Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Metascience (journal) - Knowledge

Source 📝

313:. As for the impact factor, I think that that's almost completely irrelevant. Impact factors tell you something about the spikiness of citations to recent papers in journals for fast-moving journal-based fields. They tell you almost nothing about the typical or median or long-term citations of papers in the same journals. And in this case it's a journal for book reviews in the humanities. Who cites book reviews? That's missing the point of the journal. — 351:
The journal has no impact factor, as it isn't indexed in any Clarivate database. However, it's indexed by Scopus and we generally take that to satisfy NJournals. The two in-depth reviews added to the article by David show that it even passes GNG (quite rare for an academic journal). The article can
198: 390:
For a journal of this type and in this field, impact factor is a meaningless number. High, low, who cares? Here, we have scholarly sources writing about it, and it's indexed in a selective database.
399: 246: 159: 192: 266: 286: 106: 91: 132: 127: 136: 119: 309:. I found two in-depth published reviews in unrelated journals, also establishing its earlier history back to 1984. I think it passes 213: 180: 86: 79: 17: 339: 294: 274: 254: 100: 96: 174: 382: 365: 343: 322: 298: 278: 258: 238: 61: 123: 229:
I was not about to find significant independent coverage. Journal has an impact factor of .1. May not be notable.
416: 40: 170: 318: 335: 290: 270: 250: 220: 412: 395: 234: 115: 67: 36: 361: 334:. The index factor also is different dependent on the site you use - 2 on some sites 0.149 on others. 331: 314: 206: 378: 186: 75: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
411:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
391: 230: 57: 357: 374: 353: 310: 153: 53: 373:
thank you for the additional sources. Agreed. Basicly it passes WP:GNG. --
407:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
149: 145: 141: 247:
list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions
205: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 419:). No further edits should be made to this page. 285:Note: This discussion has been included in the 265:Note: This discussion has been included in the 245:Note: This discussion has been included in the 352:be expanded according to the tips given in our 267:list of Journalism-related deletion discussions 219: 8: 287:list of Science-related deletion discussions 107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 284: 264: 244: 7: 24: 92:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 400:16:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC) 383:12:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC) 366:10:39, 28 February 2021 (UTC) 354:journal article writing guide 344:00:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC) 323:21:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC) 299:21:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC) 279:21:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC) 259:21:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC) 239:21:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC) 82:(AfD)? Read these primers! 436: 62:19:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC) 409:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 116:Metascience (journal) 80:Articles for deletion 68:Metascience (journal) 336:Davidstewartharvey 291:CommanderWaterford 271:CommanderWaterford 251:CommanderWaterford 301: 281: 261: 97:Guide to deletion 87:How to contribute 427: 224: 223: 209: 157: 139: 77: 34: 435: 434: 430: 429: 428: 426: 425: 424: 423: 417:deletion review 166: 130: 114: 111: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 433: 431: 422: 421: 403: 402: 385: 368: 346: 332:David Eppstein 325: 315:David Eppstein 303: 302: 282: 262: 227: 226: 163: 110: 109: 104: 94: 89: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 432: 420: 418: 414: 410: 405: 404: 401: 397: 393: 389: 386: 384: 380: 376: 372: 369: 367: 363: 359: 355: 350: 347: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 326: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 305: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 283: 280: 276: 272: 268: 263: 260: 256: 252: 248: 243: 242: 241: 240: 236: 232: 222: 218: 215: 212: 208: 204: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 176: 172: 169: 168:Find sources: 164: 161: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 108: 105: 102: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 83: 81: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 408: 406: 387: 370: 348: 327: 306: 228: 216: 210: 202: 195: 189: 183: 177: 167: 73: 49: 47: 31: 28: 231:Wikiman2718 193:free images 392:XOR'easter 358:Randykitty 413:talk page 37:talk page 415:or in a 375:Kemalcan 160:View log 101:glossary 39:or in a 199:WP refs 187:scholar 133:protect 128:history 78:New to 311:WP:GNG 171:Google 137:delete 54:Daniel 330:with 328:Agree 214:JSTOR 175:books 154:views 146:watch 142:links 16:< 396:talk 388:Keep 379:talk 371:Keep 362:talk 356:. -- 349:Keep 340:talk 319:talk 307:Keep 295:talk 275:talk 255:talk 235:talk 207:FENS 181:news 150:logs 124:talk 120:edit 58:talk 50:keep 221:TWL 158:– ( 398:) 381:) 364:) 342:) 321:) 297:) 289:. 277:) 269:. 257:) 249:. 237:) 201:) 152:| 148:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 60:) 52:. 394:( 377:( 360:( 338:( 317:( 293:( 273:( 253:( 233:( 225:) 217:· 211:· 203:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 178:· 173:( 165:( 162:) 156:) 118:( 103:) 99:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Daniel
talk
19:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Metascience (journal)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Metascience (journal)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.