Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Magritte (software) - Knowledge

Source 📝

224:- for now. I think your critique is not valid as to 'what does it do' — framework is something you can build stuff on, so that term defines what it does - ie. set of blocks to build or define aspects of your services. While smalltalk and squeak are pretty awesome and very notable developements in computing, I must say so far Magritte hasn't made any big splashes yet. I don't see notability through publicity or numbers happen. Whether it is pioneering effort - yes, its new type of approach to framework. Whether this article is a keeper. Well... I am not totally sure (notablity: 0, popularity: low, remarkable software: yes). 274:- No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. We do not judge directly the notability by deciding that it a bit of remarkable technology. We let the independent reliable sources decide on its remarkability to establish notability by covering the software. If really is remarkable, the coverage will come and recreation of the article then would be appropriate. -- 252:
No, it enables type of changes and developement that is not possible with other similar frameworks is what I am saying, enabling changes to the data(base)- and/or object-models of the service or app being built both 1. after the interfaces and logic dealing with that data have been set up without
253:
having to modify (all of) that logic and interfaces and 2. by people who do not have the skills to manipulate the logic and interfaces (ie. not having to program to change the model to suit the needs directed at the app/service). Ie. not subjective imo thing. Notable in technical sense.
173: 125: 92: 87: 96: 79: 17: 305: 283: 262: 247: 233: 216: 188: 163: 145: 61: 320: 36: 319:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
83: 238:
You saying that it is remarkable software is your opinion and has nothing do with the notability guidelines.
184: 75: 67: 298: 159: 258: 229: 243: 141: 58: 180: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
212: 296: 155: 279: 254: 225: 239: 137: 51: 113: 208: 133: 132:
All that I can find is a bunch of trivial mentions in multiple searches. Fails
292: 275: 313:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
120: 109: 105: 101: 154:
No external sources give to establish notability. --
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 323:). No further edits should be made to this page. 174:list of Software-related deletion discussions 8: 168: 199:meta-description and meta-data framework 172:: This debate has been included in the 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 340: 306:03:46, 14 July 2009 (UTC) 284:15:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 263:00:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 248:00:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 234:00:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 62:21:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC) 316:Please do not modify it. 217:14:55, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 189:00:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 164:21:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC) 146:21:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 201:. OK, so what does it 197:, a minor open-source 76:Magritte (software) 68:Magritte (software) 44:The result was 303: 191: 177: 331: 318: 302: 299: 178: 123: 117: 99: 60: 54: 34: 339: 338: 334: 333: 332: 330: 329: 328: 327: 321:deletion review 314: 300: 209:Smerdis of Tlön 119: 90: 74: 71: 52: 49: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 337: 335: 326: 325: 309: 308: 286: 269: 268: 267: 266: 265: 219: 192: 166: 130: 129: 70: 65: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 336: 324: 322: 317: 311: 310: 307: 304: 297: 294: 290: 287: 285: 281: 277: 273: 270: 264: 260: 256: 251: 250: 249: 245: 241: 237: 236: 235: 231: 227: 223: 220: 218: 214: 210: 206: 205: 200: 196: 193: 190: 186: 182: 175: 171: 167: 165: 161: 157: 153: 150: 149: 148: 147: 143: 139: 135: 127: 122: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 56: 55: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 315: 312: 288: 271: 221: 203: 202: 198: 194: 181:TexasAndroid 169: 151: 131: 50: 45: 43: 31: 28: 156:Cybercobra 293:User:Whpq 255:Casimirpo 226:Casimirpo 222:Weak Keep 240:Iowateen 138:Iowateen 126:View log 53:SilkTork 93:protect 88:history 289:Delete 272:Delete 195:Delete 152:Delete 121:delete 97:delete 46:delete 301:Error 124:) – ( 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 295:. — 291:per 280:talk 276:Whpq 259:talk 244:talk 230:talk 213:talk 207:? - 185:talk 170:Note 160:talk 142:talk 134:WP:N 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 179:-- 282:) 261:) 246:) 232:) 215:) 204:do 187:) 176:. 162:) 144:) 136:. 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 48:. 278:( 257:( 242:( 228:( 211:( 183:( 158:( 140:( 128:) 118:( 116:) 78:( 57:*

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
SilkTork

21:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Magritte (software)
Magritte (software)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
WP:N
Iowateen
talk
21:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Cybercobra
talk
21:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
list of Software-related deletion discussions
TexasAndroid
talk
00:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Smerdis of Tlön

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.