251:
The term may exist as a grouping of individuals, yes. Nazi hunters however are not an established/institutionalized entity. They are, rather, a concept. This usage of Nazi hunters aims to portray them as if in an established organizational entity which is borderline NEO because it is not a common
476:
You changed the article, yes, but it's still a term. How are arguing that it's not? That's rediculous. I already proved that there is no such organization as "Nazi
Hunters." It is not an established institutional entity and thus it a conceptual grouping of people. Nazi hunter is the term
290:
Google hits should not establish notability. Verifiable sources and references help to establish notability. Notability should be established in the article itself. You seem to be promoting the creation of this topic as a category rather than keeping the article.
75:
non notable group. No such group actually exists, or at least as an organized entity and thus is fictional. doesn't seem to be any real organization just a term coined by the author to refer to individuals who have a similar cause. Violates
188:
The term "Nazi hunter" is certainly well established, and not just coined by the author of the article. Searching "nazi hunter" at amazon will yield dozens of books around this title, even a "nazi hunter
439:
It's a definition of a term. According to
Knowledge (XXG)'s customs it belongs in the Wikitionary and not as an article. If you wish to make a list of Nazi hunters then that deserves its own list.
91::I updated the article per the discussion below to make it more a description of the term. No matter what changes are made, however, still makes the article no more than a
429:
576:
and expand, they are a group, a concept and a "term," and their efforts (in the aggregate, not just as individuals) belong in a comprehensive modern encyclopedia.
321:" in quotes yields more than 30,000 hits. The article explains the subject very well and does not in any way suggest that Nazi hunters are an organized group.
425:
305:
A very well known term that readers might very easily search for. Contrary to the claims made the article does not say that they were a single group.
477:
ascribed to these individuals who belong in this conceptual category which is precisely why this article should be a category and not an article. --
272:— Many ghits and a number of people tagged with this label for their efforts in this regard. I believe the topic is quite worthy of its own page. —
635:
17:
223:("neologisms") certainly does not apply. The term has been around for decades. Amazon.com and the Library of Congress both list a
455:
329:
243:
655:
36:
178:
55:
467:, a few hours before you nominated it for deletion claiming it was "just a term". I have now changed it back. -
654:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
630:
49:
443:
231:
175:
383:
per above. They may not have had numbers but hardly an insignificant group in brining Nazi's to justice.
451:
640:
616:
604:
592:
580:
568:
556:
544:
532:
506:
481:
471:
432:
416:
398:
387:
375:
363:
351:
335:
309:
295:
283:
256:
215:
198:
180:
166:
118:
103:
59:
318:
589:
478:
447:
413:
395:
292:
253:
212:
156:
144:
134:
115:
100:
86:
84:
as it refers to the concept as if it were actually an established group. Lacks verifiable sources.
625:
601:
553:
527:
487:
372:
95:
which should not be included in
Knowledge (XXG). Such articles belong in Wiktionary. Thus, my
348:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
277:
239:
220:
208:
204:
81:
77:
110:
Updating this nom again as per discussion below and with another user. Article should be
409:
161:
151:
139:
129:
317:
This is a very common term for a well-defined and significant activity. A search for "
613:
523:
503:
468:
624:. This is an obviously notable concept, I'm suprised the article isn't much longer.
498:. And like those subjects, it's not an organization, and still it needs an article.
565:
344:
306:
203:
It is still a coined term which does not generally appear in the dictionary. See
324:
273:
235:
195:
65:
384:
360:
540:
and expand. Clearly a subject of major importance for any reference work. --
577:
541:
128:, unless any reference can be found which backs any of the claims. --
114:
to
Wiktionary but a new list should be formed for Nazi hunters. --
463:
It wasn't "a definition of a term" until you made it so, in your
648:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
343:
per phh, Nathcer, and RJH. Article has potential for expansion.
194:
Still, a category might be more appropriate than an article. --
495:
491:
486:
Yes, it's a term, and it's a conceptual category, like
464:
424:
Are you kidding me? How is "Nazi Hunter" not notable.-
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
658:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
394:They aren't a group, they're a concept. --
227:book "The Nazi hunter" by Bynum Shaw.
426:Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
174:maybe Wiktionary, but not here.
1:
44:The result of the debate was
600:per above, merits expansion
319:nazi hunter simon wiesenthal
80:, borederline violation of
675:
465:edit of 16:20, 28 May 2006
89:16:03, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
651:Please do not modify it.
641:19:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
617:23:09, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
605:20:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
593:20:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
581:18:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
569:03:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
557:03:30, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
545:01:57, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
533:01:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
507:21:53, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
482:21:47, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
472:19:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
433:23:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
417:22:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
399:22:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
388:22:12, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
376:20:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
364:20:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
352:20:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
336:20:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
310:18:55, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
296:18:22, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
284:18:18, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
257:18:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
216:18:05, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
199:18:00, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
181:16:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
167:16:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
119:03:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
104:20:23, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
60:03:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
359:per phh, Nathcer, RJH.
588:per all the above. --
552:per all the above. ←
252:use of the term. --
529:£€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€
488:cardiac arrhythmia
530:
460:
446:comment added by
248:
234:comment added by
176:Master of Puppets
112:Deleted and moved
58:
666:
653:
638:
633:
628:
528:
459:
440:
334:
247:
228:
164:
159:
154:
149:
142:
137:
132:
54:
34:
674:
673:
669:
668:
667:
665:
664:
663:
662:
656:deletion review
649:
636:
631:
626:
522:. per above. --
441:
371:per all above.
332:
322:
229:
162:
157:
152:
145:
140:
135:
130:
99:vote stands. --
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
672:
670:
661:
660:
644:
643:
619:
612:and expand. -
607:
595:
583:
571:
559:
547:
535:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
436:
435:
419:
402:
401:
391:
390:
378:
366:
354:
338:
328:
312:
299:
298:
287:
286:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
191:
190:
183:
169:
122:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
671:
659:
657:
652:
646:
645:
642:
639:
634:
629:
623:
620:
618:
615:
611:
608:
606:
603:
599:
596:
594:
591:
587:
584:
582:
579:
575:
572:
570:
567:
563:
560:
558:
555:
554:Humus sapiens
551:
548:
546:
543:
539:
536:
534:
531:
525:
521:
518:
517:
508:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
484:
483:
480:
475:
474:
473:
470:
466:
462:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
438:
437:
434:
431:
427:
423:
420:
418:
415:
411:
408:and expand. —
407:
404:
403:
400:
397:
393:
392:
389:
386:
382:
379:
377:
374:
370:
367:
365:
362:
358:
355:
353:
350:
346:
342:
339:
337:
331:
326:
320:
316:
313:
311:
308:
304:
301:
300:
297:
294:
289:
288:
285:
281:
280:
275:
271:
268:
267:
258:
255:
250:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
226:
222:
219:
218:
217:
214:
210:
206:
202:
201:
200:
197:
193:
192:
187:
184:
182:
179:
177:
173:
170:
168:
165:
160:
155:
150:
148:
143:
138:
133:
127:
124:
123:
120:
117:
113:
109:
108:
107:
106:
105:
102:
98:
94:
88:
85:
83:
79:
74:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
650:
647:
621:
609:
597:
585:
573:
561:
549:
537:
519:
499:
442:— Preceding
421:
405:
380:
368:
356:
340:
314:
302:
278:
269:
230:— Preceding
224:
185:
171:
146:
125:
111:
96:
92:
90:
72:
71:
70:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
590:Ben Houston
66:Nazi hunter
564:per Phh.--
410:Viriditas
614:CNichols
524:PinchasC
504:Nunh-huh
479:Strothra
469:Nunh-huh
456:contribs
448:Strothra
444:unsigned
396:Strothra
293:Strothra
254:Strothra
244:contribs
232:unsigned
213:Strothra
189:series".
116:Strothra
101:Strothra
87:Strothra
566:Shlomke
307:Nathcer
186:Comment
632:master
602:Elizmr
373:Pecher
361:Jayjg
236:Aleph4
221:WP:NEO
209:WP:NOR
205:WP:NEO
196:Aleph4
172:Delete
126:Delete
97:Delete
93:dicdef
82:WP:NEO
78:WP:NOR
73:Delete
627:Grand
385:Bryce
315:Keep.
51:Samir
16:<
622:Keep
610:Keep
598:Keep
586:Keep
578:6SJ7
574:Keep
562:Keep
550:Keep
542:JJay
538:Keep
520:Keep
502:. -
500:Keep
452:talk
430:Talk
422:Keep
414:Talk
406:Keep
381:Keep
369:Keep
357:Keep
341:Keep
303:Keep
279:talk
270:Keep
240:talk
225:1968
211:. --
207:and
56:धर्म
46:keep
496:Jew
494:or
492:man
490:or
349:R/W
345:DVD
325:phh
274:RJH
48:--
637:ka
526:|
458:)
454:•
428:|
412:|
327:(/
291:--
282:)
246:)
242:•
163:ch
131:so
450:(
347:+
333:)
330:c
323:—
276:(
238:(
158:S
153:a
147:y
141:m
136:U
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.