685:
we don't create pages on people who might gain notability. His sole claim of notability is standing as a candidate in the 2019 Canadian federal election, where he received 165 votes, or 0.3%. His official campaign website has 6 pages and 3 policies, and hasn't been updated since the 2019 election.
540:
to allow the editor the time they wish to continue to develop this article. Note that the discussion here must conclude prior to either draftification or deletion, and it should reman where it is pending decision.A deleted article is not lost. It may be refunded by undeletion with the correct
461:
We need to firmly stop volunteers on campaigns from being able to contribute to articles on the person they are campaigning for. We also need to stop crystal balling, we have no idea what will happen in the near future, all we know is that Khan does not currently meet notability
686:
There's no secondary coverage in any reliable sources, and the only newspaper coverage is a direct quote from the subject. The next
Canadian federal election is in 2023, and there's no evidence that he plans to stand in that election, let alone being a notable candidate.
392:
As I mentioned earlier this person is not notable yet, but will become notable in the near future. I was going use his website as one of the source which states he's making a new provincial party in
Ontario. That is why I moved the article back to draft from Userspace.
415:, and we usually do not keep articles if the person will be notable in the future. Instead, editors look at sources available now to decide if we should keep the article. Creating a political party doesn't guarantee the person will be notable, and I suggest looking at
477:
I know he's not notable yet, and we don't know about what's written for the future. But I believe he's going to be notable soon with having the provincial political party. I am going to move to article back to draft page and will publish it when Khan is notable.
423:
to understand
Knowledge's guidelines for a politician's notability. Also, none of the sources I found mention Khan's plans to start a political party. Are you part of this person's campaign team or know this politician personally? If so, I suggest reading
197:
376:
to warrant an article and I don't want editors to feel like we are deleting their hard work. After the sources are posted below, editors will give their opinion on recommending keeping the article or deleting it.
619:, without draftification. Spam produced by a member of his campaign team, in its current form the article is written in a promotional tone. Zero independent reliable sources, no evidence of notability.
663:
as per
Knowledge guidelines a article can be moved back to draft until the person is notable. It should be moved to draft instead till Khan becomes notable which he is going to become in near future.
601:
I would like to go with the option draftification, as it will give me more time to edit. And the notability of Khan can change in near future. Which is I request this article to be moved to Draft.
158:
443:
I read that if the person is going to be notable in near future, then we must move the article back to UserSpace or Draft. And yes I was one of the volunteer for his campaign.
191:
246:
304:
263:
105:
90:
287:, which just put all the opinions of the candidates there, effectively making it a primary source. Bottom line: No sources exist that count toward GNG.
586:, and there is no indication that giving the author more time to work on the article will fix the fundamental problem which is that he is not notable.
283:: I was in the process of making a nomination, so I'll repeat the argument I was making: The only source mentioning him more than just by name is the
131:
126:
284:
428:
to understand
Knowledge's policies on editing people we personally know. Please message me on my talk page if you have any questions or concerns.
135:
118:
492:
Also as per notability guidelines it states that we can have articles as draft for people who are going to become notable in near future.
687:
620:
212:
179:
85:
78:
17:
57:
173:
99:
95:
695:
672:
653:
628:
610:
595:
568:
552:
530:
501:
487:
471:
452:
437:
402:
386:
362:
347:
315:
295:
272:
255:
238:
60:
714:
467:
169:
40:
668:
606:
497:
483:
448:
398:
372:, can you post the additional sources you are going to use in the article? I'm not sure this person has enough
358:
122:
338:. A search of Google, JSTOR, and Academic OneFile and newspaper databases did not produce additional results.
353:
The article is not done yet, which is way it has been moved to UserSpace for now until it's completely done.
219:
53:
691:
624:
114:
66:
664:
602:
493:
479:
444:
408:
394:
369:
354:
710:
682:
637:
523:
36:
463:
205:
334:. A candidate for office does not automatically get notability and there are no sources that show
185:
563:
547:
228:
Contested PROD. Subject is a college student who ran and lost in a 2019 election. Does not meet
649:
641:
308:
289:
74:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
709:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
511:
591:
433:
382:
343:
579:
416:
412:
327:
229:
583:
558:
542:
425:
420:
331:
645:
152:
681:
I'm not seeing how he is going to become notable in the near future, and per Per
373:
335:
587:
429:
378:
339:
267:
250:
233:
705:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
232:
nor is there enough independent sig coverage in RS for GNG.
148:
144:
140:
557:
The article as it stands cannot survive in main space
204:
578:
and oppose draftification. The subject does not meet
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
717:). No further edits should be made to this page.
303:Note: This discussion has been included in the
262:Note: This discussion has been included in the
247:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
245:Note: This discussion has been included in the
305:list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions
218:
8:
541:arguments woven at the time it is requested
106:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
264:list of Canada-related deletion discussions
302:
261:
244:
7:
24:
91:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
387:03:12, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
363:02:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
348:23:02, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
316:04:42, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
296:23:24, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
273:23:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
256:23:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
239:23:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
1:
413:doesn't predict future events
696:13:08, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
673:01:34, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
654:00:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
629:01:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
611:07:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
596:14:33, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
569:13:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
553:13:11, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
531:10:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
502:08:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
488:08:11, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
472:19:48, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
453:22:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
438:20:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
403:01:44, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
81:(AfD)? Read these primers!
61:07:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
734:
411:Unfortunately, Knowledge
707:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
285:Yorkregion.com source
79:Articles for deletion
115:Muhammad Hassan Khan
67:Muhammad Hassan Khan
464:John Pack Lambert
318:
275:
258:
96:Guide to deletion
86:How to contribute
725:
644:. Far too soon.
566:
561:
550:
545:
528:
521:
516:
313:
292:
223:
222:
208:
156:
138:
76:
34:
733:
732:
728:
727:
726:
724:
723:
722:
721:
715:deletion review
564:
559:
548:
543:
524:
517:
512:
309:
290:
165:
129:
113:
110:
73:
70:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
731:
729:
720:
719:
701:
700:
699:
698:
683:WP:CRYSTALBALL
676:
675:
665:Woodbridgenews
661:Draftification
657:
656:
638:WP:POLOUTCOMES
631:
603:Woodbridgenews
599:
598:
573:
572:
571:
534:
533:
494:Woodbridgenews
480:Woodbridgenews
475:
474:
445:Woodbridgenews
441:
440:
409:Woodbridgenews
395:Woodbridgenews
390:
389:
370:Woodbridgenews
355:Woodbridgenews
351:
350:
320:
319:
299:
298:
277:
276:
259:
226:
225:
162:
109:
108:
103:
93:
88:
71:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
730:
718:
716:
712:
708:
703:
702:
697:
693:
689:
684:
680:
679:
678:
677:
674:
670:
666:
662:
659:
658:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
632:
630:
626:
622:
618:
615:
614:
613:
612:
608:
604:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
574:
570:
567:
562:
556:
555:
554:
551:
546:
539:
536:
535:
532:
529:
527:
522:
520:
515:
509:
506:
505:
504:
503:
499:
495:
490:
489:
485:
481:
473:
469:
465:
460:
457:
456:
455:
454:
450:
446:
439:
435:
431:
427:
422:
418:
414:
410:
407:
406:
405:
404:
400:
396:
388:
384:
380:
375:
371:
367:
366:
365:
364:
360:
356:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
322:
321:
317:
314:
312:
306:
301:
300:
297:
294:
293:
286:
282:
279:
278:
274:
271:
270:
265:
260:
257:
254:
253:
248:
243:
242:
241:
240:
237:
236:
231:
221:
217:
214:
211:
207:
203:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
171:
168:
167:Find sources:
163:
160:
154:
150:
146:
142:
137:
133:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
111:
107:
104:
101:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
83:
82:
80:
75:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
706:
704:
688:86.23.86.239
660:
633:
621:86.23.86.239
616:
600:
575:
537:
525:
518:
513:
507:
491:
476:
458:
442:
391:
352:
323:
311:CAPTAIN RAJU
310:
288:
280:
268:
251:
234:
227:
215:
209:
201:
194:
188:
182:
176:
166:
72:
49:
47:
31:
28:
462:guidelines.
192:free images
642:WP:TOOSOON
510:oer nom --
374:notability
711:talk page
37:talk page
713:or in a
538:Draftify
291:Username
159:View log
100:glossary
39:or in a
646:Bearian
580:WP:NPOL
417:WP:NPOL
328:WP:NPOL
230:WP:NPOL
198:WP refs
186:scholar
132:protect
127:history
77:New to
634:Delete
617:Delete
584:WP:GNG
576:Delete
565:Faddle
560:Fiddle
549:Faddle
544:Fiddle
526:(talk)
514:Devoke
508:Delete
459:Delete
426:WP:COI
421:WP:GNG
332:WP:GNG
326:Fails
324:Delete
281:Delete
170:Google
136:delete
58:(talk)
50:delete
588:Spicy
519:water
430:Z1720
379:Z1720
340:Z1720
213:JSTOR
174:books
153:views
145:watch
141:links
16:<
692:talk
669:talk
650:talk
640:and
636:per
625:talk
607:talk
592:talk
498:talk
484:talk
468:talk
449:talk
434:talk
419:and
399:talk
383:talk
359:talk
344:talk
336:WP:N
330:and
206:FENS
180:news
149:logs
123:talk
119:edit
582:or
368:Hi
220:TWL
157:– (
54:PMC
52:. ♠
694:)
671:)
652:)
627:)
609:)
594:)
500:)
486:)
470:)
451:)
436:)
401:)
385:)
361:)
346:)
307:.
269:MB
266:.
252:MB
249:.
235:MB
200:)
151:|
147:|
143:|
139:|
134:|
130:|
125:|
121:|
56:♠
690:(
667:(
648:(
623:(
605:(
590:(
496:(
482:(
466:(
447:(
432:(
397:(
381:(
357:(
342:(
224:)
216:·
210:·
202:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
177:·
172:(
164:(
161:)
155:)
117:(
102:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.