385:
included on the compilation. Together, it would seem you aren't praising the work. My main point is that half of the substance of your comment is a non-sequitur, or red herring. It can lead to conversations like these which are neither here nor there. If you had simply commented about NALBUM or GNG, that would have sufficed, but to me, it appeared as if you went out of your way to disparage the work in a comment period about the merit (or lack thereof) of the article.
460:- This comp. album is cited by an actual book, which is more than many full-fledged albums by popular groups can make claim to. I think that given some interest Five Fingers of Funk could have a Knowledge article in the future and may be able to reference this article. I linked Nero's Rome to the Dandy Warhols, their followup act.
345:"Audacious" is a compliment, kind sir. According to dictionary.com: 1) bold, daring, fearless; 2) original, highly inventive. Consider using that site to look up "red herring", "rubbish", and "inquisition" as well, all of which you used incorrectly when stating your disagreement with my vote. The cited book (
496:
I'm mostly saying the vote by
Doomsdayer520 is faulty by way of an initial rubbish inquisition and a later one too. The premise that is laid out by them is a red herring and of no use. I'm fully aware my statement looks like "whataboutism" and I'm not trying to argue along those lines. No doubt many
403:
in which I added some colorful language on the album's title. Ignore that "non-sequitur" of "disparagement" if it hurts your feelings, and then find that it is audaciously unworthy of your apoplexy, because 95% of everything I have said is about the album's lack of notability per WP policies already
330:
Your "delete" description is pretty much a giant red herring. We're not here to comment on whether we like the name or not of the album and it's not relevant to the discussion. Furthermore, the article has a mention in an actual book referenced on the article which goes above and beyond it being a
384:
No, I typically look up words all the time at m-w, just to be sure. When I used these words, it was no exception, and I did not use them in error. I took your use of the word audacious as the reckless or rash version, because you also made what I feel is a derogatory statement about the artists
600:
What I edited into the article is about the extent of it. It discusses
Elemental Records (the publisher of the album) along with 4 other indie labels operating on shoestring budgets. For Elemental they talk with the owner and briefly discuss
193:
265:
245:
292:
but the album received no notice and only appears as a listing in various retail and directory sites. This article serves the exact same function, but WP is an encyclopedia and
187:
331:
mere directory, but you seem to neglect that fact. The bands being discussed on the compilation is also irrelevant. Yeah the article is skimpy, but your reasoning is flawed.
154:
349:) is clearly visible in Google Books, and all it does is mention the album's existence in a single sentence. That does not qualify for "significant coverage" at the
478:
based on this short book mention alone? That would require a very different understanding of "significant coverage" than what the guideline says it is. Also, those
605:
as being their first offering and how most of those bands quickly dissolved. The first page shows the owner holding two albums in his hands (one of
Floater's
296:. Also note the preponderance of non-notable bands on the compilation, and the notable bands don't seem to have discussed their inclusion on it too much. ---
228:. It cites one source, which is only a passing mention (two sentences) in a book. I can not find any significant coverage or other evidence of notability.
101:
86:
613:). The second page has a listing of all 5 indie label offerings, including Post-Grunge. The Register-Guard is available on Google's newspaper archive.
127:
122:
131:
114:
482:
you speak of, while irrelevant to this discussion, should obviously be deleted too, so I'm not sure how that's an argument for keeping.
420:
373:
312:
208:
175:
638:: Article does not meet GNG or NALBUM. Sources in the article do not meet SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth.
81:
74:
17:
582:
Alright. Would you mind quoting the relevant passage from that second reference, as it's offline? Also, I'll just ping
169:
95:
91:
651:
622:
595:
561:
543:
506:
491:
469:
440:
426:
394:
379:
340:
318:
277:
257:
237:
56:
165:
668:
40:
118:
552:
Done, only because they have acknowledged their comment was meant as a compliment. Still not on topic though.
497:
of those albums have other good articles to keep them afloat. For what it's worth I added another reference.
215:
416:
369:
308:
110:
62:
530:
suggest you strike these comments; I'm certain this was just an unfortunate choice of words on your part.
293:
664:
646:
538:
36:
618:
591:
557:
502:
487:
465:
436:
390:
336:
273:
253:
233:
201:
181:
583:
406:
359:
298:
70:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
663:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
642:
534:
354:
350:
225:
614:
587:
553:
523:
498:
483:
461:
432:
386:
332:
269:
249:
229:
353:, and there is no evidence that the album passes any of the seven requirements at the
475:
53:
148:
322:(First half-sentence stricken due to its offensiveness for the overly sensitive.)
586:
in case they're not watching this page, as they may want to reply to the above.
290:
Calling something "post-grunge" as early as 1994 was pretty audacious,
659:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
266:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
144:
140:
136:
526:, I noticed your PAs on another editor above. I would
200:
246:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
671:). No further edits should be made to this page.
264:Note: This discussion has been included in the
244:Note: This discussion has been included in the
224:Contested PROD. This compilation album fails
214:
8:
102:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
263:
243:
474:Are you saying that the article passes
480:full-fledged albums by popular groups
7:
24:
87:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
404:described multiple times. ---
399:Yawn. All of this because of
357:just because it exists. ---
351:general notability guideline
355:album notability guidelines
77:(AfD)? Read these primers!
688:
652:15:27, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
623:18:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
596:10:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
562:18:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
544:15:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
507:00:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
441:18:27, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
427:15:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
395:18:37, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
380:14:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
57:14:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
492:23:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
470:22:41, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
341:22:31, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
319:14:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
278:19:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
258:19:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
238:19:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
661:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
347:Street Style in America
401:one half of a sentence
611:Northwest Post-Grunge
431:And so it continues.
111:Northwest Post-Grunge
75:Articles for deletion
63:Northwest Post-Grunge
603:Northwest Ungrunge
424:
410:
377:
363:
316:
302:
280:
260:
92:Guide to deletion
82:How to contribute
679:
650:
542:
425:
414:
408:
378:
367:
361:
317:
306:
300:
219:
218:
204:
152:
134:
72:
34:
687:
686:
682:
681:
680:
678:
677:
676:
675:
669:deletion review
639:
609:, the other of
531:
405:
358:
297:
294:not a directory
161:
125:
109:
106:
69:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
685:
683:
674:
673:
655:
654:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
547:
546:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
325:
324:
282:
281:
261:
222:
221:
158:
105:
104:
99:
89:
84:
67:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
684:
672:
670:
666:
662:
657:
656:
653:
649:
648:
644:
637:
634:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
604:
599:
598:
597:
593:
589:
585:
584:Doomsdayer520
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
563:
559:
555:
551:
550:
549:
548:
545:
541:
540:
536:
529:
525:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
508:
504:
500:
495:
494:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
472:
471:
467:
463:
459:
456:
455:
442:
438:
434:
430:
429:
428:
422:
418:
413:
412:
402:
398:
397:
396:
392:
388:
383:
382:
381:
375:
371:
366:
365:
356:
352:
348:
344:
343:
342:
338:
334:
329:
328:
327:
326:
323:
320:
314:
310:
305:
304:
295:
291:
287:
284:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
262:
259:
255:
251:
247:
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
227:
217:
213:
210:
207:
203:
199:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
167:
164:
163:Find sources:
159:
156:
150:
146:
142:
138:
133:
129:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
103:
100:
97:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
78:
76:
71:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
660:
658:
640:
635:
610:
606:
602:
532:
527:
479:
457:
407:
400:
360:
346:
321:
299:
289:
285:
223:
211:
205:
197:
190:
184:
178:
172:
162:
68:
49:
47:
31:
28:
188:free images
409:DOOMSDAYER
362:DOOMSDAYER
301:DOOMSDAYER
665:talk page
615:Leitmotiv
588:Lennart97
554:Leitmotiv
524:Leitmotiv
499:Leitmotiv
484:Lennart97
462:Leitmotiv
433:Leitmotiv
387:Leitmotiv
333:Leitmotiv
270:Lennart97
250:Lennart97
230:Lennart97
226:WP:NMUSIC
37:talk page
667:or in a
528:strongly
421:CONTRIBS
374:CONTRIBS
313:CONTRIBS
155:View log
96:glossary
39:or in a
643:Timothy
535:Timothy
194:WP refs
182:scholar
128:protect
123:history
73:New to
54:Spartaz
636:Delete
476:WP:GNG
286:Delete
166:Google
132:delete
50:delete
209:JSTOR
170:books
149:views
141:watch
137:links
16:<
647:talk
619:talk
607:Sink
592:talk
558:talk
539:talk
503:talk
488:talk
466:talk
458:Keep
437:talk
417:TALK
391:talk
370:TALK
337:talk
309:TALK
274:talk
254:talk
234:talk
202:FENS
176:news
145:logs
119:talk
115:edit
645:::
641://
537:::
533://
411:520
364:520
303:520
216:TWL
153:– (
621:)
594:)
560:)
505:)
490:)
468:)
439:)
423:)
393:)
376:)
339:)
315:)
288:-
276:)
268:.
256:)
248:.
236:)
196:)
147:|
143:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
121:|
117:|
52:.
617:(
590:(
556:(
501:(
486:(
464:(
435:(
419:|
415:(
389:(
372:|
368:(
335:(
311:|
307:(
272:(
252:(
232:(
220:)
212:·
206:·
198:·
191:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
168:(
160:(
157:)
151:)
113:(
98:)
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.