518:
Yes I re-added it with the intention of doing some work, then real life kept me away. If you look a my contribs they are some what sparse after that edit. I accept entirely that it needs fixing and large chunks removing or completely re-writing but if your aptitude is "delete all but 2 paragraphs so
259:
Since then, the article has not been improved, but rather, the only thing that has changed is the re-addition and re-removal of the most egregious of the original research. Thus I contend that despite the "keep" result of the previous AFD, the article fails to meet notability for neologisms, nor is
560:
apply equally to everyone regardless of their level of participation in a given article. As you have not actually produced the goods, and have focused on people rather than content, I can assume that no significant coverage exists to establish notability, or else it would have been found by now.
251:
in which a martial arts teacher denies his school is a McDojo. Again, that's it. We can't build an article on this slender reed of sourcing. There's just nothing reliable and verifiable to say. The real purpose of this article is to inflate the prominence and reputation of marginal web sites. It's
478:
The article is in serious need of a clean up an additional sourcing, but a lack of feed back on what kind of sources would be acceptable, and any constructive critisum drained any motivation for working on the article, (see the talk page). Please note that the version curnely live is a crudley
519:
no one will work on it" then , but if I have to go though source hunting to make suer ever word is cited it takes ages. did you make ONE helpful comment or suggestion on the specifics of what should be improved? I they read as
188:
239:
article has the following sentence: "The sheer number of fight schools in
Toronto promising fast and furious training has also given rise to a fresh, if not flattering, moniker: McDojos." That's
89:
451:
359:
527:
arguments. One of they key points was an attempt to start a discussion on re naming the article as those opposed to it kept saying "but it dosen't say McDojo" (and ignoring the
552:
is on the person who adds or restores the material to ensure that it's well-sourced. Whether or not I have participated in any talk page discussion is irrelevant, because
143:
504:, and considering that absolutely ZERO reliable sources to establish notability have surfaced since the last AFD indicates that they aren't out there to be found.
316:
182:
148:
648:
308:
235:. There are currently 5 citations, but three of them (#2, #4, and #5) do not even mention the term at all. The other two contain passing mentions. A
84:
312:
304:
62:
260:
the term significantly covered in reliable sources. Thus it's time to put this unsalvagable article out of its misery once and for all.
320:
479:
truncated version, based on source must be perfect quality and sentences linking the sources in t a coherent flow are not allowed. --
17:
575:
Yes the burden is on me but as I said I had some real world stuff to deal with. The problem on my side is knowing what you feel
598:
579:
satisfy the burden, and as you refuse to participate its virtually impossible to figurer this out, Please don't just point @
538:
486:
464:
644:
256:
and bullshidospam. If we limited the article to verifiable information it would literally consist of about 2 sentences."
758:
743:
722:
701:
684:
664:
627:
603:
570:
543:
513:
491:
469:
441:
404:
374:
349:
328:
294:
269:
68:
36:
622:
203:
170:
116:
111:
640:
120:
757:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
621:
as stated previously; 2 passing mentions in reliable sources aren't enough to write a
Knowledge (XXG) article.
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
524:
324:
103:
652:
220:
383:, since I can find nothing from which we can build an article that complies with both our core policies (
680:
164:
243:. No further descriptions of the neologism, how it arose, how it is used, etc. The same is true of the
697:
566:
509:
345:
290:
265:
520:
501:
425:
392:
737:
253:
196:
160:
52:
49:
714:
549:
656:
595:
535:
483:
461:
400:
107:
718:
437:
370:
210:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
498:
the person who was responsible for re-adding all of the original research back to the article
676:
660:
710:
673:
429:
388:
337:
232:
228:
693:
562:
505:
341:
279:
261:
636:
580:
553:
421:
731:
588:
557:
417:
413:
384:
224:
592:
532:
480:
458:
396:
176:
434:
366:
137:
730:. Total garbage, this defies every single policy and guideline I can think of.
500:
and then doing nothing further with it. Your argument is very much a case of
591:) which seem to differ from mine in such a way that it is hard to work on. --
528:
99:
74:
231:. Furthermore, the overwhelming majority of the article constitutes
751:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
497:
133:
129:
125:
639:. Applicable policies/guidelines this topic fails are
195:
649:
Knowledge (XXG):Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary
209:
531:) so renaming would have been a sensible step. --
452:list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions
360:list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions
219:Original AFD nomination from eight months ago by
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
761:). No further edits should be made to this page.
587:interpretation of it (especially in regard to
278:this non-notable and unverifiable neologism.
90:Articles for deletion/McDojo (2nd nomination)
8:
223:was as follows: "This article fails to meet
446:
354:
450:: This debate has been included in the
358:: This debate has been included in the
635:per the lack of sufficient coverage in
82:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
229:inclusion guidelines for neologisms
81:
24:
645:Knowledge (XXG):Original research
1:
641:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability
523:this may be to counter your
247:reference, which contains a
85:Articles for deletion/McDojo
778:
692:lack of reliable sources.
653:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
225:verifiability requirements
754:Please do not modify it.
744:15:37, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
723:09:32, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
702:18:23, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
685:02:56, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
665:22:44, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
628:17:11, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
604:13:42, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
571:17:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
544:14:31, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
514:11:37, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
492:09:58, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
470:09:24, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
442:01:34, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
405:00:16, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
375:14:51, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
350:11:51, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
329:06:45, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
295:05:15, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
270:04:07, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
69:03:47, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
227:and also fails to meet
221:User:Crotalus horridus
80:AfDs for this article:
44:The result was
472:
455:
377:
363:
293:
233:original research
769:
756:
740:
734:
637:reliable sources
624:*** Crotalus ***
548:Ultimately, the
456:
440:
364:
289:
287:
286:
283:
214:
213:
199:
151:
141:
123:
65:
60:
55:
34:
777:
776:
772:
771:
770:
768:
767:
766:
765:
759:deletion review
752:
738:
732:
601:
541:
489:
467:
433:
284:
281:
280:
156:
147:
114:
98:
95:
78:
63:
58:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
775:
773:
764:
763:
747:
746:
725:
704:
687:
667:
630:
615:
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
599:
539:
525:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
487:
473:
465:
444:
407:
378:
352:
331:
309:Google scholar
298:
297:
254:bullshidocruft
217:
216:
153:
149:AfD statistics
94:
93:
92:
87:
79:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
774:
762:
760:
755:
749:
748:
745:
741:
735:
729:
726:
724:
720:
716:
712:
708:
705:
703:
699:
695:
691:
688:
686:
682:
678:
675:
671:
668:
666:
662:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
631:
629:
626:
625:
620:
617:
616:
605:
602:
596:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
573:
572:
568:
564:
559:
555:
551:
547:
546:
545:
542:
536:
534:
530:
526:
522:
517:
516:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
494:
493:
490:
484:
482:
477:
474:
471:
468:
462:
460:
453:
449:
445:
443:
439:
436:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
408:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
379:
376:
372:
368:
361:
357:
353:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
332:
330:
326:
322:
321:70.29.210.155
318:
314:
310:
306:
303:
300:
299:
296:
292:
288:
277:
274:
273:
272:
271:
267:
263:
257:
255:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
212:
208:
205:
202:
198:
194:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
162:
159:
158:Find sources:
154:
150:
145:
139:
135:
131:
127:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
91:
88:
86:
83:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
61:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
753:
750:
727:
706:
689:
669:
632:
623:
618:
584:
576:
475:
447:
409:
380:
355:
333:
313:Google books
301:
275:
258:
248:
244:
240:
237:Toronto Star
236:
218:
206:
200:
192:
185:
179:
173:
167:
157:
45:
43:
31:
28:
677:Niteshift36
305:Google news
183:free images
694:Dwanyewest
563:SchuminWeb
521:WP:ILIKEIT
506:SchuminWeb
502:WP:ILIKEIT
496:This from
426:WP:NOTDICT
393:WP:NOTDICT
342:Chrisbrl88
262:SchuminWeb
245:Cairns Sun
742:) ✄ ✄ ✄
733:JBsupreme
713:and nom.
550:WP:BURDEN
529:Duck Test
412:per nom,
367:• Gene93k
728:McDelete
397:Tim Song
144:View log
715:Adambro
583:i need
432:. —
302:Comment
189:WP refs
177:scholar
117:protect
112:history
50:King of
711:WP:NEO
707:Delete
690:Delete
674:WP:NEO
670:Delete
657:Cunard
651:, and
633:Delete
619:Delete
430:WP:NOR
428:, and
410:Delete
391:) and
389:WP:NOR
381:Delete
338:WP:NAD
334:Delete
317:Google
282:Snotty
276:Delete
161:Google
121:delete
100:McDojo
75:McDojo
46:delete
581:WP:RS
577:would
554:WP:OR
422:WP:RS
249:quote
204:JSTOR
165:books
138:views
130:watch
126:links
16:<
739:talk
719:talk
709:per
698:talk
681:talk
672:per
661:talk
593:Nate
589:WP:N
585:your
567:Talk
558:WP:V
556:and
533:Nate
510:Talk
481:Nate
476:Keep
459:Nate
448:Note
438:G. ツ
435:Jeff
418:WP:N
414:WP:V
401:talk
385:WP:V
371:talk
356:Note
346:talk
325:talk
291:talk
285:Wong
266:Talk
197:FENS
171:news
134:logs
108:talk
104:edit
457:--
365:--
211:TWL
146:•
142:– (
721:)
700:)
683:)
663:)
655:.
647:,
643:,
569:)
512:)
454:.
424:,
420:,
416:,
403:)
395:.
387:,
373:)
362:.
348:)
340:.
336:.
327:)
319:;
315:;
311:;
307:;
268:)
241:it
191:)
136:|
132:|
128:|
124:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
67:♠
48:.
736:(
717:(
696:(
679:(
659:(
600:c
597:/
565:(
540:c
537:/
508:(
488:c
485:/
466:c
463:/
399:(
369:(
344:(
323:(
264:(
215:)
207:·
201:·
193:·
186:·
180:·
174:·
168:·
163:(
155:(
152:)
140:)
102:(
64:♣
59:♦
54:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.