Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Mark Horton (bridge) - Knowledge

Source 📝

406:
it. In any case, proof of guilt in unethical or criminal behaviour should not be the basis for deletion of an article, else many articles of far more nefarious people would be deleted. The deficiencies in the article are no worse than that in many articles and it should remain available for correction and improvement.
507:
invitations to overseas events and they won both the famous Hoechst Team tournament and the Dunhill Cup. They represented England on numerous occasions and were on the Great Britain team in the World Championships in Albuquerque in 1994." The listing also speaks to his stature in chess and as a bridge writer.
405:
There is no doubt that he is well known internationally as a contract bridge writer. The article was previously nominated for deletion with the outcome of 'no consensus'. The recent accusations of plagiarism only go to support retention IMHO, heightening interest in the individual, not diminishing
506:
It states, in part (full attribution): "...he formed a partnership with Richard Winter and they rapidly rose to the top, winning in rapid succession a host of major events, including the Life Master Pairs, the Grandmaster Pairs, Crockford’s Cup and the Spring Foursomes. Their success earned them
336:
and other activities in the world of bridge are enough to make him notable, assuming that there are suitable citations for them. However it's not a very satisfactory article, as it seems to "big him up" somewhat, so that I have the suspicion that he might have written some of it himself. JH
252:
events, or who has competed as a national representative in a major international tournament, pass it. I can find no evidence that Horton meets any of those suggested WP:NBRIDGE thresholds. In the absence of a guideline agreed after discussion and
213: 543:
He is one of the leading Bridge writer from Britian, he is getting secondary coverage as stated above due to the scandal. Just because an article isn't a GA or FA ,doesn't mean it should be deleted if it is notable.
313:
I have played against Horton at the bridge table, although more than a decade ago. I would say, that I have met him but do not know him. Whoever closes this debate should bear in mind any possible bias on my part.
493:
He is listed in the 7th edition of The Official Encyclopedia of Bridge (2011). His entry is on page 215 of the bibliographies and results CD and he is listed under the category 'Other Notable Personalities".
207: 385: 166: 351: 368: 113: 424:"The deficiencies in the article are no worse than that in many articles and it should remain available for correction and improvement." That argument is 98: 139: 134: 173: 143: 126: 475:. Unfortunately my own copy is the 5th edition of 1994, and doesn't have an entry for him. Does anyone have a more recent edition? The 228: 195: 93: 86: 17: 189: 107: 103: 62: 185: 576: 559: 529: 488: 462: 437: 425: 415: 394: 377: 360: 342: 323: 68: 593: 130: 40: 235: 589: 551: 458: 433: 390: 373: 356: 319: 36: 245: 567:
Inclusion in the encyclopedia of bridge and satisfaction of GNG makes him acceptable for wikipedia. --
201: 286: 122: 74: 254: 221: 525: 411: 275: 82: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
588:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
572: 545: 484: 454: 429: 338: 315: 290: 282: 270: 249: 262: 54: 521: 407: 258: 450: 304: 296:
This has been a long-winded nomination. For the avoidance of doubt, my vote is for
160: 568: 285:
search turned up nothing specifically about Horton except the two citations in
479:, published in 2004, lists him on page 153 as being the current editor of 248:
guideline. Suggestions have been made that anyone who has won five major
520:
I consider this source sufficiently reliable to establish notability.
449:. This "he is or must be well known" is all very well. Where are the 289:. IMO neither of those gets him through any of WP:GNG, WP:NBIO, and 584:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
156: 152: 148: 220: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 596:). No further edits should be made to this page. 384:Note: This discussion has been included in the 367:Note: This discussion has been included in the 350:Note: This discussion has been included in the 386:list of Journalism-related deletion discussions 268:He is the editor of the current incarnation of 453:sources? because they aren't in the article. 234: 8: 114:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 352:list of People-related deletion discussions 303:(I haven't tried to notify article creator 383: 369:list of Games-related deletion discussions 366: 349: 471:The obvious place to look would be the 307:, who has been inactive since 2009.) 7: 332:I would say that his editorship of 287:Mark Horton (bridge)#Controversies 24: 99:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 89:(AfD)? Read these primers! 613: 577:13:45, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 69:00:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC) 560:04:49, 29 July 2018 (UTC) 530:11:12, 30 July 2018 (UTC) 489:09:29, 30 July 2018 (UTC) 463:00:29, 29 July 2018 (UTC) 438:00:39, 29 July 2018 (UTC) 416:20:12, 27 July 2018 (UTC) 395:14:34, 27 July 2018 (UTC) 378:14:34, 27 July 2018 (UTC) 361:14:34, 27 July 2018 (UTC) 343:09:04, 27 July 2018 (UTC) 324:22:48, 26 July 2018 (UTC) 586:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 477:British Bridge Almanack 473:Encyclopaedia of Bridge 278:notability from that. 63:Insertcleverphrasehere 274:. However, he cannot 87:Articles for deletion 123:Mark Horton (bridge) 75:Mark Horton (bridge) 426:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS 265:apply as defaults. 55:(non-admin closure) 554:-constructive zone 558: 397: 380: 363: 104:Guide to deletion 94:How to contribute 65: 57: 604: 550: 393: 376: 359: 311:Full disclosure. 239: 238: 224: 176: 164: 146: 84: 61: 53: 34: 612: 611: 607: 606: 605: 603: 602: 601: 600: 594:deletion review 481:Bridge Magazine 389: 372: 355: 334:Bridge Magazine 271:Bridge Magazine 250:contract bridge 181: 172: 137: 121: 118: 81: 78: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 610: 608: 599: 598: 580: 579: 562: 555: 548: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 508: 499: 498: 497: 496: 495: 494: 466: 465: 447:Comment by nom 443: 442: 441: 440: 419: 418: 399: 398: 381: 364: 346: 345: 242: 241: 178: 117: 116: 111: 101: 96: 79: 77: 72: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 609: 597: 595: 591: 587: 582: 581: 578: 574: 570: 566: 563: 561: 557: 556: 553: 549: 546: 542: 539: 538: 531: 527: 523: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 492: 491: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 469: 468: 467: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 445: 444: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 422: 421: 420: 417: 413: 409: 404: 401: 400: 396: 392: 391:North America 387: 382: 379: 375: 374:North America 370: 365: 362: 358: 357:North America 353: 348: 347: 344: 340: 335: 331: 328: 327: 326: 325: 321: 317: 312: 308: 306: 301: 299: 294: 292: 288: 284: 279: 277: 273: 272: 266: 264: 260: 256: 251: 247: 237: 233: 230: 227: 223: 219: 215: 212: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 187: 184: 183:Find sources: 179: 175: 171: 168: 162: 158: 154: 150: 145: 141: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 119: 115: 112: 109: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 91: 90: 88: 83: 76: 73: 71: 70: 67: 66: 64: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 585: 583: 564: 552: 540: 480: 476: 472: 446: 402: 333: 329: 310: 309: 305:User:Wispity 302: 297: 295: 280: 269: 267: 255:WP:CONSENSUS 244:There is no 243: 231: 225: 217: 210: 204: 198: 192: 182: 169: 80: 60: 59: 49: 47: 31: 28: 455:Narky Blert 430:Narky Blert 316:Narky Blert 208:free images 276:WP:INHERIT 246:WP:NBRIDGE 590:talk page 485:talk page 339:talk page 291:WP:NCRIME 283:WP:BEFORE 37:talk page 592:or in a 522:Newwhist 408:Newwhist 167:View log 108:glossary 39:or in a 263:WP:NBIO 214:WP refs 202:scholar 140:protect 135:history 85:New to 569:1l2l3k 483:. JH ( 298:delete 259:WP:GNG 186:Google 144:delete 451:WP:RS 229:JSTOR 190:books 174:Stats 161:views 153:watch 149:links 16:< 573:talk 565:Keep 547:JC7V 541:Keep 526:talk 459:talk 434:talk 412:talk 403:Keep 330:Keep 320:talk 261:and 222:FENS 196:news 157:logs 131:talk 127:edit 50:keep 236:TWL 165:– ( 575:) 528:) 487:) 461:) 436:) 428:. 414:) 388:. 371:. 354:. 341:) 322:) 300:. 293:. 281:A 257:: 216:) 159:| 155:| 151:| 147:| 142:| 138:| 133:| 129:| 58:— 52:. 571:( 524:( 457:( 432:( 410:( 337:( 318:( 240:) 232:· 226:· 218:· 211:· 205:· 199:· 193:· 188:( 180:( 177:) 170:· 163:) 125:( 110:) 106:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
(non-admin closure)
Insertcleverphrasehere
00:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Mark Horton (bridge)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Mark Horton (bridge)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.