366:
Though the article can use some improvement, it is an appropriate discussion of a notable concept. Since the phrase itself is used pejoratively by historians and commentators to describe an attitude towards India, the criticism that it the article itself is not neutral is problematic. Its like saying
323:
It is not accurate to call a term which has been in common use for at least 150 years a "neologism'. A Google Books search shows that the term has been discussed in depth by many authors of many political persuasions in many contexts. For example, George
Bernard Shaw used the term. To call all of
492:
changing my tentative merge struck through above. Carrite has now created a really worthwhile article which is definitely worth keeping. I really do not like it when articles are sent to AfD to provoke people into improving them. I realise this was not the motivation behind this nomination but it
275:
Keep after
Carrite's excellent rewrite - Change the title to something like "Macaulay education policy"?. This article has OR/NPOV issues, but the subject itself is notable. Macaulay is a favourite whipping boy for Indians across the ideological spectrum. There have been a lot of material covering
385:
I rarely think merge is a good option to suggest (because someone has to do it and do it sensitively) but in this case it really does seem the best solution. I think some material should be kept, but not all that is in the present article, and it would fit appropriately into the section
Colonel
452:
published by the
University of California Press in 1969: "Macaulayism and the Decline and Fall of the Orientalist Movement 1828-1835." It seems patently clear that this is a scholarly topic suitable for encyclopedic coverage, POV issues of the previous version of the article notwithstanding.
211:
Neologism which, as a cursory Google search will show, is only used in a few dubious texts. There is no evidence that the word is used by mainstream scholars. Recent scholar works about Lord
Macaulay never mention the term, which makes the existence of the concept highly questionable.
165:
324:
these books and journals "dubious texts" is a stretch, in my opinion. That being said, the article in its present state needs work, but should be improved through normal editing rather than being deleted.
126:
247:
467:
Rewrite is complete, please take a look at it again, Merge voters. It's not perfect, god knows, but there's no reason that a specialist can't take the ball from here.
159:
224:
276:
this particular point (In India, you don't write a book or article about our education system without bringing in
Macaulay and giving him a few whacks)--
405:
as an encyclopedia-worthy topic. This is an excruciatingly bad original essay, I'll see if I can punch it into shape with an hour or two of work here.
493:
does show what can be done with constructive effort. How much better than trying to think up reasons why a rather poor article should be deleted.
444:
Again, with regard to the erroneous claim in this AfD nomination that "there is no evidence that the word is used by mainstream scholars,"
62:
423:
I'm half through with the rewrite... With respect to the deletion debate, see this 1975 article title from the juried academic journal
386:
Warden suggests. Otherwise keep. It is not a neologism or a dictionary definition and there is something by way of relevant citation.
17:
99:
94:
103:
180:
147:
86:
517:
36:
372:
430:
This is clearly NOT a neologism, but is a term used in scholarly debate by specialists in the history of India.
516:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
354:
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
367:
that an article on "Racism" shouldn't exist because it appears to report mainly negative views of the subject.
201:
141:
197:
308:
137:
502:
476:
462:
439:
414:
395:
376:
358:
333:
312:
285:
262:
239:
216:
68:
368:
281:
350:
329:
187:
173:
52:
49:
295:
342:
450:
British
Orientalism and the Bengal Renaissance: The Dynamics of Indian Modernization, 1773-1835,
498:
472:
458:
435:
410:
391:
258:
235:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
346:
304:
90:
205:
277:
153:
325:
345:
which does not currently even mention
Macaulay's name. The current content seems too
494:
468:
454:
445:
431:
406:
387:
254:
231:
120:
213:
82:
74:
298:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
428:"The Intellectual Climate of India Today: The Challenge to Macaulayism."
427:
510:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
116:
112:
108:
172:
303:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
186:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
520:). No further edits should be made to this page.
248:list of Education-related deletion discussions
8:
246:Note: This debate has been included in the
223:Note: This debate has been included in the
245:
225:list of India-related deletion discussions
222:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
349:and so need not be retained.
537:
503:12:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
477:20:36, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
463:19:59, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
440:19:41, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
415:17:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
396:18:34, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
377:12:45, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
359:07:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
343:Education in India#History
334:02:28, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
313:00:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
69:01:05, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
286:04:05, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
263:23:45, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
240:23:45, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
217:06:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
198:Knowledge (XXG):NOTDICDEF
513:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
446:SEE THE TITLE OF PART V
196:Deletion proposed per
398:
44:The result was
381:
315:
265:
251:
242:
228:
528:
515:
302:
300:
252:
229:
191:
190:
176:
124:
106:
65:
60:
55:
34:
536:
535:
531:
530:
529:
527:
526:
525:
524:
518:deletion review
511:
369:Jonathanwallace
293:
133:
97:
81:
78:
63:
58:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
534:
532:
523:
522:
506:
505:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
418:
417:
400:
379:
361:
351:Colonel Warden
336:
317:
316:
301:
290:
289:
288:
267:
266:
243:
202:WP:NOTADVOCATE
194:
193:
130:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
533:
521:
519:
514:
508:
507:
504:
500:
496:
491:
488:
487:
478:
474:
470:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
451:
447:
443:
442:
441:
437:
433:
429:
426:
425:Asian Survey:
422:
421:
420:
419:
416:
412:
408:
404:
401:
397:
393:
389:
384:
380:
378:
374:
370:
365:
362:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
337:
335:
331:
327:
322:
319:
318:
314:
310:
306:
299:
297:
292:
291:
287:
283:
279:
274:
273:
269:
268:
264:
260:
256:
249:
244:
241:
237:
233:
226:
221:
220:
219:
218:
215:
209:
207:
203:
199:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
61:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
512:
509:
489:
449:
448:of the book
424:
402:
382:
363:
338:
320:
294:
271:
270:
210:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
45:
43:
31:
28:
399:(see below)
305:Ron Ritzman
160:free images
83:Macaulayism
75:Macaulayism
278:Sodabottle
326:Cullen328
255:• Gene93k
232:• Gene93k
296:Relisted
127:View log
495:Thincat
469:Carrite
455:Carrite
432:Carrite
407:Carrite
388:Thincat
347:polemic
272:Comment
166:WP refs
154:scholar
100:protect
95:history
50:King of
214:Atchom
206:WP:GNG
138:Google
104:delete
383:Merge
341:into
339:Merge
181:JSTOR
142:books
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
499:talk
490:Keep
473:talk
459:talk
436:talk
411:talk
403:Keep
392:talk
373:talk
364:Keep
355:talk
330:talk
321:Keep
309:talk
282:talk
259:talk
236:talk
174:FENS
148:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
46:keep
253:--
230:--
188:TWL
125:– (
501:)
475:)
461:)
438:)
413:)
394:)
375:)
357:)
332:)
311:)
284:)
261:)
250:.
238:)
227:.
208:.
204:,
200:,
168:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
67:♠
48:.
497:(
471:(
457:(
434:(
409:(
390:(
371:(
353:(
328:(
307:(
280:(
257:(
234:(
212:-
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
123:)
85:(
64:♣
59:♦
54:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.