211:
learners should be taught the productive processes by which new entries enter the vocabulary so that they can make sense of the new words that they will come across. Teachers of advanced learners should acquaint them with the rules of word formation which native speakers intuitively apply to form new terms and understand those created by others. The knowledge of the patterns involved in word formation will help students to increase their vocabulary permanently."
210:
Please see the recently added link to this page. It is an academic paper written in
Mandarin-Chinese by "刘升民". I think the paper demonstrates the usefulness of neologistics as a guide for students of language, especially students of a foreign native language. I quote here from the abstract: "Advanced
222:
So far as I can tell, that paper does not use the word "neologistics" at any point, implying that "neologistics" is itself a recent neologism, and inappropriate for
Knowledge at this time. The article may well be useful as a source for the
190:
Article specifically states that this is not a recognised field of study. When it is, then it can have an article. Since the term doesn't appear to actually be used anywhere else (at least in this context), even a redirect to
145:
The article does do a rather good job of convincing one, right off the bat, that this isn't a field of study that is accepted or acknowledged, doesn't it? For what it's worth, there
149:
an accepted idea of "neologistics", that I've turned up with some quick research, but it's completely different, and not documented as a standalone concept by sources. It's part of
128:
120:
87:
82:
274:
91:
17:
74:
342:
36:
341:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
166:
327:
299:
236:
204:
182:
139:
135:
56:
78:
150:
262:
170:
270:
131:
70:
62:
255:
323:
232:
200:
178:
162:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
158:
266:
243:
212:
311:
319:
315:
293:
228:
196:
174:
173:, depending from where Poist's work ends up being discussed, now or in the future.
50:
108:
247:
286:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
251:
224:
192:
154:
335:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
115:
104:
100:
96:
291:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
151:a three-era model of logistics by Richard F. Poist
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
345:). No further edits should be made to this page.
127:lacks reliable sources, appears to fall under
8:
246:. This topic should be addressed in the
254:page under ==Evolution of neologisms==
153:. So there's a case for a redirect to
227:page, but that's a different matter.
7:
24:
250:page, and it is addressed on the
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
362:
328:17:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
300:00:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
57:09:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
237:18:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
205:20:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
195:doesn't seem worthwhile.
183:04:05, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
140:01:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
338:Please do not modify it.
167:closed-loop supply chain
32:Please do not modify it.
242:see the links found in
318:by creator rarichter.
314:, pardon the pun, and
129:things made up one day
258:17:50, 8 April 2009
215:03:25, 8 April 2009
171:reverse supply chain
44:The result was
316:original research
302:
279:
265:comment added by
163:reverse logistics
353:
340:
296:
290:
288:
278:
259:
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
361:
360:
356:
355:
354:
352:
351:
350:
349:
343:deletion review
336:
294:
284:
260:
159:green logistics
114:
85:
69:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
359:
357:
348:
347:
331:
330:
304:
303:
289:
281:
244:word formation
240:
239:
213:user:rarichter
208:
207:
185:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
358:
346:
344:
339:
333:
332:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
306:
305:
301:
298:
297:
287:
283:
282:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
257:
253:
249:
245:
238:
234:
230:
226:
221:
218:
217:
216:
214:
206:
202:
198:
194:
189:
186:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:, or perhaps
156:
152:
148:
144:
143:
142:
141:
137:
133:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
337:
334:
307:
292:
285:
241:
219:
209:
187:
146:
126:
71:Neologistics
63:Neologistics
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
261:—Preceding
248:linguistics
312:neologism
267:Rarichter
256:rarichter
252:neologism
225:neologism
193:neologism
155:logistics
275:contribs
263:unsigned
132:RadioFan
121:View log
320:Bearian
295:MBisanz
229:Anaxial
220:Comment
197:Anaxial
175:Uncle G
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
308:Delete
188:Delete
116:delete
92:delete
46:delete
169:, or
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
324:talk
271:talk
233:talk
201:talk
179:talk
136:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
326:)
310:-
277:)
273:•
235:)
203:)
181:)
165:,
161:,
147:is
138:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
322:(
269:(
231:(
199:(
177:(
134:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.