197:, in order to demonstrate that you have a sound basis for stating that the Primary Notability Criterion is not satisfied. You clearly haven't looked for sources yourself, otherwise you'd have seen the many history books, other encyclopaedias, scholarly articles in journals, newspaper articles, and (as mentioned) WWW sites that document this subject in detail. As such, you have no case that the subject is not notable, since you haven't done the research from which you could determine this.
219:. You clearly are capable of writing. You've written 3 paragraphs in this very discussion. Expend that writing effort on actual article content, rather than deletion discussions. Think how much just those 3 paragraphs worth of writing on your part would have improved this article.
149:
Lack of activity is not the reason for the nomination. The nomination is because as written, the article is unencyclopedic and neither asserts nor demonstrates notability of the subject. The nomination is for this article, not for some ideal article that could be—but hasn't
207:.) Repeatedly nominating articles for deletion instead of spending your time looking for sources is zero help towards improving Knowledge (XXG), and wastes other editors' time. One ends up actually
294:
110:
177:, as I linked to in the edit summary. We don't delete articles at AFD because they "don't assert notability". That is nowhere in our policy. We delete them because they are not
269:
137:. A simple search for Nai Talim in Google gives sources from reliable Gandhi-related organizations for the top hits. Lack of activity is not a good reason for deletion. -
117:
Article started a month ago but not materially edited since its creation. Not sufficient information to determine whether the subject is notable (or real). Unreferenced.
243:
293:. The title itself is sufficient information to determine that this is notable by simply doing a Google Books search and looking at a few of the
186:
17:
158:
123:
182:
204:
190:
77:
72:
81:
321:
170:
36:
174:
64:
320:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
142:
302:
199:
Writing the encyclopaedia is not
Somebody Else's Problem. If you see a poor stub, you are supposed to
153:
118:
306:
284:
258:
228:
163:
144:
128:
280:
254:
138:
298:
224:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
276:
250:
68:
220:
215:. Follow the triage procedure, and only come to AFD if you don't find any sources
98:
60:
52:
152:
The comment on activity explains why this wasn't nominated a month ago.
314:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105:
94:
90:
86:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
324:). No further edits should be made to this page.
193:, and — yes — deletion policy itself) involves
181:notable, and determining that (as explained in
270:list of Education-related deletion discussions
8:
183:Knowledge (XXG):Guide to deletion#Nomination
244:list of India-related deletion discussions
169:You should familiarize yourself with our
268:: This debate has been included in the
242:: This debate has been included in the
205:User:Uncle G/Wikipedia triage#What to do
191:User:Uncle G/Wikipedia triage#What to do
187:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
48:Numerous sources refer to the topic
213:look for sources yourself and write
24:
211:the problem. Put in the time to
195:you looking for sources yourself
171:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion policy
175:Knowledge (XXG):Editing policy
1:
307:20:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
285:20:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
259:20:16, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
229:12:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
164:09:21, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
145:08:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
129:23:54, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
341:
317:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
295:666 sources found
287:
273:
261:
247:
332:
319:
274:
264:
248:
238:
161:
156:
126:
121:
108:
102:
84:
44:The result was
34:
340:
339:
335:
334:
333:
331:
330:
329:
328:
322:deletion review
315:
203:. (Again, see
173:, and with our
159:
154:
124:
119:
104:
75:
59:
56:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
338:
336:
327:
326:
310:
309:
288:
262:
236:
235:
234:
233:
232:
115:
114:
55:
50:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
337:
325:
323:
318:
312:
311:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
286:
282:
278:
271:
267:
263:
260:
256:
252:
245:
241:
237:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
217:after looking
214:
210:
206:
202:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
167:
166:
165:
162:
157:
150:been—written.
148:
147:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:
131:
130:
127:
122:
112:
107:
100:
96:
92:
88:
83:
79:
74:
70:
66:
62:
58:
57:
54:
51:
49:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
316:
313:
299:Phil Bridger
290:
265:
239:
216:
212:
208:
200:
198:
194:
178:
151:
134:
116:
45:
43:
31:
28:
46:Speedy keep
277:Raven1977
251:Raven1977
201:expand it
61:Nai Talim
53:Nai Talim
179:actually
111:View log
221:Uncle G
78:protect
73:history
106:delete
82:delete
209:being
160:matic
155:Bongo
125:matic
120:Bongo
109:) – (
99:views
91:watch
87:links
16:<
303:talk
291:Keep
281:talk
266:Note
255:talk
240:Note
225:talk
135:Keep
95:logs
69:talk
65:edit
275:--
272:.
249:--
246:.
139:Mgm
305:)
297:.
283:)
257:)
227:)
189:,
185:,
97:|
93:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
71:|
67:|
301:(
279:(
253:(
223:(
141:|
113:)
103:(
101:)
63:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.