651:. It's clear that it has been mentioned in a lot of reliable sources and is therefore notable. That said, I don't buy the argument that just because an article was once a Featured Article that that automatically means that it's notable (I think it's moot here, since it's otherwise notable); just because an article was at one point judged to be well-written and sources doesn't obviously indicate that the subject is notable.
298:
Lakitu was a former featured article too, but its just a minor creature from Mario and is now rightfully just a mere paragrah in an article on mario enemies (and one could argue it doesnt even really deserve that).
624:
Star Trek article on WP, due to our own familiarity as a result of constant exposure to the name on this site, it may cause us to think it is notable, when outside of the wikiworld it may be irrelevant.
98:
93:
88:
83:
364:
390:
171:
110:
104:
78:
570:, there is clear consensus to keep, however votes aren't how we measure notability. Could someone beef up the references, and put this beyond doubt?
324:. It's referenced in official Star Trek publications, per Colonel Warden. Must we go AfDing every wiki site article on WP every few weeks?
288:
Former featured article status has nothing to do with notability. All votes with regard to this former FA status should be treated like
584:
AfD is not cleanup. It is not about votes, it is weight of evidence, and 3rd-party coverage is obviously out there to fix this article
537:
138:
133:
492:
Former feature article = clearly notable. Any problems it currently has are signs the article needs improvement, not deletion.
142:
17:
695:
125:
463:
239:
435:-- The attempt to delete Star Trek material and move it to this particular site has now reached the peak of absurdity.
717:
36:
716:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
247:
221:
195:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
279:
699:
674:
660:
634:
615:
597:
579:
558:
541:
521:
501:
484:
467:
446:
427:
405:
379:
354:
332:
316:
282:
251:
229:
203:
61:
670:
554:
517:
509:
Obviously, if it was a former featured article, it was considered notable at one time. And once notable
329:
55:
630:
611:
575:
534:
340:
Official Star Trek books do mention the site, but I'm not sure as to how in-depth they get about it.
497:
418:
coverage to satisfy general notability. Memory Alpha is one of the more prominent wikis out there.
345:
243:
214:
188:
689:
261:
602:
The google books reference does not ascert notability, the usage could be just as definitive as
593:
567:
423:
401:
375:
310:
289:
129:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
666:
550:
513:
480:
459:
325:
293:
50:
626:
607:
571:
530:
510:
656:
646:
493:
685:
442:
179:
589:
419:
415:
397:
371:
303:
121:
67:
159:
476:
455:
454:- come on, folks. This site has a whole bunch of mentions in reliable sources.
603:
652:
549:
this is borderline notable, consider renominating again in a few months.--
437:
529:. Not every wiki is notable but this is one of the premier ones.
710:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
344:
was once a featured article?! My how
Knowledge has evolved.
566:
This site is certainly noteworthy, but that does not mean
684:
as per
Colonel Warden's finding books on google. Cheers,
259:
per 2 previous AfDs and former featured article status.
166:
155:
151:
147:
365:
list of
Science fiction-related deletion discussions
99:
Articles for deletion/Memory Alpha (6th nomination)
94:
Articles for deletion/Memory Alpha (4th nomination)
89:
Articles for deletion/Memory Alpha (3rd nomination)
84:
Articles for deletion/Memory Alpha (2nd nomination)
186:references by reliable third party publications.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
720:). No further edits should be made to this page.
414:and cleanup. Google News search shows sustained
212:per the rationale I've provided as nominator.
606:in any other book, notability needs ascerted
391:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
665:Mentions don't count towards notability.--
475:frankly, I find the nom a bit ridiculous.
588:. That coverage establishes notability.
389:: This debate has been included in the
363:: This debate has been included in the
620:On reflection, this wiki is linked in
76:
7:
111:Articles for deletion/Memory Alpha 3
105:Articles for deletion/Memory Alpha 2
74:
178:This website, while useful, fails
79:Articles for deletion/Memory Alpha
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
326:Chris Cunningham (not at work)
1:
737:
713:Please do not modify it.
700:22:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
675:00:21, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
661:18:33, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
635:10:48, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
616:14:13, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
598:12:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
580:11:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
559:22:42, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
542:20:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
522:14:05, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
502:04:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
485:03:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
468:23:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
447:22:56, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
428:22:55, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
406:22:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
380:22:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
355:21:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
333:21:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
317:21:26, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
283:21:11, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
252:20:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
230:20:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
204:20:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
62:03:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
456:Matthew Brown (Morven)
73:AfDs for this article:
44:The result was
540:
408:
394:
382:
368:
352:
240:evidently notable
728:
715:
533:
395:
385:
369:
359:
350:
348:
347:Ten Pound Hammer
315:
308:
277:
271:
266:
228:
224:
217:
202:
198:
191:
169:
163:
145:
58:
53:
34:
736:
735:
731:
730:
729:
727:
726:
725:
724:
718:deletion review
711:
511:always notable.
346:
313:
304:
272:
267:
262:
227:
222:
215:
213:
201:
196:
189:
187:
165:
136:
120:
117:
115:
107:
71:
56:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
734:
732:
723:
722:
705:
703:
702:
679:
678:
677:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
561:
544:
524:
504:
487:
470:
449:
430:
409:
383:
357:
351:and his otters
335:
319:
285:
254:
244:Colonel Warden
233:
232:
219:
216:coccyx bloccyx
193:
190:coccyx bloccyx
176:
175:
116:
114:
113:
108:
103:
101:
96:
91:
86:
81:
75:
72:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
733:
721:
719:
714:
708:
707:
706:
701:
697:
694:
691:
687:
683:
680:
676:
672:
668:
664:
663:
662:
658:
654:
650:
648:
644:
636:
632:
628:
623:
619:
618:
617:
613:
609:
605:
601:
600:
599:
595:
591:
587:
586:in due course
583:
582:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
562:
560:
556:
552:
548:
545:
543:
539:
536:
532:
528:
525:
523:
519:
515:
512:
508:
505:
503:
499:
495:
491:
488:
486:
482:
478:
474:
471:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
450:
448:
444:
440:
439:
434:
431:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
410:
407:
403:
399:
392:
388:
384:
381:
377:
373:
366:
362:
358:
356:
349:
343:
339:
336:
334:
331:
327:
323:
320:
318:
312:
309:
307:
302:
301:Ex-wikipedian
297:
295:
291:
286:
284:
281:
280:
278:
275:
270:
265:
258:
255:
253:
249:
245:
241:
238:
235:
234:
231:
226:
225:
218:
211:
208:
207:
206:
205:
200:
199:
192:
185:
181:
173:
168:
161:
157:
153:
149:
144:
140:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
118:
112:
109:
106:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
80:
77:
69:
66:
64:
63:
60:
59:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
712:
709:
704:
692:
681:
645:
621:
585:
563:
546:
526:
506:
489:
472:
451:
436:
432:
411:
386:
360:
341:
337:
321:
305:
300:
287:
273:
268:
263:
260:
256:
236:
220:
209:
194:
183:
177:
122:Memory Alpha
68:Memory Alpha
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
667:Otterathome
551:Otterathome
514:Umbralcorax
184:non-trivial
627:Fasach Nua
608:Fasach Nua
604:Joe Bloggs
572:Fasach Nua
568:wp:notable
531:JamesMLane
290:WP:ILIKEIT
182:and lacks
590:• Gene93k
547:Weak keep
494:Edward321
420:• Gene93k
398:• Gene93k
372:• Gene93k
338:Weak keep
294:WP:PRETTY
696:contribs
686:Casliber
223:(toccyx)
197:(toccyx)
172:View log
564:comment
306:ALKIVAR
139:protect
134:history
477:JuJube
276:dwards
210:Delete
180:WP:WEB
167:delete
143:delete
57:larity
622:every
416:WP:RS
170:) – (
160:views
152:watch
148:links
52:Singu
16:<
690:talk
682:Keep
671:talk
657:talk
653:Xihr
649:keep
647:SNOW
631:talk
612:talk
594:talk
576:talk
555:talk
527:Keep
518:talk
507:Keep
498:talk
490:Keep
481:talk
473:Keep
452:Keep
443:talk
433:Keep
424:talk
412:Keep
402:talk
387:Note
376:talk
361:Note
342:This
330:talk
322:Keep
257:Keep
248:talk
237:Keep
156:logs
130:talk
126:edit
46:keep
438:DGG
393:.
367:.
353:•
292:or
698:)
673:)
659:)
633:)
614:)
596:)
578:)
557:)
520:)
500:)
483:)
466:)
445:)
426:)
404:)
378:)
328:-
250:)
242:.
158:|
154:|
150:|
146:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
48:.
693:·
688:(
669:(
655:(
629:(
610:(
592:(
574:(
553:(
538:c
535:t
516:(
496:(
479:(
464:C
462::
460:T
458:(
441:(
422:(
400:(
396:—
374:(
370:—
314:☢
311:™
296:.
274:E
269:C
264:D
246:(
174:)
164:(
162:)
124:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.