407:. H-factor of 42, and no major awards. It appears that he has been retired/inactive for 15-20 years. Since citation rates have been rising, 42 from some time ago is closer to 52 for someone who is currently active. This is marginal without acknowledgement from the wider community via awards. Since he was once
270:
I was aiming for conciseness. It seems the emerging consensus here is that he passes notability on citation metrics, which is perfectly valid - I'm not familiar with citation rates in the field. My nomination was based on the fact that of the 8 criteria of academics' notability, I don't think there's
387:
I think my (lack of) knowledge of what constitutes being highly cited may have led me astray here. Noting that one commenter called it marginal, but I happily defer to all of you on the issue. Thanks for weighing in, sorry if it was a premature move.
204:
293:
321:
317:
301:
271:
any indication that the author passes 2-8. So to answer your second question, it would have been an inherent issue, but I defer to the consensus on the citation rates.
329:
313:
198:
161:
256:. For a 14-year old article, is it possible to ask for a deletion rationale consisting of 1 word per year? Does it inherently fail a guideline or just at the moment?
325:
309:
297:
305:
108:
93:
289:
350:
235:
134:
129:
138:
88:
81:
17:
219:
430:
121:
186:
165:
102:
98:
503:
40:
180:
482:
393:
276:
243:
176:
486:
463:
458:
397:
381:
355:
345:
280:
265:
247:
63:
36:
418:
377:
261:
226:
441:
212:
474:
58:
440:. He has published several significantly cited articles in peer-reviewed journals, so he passes
478:
426:
389:
272:
239:
125:
77:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
498:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
445:
369:
334:
499:
373:
257:
192:
365:
53:
422:
117:
69:
155:
494:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
475:
https://physics.illinois.edu/people/directory/profile/m-nayfeh
368:
on GS cites. Will the nominator explain how they carried out
473:
Prominent and well nown in the fied of particle physics:
151:
147:
143:
211:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
506:). No further edits should be made to this page.
288:Note: This discussion has been included in the
225:
8:
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
416:
287:
477:. Extremely high h-index for his field.
7:
24:
292:lists for the following topics:
94:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
523:
487:08:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
64:14:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
464:19:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
398:20:38, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
382:21:57, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
356:17:37, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
281:20:35, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
266:17:23, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
248:13:28, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
496:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
294:Academics and educators
236:Notability (Academics)
166:edits since nomination
82:Articles for deletion
434:
421:comment added by
358:
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
514:
461:
455:
450:
353:
348:
341:
337:
290:deletion sorting
230:
229:
215:
159:
141:
79:
61:
56:
34:
522:
521:
517:
516:
515:
513:
512:
511:
510:
504:deletion review
459:
451:
446:
351:
346:
339:
335:
172:
132:
116:
113:
76:
73:
59:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
520:
518:
509:
508:
490:
489:
467:
466:
435:
402:
401:
400:
359:
285:
284:
283:
238:not fulfilled
233:
232:
169:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
519:
507:
505:
501:
497:
492:
491:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
469:
468:
465:
462:
456:
454:
449:
443:
439:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
414:
410:
406:
403:
399:
395:
391:
386:
385:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
360:
357:
354:
349:
344:
343:
342:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
286:
282:
278:
274:
269:
268:
267:
263:
259:
255:
252:
251:
250:
249:
245:
241:
237:
228:
224:
221:
218:
214:
210:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
178:
175:
174:Find sources:
170:
167:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
495:
493:
479:Syrianpoet94
470:
452:
447:
442:WP:NACADEMIC
437:
417:— Preceding
412:
408:
404:
390:Samuelshraga
361:
338:
333:
273:Samuelshraga
253:
240:Samuelshraga
234:
222:
216:
208:
201:
195:
189:
183:
173:
118:Munir Nayfeh
75:
70:Munir Nayfeh
49:
47:
31:
28:
411:notable, a
322:Connecticut
199:free images
374:Xxanthippe
318:California
302:Technology
258:Geschichte
500:talk page
413:weak keep
405:Weak keep
370:WP:Before
364:. Passes
340:Quidditch
330:Tennessee
314:Palestine
37:talk page
502:or in a
431:contribs
419:unsigned
326:Illinois
162:View log
103:glossary
39:or in a
453:dameron
423:Ldm1954
366:WP:Prof
328:, and
310:Lebanon
298:Science
254:Comment
205:WP refs
193:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
409:weakly
306:Jordan
177:Google
139:delete
60:plicit
471:Keep.
220:JSTOR
181:books
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
483:talk
460:talk
448:popo
438:Keep
427:talk
394:talk
378:talk
362:Keep
277:talk
262:talk
244:talk
213:FENS
187:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
50:keep
227:TWL
160:– (
52:.
485:)
444:.
433:)
429:•
415:.
396:)
384:.
380:)
372:?
336:WC
332:.
324:,
320:,
316:,
312:,
308:,
304:,
300:,
296:,
279:)
264:)
246:)
207:)
164:|
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
481:(
457:
425:(
392:(
376:(
352:✎
347:☎
275:(
260:(
242:(
231:)
223:·
217:·
209:·
202:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
179:(
171:(
168:)
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
55:✗
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.