272:, a proposal to limit article creation to autoconfirmed accounts. While it would have been effective in cutting out many of the silly/vandalistic new articles we get, it would only have delayed this guy, I doubt it would have stopped him. He knew what he was doing, and would only have had to wait four days and make a few trivial edits.
237:
I don't see what the WMF has to do with it, that should be decided by local wikipedia consensus (their editors are going to be the ones dealing with the deletion and verification anyway). Also, this article was added over six years ago. I get the impression that back then the recent changes patrol
319:
are all board games with small parts, ill-suited to a 600-cubic-foot computer with a giant robotic claw arm. It seems doubtful that Milton
Bradley ever would have committed significant time and money to a project with an excessively high cost, size, and engineering complexity to be viable in the
354:
No evidence that this existed at all. I've searched around a bit. I considered sending an e-mail to Hasbro to see if they have anything on this, but honestly, given that there are absolutely no references to it anywhere, I doubt it would meet notability requirements even if it did exist.
297:
The article seems highly implausible on multiple grounds. Computer chess and checkers programs were in their infancy by the late 1960s, so this part is not totally inconceivable, but it's hard to imagine a 1960s-era computer being programmed to play a highly complex strategy game like
249:
Mmm, there was an attempt by the
English Knowledge (XXG) to raise the minimum requirements about three years ago. The programmers said that it would take them one hour to implement the requested change. The WMF blocked. I can't remember the name of the RfC at the moment.
238:
wasn't quite as thorough. I'm not sure something like this with absolutely no references or indication of notability would last very long if it were added today, especially if it was added by a new or relatively new user (new user edits are more likely to be scrutinized).
201:. Searching finds a number of references, but they are all Knowledge (XXG) mirrors or obviously based on this article, or in some cases use the word "Playmate" as a description of other Milton-Bradley toys. There is no independent confirmation of what this article says.
166:
306:
wasn't even produced by Milton
Bradley until 1967, so the claim that the supposed inventor worked on the prototype for a long time before releasing it in 1968 seems unlikely. Milton Bradley did not produce
413:
This is actually plausible, and may not be a hoax. I suspect the technology may have been available at the time, the
Soviets had a robot on the Moon in 1970. However despite a search, this article fails
219:
Good argument for the
Wikimedia Foundation to raise the minimum requirements for creating an article. Nothing in Google books or Google newspapers. Fails WP:V, even if the alleged picture is found.
160:
390:
119:
324:, and several online sources indicate that Milton Bradley did not acquire the rights to Mouse Trap until Ideal's demise in the 1980s. All of this seems to point to a
370:
126:
92:
87:
333:
96:
79:
337:
181:
17:
311:
until 1974, leaving very little time to program the device before
Cartwright's funding was allegedly withdrawn in 1975. Battleship,
148:
320:
consumer market. Most significant, Mouse Trap was not made by Milton
Bradley in the 1960s and 1970s. It was first manufactured by
142:
452:
433:
402:
382:
361:
345:
281:
263:
244:
228:
210:
61:
40:
138:
415:
198:
83:
259:
224:
332:
In any case, however, this file has been around for 6 years and 6 months, so it should probably be included in
188:
75:
67:
341:
448:
36:
255:
220:
154:
269:
419:
174:
55:
197:
This has been taggeded as a hoax, and that seems very likely; but even if it was real it fails
398:
378:
321:
303:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
447:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
277:
206:
251:
356:
239:
394:
374:
308:
113:
273:
202:
316:
312:
299:
441:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109:
105:
101:
173:
187:
334:Knowledge (XXG): List of hoaxes on Knowledge (XXG)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
455:). No further edits should be made to this page.
391:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
8:
389:Note: This debate has been included in the
369:Note: This debate has been included in the
388:
371:list of Games-related deletion discussions
368:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
418:, and so cannot be on wikipedia.
1:
62:02:27, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
472:
434:17:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
403:15:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
383:15:45, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
362:20:49, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
346:19:26, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
282:22:25, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
264:21:32, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
245:20:54, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
229:18:52, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
211:17:59, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
444:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
254:was closely involved.
76:Milton Bradley Playmate
68:Milton Bradley Playmate
48:The result was
405:
385:
322:Ideal Toy Company
463:
446:
430:
427:
424:
416:WP:Verifiability
359:
302:with any skill.
242:
199:WP:Verifiability
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
60:
58:
34:
471:
470:
466:
465:
464:
462:
461:
460:
459:
453:deletion review
442:
428:
425:
422:
357:
256:Unscintillating
252:User:Scottywong
240:
221:Unscintillating
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
56:
53:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
469:
467:
458:
457:
437:
436:
407:
406:
386:
365:
364:
330:
329:
295:Delete as hoax
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
232:
231:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
468:
456:
454:
450:
445:
439:
438:
435:
432:
431:
417:
412:
409:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
387:
384:
380:
376:
372:
367:
366:
363:
360:
353:
350:
349:
348:
347:
343:
339:
335:
327:
323:
318:
314:
310:
305:
301:
296:
293:
292:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
266:
265:
261:
257:
253:
248:
247:
246:
243:
236:
235:
234:
233:
230:
226:
222:
218:
215:
214:
213:
212:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
57:FreeRangeFrog
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
443:
440:
421:
410:
351:
338:66.177.64.39
331:
325:
309:Connect Four
294:
216:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
161:free images
317:Mouse Trap
313:Candy Land
304:Battleship
270:WP:ACTRIAL
449:talk page
395:• Gene93k
375:• Gene93k
268:That was
37:talk page
451:or in a
358:0x0077BE
300:Stratego
241:0x0077BE
120:View log
39:or in a
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
420:Martin
411:Delete
352:Delete
315:, and
274:JohnCD
217:Delete
203:JohnCD
139:Google
97:delete
50:delete
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
399:talk
379:talk
342:talk
326:hoax
278:talk
260:talk
225:talk
207:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
189:TWL
118:– (
401:)
393:.
381:)
373:.
344:)
280:)
262:)
227:)
209:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
52:.
429:1
426:5
423:4
397:(
377:(
340:(
336:.
328:.
276:(
258:(
223:(
205:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
54:§
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.