193:) and see all the edits by the user Sethanikeem promoting Michelle's books, ideas and hatred towards other views and works. Then do a simple search on the Sethanikeem nick online and see it is used by Michelle Belanger, the author, in several forums and online services (A few examples are Flick, LiveJournal and the Witches Voice, among many many others. Any simple search will easily show this.) This kind of attitudes is fully against Knowledge policies and nothing more than self-promotion in trying to gain notability for personal gain. More attitudes from this author against the same works that she tried to take credibility in her Knowledge edits can be found also across the web, mostly in forums. Her use of several different nicknames for her own manipulative agendas is a common thing, that again, can be easily verified by online research. So in the end this is a non notable author, publishing teen-oriented nonsense about the existence of vampires, by the use of occultist overtones to manipulate people over her views, that in the end have no credibility and are not supported by any well established and believable scholars or publications. In no way this can be justified for a Knowledge article.
403:"Knowledge is not the place to insert personal opinions, experiences, or arguments. Knowledge is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Knowledge is not a soapbox; an advertising platform; a vanity press; an experiment in anarchy or democracy; or a web directory. It is not a newspaper or a collection of source documents; these kinds of content should be contributed to the Wikimedia sister projects."
60:
31:
188:
The article is just the author self-promoting herself. Clearly fails at notability and it is by no means encyclopedic knowledge. To support these claims, we can see the same author, Michelle
Belanger, spamming Knowledge with her own books and trying to take down credibility from other works. For this
240:
In support of the mentioned reasons for deletion, I also found this article about the supposed author, on
Encyclopedia Dramatica. The nick Set Hanikeem is refered as being her alter-ego, and some form of pre-historical priest that she is trying to create a new cult based on. For further research on
541:
applies. As a
Knowledge Editor just mentioned in a commentary above, although COI alone does not warrant an article deletion, it can reinforce the other reasons for a positive and obvious deletion of a strictly promotional article, that serves only the author's
450:
However, if a reason to delete due to a conflict of interest (i.e. spam, lack of notability or verifiability) is enough to warrant deletion (which is what I sense from reading the argument), then COI comes into play to reinforce a valid reason for deletion.
436:. Conflict of interest is not a reason to delete. Regardless of how the article started, it now belongs to Knowledge and can (and should) be edited unmercifully to make it NPOV. The newspaper coverage demonstrates notability. --
232:- The reasons for deletion seem to be valid and I can't really see enough notability in this article for being considered encyclopedic knowledge. Not to mention that seems to be touching on the realms of a
417:
The fact of the author self-promoting herself and spreading links, texts and references about her own book, which can be verified in
Knowledge history logs, represent more than enough reason for deletion.
537:. Since the author herself is spamming different Knowledge articles with publicity on her book to try and bring some notability and fuss around her pseudo-intelectual work, I believe that
302:
181:
516:
AL article. Well-writen, but lacks notability. Knowledge's aim is keeping a record of encyclopedic knowledge, not advertisement. From my point of view there is not much of
325:
40:
69:
148:
143:
419:
152:
135:
592:
17:
538:
517:
411:
574:
410:
and based on the research information provided in the deletion request, seems like all of this is connected with
374:
251:
94:
75:
46:
573:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
560:
556:
529:
504:
483:
464:
445:
427:
378:
361:
343:
314:
292:
273:
255:
224:
202:
198:
117:
93:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
423:
139:
357:
338:
525:
396:
As it is described in
Knowledge's official policies and guidelines, as one of its first pillars (check
389:
370:
310:
247:
552:
548:
513:
479:
407:
288:
194:
521:
458:
441:
269:
131:
123:
87:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
353:
332:
220:
495:. I see no reason to make a special exception in this case, seems punitive to suggest so.
499:
306:
352:. This article fails in NPOV (self-promotion). The newspaper sources, are they reliable?
475:
284:
113:
586:
452:
437:
265:
551:
is the key in here, added to the spam in other articles that is easily verifiable.
397:
169:
492:
216:
496:
108:
191:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Energy_vampire&action=history
567:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
54:
25:
241:
Michelle
Belanger, the article can be found on the link:
213:
no independent reliable source to establish notability.
190:
176:
165:
161:
157:
520:, which couldn't be used as an argument for deletion.
189:
check history of edits in the Energy
Vampire article (
264:. I added three newspaper articles as references. --
406:Despite all of this, the article can be considered
303:list of Living people-related deletion discussions
97:). No further edits should be made to this page.
577:). No further edits should be made to this page.
369:It certainly needs work. I nominate Eastmain.
242:
8:
326:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
245:encyclopediadramaticacom/Michelle_Belanger
324:: This debate has been included in the
301:: This debate has been included in the
74:For an explanation of the process, see
45:For an explanation of the process, see
7:
24:
58:
41:deletion review on 2009 April 29
29:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
539:Knowledge:Conflict of interest
518:Knowledge:Conflict of interest
412:Knowledge:Conflict of interest
70:deletion review on 2009 May 10
1:
561:21:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
530:19:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
505:13:58, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
493:the usual inclusion criterion
484:10:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
465:03:57, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
446:03:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
428:03:28, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
379:02:21, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
362:02:16, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
344:01:17, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
315:00:01, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
293:22:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
274:22:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
256:22:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
225:22:07, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
203:21:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
118:09:12, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
283:. Undoubtedly Promotional. -
609:
76:Knowledge:Deletion review
47:Knowledge:Deletion review
593:Pages at deletion review
570:Please do not modify it.
388:, This article fails at
90:Please do not modify it.
390:Knowledge:NOTABILITY
549:Knowledge:PROMOTION
514:Knowledge:PROMOTION
408:Knowledge:PROMOTION
102:The result was
346:
329:
317:
132:Michelle Belanger
124:Michelle Belanger
82:
81:
68:was subject to a
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
600:
572:
502:
461:
455:
341:
335:
330:
320:
297:
179:
173:
155:
92:
62:
61:
55:
33:
32:
26:
608:
607:
603:
602:
601:
599:
598:
597:
583:
582:
581:
575:deletion review
568:
500:
474:: promotional.
459:
453:
371:ChildofMidnight
339:
333:
248:Cristina Torres
175:
146:
130:
127:
95:deletion review
88:
66:This discussion
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
606:
604:
596:
595:
585:
584:
580:
579:
553:GustavusPrimus
546:
545:
544:
543:
507:
486:
469:
468:
467:
420:193.137.158.79
394:
393:
382:
381:
364:
347:
318:
295:
277:
276:
246:
238:
237:
227:
215:Promotional.--
195:GustavusPrimus
186:
185:
126:
121:
100:
99:
83:
80:
79:
73:
63:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
605:
594:
591:
590:
588:
578:
576:
571:
565:
564:
563:
562:
558:
554:
550:
540:
536:
533:
532:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
508:
506:
503:
498:
494:
490:
487:
485:
481:
477:
473:
470:
466:
462:
456:
449:
448:
447:
443:
439:
435:
432:
431:
430:
429:
425:
421:
415:
413:
409:
404:
401:
399:
391:
387:
384:
383:
380:
376:
372:
368:
365:
363:
359:
355:
351:
348:
345:
342:
336:
327:
323:
319:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
278:
275:
271:
267:
263:
260:
259:
258:
257:
253:
249:
244:
235:
231:
230:Speedy Delete
228:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
206:
205:
204:
200:
196:
192:
183:
178:
171:
167:
163:
159:
154:
150:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
128:
125:
122:
120:
119:
115:
111:
110:
105:
98:
96:
91:
85:
84:
77:
71:
67:
64:
57:
56:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
569:
566:
547:
534:
509:
488:
471:
433:
416:
405:
402:
395:
385:
367:Keep and fix
366:
354:Zero Kitsune
349:
321:
298:
280:
261:
239:
233:
229:
212:
208:
187:
107:
103:
101:
89:
86:
65:
36:
334:Fabrictramp
340:talk to me
307:Erwin85Bot
243:http://www
542:purposes.
476:Alexius08
285:MarkChase
587:Category
491:- meets
454:MuZemike
438:Eastmain
266:Eastmain
182:View log
535:Comment
522:SydLyra
434:Comment
149:protect
144:history
510:Delete
472:Delete
386:Delete
350:Delete
281:Delete
217:Boffob
209:Delete
177:delete
153:delete
104:delete
512:as a
398:WP:5P
180:) – (
170:views
162:watch
158:links
16:<
557:talk
526:talk
497:Wily
489:Keep
480:talk
460:talk
442:talk
424:talk
375:talk
358:talk
322:Note
311:talk
305:. --
299:Note
289:talk
270:talk
262:Keep
252:talk
234:hoax
221:talk
199:talk
166:logs
140:talk
136:edit
114:talk
109:Cirt
400:):
331:--
328:.
589::
559:)
528:)
482:)
463:)
444:)
426:)
414:.
377:)
360:)
337:|
313:)
291:)
272:)
254:)
223:)
211:-
201:)
168:|
164:|
160:|
156:|
151:|
147:|
142:|
138:|
116:)
106:.
72:.
43:.
555:(
524:(
501:D
478:(
457:(
440:(
422:(
392:.
373:(
356:(
309:(
287:(
268:(
250:(
236:.
219:(
197:(
184:)
174:(
172:)
134:(
112:(
78:.
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.