477:
You're right. I was just reading the search suggestion. I did some more digging and 'Rawlins JN' is Nick
Rawlins. The problem is that there seem to be multiple people in Pubmed with the name 'Rawlins JN' so it's hard to dissect out this guys actual publications. However, he is a prof at Oxford.
147:
Please note that, on further investigation, I now believe this article should be kept. This person's publications appear under "Rawlins JN", and not "Rawlins N", as would be expected from his name, Nick
Rawlins. The fact that I could not retrieve his list of publications using "Rawlins N" lead me
548:
Unfortunately not. If there had been no delete votes you could have done a speedy keep close because you withdraw the nomination. But because there have been a few delete votes you won't be able to close it yourself. I suggest putting your note right underneath your nomination. That way future
286:
66:
126:
504:
Ok we seem to have validated with primary sources only that the subject of this article is a
Professor at Oxford, but in spite of all the keep votes no one has shown how he meets
148:
to nominate his page for deletion. However, he does have quite a few publications, as I subsequently found out, and they are fairly well cited, so his article should be kept.
393:
as it has no references. So we have an unverified article about someone claiming to be and oxford professor, the "external link" is not even to an Oxford page it is to
56:
sources to justify it's inclusion; a lot of his published work is available over Google
Scholar search; and the article needs expansion and not deletion. There is a
61:
529:. Ok, I've changed my mind. This guy's article should be kept, but the article should include some of his publications and significant findings.
99:
94:
103:
17:
86:
60:
on the subject of academicians which sums up good reasons why academicians should be included as subjects in the encyclopedia. —
443:
315:- Oxford professor w/ at least 14 publications ... I think "keep and tag for expansion" would be reasonable solution. --
327:. Professors at Oxford are indeed notable, because only a small proprtion of academics/College fellows are Professors. --
270:
539:
I've added some publication info to his page. I started this deletion request. Is there a way for me to terminate it?
596:
479:
36:
549:
editors to this AfD will be aware of how you have changed your mind that you now believe this article should be kept.
577:. The person is notable as one of the very few professors at Oxford, as well as many well cited publications.
595:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
423:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
581:
569:
553:
543:
533:
518:
486:
472:
459:
450:
432:
405:
373:
343:
331:
319:
307:
295:
274:
247:
235:
223:
203:
185:
169:
152:
141:
68:
162:
513:
If an article topic has no reliable, third-party sources, Knowledge (XXG) should not have an article on it.
508:
being a professor is not a notability criteria any place that I can find any
Knowledge (XXG) policy. Per
366:
218:
90:
566:
316:
133:
I pull up 7 hits when I Pubmed search this guy. Does not seem very notable and does not meet
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
57:
426:
357:
215:
82:
74:
394:
382:
353:
256:
134:
49:
420:
232:
578:
340:
292:
244:
509:
505:
390:
386:
540:
530:
483:
469:
456:
447:
429:
339:, Oxford professor? Of course he's notable. Could use a bit of expansion, though.
149:
138:
515:
402:
166:
120:
550:
304:
194:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
182:
328:
200:
398:
262:
589:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
385:
and could not find where it said being a "Oxford professor" met
468:
that, or are you just reading the automated search suggestion?
48:. This is a borderline case for notability when you refer to
303:, a professor at Oxford is not notable? Hmmm... I doubt it!
415:
OXION stands for Oxford Ion
Channel Initiative. Rawlins
116:
112:
108:
199:
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
287:list of Academics and educators-related deletions
599:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
214:Professors generally are notable, somewhat.
52:. The subject of the article might not have
352:Although this is a good article it fails
285:: This debate has been included in the
399:http://oxion.physiol.ox.ac.uk/oxion.php
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
419:(or was) a professor at Oxford: see
24:
233:Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens
54:multiple, non-trivial independent
44:The result was The result was
1:
582:07:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
570:22:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
554:06:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
544:23:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
534:23:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
519:14:04, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
487:23:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
473:23:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
460:22:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
451:20:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
433:20:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
406:16:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
374:16:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
344:12:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
332:05:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
320:04:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
308:04:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
296:04:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
275:03:41, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
248:03:26, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
236:02:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
224:01:42, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
204:00:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
153:07:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
69:13:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
186:06:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
170:15:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
142:03:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
442:Is this the same person as
616:
389:, this article also fails
455:No, that's John Rawlins.
397:(<notice red link) at
592:Please do not modify it.
161:This AfD nomination was
32:Please do not modify it.
231:appears non-notable.
565:, non notable person
401:Delete the article.
165:. It is listed now.
63:Nearly Headless Nick
58:proposed guideline
290:
273:
206:
607:
594:
370:
363:
362:
281:
269:
265:
243:per nomination.
221:
198:
195:
124:
106:
83:Nicholas Rawlins
75:Nicholas Rawlins
64:
34:
615:
614:
610:
609:
608:
606:
605:
604:
603:
597:deletion review
590:
368:
360:
359:
263:
219:
193:
97:
81:
78:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
613:
611:
602:
601:
585:
584:
572:
559:
558:
557:
556:
524:
523:
522:
521:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
436:
435:
409:
408:
376:
347:
334:
322:
310:
298:
278:
277:
250:
238:
226:
208:
207:
197:
189:
188:
175:
174:
173:
172:
156:
155:
131:
130:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
612:
600:
598:
593:
587:
586:
583:
580:
576:
573:
571:
568:
564:
561:
560:
555:
552:
547:
546:
545:
542:
538:
537:
536:
535:
532:
528:
520:
517:
514:
511:
507:
503:
500:
499:
498:
497:
488:
485:
481:
476:
475:
474:
471:
467:
463:
462:
461:
458:
454:
453:
452:
449:
445:
441:
438:
437:
434:
431:
427:
424:
421:
418:
414:
411:
410:
407:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
377:
375:
372:
371:
365:
364:
355:
351:
348:
345:
342:
338:
335:
333:
330:
326:
323:
321:
318:
314:
311:
309:
306:
302:
299:
297:
294:
288:
284:
280:
279:
276:
272:
268:
267:
266:
258:
254:
251:
249:
246:
242:
239:
237:
234:
230:
227:
225:
222:
217:
213:
210:
209:
205:
202:
196:
191:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:
171:
168:
164:
160:
159:
158:
157:
154:
151:
146:
145:
144:
143:
140:
136:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
67:
65:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
591:
588:
574:
567:SlideAndSlip
562:
526:
525:
512:
501:
478:His page is
465:
439:
416:
412:
378:
367:
358:
349:
336:
324:
317:Black Falcon
312:
300:
282:
261:
260:
252:
240:
228:
211:
192:
178:
132:
53:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
216:mrholybrain
444:JN Rawlins
381:I checked
163:incomplete
579:RFerreira
341:Lankiveil
293:Pete.Hurd
245:Inkpaduta
541:Mnemopis
531:Mnemopis
484:Mnemopis
470:Zagalejo
457:Mnemopis
448:Zagalejo
440:Question
430:Zagalejo
271:Reviews?
255:- Fails
150:Mnemopis
139:Mnemopis
127:View log
516:Jeepday
502:Comment
464:Do you
413:Comment
403:Jeepday
220:'s talk
181:, nn.
167:DumbBOT
100:protect
95:history
563:Delete
551:Mathmo
383:WP:BIO
379:Delete
369:addict
354:WP:BIO
350:Delete
305:Mathmo
257:WP:BIO
253:Delete
241:Delete
229:delete
183:Edeans
179:Delete
135:WP:BIO
104:delete
50:WP:BIO
395:Oxion
361:Telly
329:Bduke
201:Quarl
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
575:Keep
527:Keep
510:WP:V
506:WP:N
480:here
466:know
391:WP:V
387:WP:N
337:Keep
325:Keep
313:Keep
301:Keep
283:Note
212:Keep
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
291:--
289:.
259:.--
125:– (
482:.
446:?
428:.
425:,
422:,
417:is
264:Ed
137:.
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
356:.
346:.
129:)
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.