Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Elliott - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

254:
doing work to combat the greatest pandemic facing the world today. If the Washington Post considers him noteworthy enough to dedicate their time and resources to write an article about him, then Knowledge (XXG) shouldn't have any hesitation in adding him. Honestly, the fact this is even being debated should be embarrassing for Knowledge (XXG). When news sources as reputable as the Washington Post or even the Omaha Herald (a publication for a major city) are covering a person's actions, that person is, by definition, "newsworthy," and, by association, "noteworthy."
294:
for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Sources presented are either promotional, under the control of the subject or related organizations, or not sufficiently in depth to meet notability requirements. Coverage in reliable sources is not broad enough. One might say that the quality of the writing in the
253:
Like another user said, Nathaniel Elliott is certainly noteworthy enough to be considered. He received coverage in the Washington Post as a high school student. Reread that last sentence. Isn't that in and of itself enough to warrant his inclusion in Knowledge (XXG), not to mention the fact he is
377:
Also, just being mentioned on Fox New or CNN, and no links are presented to establish such, is not the same as in depth, significant media coverage. And if subject was mentioned in the context of an event, the article should be about the event. No indication of significant coverage of the event,
303:
is brought forth. I find no in depth bio profile from a news service. Were he notable, someone would have made one. I find no national news service coverage. Not even a limited blurb or one off. I find limited news coverage with little more information than is presented in this article. Cheers,
295:
article-- vague, promotional, shallow in depth could be remediable through sourcing and editing. (I've said that myself in other cases.) However, that is not the case here unless significant, in depth,
188: 325:
Nathaniel was on Fox New, CNN and other new outlets concerning Living Hope. He conducted a national wide, 70-day trip that raised $ 70,000 and $ 50,000 before the trip began.
123: 373:
Almost forgot-- getting news coverage is not sufficient to establish notability. This was not significant media coverage, it is barely even news coverage, and Wikiepdia is
90: 85: 374: 261: 94: 341: 77: 17: 168: 134:. At least two sources are not independent. The sources that are, talk about his bus project rather than Elliott himself. 404: 36: 200: 288:
significant enough to be considered of encylopedic merit. What he is doing is commendable, but not sufficiently
48:. Keep "votes" do not address the fact that news coverage is not in itself sufficient to establish notability. – 403:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
389: 366: 345: 315: 269: 246: 225: 204: 178: 144: 59: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
265: 384: 310: 142: 81: 329: 257: 337: 233:- he got covered for what he did in the Washingtonb post as documeted int he article and I also found ths 57: 379: 333: 305: 73: 65: 196: 158: 175: 162: 362: 234: 222: 138: 50: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
154: 131: 300: 242: 172: 296: 290: 358: 111: 238: 237:
article. There's also some articles behind pay walls I can't access. --
213:- does not appear to meet the notability guidelines. (I dispute 153:
Mind-numbingly non-notable, written like an advertisement. High
397:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
221:
Monday morning, so my mind's already numb to begin with...) --
284:
an assertion of significance. Frankly, raising $ 43,000 is
118: 107: 103: 99: 189:list of Living people-related deletion discussions 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 407:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 183: 187:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 424: 390:18:06, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 367:17:17, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 346:17:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 316:16:15, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 280:reading closely, there is 270:15:35, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 247:15:38, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 226:14:34, 20 April 2009 (UTC) 205:03:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC) 179:21:49, 19 April 2009 (UTC) 145:21:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC) 60:23:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC) 400:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 297:verifiable information 357:Got news coverage. - 157:to boot--author is 235:Omaha World Herald 223:User:AlbertHerring 44:The result was 349: 332:comment added by 260:comment added by 207: 192: 74:Nathaniel Elliott 66:Nathaniel Elliott 415: 402: 387: 382: 348: 326: 313: 308: 301:reliable sources 272: 193: 121: 115: 97: 53: 34: 423: 422: 418: 417: 416: 414: 413: 412: 411: 405:deletion review 398: 385: 380: 327: 311: 306: 255: 197:LinguistAtLarge 117: 88: 72: 69: 51: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 421: 419: 410: 409: 393: 392: 370: 369: 351: 350: 319: 318: 274: 273: 262:76.251.242.175 250: 249: 228: 215:mind-numbingly 208: 181: 130:Subject fails 128: 127: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 420: 408: 406: 401: 395: 394: 391: 388: 383: 376: 375:not the news. 372: 371: 368: 364: 360: 356: 353: 352: 347: 343: 339: 335: 331: 324: 321: 320: 317: 314: 309: 302: 298: 293: 292: 287: 283: 279: 276: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 252: 251: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 229: 227: 224: 220: 216: 212: 209: 206: 203: 202: 198: 190: 186: 182: 180: 177: 174: 170: 167: 164: 160: 156: 152: 151:Strong delete 149: 148: 147: 146: 143: 140: 137: 133: 125: 120: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 58: 55: 54: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 399: 396: 354: 334:Felipito1818 322: 289: 285: 281: 277: 230: 218: 214: 210: 195: 184: 165: 150: 135: 129: 52:Juliancolton 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 328:—Preceding 256:—Preceding 386:cierekim 312:cierekim 217:, but it 159:MyElliott 378:either. 359:Ret.Prof 342:contribs 330:unsigned 258:unsigned 169:contribs 124:View log 291:notable 173:Blueboy 91:protect 86:history 299:|from 278:Delete 211:Delete 136:Delete 132:WP:BIO 119:delete 95:delete 46:delete 355:Keep: 323:Keep: 122:) – ( 112:views 104:watch 100:links 16:< 381:Dloh 363:talk 338:talk 307:Dloh 266:talk 243:talk 239:Whpq 231:Keep 201:Talk 194:-- — 185:Note 163:talk 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 286:not 282:not 171:). 155:COI 139:Mgm 365:) 344:) 340:• 268:) 245:) 219:is 199:• 191:. 176:96 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 56:| 361:( 336:( 264:( 241:( 166:· 161:( 141:| 126:) 116:( 114:) 76:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Juliancolton

23:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Nathaniel Elliott
Nathaniel Elliott
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
WP:BIO
Mgm

21:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
COI
MyElliott
talk
contribs
Blueboy
96
21:49, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
list of Living people-related deletion discussions

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.