152:"Citing sources and avoiding original research are inextricably linked: to demonstrate that you are not presenting original research, you must cite reliable sources that provide information directly related to the topic of the article, and that directly support the information as it is presented." I fail to see how I have not done this, and as for notablity, again, I feel it meets that criteria as it is a commonly used phrase, and as the links show, used around the world, and the article explains the expression. If it is not notable on the grounds of being a "neologism" (and considering the phrase was in use at the time of CD Howe, I'm fairly certainly 60 years old hardly counts as new) why not delete every political neologism, particularly ones that are in far less day to day use then Minister of everything?
181:- at first I thought it was exactly as the nominator described, then I got to the bottom of the article, and started checking the references. Times Magazine, BBC, etc. are all using this exact term to describe these men. I believe that the article can use some cleanup, especially in the opening paragraphs, but the information is verifiable, and does appear notable.
122:
202:
that the people listed have been described as a "minister of everything". This is the criteria for neologism notability as I understand it, so I have no problem with it. -
89:
84:
93:
76:
167:
17:
198:
I'm surprised to say, the article appears to be well cited, and the citations appear to check out as reporting as an independent
246:
36:
228:
211:
190:
171:
147:
80:
58:
245:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
163:
155:
72:
64:
186:
224:
207:
159:
142:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
182:
133:
129:
220:
203:
132:
essay. I have been unable to find any references to support such role. Appears to be
137:
48:
110:
239:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
117:
106:
102:
98:
136:
neologism. Failed prod after sole-author objected.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
249:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
229:17:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
212:17:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
191:16:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
172:16:35, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
148:15:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
59:17:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
266:
242:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
73:Minister of Everything
65:Minister of Everything
174:
158:comment added by
146:
57:
257:
244:
200:secondary source
153:
140:
120:
114:
96:
51:
44:The result was
34:
265:
264:
260:
259:
258:
256:
255:
254:
253:
247:deletion review
240:
116:
87:
71:
68:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
263:
261:
252:
251:
234:
232:
231:
219:well-sourced.
214:
193:
127:
126:
67:
62:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
262:
250:
248:
243:
237:
236:
235:
230:
226:
222:
218:
215:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
176:
175:
173:
169:
165:
161:
160:WilliamNorman
157:
150:
149:
144:
139:
135:
131:
124:
119:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
55:
50:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
241:
238:
233:
216:
199:
195:
178:
151:
128:
45:
43:
31:
28:
183:Turlo Lomon
154:—Preceding
221:Jessi1989
46:WITHDRAWN
204:Verdatum
168:contribs
156:unsigned
123:View log
138:Toddst1
90:protect
85:history
49:Toddst1
118:delete
94:delete
134:WP:NN
130:WP:OR
121:) – (
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
225:talk
217:keep
208:talk
196:Keep
187:talk
179:Keep
164:talk
143:talk
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
54:talk
227:)
210:)
189:)
170:)
166:•
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
223:(
206:(
185:(
162:(
145:)
141:(
125:)
115:(
113:)
75:(
56:)
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.