
328:.
303:/
275:/
267:.
211:)
168:|
158:|
154:|
150:|
146:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
781:(
767:(
758:·
753:(
729:(
725:.
704:(
683:(
666:(
631:(
610:(
576:(
572:.
553:(
490:(
447:(
438:·
433:(
369:(
350:(
332:(
299:(
271:(
235:)
227:·
221:·
213:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
183:(
175:(
172:)
162:)
124:(
109:)
105:(
65:)
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.