Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Manu Bhardwaj - Knowledge

Source 📝

362:- the cricket project know precisely where to find a second source if need be. However, these sources alone are being subject to much debate elsewhere than this. A single AfD article which can be easily fixed is not the right place to be having hundreds of AfD debates all at the same time. It is not the "single source" debate which is up for question right now. 425:
conversations going on at the same time with regard to what we should do when articles met brightline criteria but people wanted to delete anyway - whether standalone lists needed to be created in places where they do not yet exist. Of all places, this is not the place to have this conversation. I stand by my belief that
405:) Indeed, it seems to be hard to compromise on new criteria, but if you'll allow me some unsolicited advice, participants turning their attention to doing so would be far more productive than incessant complaining about how the nasty, nasty deletionists are ruining the project and how can anything possibly be done? 377:
only because these conversations are being had elsewhere. Carrying out these same conversations in thousands of different AfDs is not the right thing to do. WP:CRIC members, can we work on our merging-related compromises before we go through all of this a thousand more times, then batch them together
530:
would be my preference. We have tow matches played, a name and style of bowling only. In those circumstances I'm not expecting that we'll find anything else about the chap anytime soon - but if we do then it's easy to re-create the article and add the substantial sources. This is along the lines I
424:
Sixteen years rather than two weeks. An AfD is not the time or place for a conversation like this. "Complaining"? No. Frustration, yes. I wish these things had been decided upon 11 years ago before I did this. In any case, that wasn't really the context of my argument here. There were two
531:
tend to argue in these circumstances (see the links hako9 provides above). I could live with delete, but a merge/redirect seems a much more effective way to deal with the chance that someone, somewhere in the world finds some substantial source about him.
450:
primary sources do not lead to GNG passing. Yes, this will be thousands of articles because we have an absurdly broad notability criteria for cricket, but there is no reason to let proceduralism keep in place articles that clearly fail notability
209: 397:
The business of Knowledge cannot be put on permanent hold until WP:CRIC chooses to get its act together. You've been debating this for over two weeks now, and this has been an issue for
509:, I think, we can't have standalone stubs like these. So the only options are either delete or merge/redirect. (Closing admin, please discount my comment as a vote of any sort). - 555: 319: 473:.. It's easy to say "the criteria are too broad", it's harder to suggest new criteria to be adopted. Feel free to add your tuppence worth there if you have better ideas. 162: 203: 293: 267: 339: 109: 94: 169: 580: 551: 527: 53: 135: 130: 306: 280: 254: 139: 89: 82: 17: 122: 224: 191: 61: 554:. This approach has worked well for other cricketers for whom we have no actual biographical information, for example 536: 103: 99: 610: 456: 40: 185: 401:(And what the heck, with a new, tighter guideline, there'll be hundreds of AfDs, prods, redirects and mergers 532: 57: 244:
as it contains only one primary source. Can't find any information on this person from a secondary source.
593: 571: 540: 518: 480: 460: 436: 415: 385: 369: 351: 331: 311: 285: 259: 181: 64: 606: 36: 500: 584: 452: 406: 302: 276: 250: 231: 470: 347: 327: 217: 126: 477: 433: 382: 366: 78: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
605:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
503: 497: 197: 514: 506: 297: 271: 245: 565: 343: 323: 241: 118: 70: 493: 474: 430: 379: 363: 505:. I am no fan of the sport and don't edit cricket articles, but prima facie, from 156: 510: 559: 469:
That's why we're trying to work out on some kind of merging compromises on
601:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
56:. I think there's a reasonable consensus for the merge. ♠ 152: 148: 144: 216: 556:
Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/Ziauddin_(cricketer)
320:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 613:). No further edits should be made to this page. 338:Note: This discussion has been included in the 318:Note: This discussion has been included in the 292:Note: This discussion has been included in the 266:Note: This discussion has been included in the 429:cricketers should exist for all teams anyway. 230: 8: 294:list of Cricket-related deletion discussions 110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 268:list of People-related deletion discussions 340:list of India-related deletion discussions 337: 317: 291: 265: 7: 581:List of Himachal Pradesh cricketers 552:List of Himachal Pradesh cricketers 528:List of Himachal Pradesh cricketers 378:for potential merges if necessary? 54:List of Himachal Pradesh cricketers 24: 95:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 594:01:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC) 437:07:33, 16 August 2020 (UTC) 416:01:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC) 85:(AfD)? Read these primers! 65:14:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC) 630: 572:14:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC) 541:16:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC) 519:22:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 481:21:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 461:21:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 386:20:28, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 370:19:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 352:19:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 332:19:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 312:19:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 286:19:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 260:19:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC) 603:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 83:Articles for deletion 583:sounds fine to me. 533:Blue Square Thing 496:'s argument here 453:John Pack Lambert 354: 334: 314: 310: 288: 284: 258: 100:Guide to deletion 90:How to contribute 621: 590: 412: 300: 274: 248: 235: 234: 220: 172: 160: 142: 80: 34: 629: 628: 624: 623: 622: 620: 619: 618: 617: 611:deletion review 586: 570: 408: 177: 168: 133: 117: 114: 77: 74: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 627: 625: 616: 615: 597: 596: 574: 564: 544: 543: 521: 486: 485: 484: 483: 464: 463: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 419: 418: 389: 388: 372: 356: 355: 335: 315: 289: 238: 237: 174: 113: 112: 107: 97: 92: 75: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 626: 614: 612: 608: 604: 599: 598: 595: 592: 591: 589: 582: 578: 575: 573: 569: 568: 563: 562: 557: 553: 549: 546: 545: 542: 538: 534: 529: 525: 522: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 501: 498: 495: 491: 488: 487: 482: 479: 476: 472: 468: 467: 466: 465: 462: 458: 454: 449: 446: 445: 438: 435: 432: 428: 423: 422: 421: 420: 417: 414: 413: 411: 404: 400: 396: 393: 392: 391: 390: 387: 384: 381: 376: 373: 371: 368: 365: 361: 358: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 336: 333: 329: 325: 321: 316: 313: 308: 304: 299: 295: 290: 287: 282: 278: 273: 269: 264: 263: 262: 261: 256: 252: 247: 243: 233: 229: 226: 223: 219: 215: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 183: 180: 179:Find sources: 175: 171: 167: 164: 158: 154: 150: 146: 141: 137: 132: 128: 124: 120: 119:Manu Bhardwaj 116: 115: 111: 108: 105: 101: 98: 96: 93: 91: 88: 87: 86: 84: 79: 72: 71:Manu Bhardwaj 69: 67: 66: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 602: 600: 587: 585: 576: 566: 560: 547: 523: 494:User:Bobo192 489: 447: 426: 409: 407: 402: 398: 394: 374: 359: 239: 227: 221: 213: 206: 200: 194: 188: 178: 165: 76: 49: 47: 31: 28: 588:Ravenswing 492:Context of 451:guidelines. 410:Ravenswing 375:Speedy keep 204:free images 298:P,TO 19104 272:P,TO 19104 246:P,TO 19104 607:talk page 427:List of X 344:Shellwood 324:Shellwood 37:talk page 609:or in a 507:WP:NCRIC 395:Comment: 307:contribs 281:contribs 255:contribs 163:View log 104:glossary 39:or in a 490:Comment 471:WT:CRIC 403:anyway. 360:Comment 210:WP refs 198:scholar 136:protect 131:history 81:New to 448:Delete 399:years. 242:WP:GNG 240:Fails 182:Google 140:delete 62:(talk) 577:Merge 548:Merge 524:Merge 511:hako9 225:JSTOR 186:books 170:Stats 157:views 149:watch 145:links 50:merge 16:< 561:Reyk 537:talk 515:talk 475:Bobo 457:talk 431:Bobo 380:Bobo 364:Bobo 348:talk 328:talk 303:talk 277:talk 251:talk 218:FENS 192:news 153:logs 127:talk 123:edit 579:to 567:YO! 550:to 526:to 305:) ( 279:) ( 253:) ( 232:TWL 161:– ( 58:PMC 52:to 558:. 539:) 517:) 502:, 499:, 459:) 350:) 342:. 330:) 322:. 309:) 296:. 283:) 270:. 257:) 212:) 155:| 151:| 147:| 143:| 138:| 134:| 129:| 125:| 60:♠ 535:( 513:( 478:. 455:( 434:. 383:. 367:. 346:( 326:( 301:( 275:( 249:( 236:) 228:· 222:· 214:· 207:· 201:· 195:· 189:· 184:( 176:( 173:) 166:· 159:) 121:( 106:) 102:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
List of Himachal Pradesh cricketers
PMC
(talk)
14:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Manu Bhardwaj

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Manu Bhardwaj
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.