388:. As it stands, the article is lacking the kind of sources that would help it pass these criteria, and looking for additional sources has not turned any up. (This is of course not a judgment of personal worth, just about suitability for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Most of the volunteers here aren't notable by these standards, either!) In addition, Knowledge strongly frowns upon
392:. While the jargon can be intimidating — "COI", "NPROF", etc. — and the policies and guidelines can take a while to read, they represent years of learning the hard way how to handle a project, and generally make sense given a little time and study. Cheers,
209:
363:
Hello. Knowledge has a set of guidelines for when topics can have articles written about them, which generally boil down to saying that the world must have taken notice in a documented way. To quote the
321:, a promotional article, clearly created by either the subject themselves or someone with a close connection to them. The sources in this article are a combination of passing mentions,
424:
401:
348:
Hello everyone. Could someone help me improve this article? I am new user and previous person’s post does not mean anything. I appreciate some plain constructive help here. --
203:
299:
162:
280:
261:
109:
94:
169:
135:
130:
139:
122:
224:
373:
191:
89:
82:
17:
381:
103:
99:
372:—those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, and are
185:
483:
338:
40:
466:
445:
357:
342:
310:
291:
272:
253:
64:
181:
126:
441:
231:
479:
454:
420:
397:
118:
70:
36:
365:
334:
217:
384:
to gauge this attention." There is a specialized set of criteria for evaluating the notability of
437:
353:
322:
197:
303:
284:
265:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
478:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
416:
393:
249:
462:
433:
330:
412:
385:
55:
389:
349:
326:
241:
377:
156:
245:
458:
413:
the criteria we use to judge notability of scientists and academics
474:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
152:
148:
144:
325:
links, and one interview. None of this helps him pass
216:
390:making edits where one has a Conflict of Interest
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
486:). No further edits should be made to this page.
298:Note: This discussion has been included in the
279:Note: This discussion has been included in the
260:Note: This discussion has been included in the
300:list of California-related deletion discussions
230:
8:
281:list of Science-related deletion discussions
262:list of Germany-related deletion discussions
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
297:
278:
259:
7:
411:No evidence that the subject passes
386:scientists, scholars and researchers
374:not outside the scope of Knowledge
24:
95:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
415:. Knowledge is not LinkedIn.
376:. We consider evidence from
368:, "Knowledge articles cover
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
503:
425:21:08, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
402:21:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
358:04:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
343:22:25, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
311:13:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
292:13:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
273:13:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
254:13:12, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
476:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
467:16:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
446:11:27, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
65:13:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
83:Articles for deletion
382:independent sources
119:Maximillian Hekmat
71:Maximillian Hekmat
313:
294:
275:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
494:
308:
289:
270:
240:Not notable and
235:
234:
220:
172:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
502:
501:
497:
496:
495:
493:
492:
491:
490:
484:deletion review
335:Devonian Wombat
304:
285:
266:
177:
168:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
500:
498:
489:
488:
470:
469:
455:WP:NOTLINKEDIN
448:
427:
405:
404:
370:notable topics
366:main guideline
346:
345:
315:
314:
295:
276:
238:
237:
174:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
499:
487:
485:
481:
477:
472:
471:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
449:
447:
443:
439:
438:Coolabahapple
435:
431:
428:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
407:
406:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
362:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
317:
316:
312:
309:
307:
301:
296:
293:
290:
288:
282:
277:
274:
271:
269:
263:
258:
257:
256:
255:
251:
247:
243:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
171:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
475:
473:
450:
429:
408:
369:
347:
318:
306:CAPTAIN RAJU
305:
287:CAPTAIN RAJU
286:
268:CAPTAIN RAJU
267:
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
165:
76:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
323:WP:CIRCULAR
204:free images
417:XOR'easter
394:XOR'easter
58:Sandstein
480:talk page
37:talk page
482:or in a
457:. Best,
434:WP:NOTCV
378:reliable
350:Mjhekmat
331:WP:NPROF
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
210:WP refs
198:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
451:Delete
430:Delete
409:Delete
327:WP:GNG
319:Delete
246:Fuddle
242:WP:COI
182:Google
140:delete
50:delete
459:GPL93
225:JSTOR
186:books
170:Stats
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
463:talk
453:per
442:talk
421:talk
398:talk
380:and
354:talk
339:talk
250:talk
218:FENS
192:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
432:as
329:or
232:TWL
161:– (
465:)
444:)
436:.
423:)
400:)
356:)
341:)
333:.
302:.
283:.
264:.
252:)
244:.
212:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
52:.
461:(
440:(
419:(
396:(
352:(
337:(
248:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
166:·
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.