Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/SS Timothy Bloodworth - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

157:
has 78 articles, so we only need about 2,700 more to finish the lot. Ok, that makes me shudder a little. Mostly we happen to have articles on ships named after notable people. But I don't recollect any policy or guideline that would lead me to believe that this should be deleted under our deletion
109:- The writers father was not the only person in the world to server on the boat. Appears to be well cited. May need so cleanup but think it is overall encylopdic material. 64:
Contested prod. Appears to be a boat with little or no historical significance beyond that the creator's grandfather served on board (all respects to him).
121:
as boat was one of numerous convoy ships but apart from being hit with a rocket once was not individually notable. This in a conflict that
17: 82:, the bar for inclusion for WWII ships is fairly low. While stubby, the article is fairly well referenced. I'd advise a look at 177: 36: 94: 162: 145: 133: 113: 100: 73: 52: 176:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
154: 58: 49: 142: 130: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
69: 110: 126: 83: 159: 65: 87: 125:
saw ~50 ships sunk or damaged every month. I fail to see the significance. --
153:
Well referenced, obviously not spam, and Knowledge (XXG) is not paper.
141:
This does has historic value and the article is well-referenced. --
170:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 180:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 86:, uploaded by the same user. 163:04:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC) 146:07:27, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 134:23:24, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 114:23:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 101:20:42, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 74:19:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC) 53:22:07, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 197: 173:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 155:Category:Liberty ships 59:SS Timothy Bloodworth 103: 188: 175: 98: 90: 34: 196: 195: 191: 190: 189: 187: 186: 185: 184: 178:deletion review 171: 97: 88: 62: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 194: 192: 183: 182: 166: 165: 148: 136: 116: 104: 93: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 193: 181: 179: 174: 168: 167: 164: 161: 156: 152: 149: 147: 144: 143:Marriedtofilm 140: 137: 135: 132: 128: 124: 120: 117: 115: 112: 111:Chris Kreider 108: 105: 102: 96: 91: 85: 84:SS John Stagg 81: 78: 77: 76: 75: 71: 67: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 172: 169: 150: 138: 122: 118: 106: 79: 63: 46:no consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 158:policy. 151:Weak Keep 123:routinely 80:Weak keep 127:Dhartung 160:GRBerry 50:W.marsh 119:Delete 66:Stifle 89:GeeJo 16:< 139:Keep 131:Talk 107:Keep 70:talk 95:(c) 129:| 99:• 72:) 48:. 92:⁄ 68:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
W.marsh
22:07, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
SS Timothy Bloodworth
Stifle
talk
19:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
SS John Stagg
GeeJo
(c)
20:42, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Chris Kreider
23:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Dhartung
Talk
23:24, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Marriedtofilm
07:27, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Category:Liberty ships
GRBerry
04:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
deletion review

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.