268:(which turned up nothing outside of the sources used here) shows that the absolute bottom of the barrel was scraped to find sources even tangentially related to Groth ("tangentially related" would even be a generous description of some of the sources). For example, four of the 11 sources are listicles from ScreenRant (borderline blog spam articles) that, in case of the second one for example, have one single item out of 10 being a screenshot of a meme posted to MandJTV's subreddit (not even made or posted by Groth himself) but zero mention of MandJTV; the only text about MandJTV in the article is the data pulled from the Reddit API which reads "r/MandJTV".
443:, the coverage appear to be routine and trivial, in merely a few short paragraphs. Similarly, the Business Insider articles, which is generally reliable for its culture section but marginally reliable otherwise (I'm unsure if media articles are culture ones) cover routine subscriber and revenue details along with a few interview-like quotes, falling into a minor story per
279:
interview from Groth placed among several other terse interviews with YouTubers within the same article, not to mention the fact that it has nothing to do with Groth himself as a subject and is instead a story about a drop in ad revenue among YouTube creators.
258:. The three sources actually about this article's subject are two small human interest stories from a local news station (KPRC) and another small human interest story from the university he attends (neither of which, I'll add, are
219:
83:
487:
I was not aware that interviews were not considered independent. I'll be more careful about sourcing in the future. I agree the page should be deleted since there aren't independent sources.
314:(a source which covers such important topics on its front page as "4 best organic babyface turns from the Triple H era of WWE so far") regurgitating verbatim Groth's opinions on BDSP.
397:
176:
393:
343:
Noting for the record that the prior
Michael Groth AfD was about a completely unrelated subject and is of no relevance here, despite its automatic inclusion by the AfD script.
401:
213:
78:
405:
423:. I concur with the nom's detailed analysis that the references are poor. The first two references are routine interview-like coverage that does not seem to pass
108:
123:
322:, whether intentionally or not, to, respectively, give the subject a facade of notability or to pad out what would otherwise be a four-sentence stub.
389:
428:
522:, screen rant isn't appropriate for demonstrating notability. The other sources also have issues with independence and/or reliability.
103:
96:
17:
149:
144:
153:
548:
531:
510:
496:
480:
414:
378:
354:
337:
63:
300:
Three ScreenRant blog spam listicles about memes that have (I cannot emphasize this enough) literally nothing to do with Groth.
136:
234:
117:
113:
201:
565:
40:
180:
455:
did not find sources that could demonstrate notability, only trivial mentions or non-SIGCOV routine coverage such as
373:
332:
307:
articles that have a few words from Groth about YouTuber ad revenue among the words of several other YouTubers.
297:
One ScreenRant listicle about
Poketubers that contains a bare-minimum, 107-word description of Groth's channel.
195:
519:
527:
191:
456:
561:
544:
523:
140:
36:
365:
324:
241:
464:
319:
475:
227:
132:
69:
452:
448:
432:
424:
265:
255:
460:
505:
92:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
560:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
276:
259:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
540:
492:
444:
440:
251:
207:
469:
409:
347:
170:
504:. A unnotable youtuber that has not done a signifigant thing to be on an article.
488:
311:
436:
54:
288:
435:
as well. Next, there are numerous bottom-of-the-barrel listicles from
556:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
363:
Oops! Thanks for pointing that out; I hadn't even noticed.
287:
Two small human-interest stories from local news channel
166:
162:
158:
226:
294:
One small human-interest story from Rice
University.
84:
Articles for deletion/Michael Groth (2nd nomination)
240:
539:per general consensus. I see no notability here.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
568:). No further edits should be made to this page.
388:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
124:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
387:
431:is a listicle that comes nowhere near to
76:
283:In summary, the sources we have are:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
439:, which is marginally reliable per
79:Articles for deletion/Michael Groth
24:
392:lists for the following topics:
262:by nature of being interviews).
109:Introduction to deletion process
318:It feels like this article was
275:source are a brief, inherently
1:
549:20:06, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
532:19:43, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
511:07:59, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
497:21:04, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
481:20:29, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
415:20:20, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
379:20:00, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
355:19:48, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
338:19:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
64:20:25, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
271:Meanwhile, things like the
99:(AfD)? Read these primers!
585:
558:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
75:AfDs for this article:
181:edits since nomination
310:A short article from
97:Articles for deletion
467:are also failed.
459:. Similarly, IMO
417:
114:Guide to deletion
104:How to contribute
576:
508:
507:`~HelpingWorld~`
478:
472:
412:
390:deletion sorting
376:
370:
335:
329:
305:Business Insider
273:Business Insider
245:
244:
230:
174:
156:
94:
62:
34:
584:
583:
579:
578:
577:
575:
574:
573:
572:
566:deletion review
506:
476:
470:
410:
374:
368:TheTechnician27
366:
346:
333:
327:TheTechnician27
325:
277:non-independent
187:
147:
131:
128:
91:
88:
73:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
582:
580:
571:
570:
552:
551:
534:
520:WP:GAMESOURCES
513:
499:
484:
483:
418:
384:
383:
382:
381:
358:
357:
344:
316:
315:
308:
301:
298:
295:
292:
250:Does not pass
248:
247:
184:
127:
126:
121:
111:
106:
89:
87:
86:
81:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
581:
569:
567:
563:
559:
554:
553:
550:
546:
542:
538:
535:
533:
529:
525:
524:Shooterwalker
521:
518:According to
517:
514:
512:
509:
503:
500:
498:
494:
490:
486:
485:
482:
479:
474:
473:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
427:IMO, whereas
426:
422:
419:
416:
413:
407:
403:
399:
398:Entertainment
395:
391:
386:
385:
380:
377:
372:
371:
369:
362:
361:
360:
359:
356:
353:
352:
351:
342:
341:
340:
339:
336:
331:
330:
328:
321:
313:
309:
306:
302:
299:
296:
293:
290:
286:
285:
284:
281:
278:
274:
269:
267:
263:
261:
257:
253:
243:
239:
236:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
193:
190:
189:Find sources:
185:
182:
178:
172:
168:
164:
160:
155:
151:
146:
142:
138:
134:
133:Michael Groth
130:
129:
125:
122:
119:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
101:
100:
98:
93:
85:
82:
80:
77:
71:
70:Michael Groth
68:
66:
65:
61:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
557:
555:
536:
515:
501:
468:
447:that is not
420:
367:
364:
349:
348:
326:
323:
320:WP:REFBOMBed
317:
304:
282:
272:
270:
264:
249:
237:
231:
223:
216:
210:
204:
198:
188:
90:
56:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
541:Zekerocks11
394:Video games
375:(Talk page)
334:(Talk page)
312:Sportskeeda
260:independent
214:free images
465:WP:NARTIST
437:ScreenRant
562:talk page
471:VickKiang
453:WP:BEFORE
449:WP:SIGCOV
433:WP:SIGCOV
425:WP:SIGCOV
411:Spiderone
266:WP:BEFORE
256:WP:ARTIST
37:talk page
564:or in a
461:WP:BASIC
402:Internet
350:Rosguill
345:signed,
177:View log
118:glossary
39:or in a
404:, and
220:WP refs
208:scholar
150:protect
145:history
95:New to
537:Delete
516:Delete
502:Delete
489:19jshi
477:(talk)
445:WP:GNG
441:WP:RSP
421:Delete
252:WP:GNG
192:Google
154:delete
50:delete
451:. My
406:Texas
235:JSTOR
196:books
171:views
163:watch
159:links
16:<
545:talk
528:talk
493:talk
463:and
429:this
303:Two
289:KPRC
228:FENS
202:news
167:logs
141:talk
137:edit
254:or
242:TWL
175:– (
547:)
530:)
495:)
408:.
400:,
396:,
222:)
179:|
169:|
165:|
161:|
157:|
152:|
148:|
143:|
139:|
60:iz
52:.
543:(
526:(
491:(
457:1
291:.
246:)
238:·
232:·
224:·
217:·
211:·
205:·
199:·
194:(
186:(
183:)
173:)
135:(
120:)
116:(
57:L
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.