440:. Notability is not the issue, although it appears borderline from the sources: the person is certainly rich enough to arrange for whatever ostensibly third-party coverage he wants. The issue is that, as noted in the DRV and in the last AfD, this article is an exercise in self-promotion, a product of undeclared paid editing, and in the face of such a campaign there is little chance of our article staying neutral. The current article should be deleted and recreated only after submission to AfC of a draft by an established editor with no ties to the subject; such a new article should also reflect any possibly (if not likely) unflattering aspects of this person's career.
386:: The Forbes article presented above is more about the company than this person. The Bloomberg articles are mostly about this person, but more about the companies that lose money. I can only find a BBC article that he bought a football/soccer club, which is minimally about this person and more about the transaction and is mostly quotes
423:
I'm still leaning delete. This is a fundamentally, and I think irreparably, biased article about a person who's spent a considerable amount of money on PR (for example, the purchase of the minor-league football team mentioned above). A neutral article is perhaps possible. It wouldn't look anything
465:
person seems unsupported by policy. As for your requirement for AFC, the article was substantially edited by PaulW, a long established editor, and accepted at AFC by Dr Vulpes, another long established editor, which is indeed what triggered this discussion, which would seem to meet your condition.
277:
on his purchase of the
Wycombe Wanderers. I've also trimmed some of the fluff and added some of these sources to the article. It still needs more cleanup, and I would support protection on the page to address the history of COI/UPE editing -- but the sources show he meets the notability guideline.
464:
include unflattering information. I’m sure said info exists (I added a
Bloomberg story about a big hit to the guy’s net worth, and there’s nothing stopping other editors from finding and adding it), but to make the inclusion of negative information a prerequisite for having an article on a living
262:
321:: As AfD1 closer, just stating I haven't had time or interest to review changes and support whatever conclusion emerges here. As I said in the DRV, it was probably time for a new discussion since much can change in two years.
304:
541:
per the coverage provided by
Dclemens1971, which establish notability. There may be some bias in the tone of the article but that can be removed via cleanup. I strongly disagree with Cryptic’s claim of this bias being
184:
47:
42:
351:
343:
258:
141:
483:
is out of place in what purports to be encyclopedic content. An insistence that our content comply with NOT is not inconsistent with the biographies of living persons policy.
178:
347:
37:
216:
407:
source is definitely SIGCOV of
Lomtadze. It's a long feature and he is discussed in at least half the paragraphs, and it includes numerous biographical details.
88:
73:
254:
250:
339:
274:
114:
109:
576:
118:
561:
533:
510:
496:
474:
452:
428:
416:
398:
377:
372:
332:
311:
287:
228:
101:
266:
492:
199:
68:
61:
17:
166:
145:
82:
78:
327:
160:
156:
554:
506:
470:
412:
283:
367:
322:
206:
105:
581:
480:
488:
394:
192:
549:
502:
466:
408:
279:
172:
57:
528:
356:
246:
224:
97:
27:
387:
270:
437:
484:
443:
390:
242:
570:
458:
238:
425:
308:
303:
Never mind; the byline was changed after publication (what a rotten thing to do).
298:
135:
525:
220:
297:
staff". There's no reason to believe it had meaningful editorial oversight. —
479:
BLPs are required to adhere closely to NPOV, and NPOV indicates that
257:, both available via The Knowledge Library if you want to review),
269:(in Georgian). Most recently, there's SIGCOV of Lomtadze in
457:
It’s a strange reading of our guidelines to insist that a
131:
127:
123:
48:
Articles for deletion/Mikheil
Lomtadze (3rd nomination)
43:
Articles for deletion/Mikheil
Lomtadze (2nd nomination)
403:
Did you look at the foreign language sources? And the
191:
501:Where is the effusive praise? I'm not seeing it.
338:Note: This discussion has been included in the
217:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2024 September 19
205:
8:
89:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
337:
261:(authored by staff and thus reliable),
219:. Please also refer to last two AfD's.
35:
543:
38:Articles for deletion/Mikheil Lomtadze
7:
215:Procedural nomination per close at
24:
342:lists for the following topics:
74:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
562:00:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
534:15:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
511:12:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
497:11:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
481:subjective and effusive praise
475:11:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
453:07:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
429:02:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
417:22:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
399:22:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
378:18:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
333:18:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
312:02:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
301:02:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
288:18:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
229:17:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
307:lists the author as staff. —
64:(AfD)? Read these primers!
598:
577:AfD debates (Biographical)
293:The Forbes article is by "
33:AfDs for this article:
146:edits since nomination
62:Articles for deletion
305:Contemporary archive
265:(in Georgian), and
249:in Bloomberg News (
237:This subject meets
451:
389:from the person.
380:
352:Georgia (country)
263:Radio Tavisupleba
79:Guide to deletion
69:How to contribute
589:
560:
557:
552:
450:
448:
441:
375:
370:
363:
359:
340:deletion sorting
330:
325:
210:
209:
195:
139:
121:
98:Mikheil Lomtadze
59:
28:Mikheil Lomtadze
597:
596:
592:
591:
590:
588:
587:
586:
567:
566:
555:
550:
547:
531:
530:it has begun...
524:per Sandstein.
444:
442:
373:
368:
361:
357:
328:
323:
152:
112:
96:
93:
56:
53:
52:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
595:
593:
585:
584:
579:
569:
568:
565:
564:
536:
529:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
431:
421:
420:
419:
381:
344:Businesspeople
335:
316:
315:
314:
213:
212:
149:
92:
91:
86:
76:
71:
54:
51:
50:
45:
40:
34:
32:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
594:
583:
580:
578:
575:
574:
572:
563:
559:
558:
553:
545:
540:
537:
535:
532:
527:
523:
520:
512:
508:
504:
500:
499:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
477:
476:
472:
468:
463:
460:
456:
455:
454:
449:
447:
439:
435:
432:
430:
427:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
401:
400:
396:
392:
388:
385:
382:
379:
376:
371:
366:
365:
364:
353:
349:
345:
341:
336:
334:
331:
326:
320:
317:
313:
310:
306:
302:
300:
296:
291:
290:
289:
285:
281:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
233:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
208:
204:
201:
198:
194:
190:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
158:
155:
154:Find sources:
150:
147:
143:
137:
133:
129:
125:
120:
116:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
94:
90:
87:
84:
80:
77:
75:
72:
70:
67:
66:
65:
63:
58:
49:
46:
44:
41:
39:
36:
29:
26:
19:
548:
538:
521:
503:Dclemens1971
467:Dclemens1971
461:
445:
433:
424:like this. —
409:Dclemens1971
404:
383:
360:
355:
318:
294:
292:
280:Dclemens1971
234:
214:
202:
196:
188:
181:
175:
169:
163:
153:
55:
582:AfD debates
544:irreperable
329:Mississippi
179:free images
571:Categories
526:* Pppery *
446:Sandstein
348:Kazakhstan
267:Fortuna.ge
485:Alpha3031
391:Oaktree b
362:Quidditch
275:Vedomosti
247:WP:SIGCOV
438:WP:PROMO
142:View log
83:glossary
426:Cryptic
350:, and
319:Comment
309:Cryptic
299:Cryptic
243:WP:NBIO
185:WP refs
173:scholar
115:protect
110:history
60:New to
556:Anchor
522:Delete
459:WP:BLP
434:Delete
405:Forbes
384:Delete
295:former
259:Forbes
239:WP:GNG
221:Daniel
157:Google
119:delete
551:Frank
245:with
235:Keep.
200:JSTOR
161:books
136:views
128:watch
124:links
16:<
539:Keep
507:talk
471:talk
462:must
436:per
413:talk
395:talk
324:Star
284:talk
273:and
255:2022
251:2020
241:and
225:talk
193:FENS
167:news
132:logs
106:talk
102:edit
271:BBC
207:TWL
140:– (
573::
509:)
495:)
491:•
473:)
415:)
397:)
358:WC
354:.
346:,
286:)
253:,
227:)
187:)
144:|
134:|
130:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
546:.
505:(
493:c
489:t
487:(
469:(
411:(
393:(
374:✎
369:☎
282:(
223:(
211:)
203:·
197:·
189:·
182:·
176:·
170:·
164:·
159:(
151:(
148:)
138:)
100:(
85:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.