362:- the cricket project know precisely where to find a second source if need be. However, these sources alone are being subject to much debate elsewhere than this. A single AfD article which can be easily fixed is not the right place to be having hundreds of AfD debates all at the same time. It is not the "single source" debate which is up for question right now.
425:
conversations going on at the same time with regard to what we should do when articles met brightline criteria but people wanted to delete anyway - whether standalone lists needed to be created in places where they do not yet exist. Of all places, this is not the place to have this conversation. I stand by my belief that
405:) Indeed, it seems to be hard to compromise on new criteria, but if you'll allow me some unsolicited advice, participants turning their attention to doing so would be far more productive than incessant complaining about how the nasty, nasty deletionists are ruining the project and how can anything possibly be done?
377:
only because these conversations are being had elsewhere. Carrying out these same conversations in thousands of different AfDs is not the right thing to do. WP:CRIC members, can we work on our merging-related compromises before we go through all of this a thousand more times, then batch them together
530:
would be my preference. We have tow matches played, a name and style of bowling only. In those circumstances I'm not expecting that we'll find anything else about the chap anytime soon - but if we do then it's easy to re-create the article and add the substantial sources. This is along the lines I
424:
Sixteen years rather than two weeks. An AfD is not the time or place for a conversation like this. "Complaining"? No. Frustration, yes. I wish these things had been decided upon 11 years ago before I did this. In any case, that wasn't really the context of my argument here. There were two
531:
tend to argue in these circumstances (see the links hako9 provides above). I could live with delete, but a merge/redirect seems a much more effective way to deal with the chance that someone, somewhere in the world finds some substantial source about him.
450:
primary sources do not lead to GNG passing. Yes, this will be thousands of articles because we have an absurdly broad notability criteria for cricket, but there is no reason to let proceduralism keep in place articles that clearly fail notability
209:
397:
The business of
Knowledge cannot be put on permanent hold until WP:CRIC chooses to get its act together. You've been debating this for over two weeks now, and this has been an issue for
509:, I think, we can't have standalone stubs like these. So the only options are either delete or merge/redirect. (Closing admin, please discount my comment as a vote of any sort). -
555:
319:
473:.. It's easy to say "the criteria are too broad", it's harder to suggest new criteria to be adopted. Feel free to add your tuppence worth there if you have better ideas.
162:
203:
293:
267:
339:
109:
94:
169:
580:
551:
527:
53:
135:
130:
306:
280:
254:
139:
89:
82:
17:
122:
224:
191:
61:
554:. This approach has worked well for other cricketers for whom we have no actual biographical information, for example
536:
103:
99:
610:
456:
40:
185:
401:(And what the heck, with a new, tighter guideline, there'll be hundreds of AfDs, prods, redirects and mergers
532:
57:
244:
as it contains only one primary source. Can't find any information on this person from a secondary source.
593:
571:
540:
518:
480:
460:
436:
415:
385:
369:
351:
331:
311:
285:
259:
181:
64:
606:
36:
500:
584:
452:
406:
302:
276:
250:
231:
470:
347:
327:
217:
126:
477:
433:
382:
366:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
605:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
503:
497:
197:
514:
506:
297:
271:
245:
565:
343:
323:
241:
118:
70:
493:
474:
430:
379:
363:
505:. I am no fan of the sport and don't edit cricket articles, but prima facie, from
156:
510:
559:
469:
That's why we're trying to work out on some kind of merging compromises on
601:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
56:. I think there's a reasonable consensus for the merge. ♠
152:
148:
144:
216:
556:
Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/Ziauddin_(cricketer)
320:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
613:). No further edits should be made to this page.
338:Note: This discussion has been included in the
318:Note: This discussion has been included in the
292:Note: This discussion has been included in the
266:Note: This discussion has been included in the
429:cricketers should exist for all teams anyway.
230:
8:
294:list of Cricket-related deletion discussions
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
268:list of People-related deletion discussions
340:list of India-related deletion discussions
337:
317:
291:
265:
7:
581:List of Himachal Pradesh cricketers
552:List of Himachal Pradesh cricketers
528:List of Himachal Pradesh cricketers
378:for potential merges if necessary?
54:List of Himachal Pradesh cricketers
24:
95:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
594:01:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
437:07:33, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
416:01:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
65:14:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
630:
572:14:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
541:16:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
519:22:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
481:21:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
461:21:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
386:20:28, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
370:19:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
352:19:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
332:19:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
312:19:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
286:19:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
260:19:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
603:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
83:Articles for deletion
583:sounds fine to me.
533:Blue Square Thing
496:'s argument here
453:John Pack Lambert
354:
334:
314:
310:
288:
284:
258:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
621:
590:
412:
300:
274:
248:
235:
234:
220:
172:
160:
142:
80:
34:
629:
628:
624:
623:
622:
620:
619:
618:
617:
611:deletion review
586:
570:
408:
177:
168:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
627:
625:
616:
615:
597:
596:
574:
564:
544:
543:
521:
486:
485:
484:
483:
464:
463:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
419:
418:
389:
388:
372:
356:
355:
335:
315:
289:
238:
237:
174:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
626:
614:
612:
608:
604:
599:
598:
595:
592:
591:
589:
582:
578:
575:
573:
569:
568:
563:
562:
557:
553:
549:
546:
545:
542:
538:
534:
529:
525:
522:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
501:
498:
495:
491:
488:
487:
482:
479:
476:
472:
468:
467:
466:
465:
462:
458:
454:
449:
446:
445:
438:
435:
432:
428:
423:
422:
421:
420:
417:
414:
413:
411:
404:
400:
396:
393:
392:
391:
390:
387:
384:
381:
376:
373:
371:
368:
365:
361:
358:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
336:
333:
329:
325:
321:
316:
313:
308:
304:
299:
295:
290:
287:
282:
278:
273:
269:
264:
263:
262:
261:
256:
252:
247:
243:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
171:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
119:Manu Bhardwaj
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
71:Manu Bhardwaj
69:
67:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
602:
600:
587:
585:
576:
566:
560:
547:
523:
494:User:Bobo192
489:
447:
426:
409:
407:
402:
398:
394:
374:
359:
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
165:
76:
49:
47:
31:
28:
588:Ravenswing
492:Context of
451:guidelines.
410:Ravenswing
375:Speedy keep
204:free images
298:P,TO 19104
272:P,TO 19104
246:P,TO 19104
607:talk page
427:List of X
344:Shellwood
324:Shellwood
37:talk page
609:or in a
507:WP:NCRIC
395:Comment:
307:contribs
281:contribs
255:contribs
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
490:Comment
471:WT:CRIC
403:anyway.
360:Comment
210:WP refs
198:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
448:Delete
399:years.
242:WP:GNG
240:Fails
182:Google
140:delete
62:(talk)
577:Merge
548:Merge
524:Merge
511:hako9
225:JSTOR
186:books
170:Stats
157:views
149:watch
145:links
50:merge
16:<
561:Reyk
537:talk
515:talk
475:Bobo
457:talk
431:Bobo
380:Bobo
364:Bobo
348:talk
328:talk
303:talk
277:talk
251:talk
218:FENS
192:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
579:to
567:YO!
550:to
526:to
305:) (
279:) (
253:) (
232:TWL
161:– (
58:PMC
52:to
558:.
539:)
517:)
502:,
499:,
459:)
350:)
342:.
330:)
322:.
309:)
296:.
283:)
270:.
257:)
212:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
60:♠
535:(
513:(
478:.
455:(
434:.
383:.
367:.
346:(
326:(
301:(
275:(
249:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
166:·
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.