622:: I was brought here, like many others by Wiggins2, or as he wants to be called, "Wiggie". I think we shouldn't be so quick to shoot him down, as I, & probably many others, are grateful for his post to draw our attention to this subject. I wouldn't mind if the other "side" did the same. But we cannot ignore the fact that this is defintely going to open wikipedia into two halves; Those who want to keep. Those who don't. I.E. Christians, & others. However, this should not be about religion. I would be ashamed of the christians on here if they only voted to keep the articles because they were christian orientated. This should strictly be business as usual, even though it does seem strange an editor would nominate so many christian articles. Maybe a hidden agenda? If an article's crap, then it should be deleted. Being an inclusionist, I will probably keep the most mundane article. However, the list of notable people list is like many others, & should not be here. To do so would be obvious bias. I ask everyone to not be drawn in with a strict "You're wrong, I'm right" situation, but be open & find a way to keep peaceful....
675:
490:
150:
618:. If he's writen stuff then he should at least have a little slice of wikipedia? I mean, Knowledge is huge, everyone can have a share can't they? Everyone thinks that because he isn't in the news, that he shouldn't be included in wikipedia, the so called "sum of all human knowledge". But how do we know he isn't influencial? He effects hundreds with his words.....
168:: Everything above was posted to skew the voting and make people turn against me and bias their viewpoint of the nomination and the entry. It's a pretty sick tactic. It shows they care little about the actual strength of the entry; which should be the only thing considered. Since the "warnings" have been posted, some people have even said that they've voted
580:: Blnguyen, there are 1100+ LBU students and thousands of graduates. Did you ever stop to think that comments like these could be offensive to thousands of people? LBU is unaccredited, but it certainly doesn't fit the criteria of a diploma mill. How many diploma mills have a campus with on-campus courses, teachers, and faculty? Not to mention
270:
Very prolific
Christian author. Not what you or I would read, maybe, but many of his books are available in mainstream outlets (Amazon, Barnes & Noble). Also, a bit of research reveals him to be a media witness to the JFK assasination for added interest. -
526:
It does not mean that. It means that Stifle agrees with JzG on the reasons. That's all it means. Would you use that disparaging comment if someone voted to keep per someone else, or are you trying to make this vote appear meaningless?
317:
Reasonably notable
Christian figure. Number of deletion nominations is not an indicator of "bad faith" and it certainly isn't an indicator simply because the articles to be deleted are "Christian biography entries." -
172:
because of the alleged misconduct. Consequently, they and the people who are engaging in this witchhunt should be ashamed of themselves. They've done irreparable damage to their integrity and to
Knowledge.
288:
better than scores of authors who are included without a thought as to where their degrees came from. How can you deny his notability? Is it because he's a fundamentalist? They can be notable, too. -
433:
Q is correct, but each article should be judged on the merits of its own topic. Consistent keeps from non-sockpuppet, non-religious-username editors suggests Couch is notable. Google sez:
409:
this article was created by Jason
Gastrich to promote his school as a mainstream institution. This is only one of around 10 articles he created promoting his religion/degree/school. See
350:
358:
numerous books, documentaries.JFK angle gives added interest.I'm sorry but a swarm of deletion nominations such as this looks suspicious esp. if articles like this are included.
183:
132:
182:
You and half the people voting here are missing the point. This AfD isn't about you. It's about the entry. Defend the entry here, yourself at the
715:
584:
is giving the graduation ceremony address. I'm sure the biggest name in fundamentalist
Christianity speaks at tons of diploma mills. JK. --
347:
105:
256:. A speedy keep can only happen if the article has had no delete votes and the nominator withdraws, or the nomination was in bad faith.
410:
17:
131:
As a result of the serial disruption of AfD and other questionable behaviour, I have raised a user RfC on Jason
Gastrich, see
119:
224:. Editor nominated 10 Christian biography entries for deletion, today. It's hard to assume good faith. Plus, Mal Couch is a
711:
419:
as per above. That an interested person wrote it is less than ideal, but not enough of a reason to delete it. --
736:
485:
284:
An added comment: Those concerning themselves with LBU or the entry's author are completely missing the point.
145:
36:
735:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
99:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
706:
594:
373:
253:
659:
721:
696:
681:
648:
639:
626:
610:
588:
570:
558:
546:
531:
521:
510:
498:
467:
455:
443:
423:
401:
389:
377:
334:
322:
309:
293:
275:
260:
240:
216:
203:
190:
177:
158:
77:
693:
585:
567:
518:
237:
174:
95:
56:
494:
154:
607:
528:
319:
113:
71:
658:
Seems notable enough. (BTW I am a gay lapsed
Catholic with no religious belief, so there is no
674:
398:
359:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
679:
645:
489:
369:
290:
272:
187:
149:
606:
Another non-notable from our most prolific creator of articles on non-notables, Gastrich.
543:
386:
690:
623:
464:
331:
91:
126:: they consist almost solely of soliciting others to come to these AfDs and vote keep.
123:
636:
581:
566:
as non-notable vanity gastrich-cruft from a holder of a fake pHd from a diploma mill.
555:
343:
109:
63:
51:
554:
per nomination. Yes I have read it, and I've even cleaned up some links for you. --
306:
629:. BTW, I hope my vote isn't discounted, I count myself as a influencial editor...
663:
507:
257:
213:
200:
644:
Feel free to give your opinoin, but the guy meets WP:BIO several times over. -
440:
420:
452:
83:
476:
136:
635:
Mal Couch is unnotable and does not meet Wiki standards of notability.
729:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
368:
over zealous afd approach here. Fairly prolific author. ::
90:
This AfD process has been further disrupted by a suspected
305:
please this is a important author should not be erased
233:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
739:). No further edits should be made to this page.
286:This guy fulfils WP:BIO's guidelines for authors
517:Does this mean you didn't examine the entry? --
385:fair number of actual books on Amazon (et al).
199:Marginal at best. I don't see the notability.
133:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Jason Gastrich
8:
411:List_of_Louisiana_Baptist_University_people
7:
24:
704:as a prolific published author.
673:
488:
148:
342:, appears to be notable as per
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
475:another bit of Gastrichcruft.
348:Can't sleep, clown will eat me
1:
44:The result of the debate was
722:06:12, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
697:04:12, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
682:01:10, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
649:03:30, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
640:00:30, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
627:04:27, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
611:22:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
593:Clutching at straws, there.
589:05:21, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
571:02:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
559:23:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
547:21:15, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
532:19:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
522:18:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
511:17:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
499:11:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
468:03:25, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
456:00:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
444:00:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
424:23:25, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
402:18:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
390:18:45, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
378:10:07, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
351:07:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
335:07:07, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
323:06:22, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
310:06:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
294:08:14, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
276:05:58, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
261:17:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
241:05:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
234:Tyndale Theological Seminary
217:04:58, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
204:04:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
191:04:28, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
178:01:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
159:12:02, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
78:19:14, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
228:author and minister. He is
756:
372:: please contact me on my
732:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
397:as per everyone else.
330:Seems notable enough.
362:02:03 18 January 2006
633:Very Strong Delete.
719:
707:Crotalus horridus
232:the President of
75:
747:
734:
709:
677:
671:
595:Charles Matthews
492:
480:
152:
140:
76:
69:
66:
61:
54:
34:
755:
754:
750:
749:
748:
746:
745:
744:
743:
737:deletion review
730:
691:Walter Siegmund
664:
487:
478:
147:
138:
87:
64:
57:
52:
49:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
753:
751:
742:
741:
725:
724:
720:
699:
684:
662:agenda here).
653:
652:
651:
630:
613:
600:
599:
598:
597:
586:Jason Gastrich
574:
573:
561:
549:
537:
536:
535:
534:
519:Jason Gastrich
514:
513:
501:
484:
470:
458:
446:
428:
427:
426:
404:
392:
380:
363:
353:
337:
325:
312:
299:
298:
297:
296:
279:
278:
265:
264:
263:
238:Jason Gastrich
219:
197:
196:
195:
194:
193:
175:Jason Gastrich
162:
144:
129:
96:Jason Gastrich
86:
81:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
752:
740:
738:
733:
727:
726:
723:
717:
713:
708:
705:
703:
700:
698:
695:
692:
688:
685:
683:
680:
676:
672:
670:
669:
661:
657:
654:
650:
647:
643:
642:
641:
638:
634:
631:
628:
625:
621:
617:
614:
612:
609:
608:FeloniousMonk
605:
602:
601:
596:
592:
591:
590:
587:
583:
582:Jerry Falwell
579:
576:
575:
572:
569:
565:
562:
560:
557:
553:
550:
548:
545:
542:
539:
538:
533:
530:
529:Harvestdancer
525:
524:
523:
520:
516:
515:
512:
509:
505:
502:
500:
497:
496:
491:
486:
482:
474:
471:
469:
466:
462:
459:
457:
454:
450:
447:
445:
442:
438:
434:
432:
429:
425:
422:
418:
415:
414:
412:
408:
405:
403:
400:
396:
393:
391:
388:
387:Mark K. Bilbo
384:
381:
379:
375:
371:
367:
364:
361:
357:
354:
352:
349:
346:guidelines.
345:
341:
338:
336:
333:
329:
326:
324:
321:
320:WarriorScribe
316:
313:
311:
308:
304:
301:
300:
295:
292:
287:
283:
282:
281:
280:
277:
274:
269:
266:
262:
259:
255:
251:
247:
244:
243:
242:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
220:
218:
215:
211:
208:
207:
206:
205:
202:
192:
189:
185:
181:
180:
179:
176:
171:
167:
164:
163:
161:
160:
157:
156:
151:
146:
142:
134:
128:
127:
125:
124:contributions
121:
118:
115:
111:
107:
104:
101:
97:
93:
85:
82:
80:
79:
73:
68:
67:
62:
60:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
731:
728:
701:
686:
667:
665:
655:
646:Jaysus Chris
632:
620:Further Note
619:
615:
603:
577:
563:
551:
540:
503:
493:
472:
460:
448:
436:
435:], so I say
430:
416:
406:
399:Hall Monitor
394:
382:
365:
360:California12
355:
339:
327:
314:
302:
291:Jaysus Chris
285:
273:Jaysus Chris
267:
249:
245:
229:
226:very notable
225:
221:
209:
198:
188:Jaysus Chris
169:
165:
153:
130:
122:). See his
116:
102:
89:
88:
58:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
451:. Notable.
395:Speedy keep
370:Kevinalewis
254:speedy keep
222:Strong keep
544:Brokenfrog
248:: This is
212:per nom.
92:sockpuppet
689:per nom.
624:Spawn Man
506:per JzG.
481:you know?
477:Just zis
465:Guettarda
374:Talk Page
332:Logophile
141:you know?
137:Just zis
84:Mal Couch
716:CONTRIBS
637:Arbustoo
568:Blnguyen
556:kingboyk
431:Comment:
166:Rebuttal
120:contribs
110:Wiggins2
106:contribs
668:ÉIREANN
578:Comment
307:Yuckfoo
246:Comment
694:(talk)
687:Delete
604:Delete
564:Delete
552:Delete
508:Stifle
504:Delete
473:Delete
461:Delete
413:. --Q
407:Delete
344:WP:BIO
258:Stifle
214:A.J.A.
210:Delete
201:A.J.A.
441:Barno
421:Thunk
53:howch
16:<
712:TALK
702:Keep
666:Fear
656:Keep
616:Keep
541:Keep
495:AfD?
479:Guy,
453:Cnwb
449:Keep
437:Keep
417:Keep
383:Keep
366:Keep
356:Keep
340:Keep
328:Keep
315:Keep
303:keep
268:Keep
236:. --
230:also
186:. -
170:only
155:AfD?
139:Guy,
135:. -
114:talk
100:talk
72:chat
46:keep
660:BAC
250:not
184:RfC
108:),
94:of
714:•
463:-
439:.
376::
252:a
173:--
65:ng
48:.
718:)
710:(
678:\
527:-
483:/
143:/
117:·
112:(
103:·
98:(
74:}
70:{
59:e
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
