577:— Note that most of the above discussion is about the state of the article as it existed a few days ago. I looked at old versions and they were indeed full of statements that were definitely exaggerations about the singer's influence, and his so-called company is almost certainly a hoax. I agree that this article's saga has revealed gaps in the CSD process, but that's a different discussion. Praxidicae has since removed most of the junk, and there is hardly anything left because the kid has no reliable coverage beyond reprints of his manager's press releases in friendly non-critical publications. Good luck to the kid, but the
609:- The sea of tags on the article says it all. The "sourcing" aren't worth crap: Twitter, official site, Mp3 download site, streaming service link and an article on Medium which is not a reliable source. Google results are the usual junk like databases, streaming service entries, social media pages, press releases, lyrics sites and WP mirrors. The guy exists, but this article is certainly WP:TOOSOON.
488:
And if anyone wants to run a sock check for WalkerSoft, CreepLord, and
Shedrack321, I am sure you will snare a few more names to add to the v2burger list. Even the Musicbrainz link at the bottom of the article lists all of the various artist names this guy has used, most of which have been deleted
427:
This is laughable. None of those are claims. set.fm isn't even a record label, a 5 star rating on
Discogs doesn't exist. I guess you're not aware that simply being signed to a label isn't a claim of significance unless the label itself is known (or you know, in existence...) You do realize that in
446:
OK. How do you believe those claims are both credible and are significant ? I find myself in agreement with
Praxidicae here, if a source doesn't exist, meaning the claims concerning that source have been fabricated, how exactly can those claims be credible or have any significance ?
318:
and it was promotional and a copyvio. And yes, it's clearly designed to be deceptive as a hoax. But now we are here and will suffer through a worthless 7 day discussion about a guy who has literally no sources about him or his company anywhere on the internet, other than you know,
372:
Claims of significance. The mtter is really no longer relevant sicne we are now dealing with notability, a much higher standard. Note that CCS need not be supported by any sources, nor externally verified. Since you ask, I considerd the following to be CCS:
563:— By far one of the worst articles I have ever seen no disrespect to anyone. It fails to satisfy any known notability criteria. Furthermore, yes! If Praxidicae called this article a hoax she wouldn’t be too far from the truth.
402:
my view is that if at least 10% of artiucles with property X are eventually kept at AfD, than a statement, even if totally unsourecd, that the subjet has property X (say being a CEO) is a claim of significance.
227:
358:
saw when they turned down the speedy deletion. I'll note that I'm pleased they didn't totally fuck up handling the speedy deletion nomination and did at least deal with the blatant copyright issues.
490:
471:
509:
180:
280:
Lack of notability is not the same as a "hoax", which would be an intentional false statement. I ask that the term hoax be either supported more clearly, or struck,
221:
526:
336:
Also please, do tell what claim there ever was. Is it being signed to "The Sets
Records" which doesn't exist? Or the 5 stars at discogs from rating themselves?
53:
127:
112:
258:
complete hoax in that this person might be alive but isn't at all notable to the extent that this article claims. Also it's a copyright violation from
596:
187:
494:
475:
489:
from
Knowledge. There is no reason whatsoever that the this discussion has been open for so long. Someone really dropped the ball.
107:
100:
17:
409:
289:
153:
148:
242:
157:
614:
377:
the owner of a
Database and software maintenance company “Miik Africa” which is notable in Nigeria and rated by Google
209:
121:
117:
140:
78:
668:
551:
40:
592:
203:
610:
664:
531:
514:
387:
He rose to prominence after the release of the song "Hard
Culture", which was rated 5 stared on Discogs.
36:
199:
547:
437:
392:
The post caught the attention of set.fm artist world which decided to make him part of a record deal.
341:
327:
267:
651:
635:
618:
601:
569:
555:
535:
518:
498:
479:
456:
441:
414:
367:
345:
331:
294:
271:
144:
82:
578:
235:
583:
407:
399:
314:
is a legitimate record label? The rest is literally made up, which fails the A7 test of having a
287:
249:
136:
88:
565:
96:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
663:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
631:
433:
337:
323:
281:
263:
452:
363:
215:
72:
404:
355:
307:
303:
284:
470:
no explanation needed. anyone that can't see why isn't going to understand anyhow.
174:
306:
If you bothered to read any of the article or the sources you'd know there are 0
627:
645:
448:
432:
it needs to exist, right? Miik Africa, as I noted above, literally doesn't.
359:
66:
58:
259:
659:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
643:- Speedy should not have been declined. Non-notable hoax. --
320:
354:
I'd really love to know what credible claims of significance
382:
He signed a record deal with set.fm a music artist industry.
626:, Per nom. if not a hoax, but does not support notability.
581:
to get him off the ground does not belong in
Knowledge. ---
510:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
170:
166:
162:
234:
311:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
671:). No further edits should be made to this page.
525:Note: This discussion has been included in the
508:Note: This discussion has been included in the
248:
8:
527:list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions
128:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
54:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/V2burger
524:
507:
398:Note that, as I have previously stated on
491:2601:983:827F:6B20:F194:3503:CE0D:3C18
472:2601:983:827F:6B20:B866:9D94:22D7:FD03
391:
386:
381:
376:
7:
24:
113:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
652:17:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
636:07:55, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
499:15:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
103:(AfD)? Read these primers!
83:18:20, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
688:
619:18:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
602:14:26, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
570:01:43, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
556:12:39, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
536:06:10, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
519:06:10, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
480:00:42, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
457:23:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
442:23:40, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
428:order for something to be
415:23:38, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
368:23:11, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
346:23:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
332:23:03, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
295:23:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
272:22:38, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
262:and complete vanity spam.
661:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
310:. Or do you think that
546:a non-notable rapper.
101:Articles for deletion
52:. G4, G5. See also
611:GhostDestroyer100
587:
579:promotional blitz
548:John Pack Lambert
538:
521:
411:DESiegel Contribs
291:DESiegel Contribs
118:Guide to deletion
108:How to contribute
65:
679:
648:
600:
585:
534:
517:
253:
252:
238:
190:
178:
160:
98:
63:
34:
687:
686:
682:
681:
680:
678:
677:
676:
675:
669:deletion review
646:
582:
530:
513:
412:
292:
195:
186:
151:
135:
132:
95:
92:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
685:
683:
674:
673:
655:
654:
638:
621:
604:
572:
558:
540:
539:
522:
504:
503:
502:
501:
483:
482:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
444:
420:
419:
418:
417:
410:
395:
394:
389:
384:
379:
370:
351:
350:
349:
348:
334:
316:credible claim
298:
297:
290:
256:
255:
192:
131:
130:
125:
115:
110:
93:
91:
86:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
684:
672:
670:
666:
662:
657:
656:
653:
650:
649:
642:
639:
637:
633:
629:
625:
622:
620:
616:
612:
608:
605:
603:
598:
594:
590:
589:
580:
576:
573:
571:
568:
567:
562:
559:
557:
553:
549:
545:
542:
541:
537:
533:
532:North America
528:
523:
520:
516:
515:North America
511:
506:
505:
500:
496:
492:
487:
486:
485:
484:
481:
477:
473:
469:
466:
465:
458:
454:
450:
445:
443:
439:
435:
431:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
416:
413:
408:
406:
401:
397:
396:
393:
390:
388:
385:
383:
380:
378:
375:
374:
371:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
352:
347:
343:
339:
335:
333:
329:
325:
322:
317:
313:
309:
305:
302:
301:
300:
299:
296:
293:
288:
286:
283:
279:
276:
275:
274:
273:
269:
265:
261:
251:
247:
244:
241:
237:
233:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
214:
211:
208:
205:
201:
198:
197:Find sources:
193:
189:
185:
182:
176:
172:
168:
164:
159:
155:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
133:
129:
126:
123:
119:
116:
114:
111:
109:
106:
105:
104:
102:
97:
90:
87:
85:
84:
80:
77:
74:
71:
68:
61:
60:
55:
51:
50:speedy delete
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
660:
658:
644:
640:
623:
606:
584:
574:
566:Celestina007
564:
560:
543:
467:
429:
315:
277:
257:
245:
239:
231:
224:
218:
212:
206:
196:
183:
94:
75:
69:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
222:free images
586:DOOMSDAYER
434:Praxidicae
338:Praxidicae
324:Praxidicae
282:Praxidicae
264:Praxidicae
665:talk page
137:Miik3Murd
89:Miik3Murd
37:talk page
667:or in a
597:Contribs
430:credible
356:DESiegel
304:DESiegel
181:View log
122:glossary
39:or in a
278:Comment
228:WPÂ refs
216:scholar
154:protect
149:history
99:New to
641:Delete
628:Alex-h
624:Delete
607:Delete
575:Delete
561:Delete
544:Delete
468:Delete
400:WT:CSD
308:WP:CCS
200:Google
158:delete
321:porn.
243:JSTOR
204:books
188:Stats
175:views
167:watch
163:links
59:Kevin
16:<
647:Dane
632:talk
615:talk
593:Talk
552:talk
495:talk
476:talk
453:talk
449:Nick
438:talk
364:talk
360:Nick
342:talk
328:talk
312:this
268:talk
260:here
236:FENS
210:news
171:logs
145:talk
141:edit
67:L235
588:520
405:DES
285:DES
250:TWL
179:– (
64:aka
634:)
617:)
554:)
529:.
512:.
497:)
478:)
455:)
440:)
366:)
344:)
330:)
270:)
230:)
173:|
169:|
165:|
161:|
156:|
152:|
147:|
143:|
81:)
56:.
630:(
613:(
599:)
595:|
591:(
550:(
493:(
474:(
451:(
436:(
362:(
340:(
326:(
266:(
254:)
246:·
240:·
232:·
225:·
219:·
213:·
207:·
202:(
194:(
191:)
184:·
177:)
139:(
124:)
120:(
79:c
76:·
73:t
70:·
62:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.