Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Monsieur Adi - Knowledge

Source 📝

484:– I am not sure what Timo92 has against me or this particular artist, but it seems there is something now. Please correct me if I am wrong. They stated that I committed vandalism of the page when I did not put the strike through their "delete" nomination. It was Atlantic306 and they explained why. Therefore I just put it back after the fact it was edited by Timo92 himself. Again, it is strange how Timo92 found this page after years of its existence and decided to nominate it for deletion as well as link to the artist's personal Instagram page in the nomination and now has accused me of "vandalism" when I did not do anything of the sort. If I am accused of being unbiased, I believe Timo92 is not unbiased as well in this situation given the circumstances. I state again, if this artist is not notable given the extensive coverage for years and has never had a nomination for deletion during its 7 years of existence, how did Timo92 find this article as well as the artist's personal page? It's either a case of knowing the artist through notability and/or knowing the artist in a personal manner somehow which then makes this a personal issue and therefore not an unbiased nomination. 461:. That seems highly reliable and I am sure Beyoncé would have shut this down herself if it was not true. In terms of neutral writing, I do not believe I have overstated or understated his work. I simply listed the facts that I got from multiple respectable sources and publications. Yes, I am a fan, but I imagine most people writing Knowledge pages are fans of the subject or edits that they are making. Where in my writing of this article is it not neutral? As for The Guardian as well as Out.com, I do not think those count as a blog as it is connected to a newspaper and/or magazine that is in print and in this day and age, online articles are a legitimate and reliable source. And even if so, you will be able to find that he has been featured in multiple magazines, has had multiple releases of his remixes on major labels, and has been on a major tour. Even Beyoncé herself included him in her own video from her tour which can be found 470:. It seems that Timo92 is targeting this page/artist for some reason and I would be curious to know how and why they found this Knowledge page if 1.) They did not know the artist before due to the lack of notability - which judging, by this being the first nomination for deletion in the 7 years this page has been up, Timo92 must know the artist somehow and 2.) was able to find the artist's personal Instagram page? It sounds like the case of someone taking something personally as this page has been on Knowledge for years and has had multiple edits done by others that could have put this up for deletion had it not met criteria for being on Knowledge. Would it then be right that someone allegedly having a problem against the artist when the artist has enough notability to meet the guidelines placed, be right to delete the article? 423:- Sources are not appropriate. A radio station expecting something is not a reliable source of having achieved something. Also, the post on The Guardian is a blog post. It's not an in-depth article with credibility. Also, Mattia86 is not neutral in writing the article, as is expected on Knowledge. Mattia86 is biased, seems to be "defending" the artist with Spotify plays, instead of objectively contributing. 372:
where his name is featured on the of an actual printed magazine cover, and others can be through Google just as I have. I am happy to prove I am not the artist in some way. Considering the level of work he has done and who he has worked with, deletion seems misguided and seems that this is targeted.
248:
This page seems to be written by the person itself, especially because a personal Instagram selfie is being used. Almost all edits are made by Mattia86, probably the artist himself. Sources are doubtful (linking to promotional things he could've sent to the promoters himself) and there's an Instagram
359:
where the current number of monthly plays is at over 200,000 and some songs have logged million of plays. As for the photo, you will notice that the photo has been posted on his official pages. Linking to the artist's personal Instagram page is odd. Links to where he has been featured in the past on
347:
I just noticed that the article is up for a speedy deletion. The article has been running for years and Monsieur Adi has been working in the music industry for years. It is not just a case of "fake it until you make it" as timo I have been following him for years and the artist allegedly deleted all
465:
on her own Youtube page where it clearly states that he is the DJ for the tour. Nothing has been made up and it has all be reliable. As for his work, take a look at Discogs.com to find a list of what he has done as well that you can find
435:
The Guardian article is not a blog and you nominated this article without signing it and then pop up with a delete vote which is very bad behaviour, especially as I reminded you yesterday to sign the nomination, imv
217: 278: 211: 170: 518:
are some official club chart rankings from the UK. He is a part of Katy Perry's remix package for Rise where his name is mentioned which can be found on Billboard
259: 523: 117: 102: 519: 401:
as has coverage in multiple reliable sources as identified above such as The Guardian so deletion is not necessary in this case in my view,
65: 177: 365: 457:
itself. Here you can find in this archive the print of the actual Billboard Magazine listing the box office totals for that tour right
143: 138: 147: 97: 90: 17: 454: 388: 232: 369: 361: 130: 199: 458: 111: 107: 356: 551: 40: 60: 193: 428: 189: 547: 535: 515: 508: 445: 441: 410: 406: 392: 342: 340: 313: 301: 289: 270: 72: 36: 134: 376: 526:
is a link to Billboard where you can see his chart positions for his song Bad Habits. All the best.
453:- If the radio station is not good enough for you, his name is listed on the Knowledge page for the 239: 329:. The refs cited in the article are either unreliable or promotional links to the subject's music. 225: 55: 126: 78: 531: 489: 478: 384: 326: 309: 249:
selfie as "artist photo". Please mind that this person has less than 200 followers on Instagram (
373:
I just felt the need to keep his page up to date and has been a personal pleasure to do that.
504: 467: 424: 282: 263: 86: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
546:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
437: 402: 330: 205: 462: 527: 485: 474: 380: 322: 305: 500: 164: 250: 352: 253:). Seems to me this is a classic case of "fake it until you make it". 542:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
279:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
160: 156: 152: 224: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 554:). No further edits should be made to this page. 277:Note: This discussion has been included in the 258:Note: This discussion has been included in the 355:page with nearly 15000 followers as well as on 238: 8: 118:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 260:list of France-related deletion discussions 374: 276: 257: 348:of his social media accounts except his 251:https://www.instagram.com/adambalbusse 7: 24: 103:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 455:The Mrs Carter Show World Tour 1: 93:(AfD)? Read these primers! 571: 536:13:10, 11 April 2020 (UTC) 509:20:08, 10 April 2020 (UTC) 73:03:57, 12 April 2020 (UTC) 446:00:04, 6 April 2020 (UTC) 411:23:42, 4 April 2020 (UTC) 393:21:34, 3 April 2020 (UTC) 343:17:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC) 314:11:49, 2 April 2020 (UTC) 290:09:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC) 271:09:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC) 544:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 492:) 13:14, 8 April 2020 481:) 22:40, 5 April 2020 431:) 18:40, 5 April 2020 91:Articles for deletion 321:. The subject fails 395: 379:comment added by 292: 273: 108:Guide to deletion 98:How to contribute 562: 499:no chart ranks. 338: 287: 268: 243: 242: 228: 180: 168: 150: 88: 68: 63: 58: 34: 570: 569: 565: 564: 563: 561: 560: 559: 558: 552:deletion review 370:Mixmag Magazine 331: 300:- Knowledge is 283: 264: 185: 176: 141: 125: 122: 85: 82: 66: 61: 56: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 568: 566: 557: 556: 512: 511: 472: 471: 448: 414: 413: 396: 345: 316: 294: 293: 274: 246: 245: 182: 121: 120: 115: 105: 100: 83: 81: 76: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 567: 555: 553: 549: 545: 540: 539: 538: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 510: 506: 502: 498: 495: 494: 493: 491: 487: 482: 480: 476: 469: 464: 460: 456: 452: 449: 447: 443: 439: 434: 433: 432: 430: 426: 422: 420: 412: 408: 404: 400: 397: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 371: 367: 363: 358: 354: 351: 346: 344: 341: 339: 337: 336: 328: 324: 320: 317: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 296: 295: 291: 288: 286: 280: 275: 272: 269: 267: 261: 256: 255: 254: 252: 241: 237: 234: 231: 227: 223: 219: 216: 213: 210: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 191: 188: 187:Find sources: 183: 179: 175: 172: 166: 162: 158: 154: 149: 145: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 123: 119: 116: 113: 109: 106: 104: 101: 99: 96: 95: 94: 92: 87: 80: 77: 75: 74: 71: 70: 69: 64: 59: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 543: 541: 513: 496: 483: 473: 450: 425:!testTimo92! 418: 416: 415: 398: 375:— Preceding 366:Out Magazine 362:The Guardian 349: 334: 332: 318: 302:not LinkedIn 297: 285:CAPTAIN RAJU 284: 266:CAPTAIN RAJU 265: 247: 235: 229: 221: 214: 208: 202: 196: 186: 173: 127:Monsieur Adi 84: 79:Monsieur Adi 57:bibliomaniac 54: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 522:. Finally, 514:- Gritmem, 438:Atlantic306 403:Atlantic306 327:WP:MUSICBIO 212:free images 306:~dom Kaos~ 548:talk page 37:talk page 550:or in a 528:Mattia86 486:Mattia86 475:Mattia86 389:contribs 381:Mattia86 377:unsigned 353:Facebook 350:verified 171:View log 112:glossary 39:or in a 501:Gritmem 357:Spotify 333:Versace 218:WP refs 206:scholar 144:protect 139:history 89:New to 497:Delete 419:Delete 323:WP:GNG 319:Delete 298:Delete 190:Google 148:delete 50:delete 233:JSTOR 194:books 178:Stats 165:views 157:watch 153:links 16:< 532:talk 524:here 520:here 516:here 505:talk 490:talk 479:talk 468:here 463:here 459:here 451:Keep 442:talk 429:talk 407:talk 399:Keep 385:talk 335:1608 325:and 310:talk 226:FENS 200:news 161:logs 135:talk 131:edit 240:TWL 169:– ( 534:) 507:) 444:) 421:- 409:) 391:) 387:• 368:, 364:, 312:) 304:. 281:. 262:. 220:) 163:| 159:| 155:| 151:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 52:. 530:( 503:( 488:( 477:( 440:( 427:( 417:* 405:( 383:( 308:( 244:) 236:· 230:· 222:· 215:· 209:· 203:· 197:· 192:( 184:( 181:) 174:· 167:) 129:( 114:) 110:( 67:5 62:1

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
bibliomaniac
1
5
03:57, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Monsieur Adi

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Monsieur Adi
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.