Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Melbourne Wireless - Knowledge

Source 📝

372:. I have just noticed this AfD. The nom did not sign the nomination. The article has been on Knowledge for 15 years. The nomination was 2 weeks ago. Nobody has commented in that time. Clearly it is an article that does not attract attention. The references are not strong, but it looks as if some are independent. I am inclined to think that it might contain useful reliable information for somebody, so a weak keep. -- 431:. No, the absence of a signature is not important. I just came across an AfD with no information on the proposer and no comments in two weeks. I wanted to draw some attention to it. I agree the sources are weak. I live in Melbourne but had never heard of this organisation, but it now seems it has had some impact here. I hope others will comment. There are worse articles still here. -- 401:
Sorry about missing the signature. Twinkle was playing up that day and I'm not in the habit of doing AfD noms manually. (Does the signature affect the listing in some way? I checked it was on the log so thought everything was OK). As to the references, 1 is the only substantial one and is written by
402:
a member of the group, so hardly independent; 2 is a passing mention only; 3 and 4 are primary sources, submissions to a parliamentary committee by the group; 5 is a listing on the group's website; 6 is a forum thread; and 7 is another listing. The only other sources I could find were
206: 407: 295: 159: 200: 255: 275: 106: 91: 237:
Sources are either semi-promotional, primary or irrelevant. All GBooks and news hits are passing mentions or listings, certainly nothing that passes
166: 132: 127: 136: 119: 221: 188: 86: 79: 17: 100: 96: 182: 415: 344: 317: 246: 461: 40: 440: 419: 381: 362: 335: 307: 287: 267: 61: 178: 123: 331: 228: 457: 411: 242: 115: 67: 57: 36: 283: 263: 214: 303: 194: 327: 238: 75: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
456:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
410:(which has actually appeared since my original nom) and a few other random bits and pieces. 358: 53: 436: 403: 377: 279: 259: 299: 153: 354: 432: 396: 373: 452:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
347:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
320:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
52:
defaulting to keep and w/o prejudice to a future nomination.
149: 145: 141: 213: 353:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 326:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 296:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 464:). No further edits should be made to this page. 294:Note: This discussion has been included in the 274:Note: This discussion has been included in the 254:Note: This discussion has been included in the 256:list of Technology-related deletion discussions 406:(obviously promotional), a passing mention in 276:list of Australia-related deletion discussions 227: 8: 107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 293: 273: 253: 241:. Not notable. (Sorry for borked nom). 7: 24: 404:Why I founded Melbourne Wireless 92:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 441:23:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC) 420:22:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC) 382:10:32, 11 February 2019 (UTC) 62:00:55, 15 February 2019 (UTC) 363:16:10, 7 February 2019 (UTC) 336:11:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC) 308:21:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC) 288:10:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC) 268:10:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC) 82:(AfD)? Read these primers! 481: 454:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 80:Articles for deletion 116:Melbourne Wireless 68:Melbourne Wireless 365: 338: 310: 290: 270: 97:Guide to deletion 87:How to contribute 472: 412:Triptothecottage 400: 352: 350: 348: 325: 323: 321: 243:Triptothecottage 232: 231: 217: 169: 157: 139: 77: 34: 480: 479: 475: 474: 473: 471: 470: 469: 468: 462:deletion review 394: 366: 343: 341: 339: 316: 314: 174: 165: 130: 114: 111: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 478: 476: 467: 466: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 423: 422: 408:this blog post 385: 384: 351: 340: 324: 313: 312: 311: 291: 271: 235: 234: 171: 110: 109: 104: 94: 89: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 477: 465: 463: 459: 455: 450: 449: 442: 438: 434: 430: 427: 426: 425: 424: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 398: 392: 389: 388: 387: 386: 383: 379: 375: 371: 368: 367: 364: 360: 356: 349: 346: 337: 333: 329: 322: 319: 309: 305: 301: 297: 292: 289: 285: 281: 277: 272: 269: 265: 261: 257: 252: 251: 250: 248: 244: 240: 230: 226: 223: 220: 216: 212: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 180: 177: 176:Find sources: 172: 168: 164: 161: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 108: 105: 102: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 83: 81: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 453: 451: 428: 390: 369: 342: 328:Jovanmilic97 315: 236: 224: 218: 210: 203: 197: 191: 185: 175: 162: 73: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 201:free images 54:Ad Orientem 280:Sheldybett 260:Sheldybett 239:WP:ORGCRIT 458:talk page 370:Weak Keep 37:talk page 460:or in a 345:Relisted 318:Relisted 300:Bakazaka 160:View log 101:glossary 39:or in a 429:Comment 391:Comment 207:WP refs 195:scholar 133:protect 128:history 78:New to 355:RL0919 179:Google 137:delete 433:Bduke 397:Bduke 374:Bduke 222:JSTOR 183:books 167:Stats 154:views 146:watch 142:links 16:< 437:talk 416:talk 378:talk 359:talk 332:talk 304:talk 284:talk 264:talk 247:talk 215:FENS 189:news 150:logs 124:talk 120:edit 58:talk 229:TWL 158:– ( 439:) 418:) 393:. 380:) 361:) 334:) 306:) 298:. 286:) 278:. 266:) 258:. 249:) 209:) 152:| 148:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 60:) 435:( 414:( 399:: 395:@ 376:( 357:( 330:( 302:( 282:( 262:( 245:( 233:) 225:· 219:· 211:· 204:· 198:· 192:· 186:· 181:( 173:( 170:) 163:· 156:) 118:( 103:) 99:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Ad Orientem
talk
00:55, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Melbourne Wireless

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Melbourne Wireless
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.