335:"Subject has yet to fight in any top tier promotion" We keep coming back to this argument, haha, and there is no other objective way anyone can look at ONE Championship and say it isn't a top tier organization. The MMA notability guidelines need to be seriously updated in this regard as some of the criteria are woefully, extremely outdated. I respect all the Knowledge editors, but it's clear there is a lack of expert knowledge on this subject and it's hurting the worldwide scope of the sport. Meng Bo is also the only fighter to defeat current UFC champion Weili Zhang. Readers are going to be curious about who beat her, and they can (as of now) click and learn about Meng Bo - someone who is currently actively competing for another top tier martial arts organization - by virtue of Knowledge. To me, that seems like it fits the goal of what Knowledge is about. Meng Bo also has several bouts in China's Glory of Heroes promotion which has a Wiki page touting its place in the MMA-sphere. This attempt at exclusion does nothing to enhance potential visitor's experience on Knowledge, it only hurts it by sticking to extremely outdated criteria that has been argued against repeatedly with no motion forward. We all have the same goal of improving Knowledge, and that is very difficult to do when there is not an attempt to revise criteria for a worldwide sport and its athletes that compete across the globe.
448:, We, the Knowledge MMA regular editors, do understand and follow MMA sport. I have been a follower of the sport for more than 10 years, practice some Muay Thai and BJJ and had the pleasure of watching ONE championship event live 2 times. Glory of Heroes is not only not a top tier promotion but not even a second tier promoter. Not only a fighter needs to fight at least 3 fights in top tier promotion such as UFC to meet the MMABIO notability guidelines for if they only have one or two fights under UFC, they will not consider meeting the requirements needed. ONE championship has not been a top tier promoter so even even if Bo have 10 fights under the ONE Championship, she will not be considered notable in Knowledge. You might want to publish Bo info in other media/outlets. Thank you.
423:
is in the eyes of anyone with knowledge of the sport outside of using these nonsensical guidelines that are rooted in non-expert and/or biased voting sites) and say that Meng needs two more bouts in the company... I'd cede and wait. But Wiki shows Glory of Heroes where she has extensive experience and ONE Championship, where she currently fights. There should be nothing holding her back from getting a page on
Knowledge. Stringent guidelines are great... except when they are
366:- MMA fighter notability guidelines. Be be a top tier promoter, at least 3 fighters of the organisation is on top 10 of their respective weight class worldwide for at least one year and if the requirements if the promoter will drop back to teir 2 if such such requirements are not fulfilled. Bo/subject is ranked #85 for strawweight - see
422:
suggesting we eliminate these rankings. I understand that you are following them to a tee, but that's the issue. When you blindly follow such clearly out-dated guidelines you do nothing but hurt the end product. If you wanted to classify ONE Championship as a top tier promoter (which it undoubtedly
214:
56:
needs to be updated, the consensus is that a) it is not currently satisfied. Also, I see that that page is not actually a guideline at all, and people have called for deletion on the basis of
418:: And we keep coming back to the blatant fact that you are utilizing extremely outdated definitions for what makes a top tier promotion. This is something that I have brought up on the
53:
167:
301:
267:
208:
253:. Subject has yet to fight in any top tier promotion, no major achievements of any other martial arts discipline and sources primary are routine sport report.
318:
284:
114:
99:
403:
174:
94:
87:
17:
229:
140:
135:
108:
104:
196:
144:
492:
40:
127:
397:
65:
471:
419:
190:
488:
36:
186:
445:
428:
355:
336:
222:
475:
454:
436:
410:
344:
327:
310:
293:
276:
259:
131:
69:
432:
382:
340:
61:
236:
467:
83:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
487:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
123:
75:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
379:
363:
359:
246:
449:
322:
305:
288:
271:
254:
463:
375:
250:
202:
57:
161:
358:. Greetings. ONE Championship has never been a top tier promoter - pls see
483:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
60:
which is actually a guideline as well. So delete this is.
466:
in-depth significant coverage of the subject is required
157:
153:
149:
54:
Knowledge:WikiProject Mixed martial arts/MMA notability
221:
427:and have little to no relevance in today's sport.
302:list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions
268:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
495:). No further edits should be made to this page.
317:Note: This discussion has been included in the
300:Note: This discussion has been included in the
283:Note: This discussion has been included in the
266:Note: This discussion has been included in the
245:Subject is a mixed martial arts fighter. Fails
235:
8:
115:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
319:list of China-related deletion discussions
316:
299:
285:list of Women-related deletion discussions
282:
265:
374:per nom. Subject of the articles fails
52:. Aside from the question of whether
7:
24:
100:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
476:14:58, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
455:07:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
437:08:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
411:07:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
345:07:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
328:07:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
311:07:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
294:07:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
277:07:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
260:07:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
70:09:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
90:(AfD)? Read these primers!
512:
485:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
88:Articles for deletion
425:extremely outdated
330:
313:
296:
279:
105:Guide to deletion
95:How to contribute
503:
420:Wikiproject page
406:
400:
392:
389:
386:
368:
367:
240:
239:
225:
177:
165:
147:
85:
34:
511:
510:
506:
505:
504:
502:
501:
500:
499:
493:deletion review
404:
398:
390:
387:
384:
182:
173:
138:
122:
119:
82:
79:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
509:
507:
498:
497:
479:
478:
457:
439:
413:
369:
348:
347:
332:
331:
314:
297:
280:
243:
242:
179:
118:
117:
112:
102:
97:
80:
78:
73:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
508:
496:
494:
490:
486:
481:
480:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
458:
456:
453:
452:
447:
443:
440:
438:
434:
430:
426:
421:
417:
414:
412:
409:
407:
401:
394:
393:
381:
377:
373:
370:
365:
361:
357:
353:
350:
349:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:
329:
326:
325:
320:
315:
312:
309:
308:
303:
298:
295:
292:
291:
286:
281:
278:
275:
274:
269:
264:
263:
262:
261:
258:
257:
252:
248:
238:
234:
231:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
188:
185:
184:Find sources:
180:
176:
172:
169:
163:
159:
155:
151:
146:
142:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
120:
116:
113:
110:
106:
103:
101:
98:
96:
93:
92:
91:
89:
84:
77:
74:
72:
71:
67:
63:
62:Jo-Jo Eumerus
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
484:
482:
468:Celestina007
460:Weak Delete
459:
450:
441:
424:
415:
395:
383:
371:
351:
323:
306:
289:
272:
255:
244:
232:
226:
218:
211:
205:
199:
193:
183:
170:
81:
49:
47:
31:
28:
209:free images
451:CASSIOPEIA
324:CASSIOPEIA
307:CASSIOPEIA
290:CASSIOPEIA
273:CASSIOPEIA
256:CASSIOPEIA
489:talk page
380:WP:MMABIO
364:WP:MMABIO
360:WP:MMANOT
247:WP:MMABIO
37:talk page
491:or in a
446:ACCBiggz
429:ACCBiggz
405:Contribs
362:and the
356:ACCBiggz
337:ACCBiggz
168:View log
109:glossary
39:or in a
462:as per
442:Comment
416:Comment
352:Comment
215:WP refs
203:scholar
141:protect
136:history
124:Meng Bo
86:New to
76:Meng Bo
464:WP:GNG
376:WP:GNG
372:Delete
251:WP:GNG
187:Google
145:delete
58:WP:GNG
50:delete
385:NNADI
230:JSTOR
191:books
175:Stats
162:views
154:watch
150:links
16:<
472:talk
433:talk
399:Talk
391:LUCK
388:GOOD
378:and
341:talk
249:and
223:FENS
197:news
158:logs
132:talk
128:edit
66:talk
237:TWL
166:– (
474:)
444::
435:)
354::
343:)
321:.
304:.
287:.
270:.
217:)
160:|
156:|
152:|
148:|
143:|
139:|
134:|
130:|
68:)
470:(
431:(
408:)
402:|
396:(
339:(
241:)
233:·
227:·
219:·
212:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
189:(
181:(
178:)
171:·
164:)
126:(
111:)
107:(
64:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.