295:
but i did already "vote" in the last afd, so this is not a new opinion. I agree its poorly sourced and should be stubified if it passes afd, but we arent a clean up crew. Not sure what jbsupremes comments about sources mean. I just know that llewellyn is the major publisher of astrology books in the
365:
Not a single outside reference is provided. Google provides her own web page plus social websites, blog mentions, and links to her books (and of course this article); not a reliable source to be found. Google News provides zip. Google Books shows only her own books. Doesn't come close to meeting
177:
78:
132:
315:
341:
171:
137:
73:
229:. If the nom feels that Geocities, Usenet and tabloid magazines are suitable as sources, I don't see how he can discredit the sources used in this article.
417:- Agree that notability has not been established. Being included in an index of published works isn't enough to pass notability - the threshold is
17:
105:
100:
109:
478:
461:
430:
406:
379:
356:
330:
305:
283:
266:
242:
220:
57:
92:
192:
159:
493:
36:
301:
492:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
153:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
149:
426:
402:
96:
53:
297:
278:
215:
199:
236:
185:
88:
63:
439:
389:
367:
375:
474:
352:
326:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
422:
398:
49:
418:
165:
272:
209:
208:
2nd nomination; still almost totally unsourced except to her publisher's blurbs about her
296:
US. I would change my vote if someone with expertise in astrology says she isnt notable.
443:
248:
230:
371:
470:
348:
322:
126:
247:
Huh? What exactly does this refer to? It seems to be a total non-sequitur.
392:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
486:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
419:
non-trivial mentions in multiple reliable secondary sources
122:
118:
114:
184:
79:
Articles for deletion/Ly De
Angeles (2nd nomination)
397:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
198:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
496:). No further edits should be made to this page.
316:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
48:. There is a clear consensus to that effect.
8:
342:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
469:per WP:AUTHOR, lack of reliable sources. --
336:
310:
340:: This debate has been included in the
314:: This debate has been included in the
71:
442:, and doesn't even really come close.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
421:- which aren't demonstrated here. --
74:Articles for deletion/Ly De Angeles
70:
24:
1:
271:It is. See your talk page. --
438:per MelanieN. Doesn't pass
513:
479:16:39, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
462:18:47, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
431:14:09, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
407:00:04, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
380:00:00, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
284:20:46, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
267:18:47, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
58:20:23, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
357:18:53, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
331:18:53, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
306:05:04, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
243:02:06, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
221:01:35, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
489:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
69:AfDs for this article:
44:The result was
409:
359:
345:
333:
319:
504:
491:
459:
456:
453:
450:
396:
394:
346:
320:
281:
275:
264:
261:
258:
255:
239:
233:
218:
212:
203:
202:
188:
140:
130:
112:
34:
512:
511:
507:
506:
505:
503:
502:
501:
500:
494:deletion review
487:
457:
454:
451:
448:
387:
298:Mercurywoodrose
279:
273:
262:
259:
256:
253:
237:
231:
216:
210:
145:
136:
103:
87:
84:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
510:
508:
499:
498:
482:
481:
464:
444:Andrew Lenahan
433:
411:
410:
395:
384:
383:
382:
360:
334:
308:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
249:Andrew Lenahan
206:
205:
142:
138:AfD statistics
83:
82:
81:
76:
68:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
509:
497:
495:
490:
484:
483:
480:
476:
472:
468:
465:
463:
460:
445:
441:
437:
434:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
413:
412:
408:
404:
400:
393:
391:
386:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
364:
361:
358:
354:
350:
343:
339:
335:
332:
328:
324:
317:
313:
309:
307:
303:
299:
294:
291:
285:
282:
276:
270:
269:
268:
265:
250:
246:
245:
244:
240:
234:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
219:
213:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
143:
139:
134:
128:
124:
120:
116:
111:
107:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:Ly De Angeles
86:
85:
80:
77:
75:
72:
65:
64:Ly De Angeles
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
488:
485:
466:
447:
435:
414:
388:
362:
337:
311:
292:
252:
226:
207:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
45:
43:
31:
28:
423:Yeti Hunter
399:Ron Ritzman
274:Orange Mike
211:Orange Mike
172:free images
50:Mkativerata
440:WP:AUTHOR
368:WP:AUTHOR
349:• Gene93k
323:• Gene93k
241:) ✄ ✄ ✄
232:JBsupreme
390:Relisted
372:MelanieN
133:View log
471:Whoosit
178:WP refs
166:scholar
106:protect
101:history
467:Delete
436:Delete
415:Delete
363:Delete
150:Google
110:delete
46:delete
193:JSTOR
154:books
127:views
119:watch
115:links
16:<
475:talk
427:talk
403:talk
376:talk
370:. --
353:talk
338:Note
327:talk
312:Note
302:talk
293:Keep
280:Talk
238:talk
227:Keep
217:Talk
186:FENS
160:news
123:logs
97:talk
93:edit
54:talk
455:bli
347:--
321:--
277:|
260:bli
214:|
200:TWL
135:•
131:– (
477:)
458:nd
452:ar
449:St
446:-
429:)
405:)
378:)
355:)
344:.
329:)
318:.
304:)
263:nd
257:ar
254:St
251:-
180:)
125:|
121:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
56:)
473:(
425:(
401:(
374:(
351:(
325:(
300:(
235:(
204:)
196:·
190:·
182:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
152:(
144:(
141:)
129:)
91:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.