1050:- Even If there wasn't enough info at the moment, why remove it? It's the lead single of one of today's major artists and carries enough notability for anticipation, and in a week's time you will have plenty of stuff to put in it. Alone the fact that someone deemed this article for deletion while there are thousands on here that have no place in wiki, should be kind of a point ;) Anyway it seems every single of today's mainstream artist seem to have pages, why do you want to delete this one.
74:
1157:
has provided sources from major sites none of these are in the actual article. Right now it is mostly un-sourced except for the cover art, Polow da Don's involvement, the fact it is an official single and the release date for
Australia. In the first source provided doesn't mention Ester Dean plus the
1248:
If only because this makes the Lady Gaga fans mad. Kidding! :D No, seriously, what's all the fuss? The song is only going to get more and more coverage as the weeks go by. It's already been written up by several major sources, including
Entertainment Weekly, and more reviews will come. If you delete
985:
of the requirements. A future single can only have a separate article if there are enough reliable sources covering it. Practically all the major music/entertainment websites have confirmed "Not Myself
Tonight" as an official single, and most importantly, so has Christina's label. Maybe this article
1263:
actually for a change i agree with the creation of the article. It is actually reasonable well sourced and is less than two weeks away from release but has already recieved some critical reception and my guess is in the coming days it will recieve even more independent coverage. In terms of content
956:
confirms the song as a new single. Plenty of song articles around here have been created before the song was released, the only thing that made them proper candidates for deletion is if there were a lack of reliable sources confirming them as an official single. Besides, this song is being released
1249:
the page now, it will only have to get re-written when the video is made and the single hits the charts - and we all know it will. Even if the song bombs, it's worth writing about. This is, as someone else said, Christina
Aguilera, not some obscure artist. --
1130:
What don't you understand about IT'S GOING TO PREMIERE THIS WEEK? We have cover art, release dates, and even the cover art. It's premiering in two days, goes to radio next week, and the digital download comes out in two weeks. There is no reason to delete it.
986:
can be restored from deletion with the click of a button, but there must be a valid reason for the article to be deleted in the first place. So far, I see no reason to delete this article when it meets all the guidelines that require it to be here.
403:
Articles about songs that haven't got enough information to provide even the basics (like writer and genre) invite chaos, because there are too many editors that feel compelled to insert their best guess into any and all empty infobox
735:" is the operative verb here. I don't think anyone is arguing that it won't probably meet the criteria for having an article at some point in the future. The question to be resolved at this AFD is whether it meets those criteria
1114:
I recommend this article be deleted without discussion, nobody is saying any valid reasons, an article can't exist simply because it exists and their is sources, it HAS to chart or be RELEASED to purchase. Why does nobody
1093:: The article definitely needs some sources, but that cover art has been revealed and a sneak peek has been released. Not to mention it is being released to radio in three days. No need to delete if sources are added. --
277:
356:
One final comment, and then I will bite my tongue for 24 hours until this AFD goes away one way or the other. People ask what harm is done by premature articles: how about that no one can figure out who wrote it?
474:
555:
Yes. A whole article from the
British Broadcasting Corporation (one of the biggest news networks in the world) is quite enough, as is the whole article from the UK broadsheet The Independent and so on...
337:
I am not going to badger each keep, but I will point out that at this point, none of the keep indications (afireinside27, HC 5555, Alexshunn, 190.29.227.98) have even commented on the relevant guideline,
613:. It is a real song, and will be premiering soon. With more suprises to come, the single release date could happen soon, I think we should keep it, unless someething occurs to question is authenticity. (
1158:
rest of the article is un-sourced. In order for this article to be notable the links mentioned above should be in the article plus all the information in the article should be properly sourced.
927:
It's about
Knowledge (XXG) guidelines not personal opinion, the deletion can be reverted when it charts by the click of a button, until then it doesn't meet noteablility guidelines.
81:
698:
Are you kidding me? It's by
Christina Aguilera, not some obscure artist. It's the lead single off of her highly-anticipated new album. Of course it will deserve a separate article.
232:
271:
466:
846:
The single will released in late march. Confirmed. So, why we have to "redirect" somthing already announced? And, we aren't talking about and indie group. --
863:: So much fancruft, a song doesn't have it's own article until AFTER it's released or AFTER it's charted. Not before. The article will be re-created after.
237:
883:
This is necessary? I mean, it represents a complete waste of time. It was announced, and in less than a week, will be on, at least, ten charts. --
579:. Song will be premiering at the end of this week and already has a release date. Will obviously chart in the coming weeks. No point in deleting.
498:
205:
200:
765:
While you're still arguing here, the lyrics of the song was posted in her official site... Of course this need a separate article. Will -: -->
209:
1212:. While the song is being released in a couple of days, and there are sources, it's going to be about another week if and when it charts.--
909:
659:. Was anounced in her official site. The song needs an article, and will be released the friday, according to RCA employer in Australia. --
526:
90:
768:
716:
660:
192:
530:
120:
987:
962:
949:
792:. As others have said, it is clearly a real song that will premiere within the next few days. I see no point in deleting the article.
17:
630:
1195:
808:
292:
447:
says the article must have "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". I found sources from:
259:
106:
48:. I appreciate that some of the arguments are not based in policy, but ultimately I cannot close this debate any other way.
1238:
490:
1265:
1292:
458:
36:
253:
79:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
1277:
1240:
1221:
1200:
1140:
1125:
1102:
1079:
1059:
1042:
1021:
995:
970:
936:
917:
892:
872:
855:
836:
776:
756:
707:
689:
668:
651:
622:
605:
588:
565:
546:
513:
429:
413:
351:
329:
152:
57:
1291:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
913:
888:
851:
561:
522:
509:
425:
249:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
1254:
961:. Poor timing to nominate this article for deletion, there's too many sources supporting its right to exist.
720:
772:
703:
664:
584:
196:
905:
796:
712:
136:
110:
1136:
1098:
991:
966:
299:
95:
1273:
1250:
834:
1190:
1055:
804:
1033:- Lots of coverage now, and no need to delete it when it will even become greater during next week.
1154:
884:
847:
645:
618:
557:
518:
505:
421:
285:
1001:
978:
444:
339:
317:
313:
1038:
699:
580:
188:
142:
73:
63:
677:
265:
743:, it does not, and serves only as an accumulation point for rumors, gossip, and the occasional
1132:
1121:
1094:
1075:
932:
868:
601:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1269:
1217:
826:
676:
to Bionic. There is not way for us to predict the future performance of the song. And per
470:
53:
1185:
1051:
800:
462:
685:
637:
614:
1153:
My take on this the article currently does not meet the guidelines established. While
1034:
1017:
752:
542:
409:
347:
325:
1230:
1117:
1071:
928:
864:
597:
482:
170:
158:
126:
226:
105:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
1213:
486:
49:
494:
681:
308:
Typical premature article, containing such earth-shattering information as "
393:
Hell, as long as we are just guessing, maybe
Christina Aguilera wrote it:
1013:
748:
538:
405:
343:
321:
952:
that confirm the song as an official single, not to mention
Christina's
902:
Ridiculous to redirect it. It premiers this week for crying out load!
680:, even charted songs don't necessarily deserve a separate article. --
310:
A music video will be shot soon. No other details have been revealed.
953:
1285:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1000:
You'll have to point out that provision for future singles in
478:
454:
68:
634:. It will be notable soon enough, but right now, it isn't. –
420:
Edit conflicts are not a valid reason to delete an article.
99:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
316:. Efforts to redirect to album article, as recommended by
89:
among
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
744:
394:
389:
387:
385:
383:
381:
379:
374:
369:
367:
365:
363:
361:
222:
218:
214:
284:
1268:
and the only thing its really missing is some charts.
1178:
article has more references and is sourced properly
298:
312:" No charts, no cover versions, no awards. Fails
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1295:). No further edits should be made to this page.
119:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
8:
93:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
1070:All fancruft, a vote is not a consensus!
113:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
880:The article will be re-created after.
596:. Same thoughts than afireinside27.--
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
1264:compare it to a released song like
1004:. There are provisions for future
24:
631:Bionic (Christina Aguilera album)
72:
1:
109:on the part of others and to
1266:I Got You (Leona Lewis song)
1257:) 14:02, 30 March 2010 (PST)
1312:
1278:01:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
1241:19:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
1222:14:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
1201:20:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
1141:19:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
1126:17:21, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
1103:10:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
1080:23:48, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
1060:11:35, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
1043:04:02, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
1022:03:18, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
996:02:18, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
971:02:06, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
937:01:19, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
918:17:29, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
893:16:37, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
873:16:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
856:06:27, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
837:05:57, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
777:23:29, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
757:21:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
708:18:55, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
690:16:24, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
669:00:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
652:21:24, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
623:21:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
606:20:50, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
589:20:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
566:20:05, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
547:19:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
514:18:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
430:18:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
414:20:43, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
378:Maybe Palow da Don helped
352:04:10, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
330:19:50, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
58:10:27, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
981:, and this article meets
1288:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
320:, have been thwarted. —
151:; accounts blocked for
121:single-purpose accounts
91:policies and guidelines
1008:, but none for future
531:few or no other edits
533:outside this topic.
373:Maybe no one knows?
745:copyright violation
360:Maybe Esther Dean?
103:by counting votes.
82:not a majority vote
959:four days from now
189:Not Myself Tonight
64:Not Myself Tonight
44:The result was
950:plenty of sources
908:comment added by
813:
799:comment added by
715:comment added by
534:
184:
183:
180:
107:assume good faith
1303:
1290:
1236:
1233:
1198:
1193:
1188:
954:official website
920:
832:
812:
793:
724:
648:
640:
516:
303:
302:
288:
240:
230:
212:
178:
166:
150:
134:
115:
85:, but instead a
76:
69:
34:
1311:
1310:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1293:deletion review
1286:
1234:
1231:
1196:
1191:
1186:
903:
827:
794:
710:
646:
638:
537:"Significant"?—
463:The Independent
245:
236:
203:
187:
168:
156:
140:
124:
111:sign your posts
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1309:
1307:
1298:
1297:
1281:
1280:
1258:
1243:
1224:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1160:
1159:
1155:KingOfTheMedia
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1106:
1105:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1063:
1062:
1045:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
974:
973:
942:
941:
940:
939:
922:
921:
910:76.117.121.148
896:
895:
885:Daviddavid0100
876:
875:
858:
848:Daviddavid0100
840:
839:
815:
814:
786:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
760:
759:
726:
725:
693:
692:
671:
654:
626:
608:
591:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
558:KingOfTheMedia
550:
549:
519:KingOfTheMedia
506:KingOfTheMedia
502:
501:
500:
492:
484:
476:
468:
460:
449:
448:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
422:KingOfTheMedia
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
391:
376:
371:
354:
306:
305:
242:
238:AfD statistics
182:
181:
77:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1308:
1296:
1294:
1289:
1283:
1282:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1262:
1259:
1256:
1252:
1251:HollywoodDoll
1247:
1244:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1228:
1225:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1208:
1207:
1202:
1199:
1194:
1189:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1174:
1173:under sourced
1168:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1156:
1152:
1151:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1116:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1089:
1088:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1029:
1028:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
998:
997:
993:
989:
984:
980:
976:
975:
972:
968:
964:
960:
955:
951:
947:
944:
943:
938:
934:
930:
926:
925:
924:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
901:
898:
897:
894:
890:
886:
881:
878:
877:
874:
870:
866:
862:
859:
857:
853:
849:
845:
842:
841:
838:
835:
833:
831:
824:
820:
817:
816:
810:
806:
802:
798:
791:
788:
787:
778:
774:
770:
769:190.29.227.98
766:No. Is -: -->
764:
763:
762:
761:
758:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
729:
728:
727:
722:
718:
717:74.216.86.130
714:
709:
705:
701:
700:afireinside27
697:
696:
695:
694:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
672:
670:
666:
662:
661:190.29.227.98
658:
655:
653:
649:
643:
642:
641:
633:
632:
627:
624:
620:
616:
612:
609:
607:
603:
599:
595:
592:
590:
586:
582:
581:afireinside27
578:
575:
574:
567:
563:
559:
554:
553:
552:
551:
548:
544:
540:
536:
535:
532:
528:
524:
520:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
496:
493:
491:
488:
485:
483:
480:
477:
475:
472:
469:
467:
464:
461:
459:
456:
453:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
439:
438:
431:
427:
423:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
411:
407:
402:
395:
392:
390:
388:
386:
384:
382:
380:
377:
375:
372:
370:
368:
366:
364:
362:
359:
358:
355:
353:
349:
345:
341:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
301:
297:
294:
291:
287:
283:
279:
276:
273:
270:
267:
264:
261:
258:
255:
251:
248:
247:Find sources:
243:
239:
234:
228:
224:
220:
216:
211:
207:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
185:
176:
172:
164:
160:
154:
148:
144:
138:
132:
128:
122:
118:
114:
112:
108:
102:
98:
97:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
71:
70:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1287:
1284:
1260:
1245:
1226:
1209:
1181:
1177:
1172:
1170:
1169:because the
1166:
1113:
1090:
1047:
1030:
1009:
1005:
988:24.189.90.68
982:
977:BTW, I read
963:24.189.90.68
958:
945:
899:
879:
860:
843:
829:
822:
818:
795:— Preceding
789:
740:
736:
732:
673:
656:
636:
635:
629:Redirect to
628:
610:
593:
576:
440:
309:
307:
295:
289:
281:
274:
268:
262:
256:
246:
174:
162:
153:sockpuppetry
146:
135:; suspected
130:
116:
104:
100:
94:
86:
80:
45:
43:
31:
28:
1270:Lil-unique1
1214:User:Gabe19
1171:article is
1115:understand?
904:—Preceding
711:—Preceding
657:Strong Keep
529:) has made
487:Digital Spy
441:Strong keep
272:free images
1165:Right now
1052:Dollvalley
948:There are
801:David Rush
495:Daily Mail
87:discussion
1176:. If the
1002:WP:NSONGS
979:WP:NSONGS
615:Alexshunn
504:There :)
471:Billboard
445:WP:NSONGS
340:WP:NSONGS
318:WP:NSONGS
314:WP:NSONGS
143:canvassed
137:canvassed
96:consensus
1210:Redirect
1035:Candyo32
906:unsigned
861:Redirect
819:Redirect
809:contribs
797:unsigned
739:. Right
713:unsigned
678:WP:NSONG
674:Redirect
527:contribs
404:fields.—
233:View log
175:username
169:{{subst:
163:username
157:{{subst:
147:username
141:{{subst:
131:username
125:{{subst:
1118:Jayy008
1072:Jayy008
1010:singles
929:Jayy008
865:Jayy008
830:Legolas
767:Yes. --
598:HC 5555
278:WP refs
266:scholar
206:protect
201:history
139:users:
1167:Delete
1133:Shadow
1095:Shadow
1006:albums
882:-: -->
823:Bionic
250:Google
210:delete
50:Stifle
1235:hotch
1192:ucard
1180:then
639:Chase
293:JSTOR
254:books
227:views
219:watch
215:links
117:Note:
16:<
1274:talk
1261:Keep
1255:talk
1246:Keep
1227:Keep
1218:talk
1197:16♫♪
1187:♪♫Al
1182:Keep
1137:talk
1122:talk
1099:talk
1091:Keep
1076:talk
1056:talk
1048:Keep
1039:talk
1031:Keep
1018:talk
992:talk
967:talk
946:Keep
933:talk
914:talk
900:Keep
889:talk
869:talk
852:talk
844:Keep
805:talk
790:Keep
773:talk
753:talk
733:Will
721:talk
704:talk
686:talk
682:Whpq
665:talk
647:talk
619:talk
611:Keep
602:talk
594:Keep
585:talk
577:Keep
562:talk
543:talk
523:talk
510:talk
426:talk
410:talk
348:talk
326:talk
286:FENS
260:news
223:logs
197:talk
193:edit
54:talk
46:keep
1014:Kww
983:all
821:to
749:Kww
741:now
737:now
539:Kww
479:NME
455:BBC
406:Kww
344:Kww
322:Kww
300:TWL
235:•
231:– (
171:csp
167:or
159:csm
127:spa
101:not
1276:)
1232:Tb
1229:.
1220:)
1139:)
1131:--
1124:)
1101:)
1078:)
1058:)
1041:)
1020:)
1012:.—
994:)
969:)
935:)
916:)
891:)
871:)
854:)
828:--
825:.
811:)
807:•
775:)
755:)
747:.—
723:)
706:)
688:)
667:)
650:)
621:)
604:)
587:)
564:)
545:)
525:•
517:—
512:)
497:-
489:-
481:-
473:-
465:-
457:-
443:.
428:)
412:)
350:)
342:.—
328:)
280:)
225:|
221:|
217:|
213:|
208:|
204:|
199:|
195:|
177:}}
165:}}
155::
149:}}
133:}}
123::
56:)
1272:(
1253:(
1216:(
1184:.
1135:(
1120:(
1097:(
1074:(
1054:(
1037:(
1016:(
990:(
965:(
931:(
912:(
887:(
867:(
850:(
803:(
771:(
751:(
731:"
719:(
702:(
684:(
663:(
644:(
625:)
617:(
600:(
583:(
560:(
541:(
521:(
508:(
424:(
408:(
396:.
346:(
324:(
304:)
296:·
290:·
282:·
275:·
269:·
263:·
257:·
252:(
244:(
241:)
229:)
191:(
179:.
173:|
161:|
145:|
129:|
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
