Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/New Zealand – Norway relations - Knowledge

Source 📝

632:- while contemporary relations are at a relative low level (though still notable), early 20th century relations and the government level cooperation in the whaling industry in the 19th and early 20th century are of high significance. We should avoid the pitfall to only look at the last ten years, but sadly that is how many articles are structured here on Knowledge. 552:
relations between the "peoples" of those countries, a form or relations. Your continued arguments, Libstar, that the concept of "relations" between countries is not supported by the definition of the word "relations". Your repeated attempts to remove sourced information from these articles, then nominate them for deletion
580:
that some of the "articles" you found such as the Norwegian church in sydney have nothing to do with relations? secondly, you can find evidence of the NZ and norwegian government talking to each other during the Tampa affair? I will continue to nominate articles as I see fit. you have not discouraged me at all.
181: 921:
visits by President Obama anywhere in the world generate massive third party coverage which makes it highly notable, and most citizens of the country know that the US President in the country. I am yet to find a newspaper article of some Norwegian Minister visiting NZ, and I doubt more than 100 NZers
608:
you've given a the NZ govt foreign affairs website as the reference for these official visits. yes you can find third party sources for the visits by the Prime Ministers, but for the ministers? seems little third party coverage for that. and I doubt the visit of a "Select Committee on Finance" didn't
710:
There is no magic number when reached that make it go from not-notable to notable. We also are not required to "say" anything. We can present facts without commentary. If Knowledge required us to present commentary for every fact, we would have to eliminate every chart and list in Knowledge. No one
663:
That official visits has been exchanged says nothing either way about the existence of a "New Zealand – Norway relations" topic. You need to find sources with that or a similar subject, not simply declare the visits as evidence of notable relations. We go by what reliable secondary sources, and not
551:
Coverage by third party sources exists for these visits. If you don't think that the Tampa affair effected the relations between Norway and New Zealand, you're just wrong. And most of those articles I linked to have to do with direct relations between the governments. The others have to do with the
267:
i believe the issue of nationx/nationy relations has been discussed on WP, with a guideline to NOT create articles unless there are substantial relations. otherwise, we end up with thousands of useless stub articles, placeholders for future information. having said that, it appears that people have
442:
I've considered the additions and the articles on the talk page, I don't believe together they indicate significant relations: one off state visits (these 2 countries rarely have state visits), the fact that NZ acted with 11 other countries, tangential link of an Asian Pacific religious conference
285:
Unless there is more than can be put in the articles called "Foreign relations of Norway" or "Foreign relations of New Zealand", a separate article is not merited. The article's author would not have been aware of the Groubani articles controversy that existed in the first few months of 2009, but
579:
visits are leaders or heads of state only. my point stands, there still only appears to be 2 known state visits between these 2 countries in the last 20 years. ministerial meetings happen around the world every day of the year. "Select Committee on Finance" is not even a Minister. do you concede
681:
there have been at least 50 bilateral articles that have been deleted even though they have had "official visits". simply having official visits is not a guarantee of notability. since Norway was formed in 1905 there have only ever been 2 state visits between Norway and NZ. 2 state visits in 104
729:
sure there is no magic number but 2 state visits in 104 years since the existence of Norway does not say much about actual relations between these countries. many people bring up multiple bilateral agreements...it appears that there are hardly any agreements between these countries. perhaps the
492:
NZ's foreign ministry website provides that "New Zealand supported Norway in its election to the UN Security Council in November 2000. Both New Zealand and Norway are parties to the Antarctic Treaty and cooperate in scientific research on that continent. The two countries concluded an Antarctic
371: 966: 149: 414:
There have been several official visits, the whaling issue is a prominent dispute. Plenty of third party sources if people actually spend time the time to look for them. (see the talk page for a few I found in about five minutes).
876:
So when Obama picks up his Nobel prize and then goes to the climate talks, we have to delete references to one of them, right, they can't both be notable unless he goes back to Washington and starts from there. Very silly notion.
493:
Cooperation Statement in December 1997. Human rights, international security, disarmament, Antarctic issues, oceans issues, and climate change are all areas where engagement with Norway has proved particularly useful."
392:
There is also independent 3rd party coverage of the visits of heads of state, and the dispute over whaling. They also have recent bilateral agreements on air services and a working holiday scheme.
143: 83: 78: 87: 70: 110: 346: 268:
provided some indication of notability here, esp. their mutual interest in whaling issues, which i should have thought of. it probably does justify an article now.
320: 370:. These two countries do share some common interests, being, for example amongst the first handful of countries to make territorial claims in Antarctica, 393: 164: 882: 760: 720: 715:
is on the top of the list, we just present the facts and provide a reference. That is the almanac part of Knowledge. It is a pillar of Knowledge. --
701: 131: 74: 444: 981: 956: 935: 912: 886: 865: 846: 830: 805: 786: 764: 739: 724: 705: 691: 670: 658: 641: 618: 603: 589: 570: 484: 404: 382: 361: 335: 310: 295: 277: 256: 236: 220: 192: 52: 947:- dull, but relevant for various reasons, not least Antarctica. Could do with more on the whaling issues - NZ has a strong green lobby.-- 201:- While the concept theoretically qualifies for an article, in practice this article lacks references (read: content entirely) and is an 878: 756: 716: 697: 125: 66: 58: 373:
and both having had major whaling industries, but I can only find discussions of any ensuing relationships in a multilateral context.
594:
I have removed nothing from this article, so mentioning it in this AfD adds no further argument to you wanting to keep this article.
431: 121: 455:
is for the Norwegian embassy in Australia whilst it has responsiblity for NZ the site is primarily about Aust-Norway relations.
17: 471:. NZ offered to take asylum seekers on behalf of Australia but there was no actual dialogue between Norway and NZ, it is pure 171: 215: 901: 856:
There is no significant relationship between the two. Most of the official visits were part of extended overseas tours.
456: 250:. We've been redirecting these to "Foreign relations of ..." either of the parties, so that's a fall-back option. - 137: 1003: 696:
No information was deleted, smaller articles were merged into larger articles in the 50 you are talking about. --
273: 36: 460: 1002:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
504:
Hon Margaret Wilson, Speaker of the House of Representatives, leading a Parliamentary Delegation, October 2007
286:
the consensus was that "Nation X and Nation Y" relations are not automatically entitled to their own page.
908: 861: 826: 712: 378: 977: 637: 566: 427: 400: 232: 952: 419: 307: 269: 180:
neither country has a resident embassy, almost all coverage is mulitlateral or of sporting contests
837:
no, at least 100 of these bilateral articles have been deleted so they are not inherently notable.
654: 291: 157: 798: 211: 183:. hard to justify given the small populations of both countries on opposite sides of the world. 931: 904: 857: 842: 822: 735: 687: 614: 599: 585: 480: 374: 357: 331: 188: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
973: 774: 633: 562: 423: 396: 228: 948: 665: 472: 304: 251: 650: 287: 813:
Even without Libstar's additions. This article is more about the foreign relations of
546: 390: 967:
Knowledge:WikiProject International relations/Bilateral relations task force/Deletion
923: 507:
Hon Phil Goff, Minister of Trade, Defence, Disarmament and Arms Control, January 2007
247: 227:
The article says that they've had official relations for over a century since 1905.--
206: 927: 838: 783: 731: 683: 610: 595: 581: 476: 464: 353: 327: 202: 184: 902:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Bilateral_relations
104: 814: 49: 467:
in Australia which was a huge diplomatic incident between the governments of
389:
NZ's government admits that official relations are modest, but they exist.
821:
themselves, and the foreign relations of any soveriegn nation is notable.
205:
target (as it appears they don't have any official foreign relations). /
447:
has nothing to do with NZ. it is about the Norwegian Church in Sydney,
575:
you should keep to the merits of this article not not other articles.
522:
Rt Hon Don McKinnon Minister of Foreign Affairs & Trade March 1996
818: 542:
Minister of Transport and Communications January 1995 and March 1993
777:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
539:
Select Committee on Finance of the Norwegian Parliament March 1995
996:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
755:
Now that the article has been improved and referenced better. --
497:
Some recent state visits: New Zealand Official Visits to Norway
536:
Kristin Clemet Minister of Education and Research October 2004
475:
to suggest this incident somehow adds to Norway-NZ relations.
459:
is not really about actual relations between Norway and NZ.
513:
Dame Silvia Cartwright Governor General-designate March 2001
452: 730:
existence of embassies, oh they don't have that either.
711:
is expected to explain why the country with the highest
443:
that was based on a conversation with the Norwegian PM.
559: 556: 553: 100: 96: 92: 156: 900:
For examples of previosu coverage of this ground see
797:article does additional resources might improving. 782:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 682:years hardly says anything about these relations. 525:Hon Rob Storey Minister of Transport November 1992 516:Hon Trevor Mallard Minister of Sport November 2000 501:Hon Anne Tolley, Minister of Education, June 2009 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1006:). No further edits should be made to this page. 347:list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions 533:Kjell Magne Bondevik Prime Minister March 2005 246:for lack of sources discussing the topic, per 922:would even know about such a visit. Remember 170: 8: 561:, are disruptive, look bad, and must stop.-- 510:Rt Hon Helen Clark Prime Minister June 2004 321:list of Norway-related deletion discussions 961: 341: 315: 649:The two countries have official visits.-- 529:Norwegian Official Visits to New Zealand 965:: This debate has been included in the 519:Hon Max Bradford Minister of Energy 1997 345:: This debate has been included in the 319:: This debate has been included in the 7: 664:Wikipedians, tell us is a topic. - 24: 609:really get noticed by the media. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 879:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 757:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 717:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 698:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 67:New Zealand – Norway relations 59:New Zealand – Norway relations 1: 982:16:45, 13 December 2009 (UTC) 957:16:02, 10 December 2009 (UTC) 936:09:48, 10 December 2009 (UTC) 913:09:16, 10 December 2009 (UTC) 887:07:40, 10 December 2009 (UTC) 866:06:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC) 847:06:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC) 740:06:43, 10 December 2009 (UTC) 706:07:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC) 405:01:10, 12 December 2009 (UTC) 362:22:20, 29 November 2009 (UTC) 336:22:20, 29 November 2009 (UTC) 311:22:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC) 296:16:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC) 278:16:38, 29 November 2009 (UTC) 257:16:09, 29 November 2009 (UTC) 221:14:44, 29 November 2009 (UTC) 193:13:06, 29 November 2009 (UTC) 53:17:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC) 831:12:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC) 806:11:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC) 787:03:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC) 765:06:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC) 725:19:00, 7 December 2009 (UTC) 692:04:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC) 671:22:16, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 659:21:34, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 642:13:25, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 619:14:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 604:13:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 590:13:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 571:02:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 485:03:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 383:18:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 237:01:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 1023: 999:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 713:Gross Domestic Product 463:relates to the famous 469:Norway and Australia 303:as per Mandsford. 44:The result was 991: 988: 984: 970: 789: 669: 436: 422:comment added by 364: 350: 338: 324: 255: 219: 1014: 1001: 990: 987: 971: 803: 781: 779: 668: 435: 416: 351: 325: 254: 209: 175: 174: 160: 108: 90: 34: 1022: 1021: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1004:deletion review 997: 799: 772: 417: 270:Mercurywoodrose 117: 81: 65: 62: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1020: 1018: 1009: 1008: 986: 985: 959: 941: 940: 939: 938: 916: 915: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 869: 868: 850: 849: 834: 833: 808: 791: 790: 780: 769: 768: 767: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 708: 676: 675: 674: 673: 644: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 573: 544: 543: 540: 537: 534: 527: 526: 523: 520: 517: 514: 511: 508: 505: 502: 495: 494: 487: 437: 408: 407: 386: 385: 365: 339: 313: 298: 280: 259: 240: 239: 224: 223: 178: 177: 114: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1019: 1007: 1005: 1000: 994: 993: 992: 983: 979: 975: 968: 964: 960: 958: 954: 950: 946: 943: 942: 937: 933: 929: 925: 920: 919: 918: 917: 914: 910: 906: 903: 899: 896: 895: 888: 884: 880: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 867: 863: 859: 855: 852: 851: 848: 844: 840: 836: 835: 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 812: 809: 807: 804: 802: 801:ApprenticeFan 796: 793: 792: 788: 785: 778: 776: 771: 770: 766: 762: 758: 754: 751: 750: 741: 737: 733: 728: 727: 726: 722: 718: 714: 709: 707: 703: 699: 695: 694: 693: 689: 685: 680: 679: 678: 677: 672: 667: 662: 661: 660: 656: 652: 648: 645: 643: 639: 635: 631: 628: 627: 620: 616: 612: 607: 606: 605: 601: 597: 593: 592: 591: 587: 583: 578: 574: 572: 568: 564: 560: 557: 554: 550: 549: 548: 547: 541: 538: 535: 532: 531: 530: 524: 521: 518: 515: 512: 509: 506: 503: 500: 499: 498: 491: 488: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 446: 441: 438: 433: 429: 425: 421: 413: 410: 409: 406: 402: 398: 394: 391: 388: 387: 384: 380: 376: 372: 369: 366: 363: 359: 355: 348: 344: 340: 337: 333: 329: 322: 318: 314: 312: 309: 306: 302: 299: 297: 293: 289: 284: 281: 279: 275: 271: 266: 264: 260: 258: 253: 249: 245: 242: 241: 238: 234: 230: 226: 225: 222: 217: 213: 208: 204: 200: 197: 196: 195: 194: 190: 186: 182: 173: 169: 166: 163: 159: 155: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 133: 130: 127: 123: 120: 119:Find sources: 115: 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 998: 995: 989: 962: 944: 905:Stuartyeates 897: 858:Stuartyeates 853: 823:Doc Quintana 810: 800: 794: 773: 752: 646: 629: 576: 545: 528: 496: 489: 468: 465:Tampa affair 461:this article 457:this article 448: 445:this article 439: 418:— Preceding 411: 375:Phil Bridger 367: 342: 316: 300: 282: 262: 261: 243: 198: 179: 167: 161: 153: 146: 140: 134: 128: 118: 46:no consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 974:Cdogsimmons 815:New Zealand 647:Strong keep 634:Pantherskin 630:Strong keep 563:Cdogsimmons 424:Cdogsimmons 397:Cdogsimmons 229:Cdogsimmons 144:free images 949:MacRusgail 666:Biruitorul 305:Buckshot06 252:Biruitorul 945:Weak keep 651:RekishiEJ 453:this link 449:Australia 354:• Gene93k 328:• Gene93k 288:Mandsford 775:Relisted 473:WP:SYNTH 432:contribs 420:unsigned 207:Blaxthos 111:View log 928:LibStar 898:Comment 839:LibStar 784:Spartaz 732:LibStar 684:LibStar 611:LibStar 596:LibStar 582:LibStar 490:Comment 477:LibStar 440:Comment 368:Comment 265:Comment 185:LibStar 150:WP refs 138:scholar 84:protect 79:history 969:page. 924:WP:GNG 854:Delete 819:Norway 308:(talk) 301:Delete 283:Delete 263:Delete 248:WP:GNG 244:Delete 199:Delete 122:Google 88:delete 50:Secret 577:state 165:JSTOR 126:books 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 978:talk 963:Note 953:talk 932:talk 909:talk 883:talk 862:talk 843:talk 827:talk 817:and 811:Keep 795:Keep 761:talk 753:Keep 736:talk 721:talk 702:talk 688:talk 655:talk 638:talk 615:talk 600:talk 586:talk 567:talk 481:talk 428:talk 412:Keep 401:talk 379:talk 358:talk 343:Note 332:talk 317:Note 292:talk 274:talk 233:talk 189:talk 158:FENS 132:news 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 352:-- 326:-- 172:TWL 109:– ( 980:) 972:-- 955:) 934:) 926:. 911:) 885:) 877:-- 864:) 845:) 829:) 763:) 738:) 723:) 704:) 690:) 657:) 640:) 617:) 602:) 588:) 569:) 558:, 555:, 483:) 451:. 434:) 430:• 403:) 395:-- 381:) 360:) 349:. 334:) 323:. 294:) 276:) 235:) 214:/ 210:( 203:OR 191:) 152:) 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 48:. 976:( 951:( 930:( 907:( 881:( 860:( 841:( 825:( 759:( 734:( 719:( 700:( 686:( 653:( 636:( 613:( 598:( 584:( 565:( 479:( 426:( 399:( 377:( 356:( 330:( 290:( 272:( 231:( 218:) 216:c 212:t 187:( 176:) 168:· 162:· 154:· 147:· 141:· 135:· 129:· 124:( 116:( 113:) 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Secret
17:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
New Zealand – Norway relations
New Zealand – Norway relations
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

LibStar
talk
13:06, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
OR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.