656:
considered noteworthy enough to keep this
Knowledge article. Aol, Inside Edition and MSN are also considered noteworth enough to have their own wikipedia pages. A great portion of the medical community in Beverly Hills, especially for elective surgeries, was basically shut down for many months due to the Covid-19 threat. The virus would also significantly slow down any of the doctor's philanthropic work due to lack of funding and individual's fears about contracting it
523:
they do that? Anyway I guess they wrote stuff that was too promotional sounding but it looks like a lot of people who saw this helped fix it. The doctor did not know about it and should not have his page deleted which has been edited by a lot of people over many months.I really want to fix this please. If there is anything else that needs to be removed please let me know and I will get advice as to how to take it out.
308:@Praxidicae I am sorry, I need to correct what I said. The article said that he is the "FIRST" black surgoen in BH, but the Wiki page has no such claims anyway. I have revised my statement I made earlier. Also the 2nd link you send is in LA, not BH, but very close to BH. Also i do feel there are some promotional statements in this article. I will see if I can revise them.
522:
I hope I am writing in tbe right section. I am trying to apologize as I am friends with an ex-patient of the doctor who did some amazing work for him. I did pay someone by mistake to help tbe article without knowing it was not allowed. I'm really sorry but why are there so many people online who say
329:
when an article is based on sources that make flase claims, the article becomes suspect. Even if he was the only black platic surgeon in
Beverly Hills, I am unconvinced that would be a sign of notability. The fact that people are falsely claiming he is is a disturbing trend and probably shows signs
239:
PR from an undeclared paid editor. Fails WP:PROF--just one publication; the references are basically press releases. The reason there are so many is they are copies of the same PR published in multiple papers. Most of the pr is because he has operated on some celebrities like most plastic surgeons
392:
I have read this article twice and I don't find any promotional content in it. This is 100% informative article which contains tons of information and 0 promotional content. And when it comes of it being paid editing I don't feel so as the depth of information given can only be given when it is
655:
his sources: Variety, Black
Enterprise, Deadline, Ebony all have their own Knowledge pages. Ebony has been in business 74 years, and nominated him this year as one of the top 100 most notable black people in the world. He was also covered by AOL, Inside Edition, and MSN. Aol, and MSN are also
410:
Article does not claim he is only black plastic surgeon in
Beverly Hills. Doesn't overhype the fact that he was included in the top 100 list of notable black persons in 2020. Was also noted in such credible sources as Variety, eonline, Black Enterprise, deadline, etc. He seems to be a well
551:
Well then the article needs to be cleaned up and all the promotional fluff removed by the
Knowledge community, but my personal assessment is that this Obeng should notable enough regardless of whether there is a COI or not.
208:
629:: I find it odd that three of the five "keep" votes so far are from editors who have only begun editing Knowledge within the past few months. That is a very unusual pattern of participants in an AfD.
348:
161:
202:
368:
428:
Accomplished
African-American surgeon in Beverly Hills, and is on Variety, Black Enterprise, Deadline, Ebony, etc. Looks quite notable for a black surgeon.
260:
There is significant coverage and mentions in well know publications. I also feel that being the FIRST black surgeon in
Beverly Hills is very significant.
108:
508:
Is mentioned in some popular items, "Forehead reduction surgery"... but also noted in some titles for awards recieved and his charity efforts in Africa.
93:
482:. not notability, though I doubt that also. I however do question the meaning of "Looks quite notable for a black surgeon". [[User::Batmanthe8th|
168:
134:
129:
138:
121:
538:
223:
88:
81:
17:
190:
702:
102:
98:
679:
601:
446:
184:
730:
583:
doctor who does a little charity on the side, as do countless others, only he has repetitious press releases to.
335:
40:
513:
713:
683:
665:
644:
619:
592:
561:
542:
517:
498:
469:
437:
420:
402:
380:
360:
339:
317:
303:
269:
251:
63:
180:
416:
376:
356:
313:
294:. Which really makes me wonder about the credibility of the single source stating this information as fact.
265:
671:
661:
588:
580:
557:
534:
433:
398:
726:
675:
412:
230:
125:
36:
657:
394:
530:
526:
331:
299:
58:
615:
509:
216:
372:
352:
309:
261:
584:
553:
465:
429:
196:
77:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
725:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
698:
639:
576:
117:
69:
291:
295:
240:
in his geographic area. . Minor charitable work, man 1press release references to it.
53:
694:
611:
572:
494:
247:
461:
155:
707:
630:
287:
330:
such is overly promotionalist and maybe even deliberately false advertising.
489:
242:
487:
Batmanthe8th]], are you sure that this wording is what you want to say?
282:
black surgeon in
Beverly Hills and he isn't even the only black
721:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
604:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
449:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
151:
147:
143:
215:
610:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
460:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
349:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
733:). No further edits should be made to this page.
411:accomplished African American and should remain.
367:Note: This discussion has been included in the
347:Note: This discussion has been included in the
478:Comment: the reason for deletion is primarily
480:Promotional content by undeclared page editor
369:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
229:
8:
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
693:I am not seeing sustained coverage of this
524:
366:
346:
579:in independent reliable sources. Just a
7:
457:Needs more policy-based discussion.
24:
94:Introduction to deletion process
670:You already voted. This isn't
393:written by the person himself.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
714:21:42, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
684:15:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
666:13:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
645:00:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
620:19:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
593:19:37, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
562:18:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
543:22:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
518:06:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
499:04:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
470:02:19, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
64:22:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
1:
438:04:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
421:22:55, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
403:18:40, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
381:12:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
361:12:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
340:14:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
318:17:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
304:12:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
270:09:08, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
252:18:15, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
575:due to a lack of sustained
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
750:
286:surgeon in Beverly Hills.
723:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
672:vote early, vote often
82:Articles for deletion
571:per the nom. Fails
455:Relisting comment:
622:
545:
529:comment added by
472:
383:
363:
332:John Pack Lambert
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
741:
710:
676:NinjaRobotPirate
637:
609:
607:
605:
459:
452:
450:
234:
233:
219:
171:
159:
141:
118:Michael K. Obeng
79:
70:Michael K. Obeng
61:
56:
34:
749:
748:
744:
743:
742:
740:
739:
738:
737:
731:deletion review
708:
631:
623:
600:
598:
581:WP:RUNOFTHEMILL
473:
445:
443:
176:
167:
132:
116:
113:
76:
73:
59:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
747:
745:
736:
735:
717:
716:
688:
687:
686:
647:
608:
597:
596:
595:
566:
565:
564:
520:
510:Deathlibrarian
502:
501:
485:
484:
483:
458:
453:
442:
441:
440:
423:
405:
385:
384:
364:
343:
342:
323:
322:
321:
320:
306:
273:
272:
237:
236:
173:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
746:
734:
732:
728:
724:
719:
718:
715:
712:
711:
704:
700:
696:
692:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
668:
667:
663:
659:
654:
653:
648:
646:
643:
642:
638:
636:
635:
628:
625:
624:
621:
617:
613:
606:
603:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
567:
563:
559:
555:
550:
547:
546:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
521:
519:
515:
511:
507:
504:
503:
500:
496:
492:
491:
486:
481:
477:
476:
475:
474:
471:
467:
463:
456:
451:
448:
439:
435:
431:
427:
424:
422:
418:
414:
413:TruthLover123
409:
406:
404:
400:
396:
391:
387:
386:
382:
378:
374:
373:Coolabahapple
370:
365:
362:
358:
354:
353:Coolabahapple
350:
345:
344:
341:
337:
333:
328:
325:
324:
319:
315:
311:
310:Expertwikiguy
307:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
278:He isn't the
277:
276:
275:
274:
271:
267:
263:
262:Expertwikiguy
259:
256:
255:
254:
253:
249:
245:
244:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
170:
166:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
722:
720:
706:
690:
658:Author Sanju
651:
649:
640:
633:
632:
626:
599:
585:Newshunter12
568:
554:Batmanthe8th
548:
525:— Preceding
505:
488:
479:
454:
444:
430:Batmanthe8th
425:
407:
395:Author Sanju
389:
326:
283:
279:
257:
241:
238:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
164:
75:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
203:free images
55:‑Scottywong
531:NewbieGuy1
296:Praxidicae
727:talk page
697:figure. (
612:Barkeep49
577:WP:SIGCOV
506:Weak Keep
37:talk page
729:or in a
652:Comment'
602:Relisted
539:contribs
527:unsigned
447:Relisted
288:See here
162:View log
103:glossary
39:or in a
695:WP:MILL
627:Comment
549:Comment
462:Natg 19
284:plastic
209:WP refs
197:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
709:buidhe
691:Delete
634:BD2412
573:WP:GNG
569:Delete
327:Delete
181:Google
139:delete
495:talk
390:Keep'
248:talk
224:JSTOR
185:books
169:Stats
156:views
148:watch
144:links
60:| ||
16:<
680:talk
662:talk
616:talk
589:talk
558:talk
535:talk
514:talk
466:talk
434:talk
426:Keep
417:talk
408:Keep
399:talk
377:talk
357:talk
336:talk
314:talk
300:talk
292:here
290:and
280:only
266:talk
258:Keep
217:FENS
191:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
490:DGG
243:DGG
231:TWL
160:– (
705:)
701:·
682:)
674:.
664:)
618:)
591:)
560:)
541:)
537:•
516:)
497:)
468:)
436:)
419:)
401:)
379:)
371:.
359:)
351:.
338:)
316:)
302:)
268:)
250:)
211:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
52:.
703:c
699:t
678:(
660:(
650:'
641:T
614:(
587:(
556:(
533:(
512:(
493:(
464:(
432:(
415:(
397:(
388:'
375:(
355:(
334:(
312:(
298:(
264:(
246:(
235:)
227:·
221:·
213:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
183:(
175:(
172:)
165:·
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.