1339:. This is a valuable article about a Brazilian author and scholar who has published a single-authored book in English with a leading peer-reviewed academic press in the United States (University of Chicago Press). His book has also been translated into Portuguese. Moises Lino e Silva has also co-edited an anthology published with another leading English-language academic press (Routledge). The Knowledge (XXG) article on Moises Lino e Silva is well written and informative and all of the information is accurate. It can be improved by adding sections.--
877:, Gangwar appears to be a personal blog of a grad student, the Jarrin ReVista review appears reliable, jornalbairrosnet may be reliable, cultura930 appears reliable but not very in-depth, and I'm skeptical of the reliability of queer.ig.com and gay.blog.br. The publisher's own site is definitely not independent or reliable for promotional quotes about its own book. So that's one good review (ReVista) and a lot of maybes or worse. The listed but not linked review for
343:
1551:), the fact that the most recent book has been translated into Portuguese and the publication covered by the Brazilian press, and by the reviews and media coverage the books have received internationally (United States, United Kingdom, Italy, Brazil), including in peer-reviewed journals. The reviews and media coverage are fully identified in the references of the article.--
1051:
WP:ACADEMIC This is an important criteria of notability in our discussions: "the person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a
National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves
930:
It's extremely competitive to publish a book with
Chicago Press. Before publication, an academic book must necessarily go through double blind peer review. Given the number of academics that want to publish with a top tier press, such peer review process is extremely competitive. What you are calling
1862:
It is true that the humanities generally have very low citation rates. However, we cannot use the absence of citations as evidence of notability. Instead, in the humanities we usually go by book reviews rather than journal citations. However, as analyzed above, that falls short in this case as well.
1755:
I agree with Liz that there has been a lot of positive changes to this article since it was originally nominated. It has been completely rewritten using a vast amount of impressive references. It now meets at least two of the necessary conditions for academic notability: 1. The person's research has
1213:
page regarding the World Social
Science Fellows program: "From 2012 to 2015, the ISSC led the World Social Science Fellows programme, an international scientific programme to support early-career researchers in the social sciences. ISSC aimed to foster a new generation of globally networked research
693:
criterion 1 does list academic impact as establishing notability, but it must be "demonstrated by independent reliable sources." None of the sources we have seen so far fulfil this requirement. Intuitively, it does seem that this researcher has received some attention, but that needs to be backed up
1565:
Peer-review publications are not independent sources for the purposes of establishing notability of their authors. Translation of a book is a weird one to point out; lots of books are translated, it doesn't have to mean anything for notability of their authors. The problem of the reviews is as Russ
1542:
The subject clearly meets the first criteria of NPROF, that being "The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." This is demonstrated by the prestige of the peer-reviewed publications (appearing
1580:
I have continued to expand the article, integrating sources regarding the visibility the scholar is achieving (for example, appearing on television), being invited to visiting professorship at
Harvard University in the Fall 2023, and increasing media coverage of his work. The scholar's impact in
724:
This is a noteworthy academic. I wish we could foster younger intellectuals, Latino academics, and from the Global South. Moises Lino e Silva seems to be among them. I wish our community would be more constructive in this case. Instead of deletion, we could work together to make this article
685:. The prevailing sentiment in the comments above seems to be that this is a highly influential scholar, someone who has conducted impactful research. That may be the case, but we seem to be forgetting something important: this impact needs to be demonstrated through coverage in reliable
1889:
It is irrelevant if the humanities have different citation patterns to the sciences because we always compare like with like: physics with physics, philosophy with philosophy but never physics with philosophy. The subject's citation record is inadequate even for the humanities.
889:; it is reliable, but I didn't see any others, and the book is apparently a conference proceedings, co-edited with Huon Wardle, not an authored work. With one in-depth reliable review for one book, and one reliable review for an edited collection, this is below my threshold for
1816:
It seems to me that the
Humanities and Social Sciences do not follow the same logic as the Natural Sciences in terms of notability. A quantitative measure of citations alone is not enough to decide anything. If you need numbers, I just read something remarkable earlier in this
1724:, the print and media interviews with the author, the translation of the book into Portuguese, and the significant media coverage of the translation in Brazil. The visibility and institutional recognition the author has received transcends his first two published books (
1720:. Lino e Silva's concept of "minoritarian liberalism" is an important original scholarly contribution as recognized in the endorsements of the book, its publication with a leading peer-reviewed academic press in the United States, the reviews the book has received in
1756:
had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources; 2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
893:
notability. The fact that there is only one authored book in play makes it unlikely that we would have enough even if more reviews for those books could be shown reliable and in-depth. And there seems no sign of any other
459:. This article has been built since 2018. The author is an important academic in his field. He has delivered talks and had his work reviewed in the most prestigious institutions around the world. See some examples below:
259:
The article is almost entirely based on a single primary source (a book the author published). A Google search yields social media and college profiles, and the book that our article mentions. Doesn't seem to agree with
91:
86:
228:
1015:
is not a conference proceedings. It is an edited volume with original research material. The academic in question, Moises Lino e Silva, co-wrote the
Preface and has his own individual chapter published in this book.
1052:
fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers)." We must consider that Moises Lino e Silva was elected a World Social Science Fellow by the
974:(formerly Programme IndĂŠpendant de Recherche), a Swiss non-profit association founded in April 2018 and specialising in science communication, education and research. You can learn more about the lab here:
320:
1442:
1732:) and now encompasses a new research project on Nigeria. There are no compelling reasons to delete this article on lack of notability for a person who has already made a major impact to the fields of
1847:
1834:
1777:
1763:
545:
528:
514:
492:
350:
81:
1736:, Brazilian (and, more broadly, Latin American and Caribbean) studies, and social sciences, as documented in numerous independent reliable sources in English and Portuguese.----
222:
1367:
Although I don't think there is any dispute about whether the article is accurate, your !vote does not address notability. What notability criterion does the subject pass?
185:
1164:
1566:
Woodroofe mentioned: if anything, they establish notability of the specific work they are concerned with, not its author. SIGCOV of a book is not SIGCOV of its author.
281:
658:
301:
1663:
Relisting. Don't let the presence of sockpuppets in this AFD obscure the fact that there has been a lot of changes to this article since it was originally nominated.
549:
532:
518:
496:
489:
1502:
1317:
1279:
1241:
1135:
1083:
1043:
1004:
962:
845:
772:
1430:
970:
Gangwar is not the blog itself. This is the reviewer's name. Gangwar's independent review was published by the
Allegra Lab: "Allegralaboratory.net is hosted by
117:
743:
902:(not necessarily in English) we might instead consider having an article on the book and redirecting to it, but I'm not convinced that we have enough yet. â
132:
1353:
I have significantly expanded the article, including biographical information, a description of the author's main book, and a revision of the sources.--
1528:. But there is no sign whatsoever that the subject meets any of the criteria of NPROF. I am uncertain what Lawrlafo was suggesting for notability.
1423:
The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
852:
The point wasnât tenure or lack thereof, but the fact that this isnât a full professorship, not to mention a named chair as described in NACADEMIC.
1795:
The IP repeats claims made above that the subject meets NPROF criterion 1. I remain firm in my view this is not so. Their Scopus profile is here:
158:
153:
542:
465:
162:
618:, especially because it is unclear how much editorial oversight and fact-checking they are subject to. However, I agree that this is at least
1463:
appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon.
505:
1210:
1166:
to be an early career award, along the lines of a postdoc. No other sign of notability. Salt, due to repeated recreation of the article.
1053:
810:
145:
359:
1899:
1872:
1842:
1811:
1771:
1745:
1703:
1677:
1641:
1610:
1590:
1575:
1560:
1537:
1485:
1376:
1362:
1348:
1329:
1299:
1261:
1223:
1203:
1117:
1065:
1025:
986:
944:
911:
861:
827:
801:
754:
675:
635:
553:
536:
522:
500:
331:
312:
293:
273:
65:
1855:
1785:
1466:
The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.
389:
1851:
1838:
1767:
1781:
112:
105:
17:
713:
659:
https://www.jornalbairrosnet.com.br/2023/destaques/ser-lgbtqia-na-favela-significa-encontrar-liberdade-mesmo-em-espacos-de-opressao/
738:
I also found a review of the author's book "Freedom in
Practice" in the JRAI (the most prestigious anthropology journal in the UK):
583:
The MASP source does not provide in-depth coverage of the individual, it only lists him as the speaker at an event. Arguably also
243:
932:
210:
731:
490:
https://www.routledge.com/Freedom-in-Practice-Governance-Autonomy-and-Liberty-in-the-Everyday/Silva-Wardle/p/book/9780367873325
1286:
Yes, exactly. Early career awards, and certainly not appearing to be of the sort that grants lasting notability or a pass of
670:
471:
375:
126:
122:
1214:
leaders who will collaborate in addressing global problems with particular relevance for low and middle-income countries."
1498:
1275:
1237:
1131:
1079:
1039:
1000:
958:
841:
768:
744:
https://www.academia.edu/44956086/Parisolis_Review_of_Freedom_in_Practice_Governance_Autonomy_and_Liberty_in_the_Everyday_
1652:
1402:
1413:
or other notability criteria. The merits of an article on the academic will depend largely on the extent to which it is
488:
Otherwise, he is the author of several other works and articles, including some in partnership with
Harvard University:
1923:
40:
1544:
1429:
The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a
189:
694:
by reliable sources. As long as the arguments for notability of this subject are based on hypothetical fulfilment of
204:
1414:
1250:
698:
derived from editor interpretation and opinion, as opposed to independent sources, notability is not established.
348:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
1798:
8 documents, 20 citations, and an h index of 2 is about as far short of meeting criterion 1 as could be. This is
1472:
The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area.
1194:
to a stub on the book could be a sensible alternative to deletion. Protection of the redirect may be indicated.
1174:) 11:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC) Addendum: The reviews added to the article now do add up to notability of the book
607:
The Queer IG article does not cover Lino e Silva in depth, but only tangentially to its primary topic. See also
421:
200:
1868:
1533:
1372:
1295:
1199:
1171:
907:
149:
654:
543:
https://revista.drclas.harvard.edu/a-review-of-minoritarian-liberalism-a-travesti-life-in-a-brazilian-favela/
527:
The University of Chicago Press is among the most prestigious academic presses in the world in anthropology.
466:
https://www.socialdifference.columbia.edu/events-1/2023/5/25/queer-aqui-together-in-hard-times-rio-de-janeiro
1460:
558:
Unfortunately, your arguments are mostly not based on the actual applicable policies and guidelines, namely
1759:
701:
405:
379:
250:
1833:
Given everything I've researched so far, this is a notable scholar in the Humanities and Social Sciences.
1712:. As I have indicated above, this is an extremely well researched article on a person who has clearly met
1426:
The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
935:
is a senior academic, specialized on liberalism, and wrote a short review of the book for the back cover.
511:
1419:
Before applying these criteria, see the General notes and Specific criteria notes sections, which follow.
695:
690:
601:
563:
506:
https://www.gsd.harvard.edu/event/sacred-groves-secret-parks-orisha-landscapes-in-brazil-and-west-africa/
364:
141:
71:
1919:
1571:
1325:
857:
709:
631:
289:
269:
36:
1152:
818:
in the USA. Once again, there is a bias here against Latin American scholars. Please, re-consider it.
1895:
797:
1717:
1629:
1187:
1160:
584:
577:
1864:
1807:
1637:
1529:
1368:
1291:
1195:
1167:
903:
236:
890:
608:
1741:
1606:
1586:
1556:
1358:
1344:
917:
I'm sorry to say this, but I'm not sure you understand how academia works in terms of notability.
873:, or if kept we must trim the promotional pull quotes and bad sources. Of the listed reviews for
666:
411:
342:
216:
1796:
1713:
1625:
1287:
1183:
1179:
1156:
464:
Here Moises Lino e Silva can be seen in dialogue with the very famous theorist Jack Halberstam:
1581:
Brazil and internationally is based on his publications but also transcends the publications.--
56:
due to multiple previous deletions and the apparent abuse of multiple accounts in the process.
1494:
1481:
1271:
1257:
1233:
1219:
1127:
1113:
1075:
1061:
1035:
1021:
996:
982:
954:
940:
837:
823:
764:
750:
324:
305:
101:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1918:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1709:
1694:
1441:
of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g.,
895:
785:
53:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1567:
1449:
1321:
882:
853:
732:
https://allegralaboratory.net/minoritarian-liberalism-a-travesti-life-in-a-brazilian-favela/
705:
627:
477:
285:
265:
61:
1410:
643:
594:
573:
1891:
793:
472:
https://masp.org.br/palestras/arte-religiao-e-ecologia-na-floresta-sagrada-de-oxum-nigeria
898:-related notability. If we could find enough reliably published and in-depth reviews of
1803:
1633:
600:"Partnership with Harvard University" does not establish notability; notability is not
510:
A recent article in the general Brazilian press highlights the importance of his work:
483:
559:
261:
1737:
1733:
1698:
1602:
1582:
1552:
1525:
1434:
1354:
1340:
662:
604:
by association. The same applies to association with the University of Chicago Press.
1708:
I strongly contest and fully disagree with the claim that this article is a case of
1469:
The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.
1490:
1477:
1267:
1253:
1229:
1215:
1123:
1109:
1071:
1057:
1031:
1017:
992:
978:
950:
936:
833:
819:
760:
746:
439:
427:
395:
1632:
but for lack of evidence of reviews. At this point notability is not established.
179:
374:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
1456:
1163:
is more likely, but I did not find reviews for it. The ISSC fellowship appears
788:
on tiny GS cites for this adjunt (not full) professor. Maybe in ten years time:
57:
1251:
https://council.science/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ISSC_history_SQ_13June-3.pdf
1628:
criterion 1 are clearly incorrect. Per Russ Woodroofe, the subject might meet
725:
stronger. For example, I just found another review of the author's main book:
1822:
1548:
1095:
886:
1830:
1106:
655:
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=1JiLY7UAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao
1668:
1448:
The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of
1693:. This is the third recreation of this article. It's a obvious case of
512:
https://queer.ig.com.br/2023-04-19/como-e-ser-lgbtqia--nas-favelas.html
576:
and not a suitable source for establishing notability. This is also a
1438:
975:
1821:
is available in more than 140 different libraries around the world:
653:. There are several references available at Google Scholar as well.
569:
The age of the article is not relevant for determining notability.
931:"promotional pull quotes" is known as "endorsement" in academia.
482:
Talk at the one of the most prestigious universities in the UK:
1914:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1443:
Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
1312:
971:
337:
1655:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
368:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
321:
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
1186:
situation for the author, and still think it is a fair bit
1452:, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.
1405:, are notable. Academics meeting none of these conditions
1105:
is available in 115 different libraries around the world:
1094:
is available in 140 different libraries around the world:
541:
The book in question has been reviewed by DRCLAS/Harvard:
92:
Articles for deletion/Moises Lino e Silva (3rd nomination)
87:
Articles for deletion/Moises Lino e Silva (2nd nomination)
478:
https://www.engagingvulnerability.se/seminars-spring2023/
358:
among Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
644:
https://www.sapiens.org/culture/minoritarian-liberalism/
175:
171:
167:
1401:
of the following conditions, as substantiated through
814:
is the equivalent of Assistant or Associate Professor
235:
470:
MASP is the most prestigous museum of art in Brazil:
484:
https://www.instagram.com/p/CrA_y4PO8fv/?img_index=1
1666:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
249:
1503:blocked for having used sockpuppets in this debate
1280:blocked for having used sockpuppets in this debate
1242:blocked for having used sockpuppets in this debate
1136:blocked for having used sockpuppets in this debate
1084:blocked for having used sockpuppets in this debate
1044:blocked for having used sockpuppets in this debate
1005:blocked for having used sockpuppets in this debate
963:blocked for having used sockpuppets in this debate
846:blocked for having used sockpuppets in this debate
773:blocked for having used sockpuppets in this debate
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1926:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1409:still be notable if they meet the conditions of
1151:(Edit: or see addendum below for AtD). Despite
597:and not appropriate for establishing notability.
319:Note: This discussion has been included in the
300:Note: This discussion has been included in the
280:Note: This discussion has been included in the
1155:of the SPA here, there is very little sign of
642:SAPIENS Magazine has published his research:
388:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
8:
614:A book review does not establish notability
282:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
133:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
302:list of Brazil-related deletion discussions
1757:
699:
362:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
318:
299:
279:
1829:is available in 115 different libraries:
1823:https://www.worldcat.org/title/1298388876
1096:https://www.worldcat.org/title/1298388876
82:Articles for deletion/Moises Lino e Silva
1831:https://www.worldcat.org/title/964527538
1316:here, but it has been removed following
1107:https://www.worldcat.org/title/964527538
382:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
476:Talk at the oldest Swedish university:
79:
1848:2804:14C:6591:47ED:25C7:14D1:AF84:30BD
1835:2804:14C:6591:47ED:25C7:14D1:AF84:30BD
1778:2804:14C:6591:47ED:3074:2E1D:9A28:821C
1764:2804:14C:6591:47ED:3074:2E1D:9A28:821C
1722:numerous independent reliable sources
1056:, under the auspicies of the UNESCO.
546:2804:7F7:A140:8A63:B0D4:4990:FB2:EC63
529:2804:7F7:A140:8A63:B0D4:4990:FB2:EC63
515:2804:7F7:A140:8A63:B0D4:4990:FB2:EC63
493:2804:7F7:A140:8A63:B0D4:4990:FB2:EC63
54:protected against further re-creation
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
1318:WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Gdohgsd
611:to read about significant coverage.
590:The same applies for the EV source.
976:https://allegralaboratory.net/why/
808:This information is not accurate.
566:. I will address them one by one:
24:
341:
118:Introduction to deletion process
1601:Please see my comments above.
1:
378:on the part of others and to
1431:National Academy of Sciences
1545:University of Chicago Press
1249:More information here too:
108:(AfD)? Read these primers!
1943:
52:â. The title will also be
1689:per David Eppstein. Also
1678:18:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
1642:18:55, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
1611:21:37, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
1591:13:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
1576:19:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
1561:21:35, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
1538:19:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
1486:19:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
1377:18:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
1363:15:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
1349:14:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
1330:17:39, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
1300:12:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
1262:11:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
1224:11:35, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
1204:10:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
1118:11:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
1066:10:55, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
1026:10:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
987:10:32, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
945:10:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
912:07:28, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
862:12:43, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
828:02:47, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
802:22:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
755:17:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
676:15:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
636:15:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
554:15:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
537:15:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
523:15:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
501:15:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
332:14:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
313:14:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
294:14:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
274:14:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
1916:Please do not modify it.
1900:06:50, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
1873:06:29, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
1843:01:56, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
1812:19:58, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
1772:02:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
1746:19:26, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
1704:00:08, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
66:01:33, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
1819:Minoritarian Liberalism
1730:Minoritarian Liberalism
1624:- Arguments this meets
1461:distinguished professor
1176:Minoritarian Liberalism
1092:Minoritarian Liberalism
900:Minoritarian Liberalism
887:10.1111/1467-9655.13089
875:Minoritarian Liberalism
420:; accounts blocked for
390:single-purpose accounts
360:policies and guidelines
77:AfDs for this article:
1455:The person has held a
1310:There was a vote from
190:edits since nomination
1856:few or no other edits
1786:few or no other edits
1182:. I think this is a
106:Articles for deletion
1858:outside this topic.
1802:a notable academic.
1788:outside this topic.
1827:Freedom in Practice
1726:Freedom in Practice
1103:Freedom in Practice
1013:Freedom in Practice
879:Freedom in Practice
372:by counting votes.
351:not a majority vote
142:Moises Lino e Silva
72:Moises Lino e Silva
1661:Relisting comment:
1394:Academics meeting
1190:for him. However,
1859:
1789:
1774:
1762:comment added by
1680:
1506:
1283:
1245:
1209:Please, read the
1139:
1087:
1047:
1008:
972:Les IndĂŠpendantes
966:
849:
811:Professor adjunto
784:. No pass yet of
776:
717:
704:comment added by
453:
452:
449:
376:assume good faith
334:
315:
296:
123:Guide to deletion
113:How to contribute
1934:
1845:
1775:
1701:
1676:
1665:
1658:
1656:
1488:
1450:higher education
1403:reliable sources
1315:
1265:
1227:
1121:
1069:
1029:
990:
948:
831:
758:
674:
447:
435:
419:
403:
384:
354:, but instead a
345:
338:
329:
310:
254:
253:
239:
183:
165:
103:
34:
1942:
1941:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1924:deletion review
1699:
1667:
1651:
1649:
1515:
1459:appointment or
1311:
1264:
1226:
1149:Delete and salt
1120:
1098:
1068:
1028:
989:
947:
918:
830:
757:
739:
734:
726:
661:
437:
425:
409:
393:
380:sign your posts
325:
306:
196:
156:
140:
137:
100:
97:
96:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1940:
1938:
1929:
1928:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1865:David Eppstein
1790:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1683:
1682:
1664:
1659:
1645:
1644:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1530:Russ Woodroofe
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1470:
1467:
1464:
1453:
1446:
1427:
1424:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1369:Russ Woodroofe
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1292:Russ Woodroofe
1248:
1246:
1208:
1196:Russ Woodroofe
1168:Russ Woodroofe
1153:WP:BLUDGEONing
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1101:
1099:
1090:
1088:
1050:
1048:
1011:
1009:
969:
967:
929:
922:
921:
920:
919:
916:
904:David Eppstein
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
807:
778:
777:
742:
740:
737:
735:
730:
720:
681:
679:
678:
647:
646:
640:
639:
638:
625:
624:
623:
612:
605:
598:
591:
588:
581:
570:
539:
525:
508:
503:
486:
480:
474:
468:
461:
460:
451:
450:
346:
336:
335:
316:
297:
257:
256:
193:
136:
135:
130:
120:
115:
98:
95:
94:
89:
84:
78:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1939:
1927:
1925:
1921:
1917:
1912:
1911:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1861:
1860:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1794:
1791:
1787:
1783:
1779:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1754:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1734:queer studies
1731:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1702:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1685:
1684:
1681:
1679:
1675:
1673:
1672:
1662:
1657:
1654:
1647:
1646:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1620:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1524:I was asking
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1476:
1471:
1468:
1465:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1451:
1447:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1435:Royal Society
1432:
1428:
1425:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1399:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1314:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1284:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1252:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1212:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
988:
984:
980:
977:
973:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
946:
942:
938:
934:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
915:
914:
913:
909:
905:
901:
897:
892:
888:
884:
880:
876:
872:
869:
863:
859:
855:
851:
850:
847:
843:
839:
835:
829:
825:
821:
817:
813:
812:
806:
805:
803:
799:
795:
791:
787:
783:
780:
779:
774:
770:
766:
762:
756:
752:
748:
745:
741:
736:
733:
729:
728:
727:
723:
718:
715:
711:
707:
703:
697:
692:
688:
684:
677:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
649:
648:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
626:
621:
617:
613:
610:
606:
603:
599:
596:
593:Instagram is
592:
589:
586:
582:
579:
575:
571:
568:
567:
565:
561:
557:
556:
555:
551:
547:
544:
540:
538:
534:
530:
526:
524:
520:
516:
513:
509:
507:
504:
502:
498:
494:
491:
487:
485:
481:
479:
475:
473:
469:
467:
463:
462:
458:
455:
454:
445:
441:
433:
429:
423:
417:
413:
407:
401:
397:
391:
387:
383:
381:
377:
371:
367:
366:
361:
357:
353:
352:
347:
344:
340:
339:
333:
330:
328:
322:
317:
314:
311:
309:
303:
298:
295:
291:
287:
283:
278:
277:
276:
275:
271:
267:
263:
252:
248:
245:
242:
238:
234:
230:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
202:
199:
198:Find sources:
194:
191:
187:
181:
177:
173:
169:
164:
160:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
138:
134:
131:
128:
124:
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
110:
109:
107:
102:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1915:
1913:
1826:
1818:
1799:
1792:
1758:â Preceding
1752:
1729:
1725:
1721:
1690:
1686:
1670:
1669:
1660:
1650:
1648:
1621:
1418:
1406:
1397:
1395:
1336:
1309:
1308:
1191:
1175:
1148:
1102:
1091:
1012:
899:
878:
874:
870:
815:
809:
789:
781:
721:
719:
700:â Preceding
696:WP:NACADEMIC
691:WP:NACADEMIC
686:
682:
680:
650:
619:
615:
602:WP:INHERITED
564:WP:NACADEMIC
456:
443:
431:
422:sockpuppetry
415:
404:; suspected
399:
385:
373:
369:
363:
355:
349:
327:CAPTAIN RAJU
326:
308:CAPTAIN RAJU
307:
258:
246:
240:
232:
225:
219:
213:
207:
197:
99:
49:
47:
31:
28:
1854:) has made
1804:Sirfurboyđ
1784:) has made
1634:Sirfurboyđ
1568:Actualcpscm
1457:named chair
1322:Actualcpscm
1192:redirection
933:Wendy Brown
854:Actualcpscm
816:with tenure
792:until then.
706:Actualcpscm
628:Actualcpscm
572:YouTube is
286:Saturnalia0
266:Saturnalia0
223:free images
1892:Xxanthippe
1718:WP:NAUTHOR
1630:WP:NAUTHOR
1415:verifiable
1188:WP:TOOSOON
1161:WP:NAUTHOR
794:Xxanthippe
585:WP:PRIMARY
578:WP:PRIMARY
356:discussion
1920:talk page
1700:Kacamata!
1549:Routledge
891:WP:AUTHOR
689:sources.
687:secondary
620:something
609:WP:SIGCOV
412:canvassed
406:canvassed
365:consensus
37:talk page
1922:or in a
1760:unsigned
1738:Lawrlafo
1714:WP:NPROF
1653:Relisted
1626:WP:NPROF
1603:Lawrlafo
1583:Lawrlafo
1553:Lawrlafo
1526:Lawrlafo
1499:contribs
1355:Lawrlafo
1341:Lawrlafo
1313:Mles2022
1288:WP:NPROF
1276:contribs
1238:contribs
1184:WP:BLP1E
1180:WP:NBOOK
1157:WP:NPROF
1132:contribs
1080:contribs
1040:contribs
1001:contribs
959:contribs
842:contribs
769:contribs
714:contribs
702:unsigned
671:contribs
663:Eastmain
444:username
438:{{subst:
432:username
426:{{subst:
416:username
410:{{subst:
400:username
394:{{subst:
186:View log
127:glossary
39:or in a
1817:thread:
1793:Comment
1710:WP:SPAM
1695:WP:SPAM
1491:Gdohgsd
1478:Gdohgsd
1437:) or a
1433:or the
1268:Gdohgsd
1254:Gdohgsd
1230:Gdohgsd
1216:Gdohgsd
1124:Gdohgsd
1110:Gdohgsd
1072:Gdohgsd
1058:Gdohgsd
1032:Gdohgsd
1018:Gdohgsd
993:Gdohgsd
979:Gdohgsd
951:Gdohgsd
937:Gdohgsd
896:WP:PROF
834:Gdohgsd
820:Gdohgsd
786:WP:Prof
761:Gdohgsd
747:Gdohgsd
580:source.
408:users:
229:WPÂ refs
217:scholar
159:protect
154:history
104:New to
1687:Delete
1622:Delete
1439:fellow
1411:WP:BIO
871:Delete
782:Delete
683:Delete
657:Also,
616:per se
595:WP:UGC
574:WP:UGC
201:Google
163:delete
58:RL0919
50:delete
1543:with
1501:) is
1278:) is
1240:) is
1134:) is
1082:) is
1042:) is
1003:) is
961:) is
844:) is
771:) is
722:Keep.
386:Note:
244:JSTOR
205:books
180:views
172:watch
168:links
16:<
1896:talk
1869:talk
1852:talk
1839:talk
1825:and
1808:talk
1782:talk
1768:talk
1753:Keep
1742:talk
1728:and
1716:and
1691:salt
1638:talk
1607:talk
1587:talk
1572:talk
1557:talk
1547:and
1534:talk
1495:talk
1482:talk
1396:any
1373:talk
1359:talk
1345:talk
1337:Keep
1326:talk
1296:talk
1272:talk
1258:talk
1234:talk
1220:talk
1211:ISSC
1200:talk
1178:per
1172:talk
1128:talk
1114:talk
1076:talk
1062:talk
1054:ISSC
1036:talk
1022:talk
997:talk
983:talk
955:talk
941:talk
908:talk
858:talk
838:talk
824:talk
798:talk
790:Salt
765:talk
751:talk
710:talk
667:talk
651:Keep
632:talk
562:and
560:WP:N
550:talk
533:talk
519:talk
497:talk
457:Keep
290:talk
270:talk
262:WP:N
237:FENS
211:news
176:logs
150:talk
146:edit
62:talk
1800:not
1697:.--
1407:may
1398:one
1159:.
883:doi
881:is
440:csp
436:or
428:csm
396:spa
370:not
251:TWL
184:â (
1898:)
1871:)
1846:â
1841:)
1810:)
1776:â
1770:)
1744:)
1674:iz
1640:)
1609:)
1589:)
1574:)
1559:)
1536:)
1505:.
1497:â˘
1489:â
1484:)
1445:).
1417:.
1375:)
1361:)
1347:)
1328:)
1320:.
1298:)
1290:.
1282:.
1274:â˘
1266:â
1260:)
1244:.
1236:â˘
1228:â
1222:)
1202:)
1138:.
1130:â˘
1122:â
1116:)
1086:.
1078:â˘
1070:â
1064:)
1046:.
1038:â˘
1030:â
1024:)
1007:.
999:â˘
991:â
985:)
965:.
957:â˘
949:â
943:)
910:)
860:)
848:.
840:â˘
832:â
826:)
804:.
800:)
775:.
767:â˘
759:â
753:)
716:)
712:â˘
669:â˘
634:)
552:)
535:)
521:)
499:)
446:}}
434:}}
424::
418:}}
402:}}
392::
323:.
304:.
292:)
284:.
272:)
264:.
231:)
188:|
178:|
174:|
170:|
166:|
161:|
157:|
152:|
148:|
64:)
1902:.
1894:(
1867:(
1863:â
1850:(
1837:(
1806:(
1780:(
1766:(
1740:(
1671:L
1636:(
1605:(
1585:(
1570:(
1555:(
1532:(
1493:(
1480:(
1371:(
1357:(
1343:(
1324:(
1294:(
1270:(
1256:(
1232:(
1218:(
1198:(
1170:(
1126:(
1112:(
1074:(
1060:(
1034:(
1020:(
995:(
981:(
953:(
939:(
906:(
885::
856:(
836:(
822:(
796:(
763:(
749:(
708:(
673:)
665:(
630:(
622:.
587:.
548:(
531:(
517:(
495:(
448:.
442:|
430:|
414:|
398:|
288:(
268:(
255:)
247:¡
241:¡
233:¡
226:¡
220:¡
214:¡
208:¡
203:(
195:(
192:)
182:)
144:(
129:)
125:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.