645:
307:. Should not be considered as a 'porn-only' notoriety in my humble opinion. Decent international notoriety as porn actress albeit without awards won; notable for having been a Penthouse Pet in diptych with her sister as well as for her being a Polish celebrity. Creating a page or redirect for her sister could therefore be useful. Nota: the 'listed nominations' mentioned above were oddly removed from the page before the debate was launched (see the article talk page).--DPD (
655:. Borderline at best, and frankly, given that majority of coverage comes from tabloids, trade journals and a single local newspaper, well, I think we usually lean towards delete with no other arguments, and as the remaining question should be whether she fails PORNBIO - and nobody disputed the nominator's claim she is not.--
860:
I wouldn't rely on an outside wiki article to determine reputation as there is potential for coatracking, and I can't track the underlying sourcing (if there is any and whether it's from competition or an actual academic journal). Even the best of newspapers, most notably the New York Times, have had
678:
points out its reputation for "misconduct and disregard for the rules of journalistic ethics" and "the administration of untruth and creat fictional material". What's happened here is fairly straightforward: a flurry of posts on social media claimed (without any credible evidence) that the winner of
546:
and the discussion immediately beneath that RFC. One important reason was the increasingly outlandish proliferation of award categories and nominations within most categories. One incarnation of AVN's fan awards had categories with up to 100 nominees, and most categories from the more prominent
841:
page is more tabloidery, apparently based on social media postings and riddled with dubious claims -- "the first Polish woman in the porn business" -- not even remotely plausible. Sourcing like this can't sustain a BLP.
676:
636:. Uh, Polish celebrity - hardly. In addition to the English language article in a minor Polish-American newspaper, I checked Polish language coverage. All I see is an article in regional (provincial) newspaper (
185:
344:
84:
284:
675:. No genuine international notoriety or celebrity. Such claims are based on unreliable tabloidery, including one source whose extensively referenced native-language Knowledge (XXG) article
682:
seems to be the starting point, apparently based only on visual resemblances in a few photos. Sources which base their reporting on social media aren't reliable, and can't support a BLP.
264:
138:
216:
A BLP lacking in reliable secondary sources that that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Article sourced to non-independent industry materials or tabloids. Recently added
227:
The notability tag has been contested and it may be best to resolve the issue via AfD. The first AfD in 2015 closed as no consensus, so this would be a good time to revisit.
543:
521:
Could you explain the SNG drop and why you think the award is not worth considering? We should discard all awards if the standard is the Nobel Prize. I am all ears. :)
179:
244:
79:
364:
220:
content appears to be citing to tabloid-like content as well. The best I could find was TMZ and
Knowledge (XXG) does not generally cite to tabloids. Does not meet
145:
570:
Thanks. That link is all that I needed. My caveat was the "nominations" and according to the discussion in your link, the consensus is to remove this rung from
324:
574:. It is an informative RfC discussion. I think that until the reform of the guidelines occurs, a link to it should appear in all of the AfD PORNBIO cases.
544:
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)/Archive_2014#RfC:_As_regards_WP:PORNBIO.2C_should_the_criteria_for_awards_nominations_be_removed_from_the_guideline.3F
699:
non-notable pornographic performer. Our guidelines clearly say we should not create articles built on tabloid coverage, which this article would be.
321:
754:
Fails both PORNBIO and GNG. The claim of celebrity in their native Poland is very questionable as is the source that makes that claim.
837:
most certainly is not a reliable source; most of the Polish wiki article on it is devoted to detailing its journalistic failings. The
17:
111:
106:
115:
901:
878:
851:
821:
796:
763:
744:
720:
708:
691:
667:
626:
590:
556:
537:
509:
482:
437:
417:
396:
376:
356:
336:
312:
296:
276:
256:
236:
63:
847:
687:
552:
454:
404:
per above - She's gained international notability and at present I see no valid reason for deleting, Meets PORNBIO and GNG. –
308:
98:
200:
680:
167:
729:
862:
920:
40:
843:
759:
683:
565:
548:
392:
704:
874:
817:
779:
500:. Award nominations have been dropped from this SNG a long time ago. Besides, XBIZ is not the Nobel Prize :-).
161:
865:. I see these populist foreign papers that are in tabloid formats to be the equivalent of something like the
772:
755:
157:
61:
453:
Keep (Weak). Weak because of the dearth of independent sources. But she has twice been nominated for the
916:
505:
433:
388:
292:
272:
252:
232:
102:
36:
897:
700:
637:
207:
571:
497:
221:
870:
813:
193:
94:
69:
458:
791:
611:
575:
522:
491:
467:
804:- the Google News results show multiple articles about her in two popular newspapers in Poland,
661:
372:
352:
332:
54:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
915:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
892:- The arguments for deletion are too weak and based on subjective opinion rather than fact.
516:
501:
462:
429:
288:
268:
248:
228:
173:
893:
844:
The Big Bad
Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.
684:
The Big Bad
Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.
549:
The Big Bad
Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.
641:
405:
679:
a quite minor beauty pageant ("Miss
Polonia Manhattan") had become a porn performer. (
866:
805:
786:
652:
717:
657:
368:
348:
328:
132:
740:
387:
As sources show she's recognized in Poland as a rare Polish star in
America. --
428:
Starr has won no awards from what I can see. How does she meet PORNBIO?
648:
869:
which has never been outright rejected as a source for wikipedia.
909:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
809:
732:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
345:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
647:), a single paragraph at a news section of a bigger portal
285:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
128:
124:
120:
192:
85:
Articles for deletion/Natalia Starr (2nd nomination)
738:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
206:
610:After reading the RfC linked and explained above.
265:list of United States-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
923:). No further edits should be made to this page.
716:we rightly expect better coverage from blps.
547:awardgivers have more than a dozen nominees.
496:Two XBIZ nominations is nowhere near meeting
8:
363:Note: This debate has been included in the
343:Note: This debate has been included in the
283:Note: This debate has been included in the
263:Note: This debate has been included in the
243:Note: This debate has been included in the
245:list of Poland-related deletion discussions
365:list of Women-related deletion discussions
362:
342:
282:
262:
242:
320:Note: This debate has been added to the
77:
658:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
651:, and a bunch of articles in tabloid
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
224:as only two nominations are listed.
812:(fakt.pl). This satisfies the GNG.
80:Articles for deletion/Natalia Starr
76:
24:
1:
902:17:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
879:22:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
852:17:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
822:16:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
797:14:52, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
764:21:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
745:00:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
721:22:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
709:20:51, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
692:13:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
627:10:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
591:10:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
557:00:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
538:22:58, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
510:22:25, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
483:05:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
64:00:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
668:03:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
438:03:55, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
418:23:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
397:12:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
377:02:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
357:02:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
337:01:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
313:01:32, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
297:01:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
277:01:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
257:01:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
237:01:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
457:a criteria for notability (
940:
912:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
322:WikiProject Pornography
773:List of Penthouse Pets
542:I'd suggest reviewing
75:AfDs for this article:
863:journalistic failings
566:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
461:). Less important,
455:"Best New Starlet,"
642:pl:Kurier Lubelski
465:has a page on her.
747:
701:John Pack Lambert
379:
359:
325:list of deletions
299:
279:
259:
931:
914:
794:
789:
784:
778:
756:Wikiuser20102011
737:
735:
733:
664:
623:
619:
617:
587:
583:
581:
569:
534:
530:
528:
520:
495:
479:
475:
473:
415:
410:
389:SamWinchester000
339:
211:
210:
196:
148:
136:
118:
57:
34:
939:
938:
934:
933:
932:
930:
929:
928:
927:
921:deletion review
910:
792:
787:
782:
780:R to list entry
776:
748:
728:
726:
666:
662:
638:Kurier Lubelski
621:
615:
612:
585:
579:
576:
563:
532:
526:
523:
514:
489:
477:
471:
468:
411:
406:
319:
153:
144:
109:
93:
90:
73:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
937:
935:
926:
925:
905:
904:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
871:Morbidthoughts
855:
854:
825:
824:
814:Morbidthoughts
799:
766:
736:
725:
724:
723:
711:
694:
670:
656:
630:
629:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
487:
486:
485:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
421:
420:
399:
381:
380:
360:
340:
316:
315:
301:
300:
280:
260:
214:
213:
150:
89:
88:
87:
82:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
936:
924:
922:
918:
913:
907:
906:
903:
899:
895:
891:
888:
887:
880:
876:
872:
868:
867:New York Post
864:
859:
858:
857:
856:
853:
849:
845:
840:
839:Super Express
836:
832:
829:
828:
827:
826:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
806:Super Express
803:
800:
798:
795:
790:
781:
774:
770:
767:
765:
761:
757:
753:
750:
749:
746:
743:
742:
734:
731:
722:
719:
715:
712:
710:
706:
702:
698:
695:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
674:
671:
669:
665:
659:
654:
653:Super Express
650:
646:
643:
639:
635:
632:
631:
628:
625:
624:
618:
609:
606:
605:
592:
589:
588:
582:
573:
567:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
554:
550:
545:
541:
540:
539:
536:
535:
529:
518:
513:
512:
511:
507:
503:
499:
493:
492:Caballero1967
488:
484:
481:
480:
474:
466:
464:
460:
456:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
439:
435:
431:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
419:
416:
414:
409:
403:
400:
398:
394:
390:
386:
383:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
361:
358:
354:
350:
346:
341:
338:
334:
330:
326:
323:
318:
317:
314:
310:
306:
303:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
281:
278:
274:
270:
266:
261:
258:
254:
250:
246:
241:
240:
239:
238:
234:
230:
225:
223:
219:
209:
205:
202:
199:
195:
191:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
159:
156:
155:Find sources:
151:
147:
143:
140:
134:
130:
126:
122:
117:
113:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:Natalia Starr
92:
91:
86:
83:
81:
78:
71:
70:Natalia Starr
68:
66:
65:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
911:
908:
889:
838:
834:
830:
808:(se.pl) and
801:
768:
751:
739:
727:
713:
696:
672:
633:
620:
613:
607:
584:
577:
531:
524:
476:
469:
452:
412:
407:
401:
384:
304:
226:
218:Polska Times
217:
215:
203:
197:
189:
182:
176:
170:
164:
154:
141:
56:Juliancolton
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
634:Weak delete
622:Historiador
586:Historiador
533:Historiador
517:K.e.coffman
502:K.e.coffman
478:Historiador
430:K.e.coffman
289:K.e.coffman
269:K.e.coffman
249:K.e.coffman
229:K.e.coffman
180:free images
894:Holanthony
663:reply here
572:WP:PORNBIO
498:WP:PORNBIO
222:WP:PORNBIO
917:talk page
614:Caballero
578:Caballero
525:Caballero
470:Caballero
459:WP:ANYBIO
369:• Gene93k
349:• Gene93k
329:• Gene93k
37:talk page
919:or in a
769:Redirect
730:Relisted
139:View log
39:or in a
831:Comment
718:Spartaz
649:onet.pl
608:Delete.
186:WP refs
174:scholar
112:protect
107:history
752:Delete
741:st170e
714:delete
697:Delete
673:Delete
158:Google
116:delete
50:delete
793:flyer
408:Davey
201:JSTOR
162:books
146:Stats
133:views
125:watch
121:links
52:. –
16:<
898:talk
890:Keep
875:talk
848:talk
835:Fakt
818:talk
810:Fakt
802:Keep
760:talk
705:talk
688:talk
553:talk
506:talk
463:IMDb
434:talk
413:2010
402:Keep
393:talk
385:Keep
373:talk
353:talk
333:talk
305:Keep
293:talk
273:talk
253:talk
233:talk
194:FENS
168:news
129:logs
103:talk
99:edit
788:SST
775:as
771:to
208:TWL
137:– (
900:)
877:)
850:)
833:.
820:)
785:.
783:}}
777:{{
762:)
707:)
690:)
644:)
555:)
508:)
436:)
395:)
375:)
367:.
355:)
347:.
335:)
327:.
311:)
295:)
287:.
275:)
267:.
255:)
247:.
235:)
188:)
131:|
127:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
60:|
896:(
873:(
846:(
816:(
758:(
703:(
686:(
660:|
640:(
616:/
580:/
568::
564:@
551:(
527:/
519::
515:@
504:(
494::
490:@
472:/
432:(
391:(
371:(
351:(
331:(
309:t
291:(
271:(
251:(
231:(
212:)
204:·
198:·
190:·
183:·
177:·
171:·
165:·
160:(
152:(
149:)
142:·
135:)
97:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.