177:
easy to read presentation of propositions. I think it's only a matter of chance timing that N3 is so popular and mKR is not. I do feel that mKR has something valuable to offer the
Semantic Web community. I would be happy to edit the mKR and mKE pages to get rid of any appearance of conflict of interest. As soon as I finish this note, I intend to look carefully at my references. Off the top of my head, I would say that the only reference of mine that ought to stay in is the original 1997 announcement of the existence of mKR and mKE. I can look for someone else's post from the W3C & Yahoo archives to replace mine, or I could just delete those two posts of mine. I certainly welcome any comments from Knowledge (XXG)'s staff re: what might be considered a better presentation than the present one. I certainly will not do anything to "hide" my pages, or in any other way, to avoid this issue of deletion.
324:: While COI is not a deletion criteria, it is something that may cause an article to be too skewed to be savable in its current form. However, lack of notability is a deletion criteria and I can not find reliable sourcing on this software. The cost of the software or intent of the creator are also not valid reasons for having an article. There are websites for software listings, downloads, and descriptions. This isn't one of them unless the software meets the
201:
languages I've seen here and it's certainly going to be more widely used than all the esoteric languages that are included (though I appreciate that this is not a strong argument). The article could do with some expansion, particularly in the
History section; the definition section could be expanded into a paragraph of prose for use as an introductory paragraph. The information is clearly verifiable, and the article is well cited, so I see no reason to delete.
200:
is no reason to delete something - though it is something that rhmccullough should bear in mind. As the creator you are inherently biased in favour of the language - that's not a flaw in you, just the way humans work. In terms of notability this seems to be on par with many of the other programming
176:
I do not feel that I have a conflict of interest. My primary objective is to advance the state of the art for
Semantic Web. All my software is freeware; I get no money for anything. In spirit, mKR/mKE is very much like Notation 3 (aka N3); it attempts to provide users of the Semantic Web with an
244:
To Proxy User: From the way you talk, you seem to imply that my conflict of interest has surely caused me to make false statements on the pages that I prepared. I thought, in
America, you were innocent until proved guilty.
169:
142:
265:
109:
104:
381:
I have updated the
History section, including references, to show how mKR fits into the bigger picture. Let me know if you think further references are needed.
113:
96:
402:: This article still needs work -- it's barely Start Class -- but there's enough here to build from at this point. I have more comments on the talk page.
351:
some time to develop this article some more, after comparing it with other programming language pages on
Knowledge (XXG) (perhaps the
17:
49:
278:
352:
430:
411:
390:
372:
337:
314:
287:
254:
238:
217:
186:
162:
78:
360:
445:
36:
407:
368:
74:
100:
66:
92:
84:
444:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
426:
403:
386:
364:
250:
206:
182:
356:
213:
63:
283:
234:
303:. Sources are all debatable, none seem notable. Very little content an outsider would understand.
308:
52:
is not a good reason to delete an article about something notable. Article has been tagged with
422:
382:
348:
333:
246:
210:
202:
178:
158:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
325:
226:
197:
150:
273:
230:
149:
non-notable obscure programming language whose article creator and major contributor is a
304:
329:
154:
56:
130:
438:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
363:'s page is a fine example, though.) Note the info-boxes.
421:: I have comments re: status on mKR talk, and mKE talk.
137:
126:
122:
118:
229:issue, non-notable obscure programming language.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
448:). No further edits should be made to this page.
153:problem as the source of most of its references
266:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
168:Please also note the related discussion at
328:and I do not see how this software does.
264:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
170:AfD for MKE (my Knowledge Explorer)
24:
62:, and should be cleaned up. -
1:
326:software notability criteria
295:This isn't America.. and so:
465:
93:MKR (programming language)
85:MKR (programming language)
431:16:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
412:21:52, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
391:10:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
373:10:43, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
338:01:16, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
315:00:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
288:16:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
255:14:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
239:12:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
218:12:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
187:09:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
163:08:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
79:21:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
441:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
359:pages aren't the best;
46:no consensus to delete
50:Conflict of Interest
347:: I suggest giving
225:As per nom. Clear
44:The result was
404:NoDepositNoReturn
365:NoDepositNoReturn
290:
269:
77:
48:; article kept.
456:
443:
311:
281:
276:
270:
260:
140:
134:
116:
73:
71:
61:
55:
34:
464:
463:
459:
458:
457:
455:
454:
453:
452:
446:deletion review
439:
313:
309:
279:
274:
136:
107:
91:
88:
67:
59:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
462:
460:
451:
450:
434:
433:
415:
414:
396:
395:
394:
393:
376:
375:
341:
340:
318:
317:
307:
297:
296:
292:
291:
242:
241:
220:
190:
189:
147:
146:
87:
82:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
461:
449:
447:
442:
436:
435:
432:
428:
424:
420:
417:
416:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
397:
392:
388:
384:
380:
379:
378:
377:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
343:
342:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
320:
319:
316:
312:
306:
302:
299:
298:
294:
293:
289:
286:
285:
282:
277:
267:
263:
259:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
221:
219:
215:
212:
208:
204:
199:
195:
192:
191:
188:
184:
180:
175:
174:
173:
172:
171:
165:
164:
160:
156:
152:
144:
139:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
86:
83:
81:
80:
76:
75:(and friends)
72:
70:
65:
58:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
440:
437:
423:Rhmccullough
418:
399:
383:Rhmccullough
349:Rhmccullough
344:
321:
300:
284:(yada, yada)
272:
261:
247:Rhmccullough
243:
222:
193:
179:Rhmccullough
167:
166:
148:
68:
45:
43:
31:
28:
231:Proxy User
305:Rehevkor
143:View log
64:Diligent
345:Comment
330:ju66l3r
322:Comment
155:ju66l3r
110:protect
105:history
69:Terrier
361:Python
301:Delete
280:crewer
227:WP:COI
223:Delete
203:Conrad
151:WP:COI
138:delete
114:delete
207:Irwin
141:) – (
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
427:talk
419:Keep
408:talk
400:Keep
387:talk
369:talk
334:talk
275:brew
262:Note
251:talk
235:talk
214:wikt
194:keep
183:talk
159:talk
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
357:OWL
355:or
353:RDF
271:--
268:.
198:COI
57:COI
429:)
410:)
389:)
371:)
336:)
310:✉
253:)
237:)
216:)
211:on
196:-
185:)
161:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
60:}}
54:{{
425:(
406:(
385:(
367:(
332:(
249:(
233:(
209:(
205:.
181:(
157:(
145:)
135:(
133:)
95:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.