Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Mean information - Knowledge

Source 📝

255:. Wouldn't it be appropriate to inform the author that his article has been nominated for deletion? While he appears to be taking a wikibreak here, he is embroiled in a discussion on the Swedish Knowledge on Social Darwinism. 243:
When you read through an entire article and the only thing you get form it is, "Huh?" then you have problems. I think "pop-scientific" may translate into "original research," too.
198:
When other people start to take it seriously, and produce independent reports on the subject, we can have an article. This may be a good or even brilliant topic, but we have
113: 227:- The first sentence, that the article is meant to give "alternate views" raises POV converns. Additionally, it make no claim of notability that I can see. -- 166:. While IMO this isn't in itself grounds for deletion, there's no evidence at present that anyone other than Kjellström takes it seriously. 86: 81: 90: 73: 312: 212: 17: 332: 36: 331:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
317: 298: 266: 247: 235: 217: 191: 146: 133: 55: 181: 77: 143: 169: 69: 61: 228: 285: 279: 232: 159: 158:
knows more about the subject than I do, but (especially in light of this article's sister page at
163: 52: 262: 162:) this in its present form looks like one mathematician's pet project to rewrite the rules of 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
244: 307: 207: 306:. Author is citing his own work on a non-notable topic, probably for self-promotion. 203: 128: 122: 259: 199: 142:. Meandering nonsense. I know something about probability as a result of my work. 107: 295: 291: 288:
the recipient is missing when they do not know the value of the random variable"
275: 155: 256: 325:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
284:"Equivalently, the Shannon entropy is a measure of the average 103: 99: 95: 294:
as to why he was moved to create a separate article.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 278:'s perspective already included in the article on 335:). No further edits should be made to this page. 154:unless it's improved very soon.. I do realise 8: 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 290:? I would like to hear from 1: 282:, when in its lead it says 352: 318:16:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 299:11:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 267:05:41, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 248:01:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 236:21:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 218:16:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 192:17:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 147:16:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 134:15:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 120:A strange personal essay. 56:10:43, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 328:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 286:information content 280:Information entropy 160:Gaussian adaptation 164:information theory 264: 188: 156:Gregor Kjellström 144:Anthony Appleyard 132: 343: 330: 263: 190: 187: 182: 179: 174: 126: 111: 93: 70:Mean information 62:Mean information 48: 34: 351: 350: 346: 345: 344: 342: 341: 340: 339: 333:deletion review 326: 315: 215: 183: 175: 170: 167: 84: 68: 65: 46: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 349: 347: 338: 337: 321: 320: 311: 301: 269: 250: 238: 221: 220: 211: 195: 194: 149: 118: 117: 64: 59: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 348: 336: 334: 329: 323: 322: 319: 314: 309: 305: 302: 300: 297: 293: 289: 287: 281: 277: 273: 270: 268: 265: 261: 257: 254: 251: 249: 246: 242: 239: 237: 234: 230: 226: 223: 222: 219: 214: 209: 205: 201: 197: 196: 193: 189: 186: 185:(talk to me!) 180: 178: 173: 165: 161: 157: 153: 150: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 136: 135: 130: 125: 124: 115: 109: 105: 101: 97: 92: 88: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 66: 63: 60: 58: 57: 54: 53:Mailer Diablo 50: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 327: 324: 303: 283: 271: 252: 240: 224: 184: 176: 171: 151: 139: 121: 119: 45: 43: 31: 28: 292:User:Kjells 276:User:Kjells 245:Realkyhick 308:Jehochman 208:Jehochman 274:. Isn't 114:View log 313:contrib 272:Comment 260:Lambiam 253:Comment 241:Delete. 213:contrib 87:protect 82:history 304:Delete 296:Jheald 225:Delete 204:WP:COI 172:irides 152:Delete 140:Delete 91:delete 200:WP:OR 177:centi 129:Help! 108:views 100:watch 96:links 49:elete 16:< 233:Talk 202:and 104:logs 78:talk 74:edit 51:. - 229:EMS 168:- 123:Guy 112:– ( 316:) 310:(/ 258:-- 231:| 216:) 210:(/ 206:. 106:| 102:| 98:| 94:| 89:| 85:| 80:| 76:| 131:) 127:( 116:) 110:) 72:( 47:d

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Mailer Diablo
10:43, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Mean information
Mean information
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Guy
Help!
15:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Anthony Appleyard
16:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Gregor Kjellström
Gaussian adaptation
information theory
iridescenti
(talk to me!)
17:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
WP:OR
WP:COI
Jehochman

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.