427:
NetEase source might work, but then they own
Tencent QQ and the article smells like a non-neutral puff piece. For some weird reason the Xinhua (via syndicate) article is also to NetEase (likely more promo reasons involved) and is just as puffy. While the SoHu "article" is about "City Lover" and Ma Yanting and Ma Ge isn't mentioned in it. Maybe they are the same person, I don't really know. They could be the same person (Ma Ge did play in the film). Even if they are the same person SoHu is an entertainment blog and blogs are not considered reliable sources. So, that's really it. Essentially nothing. Except maybe the one NetEase promo puff piece if I wanted to be generous, but I don't and it takes "multiple" sources for someone to be notable anyway. --
586:"Your clearly not a recreational Knowledge editor who is doing it (What happens if anyone who has neither any career of deeply researching nor any interest in the topic created a new article on Knowledge? It is practically impossible for an author to create a new page without any interest in it but just based on robotic neutrality, as long as the author is a living human being)"
545:, constitute WP:RS." Obviously, it had nothing to do with a "syndicate." Someone with a basic level of English understanding would know "syndication" refers to the sale or licensing of material for publication. I could see where you wouldn't know that though, what with you being a paid editor from China and all that.
550:
I'm not going to respond to your comments about
Tencent QQ and Blogs, because anyone who has even a rudimentary understanding of the guidelines knows why both are not reliable sources. Plus, like I said I'm not going to waste my time explaining the guidelines to a SPA COI editor such as you. You can
281:
has been translated in 29 languages, so it seems the claimer above would love to mark the 28 variations out of the original
English article as the "spams". If the claimer thinks that any non-English reference sites were short of notability on the English Knowledge, the entire audience of it might be
272:
Whoever claims the notability for this article must specify what types of any other language, except for
English or Chinese, can always satisfy the criteria for the referenced articles to be written in, as long as the claimer believes that any written-in-English information can always accomplish it.
529:
Wow, you must be a real special kind of snowflake. I guess that's how people who's pay checks depend on articles not being deleted would act though. Anyway, first of all, I don't need to "explain" anything. Especially what a reliable source. The guidelines do that accurately enough and anyone that
426:
Due to lacking multiple in-depth reliable sources and the article likely being created by a COI editor. Just as a short breakdown of why the sources that have been provided are lacking, Tencent QQ is a paid video streaming platform and the link to it isn't about her anyway. so it doesn't work. The
535:
Second, your likely a COI editor because you've only edited her page a few others that are closely related to her. Your clearly not a recreational
Knowledge editor who is doing it just because your interested in Chinese actresses and films. That you "translated it without using it" (whatever that
497:"SoHu is an entertainment blog and blogs are not considered reliable sources (You must try to establish a decisive border line between some perfectly reliable encyclopedic sources and the consequently stored information on weblog services, before disregarding blogs.)"
578:"people who's pay checks depend on articles not being deleted would act (If I were a verified paid editor on Knowledge, I thoroughly welcome you to disclose my PayPal ID, bank account number and crypto-currency wallet addresses that were used for the payments)"
582:"The guidelines do that accurately enough (There is always room for discussing conflicts on deletion-pending articles on Knowledge because the guidelines are too imperfect to provide any absolute definitions of actions to solve issues)"
551:
find them pretty easily on your own anyway. If you really want the article to be kept, I suggest you read up on them so you have a better line of time for the next person that votes delete then "your a horrible person." --
198:
282:
diagnosed from critical multi-linguistic disabilities. Besides, it is theoretically impossible for a living user like me to publish each translated version of an article on "every-language" of
Knowledge server.
246:
660:
before publishing, in order to establish even more formal linguistic accuracy of your all statements on
Knowledge than I do usually, so as to prevent every audience from confusions.
277:
variations of the original translated article are determined to be "violations" against the
Knowledge guidelines. For example, the 35th president of the United States of America;
159:
404:
192:
599:
Second, I feel sorry for the partially corrupt grammatical structures of your written
English phrases as if they were automatically transferred from your spoken words:
466:"the link to it isn't about her (TRUTH: Tencent QQ is always proving both the information and the full streaming movie for free, in which she co-starred in 2016:
385:
656:
If you suppose that I am a non-native-English-speaking paid editor from China, I recommend you try some free online grammatical precision checking services like
366:
347:
106:
91:
132:
127:
136:
590:"anyone who has even a rudimentary understanding of the guidelines knows why both are not reliable sources (Submit the lists of the
119:
229:
I can't find any (non-Chinese) sources to show the notability. Same user is spamming this article to every-language
Knowledge.
86:
79:
17:
493:"Ma Ge isn't mentioned in it (TRUTH: Ma Yanting is identical to Ma Ge who played a role called Yu Fang in the drama series)"
213:
180:
100:
96:
453:
without submitting any official definitions from Knowledge guidelines to support your arbitrary assumptions above:
690:
40:
333:
174:
674:
560:
523:
436:
415:
396:
377:
358:
338:
295:
258:
238:
61:
668:
517:
289:
170:
123:
686:
536:
means) is completely irrelevant. IMO, your overly personal and way aggressive response just confirms it.
36:
485:(Show the evidence that a syndicate is controlling the website and provide the definition of your word
458:"reliable sources (Explain what can be a definitively reliable source on Knowledge quoting references)"
220:
115:
67:
206:
556:
432:
573:
First, again I pick some parts of your latest statement above against the validated facts I own:
664:
513:
408:
389:
370:
351:
285:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
685:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
474:"article smells like a non-neutral puff piece (Information has no smell on Knowledge at all)"
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
324:
186:
278:
254:
234:
57:
316:
304:
568:
552:
541:
Third, "Xinhua (via syndicate)" was a direct quote from CaradhrasAiguo who said "and
510:
objectivity nor neutrality for persuading everyone to delete this article after all.
444:
428:
320:
153:
312:
462:"likely being created by a COI editor (TRUTH: I translated it without using it)"
308:
273:
I require the claimer above to give the definition of the word "spamming": over
657:
467:
530:
can't find and read over them on their own shouldn't be participating in AfDs.
267:
250:
230:
477:"For some weird reason (Unspecific expression to downgrade your reliability)"
53:
506:
As I listed here, your opinion is full of dogmatic arrogance, and there is
594:
unreliable sources on Knowledge before criticizing Tencent QQ and Blogs)"
501:"Essentially nothing (TRUTH: This article is not blanked obviously)"
681:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
247:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
149:
145:
141:
205:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
693:). No further edits should be made to this page.
403:Note: This discussion has been included in the
384:Note: This discussion has been included in the
365:Note: This discussion has been included in the
346:Note: This discussion has been included in the
245:Note: This discussion has been included in the
405:list of Television-related deletion discussions
323:. Nominator has demonstrated no awareness of
219:
8:
386:list of Fashion-related deletion discussions
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
604:how people who's pay checks depend ---: -->
402:
383:
367:list of Women-related deletion discussions
364:
348:list of China-related deletion discussions
345:
244:
638:just because your interested ---: -->
7:
449:Please avoid simply utterring your
24:
621:your likely a COI editor ---: -->
92:Introduction to deletion process
647:your a horrible person ---: -->
613:what a reliable source ---: -->
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
675:16:00, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
629:her page a few others ---: -->
561:19:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
524:15:27, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
437:12:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
416:18:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
397:18:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
378:18:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
359:18:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
339:18:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
296:18:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
259:16:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
239:16:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
1:
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
62:03:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
710:
683:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
614:what a reliable source
543:Xinhua (via syndicate)
317:Xinhua (via syndicate)
80:Articles for deletion
592:officially certified
625:likely a COI editor
651:a horrible person
609:pay checks depend
418:
399:
380:
361:
336:
261:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
701:
671:
520:
413:
394:
375:
356:
332:
330:
292:
224:
223:
209:
157:
139:
77:
34:
709:
708:
704:
703:
702:
700:
699:
698:
697:
691:deletion review
669:
518:
409:
390:
371:
352:
328:
290:
279:John F. Kennedy
166:
130:
116:Ma Ge (actress)
114:
111:
74:
71:
68:Ma Ge (actress)
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
707:
705:
696:
695:
661:
658:PaperRater.com
654:
653:
652:
645:
644:
636:
635:
627:
626:
619:
618:
611:
610:
600:
597:
596:
595:
588:
587:
584:
583:
580:
579:
574:
564:
563:
547:
546:
538:
537:
532:
531:
504:
503:
502:
499:
498:
495:
494:
491:
490:
479:
478:
475:
472:
471:
464:
463:
460:
459:
454:
440:
439:
420:
419:
400:
381:
362:
342:
341:
334:leave language
263:
262:
227:
226:
163:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
706:
694:
692:
688:
684:
679:
678:
677:
676:
672:
666:
662:
659:
650:
646:
642:
639:just because
637:
633:
628:
624:
620:
617:
612:
608:
603:
602:
601:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
576:
575:
571:
570:
562:
558:
554:
549:
548:
544:
540:
539:
534:
533:
528:
527:
526:
525:
521:
515:
511:
509:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
456:
455:
452:
447:
446:
438:
434:
430:
425:
422:
421:
417:
414:
412:
406:
401:
398:
395:
393:
387:
382:
379:
376:
374:
368:
363:
360:
357:
355:
349:
344:
343:
340:
335:
326:
322:
319:, constitute
318:
314:
310:
306:
303:
300:
299:
298:
297:
293:
287:
283:
280:
276:
270:
269:
260:
256:
252:
248:
243:
242:
241:
240:
236:
232:
222:
218:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:Find sources:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
682:
680:
665:Supremarguax
663:
655:
648:
640:
634:a few others
631:
622:
615:
606:
598:
591:
572:
565:
542:
514:Supremarguax
512:
507:
505:
486:
482:
468:Dispel Demon
450:
448:
441:
423:
411:CAPTAIN RAJU
410:
392:CAPTAIN RAJU
391:
373:CAPTAIN RAJU
372:
354:CAPTAIN RAJU
353:
301:
286:Supremarguax
284:
274:
271:
264:
228:
216:
210:
202:
195:
189:
183:
177:
167:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
605:how people
302:Speedy keep
193:free images
643:interested
309:Tencent QQ
687:talk page
630:her page
487:syndicate
483:syndicate
451:delusions
329:Caradhras
325:WP:NONENG
37:talk page
689:or in a
569:Adamant1
566:---: -->
553:Adamant1
445:Adamant1
442:---: -->
429:Adamant1
275:HOW MANY
265:---: -->
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
649:you are
641:you are
623:you are
508:NEITHER
331:Aiguo (
305:NetEase
199:WP refs
187:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
424:Delete
315:, and
171:Google
137:delete
50:delete
607:whose
481:"via
321:WP:RS
268:Stryn
251:Stryn
231:Stryn
214:JSTOR
175:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
670:talk
567:Re:
557:talk
519:talk
443:Re:
433:talk
313:Sohu
291:talk
266:Re:
255:talk
235:talk
207:FENS
181:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
54:Izno
632:and
221:TWL
158:– (
673:)
616:is
559:)
522:)
489:)"
470:)"
435:)
407:.
388:.
369:.
350:.
337:)
327:.
311:,
307:,
294:)
257:)
249:.
237:)
201:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
667:(
555:(
516:(
431:(
288:(
253:(
233:(
225:)
217:·
211:·
203:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
173:(
165:(
162:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.