415:. The subject lacks notability for a biography; the controversy over the photographs however was notable, and people who come across the images may appreciate learning something about the story's background. I'm not sure how much historical notability the case has or will have; it still appears to be ongoing in the appellate court, if I read this article from June 2009 correctly:
680:
agree strongly with Jayen that having a
Knowledge (XXG) article on this subject if anything reduces harm emotional to the family. The point there is not that we should be compensating for bad behavior of others but that if we are going to seriously consider issues of emotional harm then we should take them in the full context.
222:. The subject in herself fails notability, whatever about the incident and the aftermath. Though she is deceased, the criteria around BLP still largely apply here. Furthermore, the subsequent legal case surrounding this incident was dismissed. I see absolutely no reason why this biography should be kept.
679:
Subject is dead so BLP name doesn't strictly apply. Given the renaming to focus on the controversy there's really no issue. There's no NOTNEWS are similar problem since the issue of the photos has been discussed repeatedly by a variety of reliable sources over the course of a long timespan. Also
276:. While the subject of the article is not subject to BLP policies, her family, who make up a large proportion of the article, are. I have no problem categorising this as a BLP1E, and should be deleted under the principle of 'do no harm' anyway.
471:, and it is not inappropriate to write about that. As the article makes clear, her family seek publicity, wanting something good to come out of the case eventually, which weakens the BLP argument, provided our coverage remains sensitive. --
297:, although the article is not strictly a biography of Nikki Catsouras. People regularly discuss these disturbing photos on the Internet message boards, and the article provides some detailed background material on what actually happened.--
528:, leads to important issues of ethics on the Internet. Nikki's parents accepted long ago that they will never eradicate all of the photos, although they have had some limited success. When people do a Google search on "
180:
87:
114:
109:
118:
101:
141:
662:. Sensational, disturbing, shows how badly people behave, yes; but historically notable? No. (And it's not our business to compensate for the excesses of Encyclopedia Dramatica).
325:
174:
82:
105:
333:
405:
362:
97:
658:- article is certainly vastly better, and I have thought hard about whether to change my "delete" !vote above; but I still feel this fails
51:
The nomination is no longer really applicable for that reason, though it may be renominated on different grounds if anyone wishes to.
17:
689:
671:
650:
616:
595:
577:
561:
514:
484:
456:
434:
387:
352:
314:
285:
268:
238:
66:
366:, I moved the article back(?) because it simply was not primarily about the controversy but the individual (For example it starts
195:
162:
464:
416:
704:
36:
259:
no legal liability, no changes in the law - it cannot be argued that there is any "historical notability" about this.
293:
One way or another, this deserves to be in
Knowledge (XXG). The controversy over the leakage of the photos satisfies
156:
251:. Article could avoid that if renamed "Nikki Catsouras fatal crash incident" or something, but would still fail
703:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
59:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
152:
537:
525:
419:
335:, and Knowledge (XXG) should have something to say. My votes goes to renaming or reshaping the article.--
248:
212:
202:
541:
215:
573:
452:
383:
281:
188:
52:
497:
in the first place. The focus of the article should be on the legal issues that the case raised.--
589:
544:, we should be looking at ways of covering the case that are within Knowledge (XXG) guidelines.--
478:
428:
540:, which is tasteless and contains the uncensored photos. Rather than arguing about issues like
685:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
168:
667:
264:
659:
444:
294:
255:: an unfortunate accident, distasteful behaviour in the aftermath, a short-term sensation,
252:
219:
494:
409:
72:
533:
631:
569:
448:
379:
277:
584:
473:
423:
681:
547:
500:
368:"Nicole "Nikki" Catsouras (March 4, 1988 – October 31, 2006) was an American woman"
338:
300:
135:
378:.). Refocusing (and retitling) the article might alleviate some of the concerns.
663:
635:
601:
260:
223:
443:
Wouldn't trying to predict the potential future impact of the case be somewhat
467:(note the presence of the Knowledge (XXG) article on the topic overview page)
468:
463:
We can't speculate one way or the other. But reputable sources like
48:. The article has already been renamed and refocused during the AfD.
697:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
568:
Page moved and roughly refocused, don't know if it will stick.
408:
and revise accordingly. Note that the article was moved to
418:
and it may well end up influencing future legislation:
413:
332:" is a popular but controversial search term on Google
131:
127:
123:
49:
187:
88:
Articles for deletion/Nikki
Catsouras (2nd nomination)
493:
Agree that it was a mistake to rename the article to
326:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Nikki
Catsouras
201:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
707:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
532:", it is better for them to find something
360:this article was located for a period at
536:at Knowledge (XXG) than the article at
406:Nikki Catsouras photographs controversy
363:Nikki Catsouras photographs controversy
98:Nikki Catsouras photographs controversy
80:
83:Articles for deletion/Nikki Catsouras
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
79:
24:
376:"Events leading up to her death"
328:has a range of useful points. "
690:17:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
672:20:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
651:19:37, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
617:19:37, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
596:18:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
578:13:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
562:06:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
515:10:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
485:10:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
457:01:05, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
435:23:11, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
388:22:41, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
353:22:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
315:22:07, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
286:21:36, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
269:21:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
239:20:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
67:22:52, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
1:
524:The Catsouras case, like the
600:That works for me, too :) -
324:The previous AFD debate at
724:
700:Please do not modify it.
370:and has sections titled
211:Requesting deletion per
32:Please do not modify it.
412:less than a month ago:
538:Encyclopedia Dramatica
526:Dnepropetrovsk maniacs
78:AfDs for this article:
582:Thanks, well done. --
628:Rename and refocus
44:The result was
715:
702:
648:
645:
643:
614:
611:
609:
592:
587:
557:
555:
554:
534:reliably sourced
510:
508:
507:
481:
476:
431:
426:
348:
346:
345:
310:
308:
307:
236:
233:
231:
206:
205:
191:
139:
121:
62:
34:
723:
722:
718:
717:
716:
714:
713:
712:
711:
705:deletion review
698:
641:
639:
636:
607:
605:
602:
590:
585:
552:
550:
548:
530:Nikki Catsouras
505:
503:
501:
495:Nikki Catsouras
479:
474:
429:
424:
410:Nikki Catsouras
343:
341:
339:
330:Nikki Catsouras
305:
303:
301:
229:
227:
224:
148:
112:
96:
93:
76:
73:Nikki Catsouras
60:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
721:
719:
710:
709:
693:
692:
674:
653:
634:. Good call -
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
565:
564:
518:
517:
490:
489:
488:
487:
460:
459:
438:
437:
391:
390:
355:
318:
317:
288:
271:
209:
208:
145:
92:
91:
90:
85:
77:
75:
70:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
720:
708:
706:
701:
695:
694:
691:
687:
683:
678:
675:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
654:
652:
649:
647:
633:
629:
626:
625:
618:
615:
613:
599:
598:
597:
594:
593:
588:
581:
580:
579:
575:
571:
567:
566:
563:
560:
559:
558:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
520:
519:
516:
513:
512:
511:
496:
492:
491:
486:
483:
482:
477:
470:
466:
462:
461:
458:
454:
450:
446:
445:crystal bally
442:
441:
440:
439:
436:
433:
432:
427:
420:
417:
414:
411:
407:
403:
399:
396:
395:
394:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
364:
359:
356:
354:
351:
350:
349:
334:
331:
327:
323:
320:
319:
316:
313:
312:
311:
296:
292:
289:
287:
283:
279:
275:
272:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
243:
242:
241:
240:
237:
235:
221:
217:
214:
204:
200:
197:
194:
190:
186:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
154:
151:
150:Find sources:
146:
143:
137:
133:
129:
125:
120:
116:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
94:
89:
86:
84:
81:
74:
71:
69:
68:
65:
63:
56:
55:
50:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
699:
696:
676:
655:
637:
627:
603:
583:
546:
545:
529:
521:
499:
498:
472:
422:
401:
397:
392:
375:
372:"Early life"
371:
367:
361:
357:
337:
336:
329:
321:
299:
298:
290:
273:
256:
244:
225:
210:
198:
192:
184:
177:
171:
165:
159:
149:
57:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
660:WP:NOT#NEWS
253:WP:NOT#NEWS
249:WP:ONEEVENT
213:WP:ONEEVENT
175:free images
542:WP:ONEVENT
216:WP:BLPNAME
632:Guest9999
570:Guest9999
449:Guest9999
380:Guest9999
278:Quantpole
465:Newsweek
404:back to
142:View log
682:JoshuaZ
656:Comment
522:Comment
358:Comment
322:Comment
181:WP refs
169:scholar
115:protect
110:history
664:JohnCD
630:- per
402:Rename
393:(e/c)
295:WP:GNG
274:Delete
261:JohnCD
245:Delete
220:WP:BIO
153:Google
119:delete
196:JSTOR
157:books
136:views
128:watch
124:links
16:<
686:talk
677:keep
668:talk
574:talk
549:♦Ian
502:♦Ian
453:talk
421:. --
400:but
398:Keep
384:talk
374:and
340:♦Ian
302:♦Ian
291:Keep
282:talk
265:talk
247:per
218:and
189:FENS
163:news
132:logs
106:talk
102:edit
61:Talk
46:keep
591:466
480:466
430:466
257:but
203:TWL
140:– (
688:)
670:)
642:is
608:is
586:JN
576:)
556:M♦
551:Ma
509:M♦
504:Ma
475:JN
469:do
455:)
447:?
425:JN
386:)
347:M♦
342:Ma
309:M♦
304:Ma
284:)
267:)
230:is
183:)
134:|
130:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
54:NW
684:(
666:(
646:n
644:o
640:l
638:A
612:n
610:o
606:l
604:A
572:(
553:c
506:c
451:(
382:(
344:c
306:c
280:(
263:(
234:n
232:o
228:l
226:A
207:)
199:·
193:·
185:·
178:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
155:(
147:(
144:)
138:)
100:(
64:)
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.