Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/List of public domain characters (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

373:. I have to agree. Owing to the nature of Knowledge, it would be impossible to maintain an article of this nature that would not run into issues involving different laws. I could see, perhaps, separate articles on different countries. But the problem is copyright rules change from time to time. Didn't the US recently add a bunch more decades to the copyright term, for example? 209:
created before 1923 plus those failing paperwork requirements" (USA). The country of origin is not helpful in determining which rule to apply for a given work, because it is not relevant under international law. So there's no single standard for Knowledge to apply to this list. For a work which is in the public domain in a given jurisdiction,
302:
This is crawling with and has been since at least February. . I think this article consists of the assumption that since these are characters created long ago, and that therefore they are "in the public domain". But I wouldn't rely upon this article to determine whether I could have free use of a
208:
The laws determining what is in the public domain vary widely from one jurisdiction to another, including "everything" (Afghanistan), "works by people who died over 50 years ago" (Canada), "works by people who died over 70 years ago" (EU), "works by people who died before 1928" (Mexico), and "works
213:
might be listed, and the works in question stretch into the ancient past (and into debates about historical figure vs. fictional character). Additionally, this article has lain unreferenced and orphaned for far too long to expect these problems to be resolved. Because of the nature of copyright
214:
law, there are usually no sources to cite for any given character, unless the question has gone to trial somewhere (and there again we have jurisdiction limitations). It's unmaintained because it's unmaintainable. It'd be a worthy project for a site which doesn't have to abide by
273:. JasonAQuest's points are enough to show why a "list of public domain works of fiction" would be impossible. A "list of public domain characters" is even worse, since it can't account for characters who are strongly associated with works inside 75: 174: 70: 346: 168: 102: 97: 106: 135: 89: 399: 382: 364: 334: 312: 294: 265: 235: 54: 244:- while I recognise the potential usefulness of such a list to some, I fear that being unsourced, it could lead people to infringe copyright etc. Since 189: 156: 205:
The subject named by this article has no international criteria or finite scope, and furthermore is chronically unsourced and orphaned.
281:
in the US). People looking for preexisting characters for use in an original work of fiction would do better to start by looking at
150: 17: 146: 93: 196: 85: 60: 390:
Besides the complicated legal issues, this list could run into the hundreds of thousands and can never be complete.
282: 414: 36: 413:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
395: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
162: 359: 330: 231: 391: 308: 182: 378: 290: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
353: 326: 261: 227: 278: 304: 223: 374: 322: 286: 219: 49: 123: 258: 245: 215: 76:
Articles for deletion/List of public domain characters (2nd nomination)
251:
one of the big 3, and this case presents such a good example for just
407:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
317:
To be fair, the article was created with more research than
347:
list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions
130: 119: 115: 111: 181: 71:
Articles for deletion/List of public domain characters
255:
verifiability is important, I think this must go. –
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 417:). No further edits should be made to this page. 195: 8: 226:, but doesn't work as a Knowledge article. - 325:, and the rest of it is also US-centric. - 345:: This debate has been included in the 277:outside the public domain (for example, 68: 7: 67: 24: 86:List of public domain characters 61:List of public domain characters 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 321:, but the research is mostly 283:Category:19th century novels 400:03:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 383:23:08, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 365:22:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 335:01:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 313:00:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 295:20:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 266:16:31, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 236:15:07, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 55:00:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 434: 410:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 66:AfDs for this article: 211:every character in it 44:The result was 367: 350: 53: 425: 412: 362: 356: 351: 341: 264: 200: 199: 185: 133: 127: 109: 52: 34: 433: 432: 428: 427: 426: 424: 423: 422: 421: 415:deletion review 408: 360: 354: 279:Sherlock Holmes 256: 142: 129: 100: 84: 81: 64: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 431: 429: 420: 419: 403: 402: 392:Squidfryerchef 385: 368: 339: 338: 337: 297: 285:and the like. 268: 203: 202: 139: 80: 79: 78: 73: 65: 63: 58: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 430: 418: 416: 411: 405: 404: 401: 397: 393: 389: 386: 384: 380: 376: 372: 369: 366: 363: 357: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 315: 314: 310: 306: 301: 298: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 269: 267: 263: 262: 260: 254: 250: 247: 243: 240: 239: 238: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 212: 206: 198: 194: 191: 188: 184: 180: 176: 173: 170: 167: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 144:Find sources: 140: 137: 132: 125: 121: 117: 113: 108: 104: 99: 95: 91: 87: 83: 82: 77: 74: 72: 69: 62: 59: 57: 56: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 409: 406: 387: 370: 342: 318: 303:character. 299: 274: 270: 257: 252: 248: 241: 210: 207: 204: 192: 186: 178: 171: 165: 159: 153: 143: 45: 43: 31: 28: 355:Fabrictramp 327:JasonAQuest 228:JasonAQuest 169:free images 361:talk to me 305:Mandsford 375:23skidoo 323:Original 136:View log 287:EALacey 224:WP:BIAS 175:WP refs 163:scholar 103:protect 98:history 388:Delete 371:Delete 300:Delete 271:Delete 242:Delete 222:, and 147:Google 131:delete 107:delete 46:delete 220:WP:OR 190:JSTOR 151:books 134:) – ( 124:views 116:watch 112:links 16:< 396:talk 379:talk 343:Note 331:talk 319:that 309:talk 291:talk 259:Toon 246:WP:V 232:talk 216:WP:V 183:FENS 157:news 120:logs 94:talk 90:edit 352:-- 349:. 275:and 253:why 197:TWL 398:) 381:) 358:| 333:) 311:) 293:) 249:is 234:) 218:, 177:) 122:| 118:| 114:| 110:| 105:| 101:| 96:| 92:| 50:BJ 48:. 394:( 377:( 329:( 307:( 289:( 230:( 201:) 193:· 187:· 179:· 172:· 166:· 160:· 154:· 149:( 141:( 138:) 128:( 126:) 88:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
BJ
00:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
List of public domain characters
Articles for deletion/List of public domain characters
Articles for deletion/List of public domain characters (2nd nomination)
List of public domain characters
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:V
WP:OR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.