340:
argument – if you think the subject of that article doesn't meet the notability criteria, then the answer is to nominate that article for deletion, not to refrain from deleting this one. I think that article is at the very least borderline, and could be a candidate for deletion, although on the other
331:
that counts. Is this software discussed (not just once, but multiple times and in detail) in the trade press (whether online or offline), in academic papers, in books published by respected publishers, etc. This software doesn't seem to meet that standard, since searching for those sorts of sources
304:
SQLDetective is a development and administration tool for Oracle databases. It's used by many developers and DBAs around the world. This article provides a brief description about its features for prospects and users. BTW: PL/SQL Developer you mentioned above has the similar article but it's not
219:
In addition to the manual method covered in the previous section, it's also possible to use one of the graphical interfaces available in third party products. Such an interface is provided by the major players such as PL/SQL Developer (Allround
Automations), SQLDetective (Conquest Software
263:
The article is just a cut-n-paste of a data sheet, not even in
English prose. Clearly the company would need to be notable as a whole (together with all the "products") before each product is spun off. Searches do not find much mention - it might just be two kids and a web site?
199:
No evidence this product is sufficiently notable for an article. The article doesn't cite any sources other than the vendor's own web site. I searched for reliable sources (Google News, Google Books, Google
Scholar), the only thing I could find was a passing mention:
220:
Solutions), Toad and SQL Navigator (Dell), or Rapid SQL (Embarcadero). All these tools can be used to profile the code, usually by clicking a check box or button before running a test or by simply analyzing the content of the output tables.
168:
341:
hand I find significantly more Google Books mentions of that product than of this one, so it may be that that other article (even if only just) passes the bar whereas this article fails to meet it.
121:
223:
Maybe that is enough for this to be briefly mentioned in an existing article, but it doesn't seem to be enough coverage to justify an independent article on this product.
240:
162:
128:
212:
286:
17:
94:
89:
281:- Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up download sites but no significant
98:
183:
81:
337:
150:
369:
40:
310:
144:
322:
306:
61:
140:
365:
350:
314:
298:
273:
252:
232:
63:
36:
85:
294:
190:
269:
176:
77:
69:
209:
203:
54:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
364:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
333:
290:
289:
who has added info on several
Conquest Software Solutions products, so likely promotional.
156:
328:
282:
327:
For
Knowledge (XXG), the number of users doesn't matter, it is substantial coverage in
265:
346:
248:
228:
115:
342:
244:
224:
358:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
111:
107:
103:
175:
332:
only found the brief mention I gave above. As far as
189:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
372:). No further edits should be made to this page.
241:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
239:Note: This debate has been included in the
238:
305:nominated for deletion. Please explain.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
285:coverage. Article was created by an
202:Christian Antognini (14 June 2014).
205:Troubleshooting Oracle Performance
24:
1:
389:
351:20:41, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
315:14:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
299:14:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
274:20:21, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
253:09:35, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
233:09:26, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
64:03:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
361:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
338:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
208:. Apress. p. 100.
336:goes, that is an
255:
214:978-1-4302-5759-2
380:
363:
334:PL/SQL Developer
329:reliable sources
326:
323:Scott tiger 2002
307:Scott tiger 2002
222:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
57:
34:
388:
387:
383:
382:
381:
379:
378:
377:
376:
370:deletion review
359:
320:
215:
201:
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
386:
384:
375:
374:
354:
353:
302:
301:
276:
257:
256:
213:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
385:
373:
371:
367:
362:
356:
355:
352:
348:
344:
339:
335:
330:
324:
319:
318:
317:
316:
312:
308:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
277:
275:
271:
267:
262:
259:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
237:
236:
235:
234:
230:
226:
221:
216:
211:
207:
206:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
360:
357:
303:
278:
260:
218:
204:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
78:SQLDetective
70:SQLDetective
56:Juliancolton
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
163:free images
291:Dialectric
366:talk page
266:W Nowicki
37:talk page
368:or in a
122:View log
39:or in a
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
279:Delete
261:Delete
141:Google
99:delete
50:delete
283:WP:RS
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
52:. –
16:<
347:talk
311:talk
295:talk
270:talk
249:talk
229:talk
210:ISBN
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
343:SJK
287:SPA
245:SJK
225:SJK
191:TWL
120:– (
349:)
313:)
297:)
272:)
251:)
243:.
231:)
217:.
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
60:|
345:(
325::
321:@
309:(
293:(
268:(
247:(
227:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.