248:) but, the deletion decision is uninformed.The MSC method has been in use since the mid-1990s, it is used by a large number of aid agencies around the world, especially NGOs, and there is a dedicated email list of 900+ people who share information about its use. There have also been articles about it published in academic journals on evaluation in the USA, Australia and the UK. If the style of the article needs improvement, then let it be improved
156:
Needs an intro and the good references that are hidden in here need better link targets and inlining their cites. As a topic though, it seems notable and supported by independent references.
123:
90:
85:
94:
77:
17:
264:
186:
285:
268:
237:
220:
191:
165:
147:
59:
36:
134:
riddled with inappropriate or vanity external links. Descriptions are vague and geared to click external links to
81:
284:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
73:
65:
233:
252:
202:
per nom. The article claims that two people are promoting a theory, does seem a bit promotional as well.
161:
135:
260:
256:
212:
157:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
181:
143:
131:
55:
203:
111:
175:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
246:
229:
139:
50:
245:
I dont know how or where else to make this comment (please advise me at
278:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
118:
107:
103:
99:
180:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
288:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
130:Promotional article/advert on
1:
269:10:13, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
238:13:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
221:01:00, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
192:00:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
166:14:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
148:13:39, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
60:00:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
305:
281:Please do not modify it.
136:non-notable researcher's
32:Please do not modify it.
74:Most significant change
66:Most significant change
216:
208:
44:The result was
272:
255:comment added by
217:
214:
209:
206:
194:
132:original research
296:
283:
271:
249:
213:
205:
184:
179:
177:
121:
115:
97:
34:
304:
303:
299:
298:
297:
295:
294:
293:
292:
286:deletion review
279:
250:
189:
182:
173:
117:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
302:
300:
291:
290:
274:
273:
240:
228:per Pharmboy.
223:
196:
195:
187:
178:
170:
169:
168:
128:
127:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
301:
289:
287:
282:
276:
275:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
247:
244:
241:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
222:
218:
210:
201:
198:
197:
193:
190:
185:
176:
172:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
151:
150:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
125:
120:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
280:
277:
242:
225:
199:
174:
158:Andy Dingley
153:
129:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
251:—Preceding
257:Rckjdavies
265:contribs
253:unsigned
138:theses.
124:View log
207:HARMBOY
91:protect
86:history
230:Stifle
226:Delete
200:Delete
183:treelo
140:Boffob
119:delete
95:delete
46:delete
188:radda
122:) – (
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
261:talk
243:Keep
234:talk
215:TALK
162:talk
154:Keep
144:talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
267:)
263:•
236:)
219:)
164:)
146:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
48:.
259:(
232:(
211:(
204:P
160:(
142:(
126:)
116:(
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.